President Obama says that allowing bankruptcy judges to write down mortgages to reflect fair market housing values is an important part of his plan to arrest the downward spiral of the mortgage crisis. So why is Ellen Tauscher, head of the New Democrat Coalition, working so hard on behalf of bank and mortgage industry lobbyists to stop it from happening?
That’s a good question. When Chris Bowers told readers to write and urge her to stop watering down HR 200, her communications director contacted him to point out "that she voted in favor of the rule on HR 1106, which implies support." Not only is the vote not reflective of support for the bill, but numerous House sources indicate that former Wall Street investment banker Tauscher is the one who recruited Blue Dogs and New Dems to join with the Republicans to render it meaningless. She’s the undisputed leader of the opposition, speaking boldly in the caucus meeting and negotiating with Zoe Lofgren on behalf of the banks. Fer chrissakes, even Fox News is reporting she’s taking the lead on this. It’s downright insulting that her office tried to pass off something this outlandish and easily disputed.
Tauscher’s office also said she hasn’t met with any bankers or lobbyists on the matter, and that may well be true. She doesn’t have to. Adam Pase, the executive director of the New Democrat Coalition which Tauscher chairs, works directly out of her office.
Pase is a former lobbyist for the Twenty First Century Group, whose client, the Coalition for Fair & Affordable Lending, is an astroturf group, financed by the banking industry, that lobbied on behalf of. . . you guessed it. . . sub-prime lenders. Contrary to what you might hear on Morning Joe, it was national civil rights leaders who joined together to fight the Coalition’s predatory lenders as they tried to pass the Ney-Kanjorski bill, which would have enabled banks to get around predatory lending laws and make more bad loans. This they justified based on the oh-so-high-minded need to provide loans to low income and minority borrowers. It was true scumbaggery.
Pase was also the senior policy adviser for Dennis Moore when Moore organized Blue Dogs to oppose mortgage write-downs on behalf of the banking industry in 2007. He is evidently the one driving policy on this one for the New Dems. But one has to wonder — what is Tauscher thinking? Her district is one of the hardest hit by the mortgage crisis, as you can see from the map above. Why is she trying to limit mortgage write-downs to subprime loans only, on behalf of banks, when every foreclosure brings down the value of all houses in a neighborhood? Her claim to care so very much about people still struggling to pay their mortgages rings hollow.
Credit Suisse says that this bill would cut the rate of foreclosure by 20% and it wouldn’t cost the taxpayers a dime. Why? Because it would force banks to write down the value of the loans on their books to their true value – which would quickly show that they are probably insolvent. They’re also hoping that the taxpayer will pick up the tab and they’ll be able to escape taking responsibility for their own bad business decisions. Taushcer’s own bill would provide mortgage relief from TARP funds.
Tauscher and others are hiding behind the mantle of "fiscal conservativism," but it’s little more than self-interest on behalf of banks that are incomprehensibly still writing our legislation again.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Dugg right here! Please join me.
Ellen Tauscher, graduate of the DiFi School of protecting corporate interests.
I thought Tauscher was one Blue Dog we’d brought to heel with a primary challenge. Seems as if she has a short memory. Her protestations that the bill doesn’t help homeowners in less dire straits brings to mind my favorite DiFi quote: “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”
Unless Ellen opposes the bill “cram-down” bill for reasons that have nothing to do with her hard-working homeowner constituents?
Bankruptcy Judges in my state are trying to buy time in hopes that the legislation will pass.
Jane: I think we know who are enemies are in the House on this legislation, who are our friends?
Boy is that a misnomer ; “New Democrat Coalition”. OMG, my Rep. Susan Davis is among them; no wonder she hasn’t responded to my query of her DC office member to tell me why she hasn’t signed on as a co-sponsor of HR676(the national health bill).
I count 53 members of the NDC; one member is “Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Weston, who is angry that the huge spending bill passed by the House on Wednesday includes a provision to ease travel rules for Cuban-Americans.”
