So why did she downgrade Walmart from a "buy" to a "hold" on Tuesday of this week? Because, she says, the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) — a bill that Majority Leader Harry Reid says will not come before the Senate until late summer — might pass. It "could be a significant drag on earnings," she concluded.
Yesterday, Walmart Treasurer Charles Holly said that the company believed the bill would be defeated.
There are 21 analysts who cover Walmart. Of that twenty-one, not one has followed Weinswig’s suit and downgraded the stock. The only other one to publicly address the bill was Credit Suisse grocery analyst Ed Kelly, who concurred with Holly:
Because of all the derision surrounding the bill, Credit Suisse doesn’t believe the bill will pass in its current form and instead a compromise will be debated over the next several months.
Four days later, Deborah Weinswig is out there all by herself.
Citi held a private conference call on Wednesday, hosted by a lobbyist for the US Chamber of Commerce, to "build opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act" according to the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein. During the call, Weinswig cited dubious research funded by an astroturf front group for the Chamber to make the claim that the bill’s passage would increase the following year’s unemployment rate by 1%. (In 2006 the OCED did an exhaustive analysis and concluded that there was no correlation between unionization and unemployment rates.)
I spoke with Mark Miller, Walmart analyst at William Blair & Co., who currently rates Walmart as an "outperform." He doesn’t seem to believe that a response is necessary at this time. "It seems early in the process — it seems premature to make a stock call on this issue. It could go both ways," he said. "If the measure would be delayed, it could be a positive for Walmart stock, because it’s something that has been discussed for a while. There is some risk that is being discounted in the shares — in other words, if there was no consideration of this, if there was no risk, I think the shares would be higher than they are."
Last night in an appearance on the Rachel Maddow show, Sam Stein noted that if the Employee Free Choice Act had a negative impact on Walmart stock, it could also benefit a company like Safeway which is already unionized. Although he does not cover Safeway, Miller said "I think it’s fair to say that it could be a relative benefit."
Deborah Weinswig also covers Safeway for Citigroup. She did not upgrade the stock based on the assumption that the Employee Free Choice Act would pass.
I spoke to a lawyer who follows the industry, and asked him if he thought Weinswig’s Walmart downgrade, and her subsequent participation in a conference call with an overt political agenda, was in any way suspect.
He pointed out that Citigroup had been in trouble before, when CEO Sandy Weill asked analyst Jack Grubman to "take a fresh look" at AT&T’s stock rating — and subsequently helped Grubman’s kids to get into an elite preschool. Citigroup ultimately paid $2.65 billion in a settlement with investors who filed suit claiming that Grubman manipulated the analysis he used to justify a "buy" rating on WorldCom.
"If you’re an analyst, you need to show that your analysis is independent, and that you’re not beholden [to] anyone," he said. "Is that a valid assessment? She’s one of 21 analysts of Walmart — and if she’s the only one doing something, the marketplace is going to recognize it."
"Her reputation on the line," he said.
Related posts:
- Chamber of Commerce’s “Buy an Economist” Health Care Strategy Identical to its Anti-Employee Free Choice Campaign
- CT-Sen: McMahon Says Opposing Terrorist Trials in NYC Just Like Opposing Employee Free Choice
- The Max Tax: Baucus Plan Shafts Workers, Rewards Walmart
- Reid, Wyden, Baucus Reach Agreement on Version of Free Choice Amendment
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jonathan Tasini, “The Audacity of Greed: Free Markets, Corporate Thieves and the Looting of America”





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Ms. Weinswig apparently just watched the Cramer video where he talks about how to talk stocks up or down and manipulate them for the benefit of himself and his close friends. She probably had a huge short-sell order ready to go for when WalMart’s stock dropped.
Trouble is, Weinswig is stupid. She really didn’t learn how to ‘do it’ correctly. So basically she’s swingin’ in the breeze. Hope she disappears – we need less people like her in any capacity whatsoever operating in, near, for, or around Wall Street.
