We didn’t hear much about Rahm Emanuel when things were looking dicey and Obama had to fight for the stimulus bill, but now that there is a conference deal, Rahm would like his credit. Let’s see who’s jockeying for access in the new White House and obliging.
Well, first the obvious. Here we have David Broder, giving us the official Village press release on how the incident will be digested (h/t Teddy):
But it was probably a lucky break for the administration that Rahm Emanuel was also around to work the House. Obama’s chief of staff was the No. 4 man in the House Democratic leadership. If anyone could placate Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants who run the key committees, it was probably Emanuel. This week was the first big test.
If "placate" means engaging in a personal pissing contest to unload blame for the bill’s shortcomings on the House and dispatching minions to attack and undermine Pelosi, I guess you could say that.
Then we have The Hill:
And if anyone’s fingerprints are on the nearly $800 billion economic stimulus package being sorted out in Congress this week, they belong to Emanuel, the former Illinois House member who is now the White House chief of staff.
There he was on the morning before the House stimulus vote, bringing Blue Dogs back into the fold as he huddled with their leaders in House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s (D-Md.) hideaway off the House floor.
Enough Blue Dogs were wooed over to vote for the bill, per The Hill’s own reporting at the time, by a letter from Obama’s director Peter Orszag saying the White House would commit to pay-go budget principles for all non-emergency legislation going forward. Rahm is never mentioned in the article.
There he was Friday afternoon in the office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), tossing spending programs overboard until the package was light enough to support the heavy doubts of three Republican senators.
Reid was trying to sell his own deal, reducing the tax cuts to $65 billion while Diane Feinstein was on the floor saying she wouldn’t vote for any bill that had too many tax cuts. Rahm cut their legs off.
Emanuel has returned to his old stomping grounds at each step of the process, cutting deals and holding hands to keep Democrats together and win enough Republican support to get the package through the Senate.
January 29: “Rahm hates us and lets us know it, and we hate him back,” said a senior Republican.
Pay close attention to this part, because if you think Rahm did a great job "tossing spending programs overboard" (like children’s nutrition), he’s just getting started:
The fiscally conservative Democrats might not have been able to defeat the bill, but a large chunk of Democrats defecting on the top priority of a new Democratic president would have heaped insult on the injury inflicted by the GOP’s wall of opposition. So they huddled in the majority leader’s hideaway, and Emanuel pledged that they would see signs of Obama’s commitment to fiscal reform.
That means Social Security and Medicare reform. Jim Cooper, a leader of the Blue Dogs, has a fetish about it. In December, Cooper received a promise that the administration would convene a "fiscal responsibility summit" in February to address it. Kagro: "I said Obama should have waited to see that Cooper and the Blue Dogs pony up on the stimulus before agreeing."
After that, 11 Democrats voted against the stimulus bill, nine of them Blue Dogs. But none of them were leaders of the group and there was no mass defection.
Jim Cooper is a leader of the Blue Dogs. He voted against the bill, and claimed that the White House urged him to do so.
Rahm’s been able to write a revisionist history about himself using the press every bit as skillfully as the Republicans did. His genius strategy as head of the DCCC in 2006 was "sidelining candidates who were running in favor of withdrawal from Iraq."
In 2008 he appeared in a candidate training video "haranguing congressional candidates to ‘move right’ on immigration or risk defeat at the hands of Republicans." He triggered a revolt of the Hispanic Caucus on the House floor when his puppet Heath Shuler put forward the enforcement-only SAVE Act and he forced Democratic freshmen to co-sponsor for cover. His advice to candidates with Hispanic constituencies? "They don’t vote, ignore ‘em."
Hispanic share of the national vote increased from 8% to 9% from 2004 to 2008 and provided the margin of victory for Obama in Colorado, Florida, Nevada and New Mexico.
As I mentioned yesterday, there is no shortage of journalists jockeying for White House "access" these days, willing to transcribe whatever kind of delusional self-hagiography Rahm dictates in order to get it. Expect these to be the first of many.



105 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Rahm must figure that the stimulus plan will be big enough to work, then.
