<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Amendment Transparency vs. Grand Jury Secrecy: Does Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s Vindication Hang in the Balance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:38:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kassandra</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847931</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847931</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Spitzer was the only guy in NY going after these crooks. Giethner sure couldn’t be bothered.&lt;br /&gt;
I figured from the beginning it was a political hit job.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spitzer was the only guy in NY going after these crooks. Giethner sure couldn’t be bothered.<br />
I figured from the beginning it was a political hit job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkinsaw</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847697</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkinsaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually Spitzer was going after the Bush administration for their complicity in this crime. This is from his op-ed in the Washington Post, Feb. 14, 2008:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York’s, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....02783.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One month later he’s outed and resigns.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Spitzer was going after the Bush administration for their complicity in this crime. This is from his op-ed in the Washington Post, Feb. 14, 2008:</p>
<p>“Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York’s, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.</p>
<p>“What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.</p>
<p>“Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye. </p>
</p>
<p>When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners, the Bush administration will not be judged favorably. The tale is still unfolding, but when the dust settles, it will be judged as a willing accomplice to the lenders who went to any lengths in their quest for profits. So willing, in fact, that it used the power of the federal government in an unprecedented assault on state legislatures, as well as on state attorneys general and anyone else on the side of consumers.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#8230;..02783.html</a></p>
<p>One month later he’s outed and resigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margot</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847541</link>
		<dc:creator>Margot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;New post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/house-deal-reached-on-mortgage-write-down-new-dems-assure-banks-get-theirs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;House Deal Reached on Mortgage Write-Down; New Dems Assure Banks Get Theirs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New post: <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/house-deal-reached-on-mortgage-write-down-new-dems-assure-banks-get-theirs/" rel="nofollow">House Deal Reached on Mortgage Write-Down; New Dems Assure Banks Get Theirs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847536</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847536</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;111.  Georgia Thompson a purchasing agent in Wisconsin was convicted of steering a contract to a company in which 2 executives had contributed the maximum to Democratic Governor Jim Doyle’s re-election campaign. Thompson had been a hire of the previous Republican governor and no evidence was produced at trial that she knew of the contributions. Remanded by the Republican judge who heard the case, she served 4 months of an 18 month sentence before an appeals court overturned her conviction after oral arguments where one judge typified the government’s case as “beyond thin” and ordered her freed the same day.  The case was brought by Bush appointed US attorney Steven Biskupic during the campaign and was used in Republican campaign ads to accuse Doyle of corruption&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>111.  Georgia Thompson a purchasing agent in Wisconsin was convicted of steering a contract to a company in which 2 executives had contributed the maximum to Democratic Governor Jim Doyle’s re-election campaign. Thompson had been a hire of the previous Republican governor and no evidence was produced at trial that she knew of the contributions. Remanded by the Republican judge who heard the case, she served 4 months of an 18 month sentence before an appeals court overturned her conviction after oral arguments where one judge typified the government’s case as “beyond thin” and ordered her freed the same day.  The case was brought by Bush appointed US attorney Steven Biskupic during the campaign and was used in Republican campaign ads to accuse Doyle of corruption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847535</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847535</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know who you are talking about.  I don’t remember her name either but IIRC, she was freed by the Fed Appeals court who gave a directed verdict and ordered her freed and no re-trial.  Rather unusual assertions as I recall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know who you are talking about.  I don’t remember her name either but IIRC, she was freed by the Fed Appeals court who gave a directed verdict and ordered her freed and no re-trial.  Rather unusual assertions as I recall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847534</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What ever happened with the state purchasing gal in Wisconsin that was tossed in jail for political purposes?  I can’t remember her name, but she made about 86K…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully we will now be rid of gulags.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened with the state purchasing gal in Wisconsin that was tossed in jail for political purposes?  I can’t remember her name, but she made about 86K…</p>
