The CEOs and others at major financial institutions who aren’t completely clueless are having trouble sleeping at night. They keep having a recurring nightmare, in which a certain advertisement keeps playing . . .
Hi, I’m James Robert Banker, president of Local Bank Incorporated. Here at Local Bank, we’ve been serving the needs of regular folks in our little burg for quite a while. We don’t play in the subprime mortgage markets, and we don’t pay outrageous bonuses. We leave that to the big boys — BofA, Citibank, their friends at AIG and Goldman Sachs, and all the others like them. They may be too attached to their bonuses to see what goes on in the lives of regular people, but that’s not how we do business.
One big problem right now, here in our town and across our nation, is that credit has become too tight. To fight this, the government has made money available to banks to increase the amount of lending we do. Sadly, too many of the big banks either have too much devotion to their bonuses and refuse to take the money, or else they have so much bad debt on their books that they have to keep the money to stay solvent and can’t lend it out.
We don’t have either of those problems. In fact, we’re happy to take this money, so that we can lend it out to revitalize our community and continue to build our reputation as a partner with individuals and small businesses.
Let the big banks squabble over their bonuses and scramble to hide their bad debts. Meanwhile, here at Local Bank Inc., we’re ready and willing to work for and with our customers to rebuild our community’s economic base, one good loan at a time. Drop in and see what we can do for you.
To the Big Banks who built The Magnificent House of Cards, an ad by Jim Bob Banker is scarier than a subpoena to testify before Congress.




47 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
That because the big banksters know, that thanks to BushCo, they can ignore a Congressional subpoena
Wasn’t some public figure recently arguing that we have too many banks and that consolidation would be a good thing?
I was surprised because it seems to me that excessive concentration is what got us into this mess.
Additionally, many of the big banks only lend money to certain classes like big Pharma to fund things like mergers. Unfortunately these mergers only serve to reduce competition driving up prices while simultaneously eliminating jobs. So if you work for Wyeth don’t come in for a loan because the only way you will qualify for a loan is if you don’t need it.
Conn. Attorney General Releases Partial List of AIG Bonus Recipients
The individuals subpoenaed Friday who received a portion of the $165 million are:
* James Haas, Fairfield
* Jonathan Liebergall, New Canaan
* Douglas Polling, Fairfield
* Christopher Phole, New Canaan
* Steven Pike, Stamford
* Robert Powell, Westport
* Joseph Rooney, Fairfield
* Gregory Ruffa, Darien
* Leonid Shekhtnam, Redding
* Christian Toft, Weston
* Steven Wagar, Norwalk
According to a story published late Friday evening in the Stamford Advocate, other than Cenci and Haas, “each donated $2,100 to U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd’s presidential campaign in December 2006.
According to late reports the CT AG said that AIG bonuses actually totaled $218 million.
http://money.cnn.com/news/news…..RTUNE5.htm
Dodd should resign.
-G
You’ll find the Easter Bunny on your chaise lounge with a Singapore sling in his paw before you find a banker with a sense of community that doesn’t end with the denominations of the bills in their wallet, IMO.
;>)
Ah good, you’re here ! *g*
And this is the tragedy, that we have been lied to that the big banks were the backbone of our economy. Now that we’ve sunk all this $$$$$ into them, they really are the backbone of our economy.
Meanwhile, the smaller banks which had nothing to do with thsi are being gobbled up and that makes US even more dependent on the big bank’s survival.
Obama MAY have a chance to do something decent for regular Americans with his enormous budget, but the risk is that the big banks may well pull US down anyway.
And you know congress isn’t going to get behind it anyway, so all it will become is a nice gesture…..a nod toward helping the real economy.
Sorry, we’re out of $$$$$ and can’t get China to lend US anymore… too bad.
If Dodd goes out, you get Summers in charge of the Fed.
Bad idea.
And, no doubt, James Robert Banker of Local Bank Incorporated followed the 3-6-3 rule: pay 3% interest on deposits, charge 6% interest on loans, and be on the golf course by 3pm. It’s hard for a bank to lose money that way.
In our computerized age is there anyone who can add a column of figures.
There are plenty of bankers who realize that a healthy sense of community is NOT incompatible with making a profit.
You won’t find them at BofA or Citi, though.
I’m having similar nightmares, by the way
And it’s time to raise the issue of impeaching Treasury Secretary Geithner.
And someone like Rob Simmons or Nancy Johnson as the replacement senator.
not me, you have to fall sleep first to wake up with nightmares.
and who to replace him?
How does A follow B in that equation? I thought Chris Dodd was a Senator from Connecticut, not the head of the Fed?
-G
HA! I hear ya
Let us not limit it to Dodd. He’s not the only player in this game. For example, the last name on the list, Steven L Wagar:
$2,300 to Barack OBama 1Q2008,
$2,100 to Chris Dodd 4Q2006
$750 to Jim Himes for Congress 1Q2008
$500 to Committee to Elect Chris Murphy 3Q2007
$300 Hillary Clinton 1Q2008
$250 DSCC 2Q2007
$250 Jim Himes for Congress 4Q2007
$1,550 John Kerry for President 1Q2004
Let’s be fair and complete.
BTW, this guy is listed as a “Computer programmer” – WTF is he getting that kind of money from programming computers?
Sen. Susan Collins of Maine made sure the whisteblower protections were stripped from the economic stimulus bill. I wonder what consequences that will have. Well, she’s a republican so I’m sure we’ll let it slide.
George Bush got way more money from AIG than did President Obama.
Go read.
Plus, he could put a hold on Summers’ (and, after his treatment this week by Treasury would have every reason to do so).