Fine. If it is, good for him. If it isn’t, Rahm’s just set himself up to be the guy Obama throws under the bus in order to stem the bleeding in 2010.
Rahmbo took the credit for Obama’s win, iirc. Howard Dean’s 50 state strategy…what dat?
Rahm paid no price for telling candidates not to oppose the war in 2006, or for triggering a crisis with Hispanics in 2008. Journalists willingly credit him with being the “hero” of the Democratic majority.
Why would he think that he will be held responsible this time?
The Right has every interest in building up Rahm. He’s their trojan horse.
I would hazard a guess that Pelosi would like his tush kicked. No love there at all. I wonder if Obama fully understood House politics.
Perhaps in a rational world, what you suggest would be so.
One suspects that the foam-flecked “music” has not yet reached full crescendo in our very irrational world, however …
it sucks to have to agree with “a senior republican”.
Everybody in Alaska thought Sarah Palin was wonderful, until Rahm explained to us that she isn’t so wonderful. How an we ever repay him…?
Is that Bela-foam-Flecked music like UFO-TOFU?
Morning Jane and Puppies.
If this all weren’t so serious, it would be hilarious.
Sounds just like middle school tryouts for head cheerleader. egad!
WELL! I NEVER!?! ma, is it sausage yet? *snerk*
US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation nomination hearings for NOAA chief and WH science chief just opening here on webcast.
Holdren (WH Science) giving intro remarks.
Ya takes ‘em whenever they present themselves.
Rahm takes credit for that? Whatever. You’re good. You’re very good. ;->
w00t-en!
yeah. PW is right that he should be. But I guess he has too many journalists (”journalists”?) in his pocket. Knew a guy like him. Real prick. Just nasty. But would turn on the charm. Thought he was really effective with that. It only pissed people off more. Inside. Outwardly, though, they would act… charmed. But only because they needed or wanted something from the guy. Access jounalism didja talk about yesterday?
Sorry Raven, I can’t hear you … the Wurlitzer is cranked up too loudly.
I think we are going to have to shout.
Rahmbo seems ideologically much closer to rethugs. Familiarity breeds contempt?
I’m still blastin the Allman’s I got yesterday. . .8/17/71 Boston. . .
Weren’t there several posts here and at Howie’s place that showed Rahm and Schumer’s efforts actually cost us a few more gains in 2006? They were actively working against Howard Dean’s efforts, which clearly were a massive success in 06 and 08, and actively against several Blue America candidates, who might’ve out-performed the Rahm-backed candidates…can’t remember offhand.
It was my first instinct that Emanuel could end up being the fall guy if (or more likely when) this thing goes sideways. However, he’s never had to pay up in the past, why would we think it might go differently this time around? Further, when the rightwingers fire up their attacks on the failing plan – and they will – they’re going to go after Obama, not Emanuel. If BO should throw him under the bus, the aftermath will be a one-day press event, not something that will play out over time. After that it’s…
Business as usual.
then there was Ned Lamont….
What I don’t get is this: What’s Emanuel’s angle? What does he get out of being a straight-up dirtbag? I can’t believe he’s doing all this for naught.
Rahm E made over $16 million in 2 1/2 years as an investment banker after he left the Clinton administration.
Rahm is clearly a plutocrat, and we can expect nothing more of him.
That’s the worst of it. There seems to be this sense in some quarters that it’s okay that this stimulus is too small, because of course this won’t be the only stimulus. But the GOP and the Blue Dogs aren’t going to say “okay, you were right, it should have been bigger,” they’re going to say “your way failed, just like we said it would, now you have to do it our way” (the same logic won’t apply to “their way” any more than it did now, when “their way” was the same as Bush’s failed policies.)
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Hamsher and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
I agree with your assessment of Rahm “Tiny Dancer” Emmanuel and where his real politics lie, after all let’s look at where he got his start and who is pullin’ his strings here (or rather “there”). However, I am still NOT convinced that Obama is a Friedmanist and will not pull the cap entirely on SS and, hopefully, reduce the FICA tax by 1% . This gives the fund solvency until the cows come home and gives small business and payroll tax payers under $200,000 per year a break.