<p>Hopefully we will now be rid of gulags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanderO</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847533</link>
		<dc:creator>SanderO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;‘Who would you recommend buys the stocks? The millions losing their homes? The even bigger numbers losing their jobs? Maybe the tens of millions who’ve seen their pensions lose 40% in one single year should try to make up for these losses with one more brave bet?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And what would you advice they buy? What stocks are cheap, where are the potential gains to be made? Would you want to tell Americans to buy the stock of the biggest losers (in more than one sense), the AIG’s and CIti’s of the world, the companies that you have now transferred trillions of dollars to that belonged to the same Americans in the first place that you now suggest buy the shares?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How about shares in GM and Ford, who today announced sales that are down 53% and 48%, respectively, numbers that ensure unemployment for millions of additional Americans, regardless of future ingestion of government billions? You want the men and women who just lost their jobs, and likely much of their pensions, to go out and buy shares in their former employers? Is that what you want? Am I the only one around here who thinks of terms like ‘cynical’ and ‘perverted’ when I think this over? How dare you sir, how dare you? Have you no shame?”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘Who would you recommend buys the stocks? The millions losing their homes? The even bigger numbers losing their jobs? Maybe the tens of millions who’ve seen their pensions lose 40% in one single year should try to make up for these losses with one more brave bet?</p>
<p>And what would you advice they buy? What stocks are cheap, where are the potential gains to be made? Would you want to tell Americans to buy the stock of the biggest losers (in more than one sense), the AIG’s and CIti’s of the world, the companies that you have now transferred trillions of dollars to that belonged to the same Americans in the first place that you now suggest buy the shares?</p>
<p>How about shares in GM and Ford, who today announced sales that are down 53% and 48%, respectively, numbers that ensure unemployment for millions of additional Americans, regardless of future ingestion of government billions? You want the men and women who just lost their jobs, and likely much of their pensions, to go out and buy shares in their former employers? Is that what you want? Am I the only one around here who thinks of terms like ‘cynical’ and ‘perverted’ when I think this over? How dare you sir, how dare you? Have you no shame?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluebutterfly</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847531</link>
		<dc:creator>bluebutterfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You’re right; Spitzer wanted penalties, not taxpayer bailouts for the criminals.&lt;br /&gt;
************&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;” But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The editorial appeared the day after Spitzer’s ill-fated rendezvous with the prostitute at the Mayflower Hotel. With that article, some Washington insiders believe, Spitzer signed his own political death warrant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 4, 2008, Spitzer furthermore proposed legislation that would have imposed penalties for mortgage fraud and predatory lending. ” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/25-bushs-real-problem-with-eliot-spitzer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.projectcensored.org.....t-spitzer/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right; Spitzer wanted penalties, not taxpayer bailouts for the criminals.<br />
************</p>
<p>” But the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the investigation.”</p>
<p> The editorial appeared the day after Spitzer’s ill-fated rendezvous with the prostitute at the Mayflower Hotel. With that article, some Washington insiders believe, Spitzer signed his own political death warrant.</p>
<p>On March 4, 2008, Spitzer furthermore proposed legislation that would have imposed penalties for mortgage fraud and predatory lending. ” </p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/25-bushs-real-problem-with-eliot-spitzer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectcensored.org&#8230;..t-spitzer/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanderO</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847530</link>
		<dc:creator>SanderO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stocks are a joke and the only ones who make out are the brokers and traders.  The market has seen half the value of American companies disappear in a year or two.  Where did it go?  Nowhere of course because that value is BS and always was.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t buy stocks.  Break capitalism now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stocks are a joke and the only ones who make out are the brokers and traders.  The market has seen half the value of American companies disappear in a year or two.  Where did it go?  Nowhere of course because that value is BS and always was.</p>
<p>Don’t buy stocks.  Break capitalism now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847529</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/03/first-ammendment-transparency-vs-grand-jury-secrecy-does-elliot-spitzers-vindication-hang-in-the-balance/#comment-1847529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;reminds me of when greenspan advised people to get adjustable rate mortgages.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reminds me of when greenspan advised people to get adjustable rate mortgages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