So market manipulation is against the law… so where is the crackdown on this type of activity?
Where are the new regulations that are going to keep the markets fair for little people who are trying to save for retirement?
A) Because she is a paid hack? B) Because her Downgrade was a political stunt meant to pressure Obama. C) Because her boss Citi is a bunch of tools?
D all of the above
here’s the thing with the price of stock;
it doesn’t affect anyone in the firm, they get no return on stocks being higher or lower, all it affects is the stock they hold if or when they decide to sell
therefore, walmart is sponsoring this “downgrade” because it costs them nothing and in the long run it could force them into paying their own labor bills
they’ve gotten so used to the extra profit they pocket by getting us to pay their bills they can afford downgrading their stock for a while to try and keep it from happening
The big bankers haven’t had time to write the new regulations yet – they are too busy gobbling up all the taxpayer’s money and trying to figure out how to get most of it into their personal pockets before anyone slams their hand in the door. /s
Very good point if Debby really believed her lies then she should have recommended Safeway to go up.
Round Heels
Some folks in Obama’s White House and on Capitol Hill need to be making some phone calls to Vikram Pandit asking why his analysts are mixing their business and political activities.
So the last time a Citi analyst played games with stock recommendations
but back then Citi stock was worth what $60 a share? Today its $1.78 a share and that with all the bailout money we gave them.
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:C
Some folks at the Justice Dept need to take him and Debby downtown.
No bail should be allowed.
I think the market may go up on that news.
Anti-union propaganda paid for with my taxpayer dollars which just went into Citigroup.
Something is wrong with this picture.
The original
I hope readers not familiar with Wall Street are aware that the downgrade of WalMart was in all probability engineered and/or approved by WalMart itself. The fight over EFCA is now fully joined, and the downgrade is a rhetorical weapon to be used by EFCA opponents, especially WalMart. As pointed out elsewhere, the downgrade if WalMart has no ill effect whatsoever on the owners of WalMart stock.
Wall Street “analysts” are notorious for parroting any line handed them by the company being analyzed.
oooh Jane, that newest scalp looks great with your outfit :D
am busy Spotlighting this post –
firedogs, who was the guy Stewart/Cramer mentioned as doing the reality based financial shenanigans reporting ?? Faber ???
No handcuffs and perp walk? When is Debby going to jail just what is the SEC and the US District Attorney waiting for?
If proven then Wallmart is part of the conspiracy I see RICO actions.
Just what is Debby’s record as an analyst?
David Faber
Battle of the Network Stars: Street.com CEO Quits; MSNBC Told to Downplay Stewart – Cramer Interview
Gregg’s up
I wonder if Walmart workers are even now being told, “See what happened? Our stock went down because of this bill. You want more falling stock? You want to still have a job, don’t you?”
It’s all a big casino, and we are the marks.
Deborah’s MBA is from the University of Chicago, so she learned from or in the shadow of Milton Friedman — who taught Chile’s Agosto Pinochet how to handle difficult labor issues.
thanks ! just sent him a little note w/ Jane’s post
You are exactly right.
Another reason why the GOP will do everything in their power to keep Franken out.
It’s all about EFCA.
Too bad Stewart or Colbert can’t take her down. If only she were more of a clown.
Thanks, Jane. Glad to see that living inside the Beltway has not dulled your journalistic skills.
Citi was a leader in abusing its analysts to move stock it had a financial incentive to move, part of a widespread market abuse by Wall Street’s top dogs that was in the news a few years ago and which led to formal requirements to separate in-house analysts from their investment banking brethren. As Jane points out, the direct cost just to Citi to settle securities claims for this blatant conflict of interest was $2.65 billion. But old dogs don’t really learn new tricks or stop using the old ones.
Hah! A RICO suit would provide interesting insights into WalMart over the two-to-three year period it would take to prosecute a case.
Alternately, one phone call from Citi’s largest shareholder could put a stop to this nonsense at once. Mr. Geithner?
Great catch, thanks Jane.