If Obama is really a Clinton corporatist then he will be denying his political genetics and his history…I don’t think he’s stupid and he surely knows who isn’t gunna support ‘im when the shit gets deep.
I know that this opinion is really an act of faith but what the hell…that’s what the struggle is all about, ain’t it?
Do you have any info that we might not be privy to that would indicate that Obama will blow up Social Security and Medicare?
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…I THINK OBAMA’S SMARTER’N RAHM!!
Well, Rahm is responsible for penicillin and he formed the Beatles, so I’ll give him props for those.
Oh, and I should thank him those self-titled movies he was making when I was a 13-year-old boy. Stimulus indeed.
BTW, I talked to a congressional staffer friend last night, and Reid’s “call a press conference, we have a deal”/”no, we don’t have a deal, the Dems all look like idiots” move yesterday was purely to screw over the House Dems, who were about to hold a press conference to press for the school funding.
Folks who are all-consumed by pride in their own smarts sometimes become blinded by the light, and can take just excruciatingly painful spills.
Example: gringrich, who seems to think he’s back on his way up in the grand scheme of things.
I think believers in such as that are vastly overrating whatever random signals are pinging around in their cavernous brain pans.
this bill is starting to look pretty good if think progress is reporting this accurately
me likey
Personality disorder like Bush?
power? being the “go-to” guy? the kewl kid on the block? Such pursuits can be intoxicating to some people.
If the Left will help kill this bill, you can count on the GOP to help…
Yep, just don’t understand why the other plutocrats hate him since their interests are completely aligned.
Citizen Redshift:
As long as Rahm is identified with the “Blue Dogs” and the bankers and corporatists and Obama gets the heat from these folks and NOT from us, then he, Emmanuel, is marginalized. The question here really is “who is running who”…is Rahm runnin Obama or is Obama usin Rahm. I think that Obama would cut Rahm loose in a heartbeat if he tried ta outflank the boss.
Which is what will make it even more devastating when he does fall. This is one tight spot he can’t wriggle out of, largely because of what he’s doing right now.
Or like Tom Delay?
That’s how I see it, too. I think BO has shot the only bullet he had…and a BB round against a mastodon just won’t cut it.
There’s a thought…
If Obama seriously objected to this he could put a stop to it anytime. He knew who Rahm was when he hired him.
Incidentally Jane, your Rahm watch blogging is superb.
This is why posts like this are so crucial. Rahm’s counting on the Memory Hole to work in his favor, as it always has in the past. But Jane’s written it all out in such a way that it’s there for us to bludgeon him with if he tries to disavow it.
Ohhhh! Thank you Perris. We’ve been holding our breath in this household, wishing the hastiest of the nay-sayers would please just have a little patience instead of drawing the long knives out at first light.
Much appreciate your take on this. ;->
If that’s true, then pressure needs to be put on BO to get him to understand that Emanuel is undermining him at every turn.
In the last week, I’ve seen people trying to blame Pelosi for things like federal drug policies, as well as other policy-type stuff. (I think some of them were LaRouchies.) Flunked government and civics, maybe?
Oh you dear thing. Just like clockwork. A cheery thought to brighten our morn. Thank you so much for all your positive thoughts expressed here and, I’m sure, elsewhere. I seem to have lost my way. Perhaps you could point me to one of them. That would be lovely.
Right on. Saw a report last night with a few polls showing that Obama’s approval rating has been rising through this Job Creation Plan debate. My better half told me last night that a CNN radio cut-in was touting some poll that gave him an 82% positive rating, up dramatically just yesterday. CNN is reporting it this way, which being a major info source for the sheeple, this is very good news.
Things have shifted tremendously in just a few weeks, and now with incredibly high public approval, Obama is poised to start pushing for some more radical changes (yes, provided that’s what he really wants). I’m thinking were seeing his usual three steps ahead strategy, and the vipers don’t even know what hit ‘em a year later.
Certainly hope this is true with Rahm and the other Clintonistas. It’s going to take a long time to undo the “bubble” culture of the Booshes and Clinton, and create an actual sustainable economy, in more ways than one. Of course, Obama could end up being another corporate shill (although his history suggests otherwise), in which case, it’ll take a violent revolution. Either way, we’re ready.
