<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIG and Arbitrage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:45:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobschacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850986</link>
		<dc:creator>bobschacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850986</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please excuse if this has already been posted, but there’s more on the topic of this thread here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who Got AIG’s Bailout Billions?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthout.org/030809F&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.truthout.org/030809F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tondai Reinhold, Reuters: “Where, oh where, did AIG’s bailout billions go? That question may reverberate even louder through the halls of government in the week ahead now that a partial list of beneficiaries has been published. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that about $50 billion of more than $173 billion that the US government has poured into American International Group Inc since last fall has been paid to at least two dozen US and foreign financial institutions.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please excuse if this has already been posted, but there’s more on the topic of this thread here:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Who Got AIG’s Bailout Billions?</strong><br /><a href="http://www.truthout.org/030809F" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthout.org/030809F</a><br />
Tondai Reinhold, Reuters: “Where, oh where, did AIG’s bailout billions go? That question may reverberate even louder through the halls of government in the week ahead now that a partial list of beneficiaries has been published. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that about $50 billion of more than $173 billion that the US government has poured into American International Group Inc since last fall has been paid to at least two dozen US and foreign financial institutions.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libbyliberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850983</link>
		<dc:creator>libbyliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@26 … about AIG handling Congressional pensions…SNOPES SAYS FALSE… ANGRY FALSE RUMOR&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@26 … about AIG handling Congressional pensions…SNOPES SAYS FALSE… ANGRY FALSE RUMOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HubrisSonic</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850982</link>
		<dc:creator>HubrisSonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850982</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well done.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libbyliberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850981</link>
		<dc:creator>libbyliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850981</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Got an email forward about how AIG handles the Congresspeople’s pensions.  Maybe I better check out snopes. Is this a conflict of interest I wonder?  Or just anger-mongering of the emailing citizenry?  Anybody know?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got an email forward about how AIG handles the Congresspeople’s pensions.  Maybe I better check out snopes. Is this a conflict of interest I wonder?  Or just anger-mongering of the emailing citizenry?  Anybody know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850816</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, good to be here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, good to be here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldgold</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850815</link>
		<dc:creator>oldgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The other lecture they missed was: “Don’t Bet the Damn Company.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other lecture they missed was: “Don’t Bet the Damn Company.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850814</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for fleshing it out. That is very helpful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for fleshing it out. That is very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorobei9</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850812</link>
		<dc:creator>gorobei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You almost got it right…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;y-r-S is the arbitrage (a small. mathematically certain fixed profit.)  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The person on the other side of the trade does not “evaluate things differently,” though.  They can see the exact same thee numbers for y, r, and S.  So why do they paid money to make the trade?  Well, y and r are constants, while S can vary over time, so they are betting that S will increase over time (i.e. the underlying company’s condition will worsen over time.)  Note the the arbitrageur doesn’t care what happens to S (that’s why it’s called arbitrage.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why does the buyer want to be long S?  There are some valid business reasons, but the most common answer is that they can get huge leverage (10-1 or more) on the underlying company.  Compare that to a vanilla stock transaction where you max out around 3-1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You almost got it right…</p>
<p>y-r-S is the arbitrage (a small. mathematically certain fixed profit.)  </p>
<p>The person on the other side of the trade does not “evaluate things differently,” though.  They can see the exact same thee numbers for y, r, and S.  So why do they paid money to make the trade?  Well, y and r are constants, while S can vary over time, so they are betting that S will increase over time (i.e. the underlying company’s condition will worsen over time.)  Note the the arbitrageur doesn’t care what happens to S (that’s why it’s called arbitrage.)</p>
<p>Why does the buyer want to be long S?  There are some valid business reasons, but the most common answer is that they can get huge leverage (10-1 or more) on the underlying company.  Compare that to a vanilla stock transaction where you max out around 3-1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmaz</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850810</link>
		<dc:creator>bmaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wait.  Who is this poster known as “masaccio”???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is he new here?  I think he might be!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Welcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.  Who is this poster known as “masaccio”???</p>
<p>Is he new here?  I think he might be!</p>
<p>Welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850808</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/08/aig-and-arbitrage/#comment-1850808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The re-air of the Bernanke hearing is on CSPAN right now, it’s unbelievable what we aren’t allowed to know about what they are doing — &lt;em&gt;and &lt;/em&gt;what Bernanke and friends don’t know anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The re-air of the Bernanke hearing is on CSPAN right now, it’s unbelievable what we aren’t allowed to know about what they are doing — <em>and </em>what Bernanke and friends don’t know anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.519 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-16 21:47:36 -->