I’m all in favor of nationalization and following Krugman’s and Galbraith’s advice, but what I’m disgusted about is all the loud proclamations of ”I’ve given up on Obama” bullshit. What the hell is happening? Giving up on Obama is giving up on the american people. The budget battle is coming. We need to be fighting for unions and workers and the powerless in this society, not spreading endless garbage about Obama based on strict ideological purity tests. It’s sickening.
POLLING, DOUGLASFAIRFIELD, CT
06824 AIG/EXECUTIVE VP $2,000 02/28/2007 P FRIENDS OF MAX BAUCUS – Democrat
Thank you RobZuber! Exactly. After 8 years of George Bush for some reason some Americans thought President Obama would have fixed the economy by noontime on the Saturday after his inauguration. NOT ONCE did Obama say that he could do that. In fact, the last year of his campaign he said the financial sector was such a mess that it could take AT LEAST two years to fix it. Some economists are saying 5 years is more like, whereas, Bernanke thinks we should see a turnaround by the end of this year.
shorter scriibe
he knows which side to butter his bread
Call me a cynic but I bet that congress would whip out a law against such ads so quick it would make your head spin. Unfair competition that discourages the banksters from accepting the billion dollar free checks, you know.
Just like the “tax the bonuses” fiasco.
But pass a bill that limits the egregiously evil practices of credit card issuers who are preying on their customers like a flesh-eating virus? Not a chance. Regulate the banks who nickel and dime the unemployed out of huge percentages of their benefits through debit card fees? Not a chance.
It seems that Obama is counting on being able to weather this populist storm because he truly believes that the mighty of Wall Street can fix the problems and if that is true then America is doomed.
I agree. Two months – not much time to fix the world.
strict ideological purity tests?
When you have the same old players making the same old bad decisions how can a person not feel that Obama
is part of the problem? This is much broader than strict ideological purity. He has partnered with the criminals.
Blue America upstairs with guest Sam Bennett discussing her new position as President of the Women’s Campaign Forum
Interestingly, here in the Dallas / Fort Worth area, there have been some advertisements along those lines… I have been sorely tempted to move my funds to one of those banks, simply because I believe in supporting local businesses. I used to be with one such bank until it got snapped up by Bank of America. Maybe it is a good time to take another look…
Just for a moment, dear Petro – I’m very angry with Fox Network at the moment, and I don’t wish to hijack a worthy thread.
…
Peterr, perhaps there are community-minded types who are in touch with their respective locales enough to care – but they would never be allowed to ascend to ‘higher office’ with such lofty sentiments given the current climate of rapacity, which sadly is what would be needed to make a meaningful change.
;>)
So here we go again. Since Obama is not Bush no criticism is allowed. He actually told us to “make him” do the right thing. Remember? The Clintonistas he’s placed in charge of the financial sector are not the right thing! Every day a new scandal erupts out of this mess. I want Obama to come out and tell us, the American people, that WE are his first priority, and not the bankster gamblers of Wall Street. I trust the analyses of Roubini, Krugman, and Galbraith that the decisions being made by Obama’s administration are setting us up for a much worse and more painful fall.
If Obama had appointed even 1 or 2 dissenting voices to his cabinet I would cut him a break. But instead he has an echo chamber of Wall Street players that are working to save each other’s asses and he comes out like Bush after Katrina and says that Geithner is doing a heckuva job. That’s deeply alarming to me.
After reading Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone I don’t think we have the luxury anymore of waiting for the super secret poker hand of 19-dimensional chess moves to play out. We are talking trillions of dollars here. The budget will not change that nor will health care reform. We could well see the collapse of America entirely over our debt. Obama needs to come out and talk to those fears directly, honestly, and without clever dodges. Now.
Thank you.
consolidation of banks has obviouly cots jobs, I think anytime one business buys another one the rule needs to be they can’t fire any of their staff
If Obama were doing these things, I would be supporting him. But I don’t think that the Establishment which Obama represents qualifies as “unions and workers and the powerless”. I also find it funny that anyone who disagrees with Obama can do so only on “strict ideological” grounds. I think everyone here wanted Obama to be a success but he has chosen people and policies that make sure that he won’t be. I can understand your frustration but I think it is misdirected. We are just calling them as we see them, just as we did with Bush. If Obama isn’t measuring up to this same bar, a bar I should point out that is based not on ideology but effectiveness, that’s his fault not ours.
it’s no more than approximately $2000 – $3000/year. lots of computer programmers could afford that, i believe.
This up at rawstory.com
WaMU SUES FDIC FOR $13 BILLION: SOON
Calm down, Obama is an 8th Level-Double Black Belt Jiu-Jiutsu Master. He has been planning this for sometime now, we really cannot comprehend the level at which his mind works… ~snark~
Peterr,
Isn’t this what Obama’s Small Business Loan program is promoting?
Bob in HI
He’s probably the only one that actually did any real work.
There were about 40 people who went to protest in front of some of the bonus babies’ houses. That is pathetic. So much for outrage, I bet those AIG people were REALLY intimidated by a bus load of people.
There is a group of banks that have to a large extent avoided the problems of the financial houses. These are the credit unions that are actually owned by their depositors and clients. I have had very good luck with the one I belong to (22 years) and would recommend that those who qualify by virtue of belonging to some class of person (university student, worker in some industry, etc.) look into using them as your bank. Since they belong to the depositors, they are less likely to get eaten up by some big bank and engage in really stupid financial transactions, unlike regular banks.
There surely are credit unions in the Dallas area. Check out the Greater Texas Federal Credit Union out of Austin if you can qualify to join.
Credit Unions may not be in all that great shape either what with the Government taking over the big central Credit Unions.