Yep! Jane’s a keeper. So’re you, and a bunch of other pups. Thanks all.
Citizen ShotoJamf:
No Citizen Shoto, let’s keep the support behind Obama and keep the heat on Rahm…keep Rahm penned in with the Blue Dogs and Clintonistas. The question is: “Is Rahm running Obama or is Obama running Rahm?”…my money is on Obama.
but he’s all “behind the scenes.” he’s not out there having dueling press conferences with b.nelson, lieberman and the rest. Most people won’t even realize the extent of Rahm’s involvement or will forget by the time the stimulus turns to shit, if it does. The blame game is going to be interesting, if it needs to be played. some will say the stimulus was too big; some too small. wonder which side Rahm will be taking? Hope it doesn’t come to that though. As most people her know, I love Joe The Biden. And I think it’s just a matter of time before Rahm tosses him under the bus over something. And that will piss me off to no end.
Yes, there’s nothing new with idea of “keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.” One of the oldest ones in the book could very well be what Obama’s been doing.
is this the guy who told me yesterday that the “economic data” (or something like that) proved that the New Deal didn’t work ??? and I asked him what economic data and never heard back? this the guy?
We also of like mind as you, fingers crossed. But we’re still Obama fans. Expect him to be a very quick study.
What do you have against the Clintons?
heh heh. dang u BfL. You smoked me. Have a go yerself. Be my guest. *hands can of spitball thru toobz*
Citizen Phoenix Woman:
Yes indeed, the messaging inside the blogosphere is important especially to tell Obama where his “base” is at…there’s a reason the Big O fought ta keep his Blackberry and it wasn’t ta text Rahm.
But on to more important questions: when are you folks in my home state gunna impeach that jive-assed governor?
I’m definitely with you in not wanting to go the “perfect is the enemy of the good” route. I’m not looking for long knives, I’m looking to keep up the pressure for the right things, because the people pushing for the wrong things aren’t going to let up.
Well said!
I wonder which blogs he visits by habit
LOL. Thanks. But he’s gone, I think.
Is there any evidence that they aren’t working together toward the same goals? Obama picked Rahm for the COS just a couple months ago. It’s not like they’ve had time to grow apart or anything.
Citizen Beerfart Liberal:
If the economy continues ta tank, as I think it will for at least 6 months, the pressure will be on Obama not to reduce spendin’ but to run the Federal Reserve presses and open the spigot to full blast…folks aren’t gunna buy the dead pig, they’re gunna wanna roast it.
And that’s gunna be when it gets dicy, because TOO much paper spendin’ will send the world into hyper-inflation unless it goes DIRECTLY to people and the wealth that has been stashed so far is taxed into circulation.
Thanks! Yes, we can and will lean and keep reasonable pressure on, but what’s the sense in whacking a good guy over the head just on the off chance that he might head down a less desirable path? Doesn’t work worth a darn with horses. Even less effective with smart, tough, good-hearted humans.
mebbe, but likes to lurk & lob occasional mudpies. Stay alert sojer. ;->
Oooh! Oooooh! *raises hand*
errrr
you there, in the back, raising the hand, yes, adie is it?
did you have an answer for us?
Any predictions when the administration will begin to dismantle Social Security to please the Republicans and the Blue Dogs?
telecommunications consolidation, so-called trade policies, financial industry deregulation, iraq sanctions, imf structural adjustments and shock therapy, welfare “reform,” and that’s just off the top of my head.
and yes clinton was far, far better than bush. but that doesn’t mean he gets a pass from me on the people he’s killed. especially as i’ve never seen a bit of remorse.
Nixon in China.
me likey that post
did you catch geithner’s testimony before the senate banking committee earlier this week? jane live blogged it.
Would it be too outlandish if i curtsied when Himself appears?
ding!
for a more recent example: clinton and nafta
It seems to me that President Oabama needs Rahm, or someone like him, to bash heads in the Congress. Otherwise they’d never get anything done.
i wouldn’t be surprised if obama lost interest in blogs after his less than satisfactory visit to dkos several years ago.