Rush Holt is another member(he keeps wanting to deny us the right to examine voting machine software or hold the EAC accountable to the reasons they were created.
Jane Harman ,supporter of illegal wiretapping and other ‘executive privilege’ powers.
And ,of course, Rahm Emmanuel.
It’s downright insulting that her office tried to pass off something this outlandish and easily disputed.
Jane calls bullshit.
I love Joe Biden, but nobody messes with Jane.
Good job.
Adam Pase’s training in finance and philosophy are the perfect preparation for a job asking banks and financiers exactly what kind of deregulation and ‘modernization’ they would like enacted by our legislators. Financiers! Hey, we speak your language! We are you.
Chris Bowers has this nailed: External Corporate influence is an unnecessary concern in an age when corporate clerks (Pases) can work in Representatives’ offices, lobbying from the inside.
Hmmm. This has potential./s
Could put military guys inside ABC, NBC, CNN…..
This will save so much fossil fuel! Getting the large corporations to put corporate clerks inside legislators offices to write the Doable legislation right where its going to get the big green light./s
Well said,how those 2( Tauscher & Feinstein) keep passing ‘emselves off as dems & hardly any push back on ‘em has been a source of disappointment for years.Let’s hope she ,Ellen Tauscher get primaried in 2010.
It is just a crying shame that it is unconstitutional to grant titles of nobility, surly the banksters, being all wise and all./s
I don’t understand this paragraph at all. The first sentence sez cramdown wouldn’t cost the taxpayers a dime and the very next sentence sez that “they” (banks? what is the antecent?) are hoping the taxpayer will pick up the tab. Will someone please unconfuse me?
“New Democrat Coalition” – does that mean that they figure to keep using the name Democrat after the rest of us form our own party (’Progressive’, ‘Liberal’?) out of frustration with those #$%^&*s?
Otherwise, that name is clearly in error, because they aren’t new in any way and they surely aren’t Democrats.
I read the ‘they’ as referencing the banks. Yes, the ‘antecedent’ could ahve been made clearer.
Your life or your lupins!
i don’t understand either – weren’t the loans securitized? who owns them now? i doubt it’s the mortgage originator.
my guess is that it’s the mortgage servicer who will being doing the cram downs, but how the losses would be taken by the holders of CDOs and other securities based on the mortgages, i don’t know. and i’m not so sure who they are.
doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done – i think it should. i just have my doubts it’s as simple as described.
Book Salon a couple of flights upstairs with author Matt Miller and The Tyranny of Dead Ideas hosted by Christy
Apologies for lack of clarity. Banks hold the mortgages on their books at full value. If they were forced to value them at market value (which they would if they were adjusted by bankruptcy court) then their true value would be apparent and it would become evident that they’re not worth what they say they’re worth. If taxpayers take them off their hands at full value, problem solved.
the lack of clarity could all be at my end…. *g*
this is the part i think is more complicated (with the caveat that i could have it very wrong as i’m just trying to learn about all this stuff now and am very definitely still in student mode) and one of the reasons that there is a lot of doubt that in many cases loan docs may not even still exist. by securitized, i mean weren’t the mortgages pooled, sliced and diced into various types of mortgage backed securities which were sold to pensions funds, SWFs, other banks and all manner of “investors” and even “insured” with CDSs?
here’s a bit from something i got a while ago from RGE (sorry, i don’t have the link handy): Structured Finance Glossary – Making Sense of the Alphabet Soup
Rep. Tauscher’s (D-CA-10) phone numbers:
Walnut Creek, CA office: (925) 932-8899
Fairfield, CA office: (707) 428-7792
Washington DC: (202) 225-1880
I live in her district. She never has been primaried. Although there was talk of it the last time around, it never materialized. Although this is a district that has in the past been represented by extreme right wing nut jobs, I think that things have changed a lot and she needs to be run out of town. The district is more Democratic than the one she had when she first defeated a wingnut. She needs to go. I swore I would never support her again when she campaigned for the draconian bankruptcy law. The last two rounds, I have just left the congressional race blank.