Lover’s Leap by Bela & the Flecktones
wish we had a “hugh’s list” for the clinton era – to help us remember and fairly compare.
Next, Phillip Glass writes an opera based on the gutting of Social Security…
Clinton also lifted restraints on Israel allowing them to go full bore on their settlements.
surely he’s got the smarts to realize it’s not a totally homogeneous stew running thru the toobz. i bet he lurks. i doubt dubya even knew the term.
Ding, Ding, Ding!!!
Shoot, that was John Adams. My bad. More coffee.
using one note or two?
LOL
tell me when it happens, I didn’t even know
Heh. I was going to check the composer, but decided not to.
common mistake. you’re excused. could you grab a refill for me while you’re up? Thanks much.
I take your point. I’m 100% behind anything that will work, because the rightwing attack machine is already fired up. They’re aiming at 2010 and 2012…
and u think i DO?! um, my hair stands on end & i tend to giggle too much. at 60-something, that’s not a pretty sight.
As few as possible for that dainty minimalist touch. ;)
Good question. He did call on a HuffPo reporter in the Monday presser. That’s a start.
eek. linkie please. ballpark? anything? definition of “work”?
Such a tired debate, but a lot can be learned from history:
NAFTA: Clearly at the was not a good thing for the American worker. Millions loudly fought against it. Clinton signed it.
Welfare “Reform”: Just plain cruel. Clinton signed it.
Telecommunications Act: Obvious at the time that this was not going to go well. Allowed for almost complete message control for the gatekeepers. The results of this Act are still in play and still very powerful. Clinton championed this Act and signed it.
Glass-Steagall Repeal: Many have been making the case that this one thing was the single biggest cause of our economic collapse right now. Clinton signed it.
As far as Glass-Steagall, some argue that there were enough votes to override any Prez veto, but Clinton never even tried to get support for a veto. The initial Senate version vote was 54-44, so there was opportunity, and anyway, why not veto and let them own it instead?
But that brings up another point, since Clinton had little pull in Congress, even within his supposed Party especially by this point in 1999 because of personal issues among other things, he wasn’t able to get many of the things he said he wanted done. Guess what? He had a long history of this as well, and it was one of the main things we talked about when campaigning against him in the 1992 Dem primaries. I remember saying and having it on our literature that Clinton would not be an effective leader because of his history of affairs (which we knew would be a distraction), and more importantly not being skilled at working with all the different factions involved in legislating. Like many of the horrendous legislation he signed, his problems were also completed predictable.
So from even very recent history like the Clinton years, we know that the Greenspan/Clinton economics policies lead only to short-term gain for few leading to bubble after bubble, and that different approaches are needed to have sustained prosperity.
And also from this history, since many things improved during this time as you were getting at, even the smallest amount of Liberal policy helps a lot. Imagine what would happen if went “all-in” on the Liberal front.
That’s why he was picked for Chief of Staff?? That’s why he has the GOP over for drinks?? Wow, who coulda predicted neither of those ideas would pan out???
How about “Madoff in Rikers”?
How about going for the gold[en] “SILENCE” by Anonymous.
Oh no. Already been done, by Norquizitunbury.
yep. very true. if a two state solution was still possible at the beginning of the clinton administration, imo it was dead by the end.
did you read obama’s posts? i’ll go find the links if you need them. he defended the decision by many dems in the senate not to oppose seating roberts to the supreme court and called out the blogs for our “tone” – obama was rightly taken to task for that.
obama never showed up again – although he had promised to do so.
for demonstration purposes only(?)
let’s hope he comes back, and demonstrates a sharp learning curve. I heard of those posts, didn’t see them, and frankly had conveniently forgotten them. oogh! Thanks for the refresher.
p.s., selise. I’ll take your word for it. No need to bother looking up the links, thanks.
Hey, thanks for letting me know about that. Just looked it up and thought it was great. Really long and thoughful, and thought-provoking…directly addresses much of the criticism that I’ve had of him…and his actions back up that talk exactly.
Seriously, that one of the more useful posts I’ve read, at least for me personally. I’d recommend it to anyone who hasn’t seen it, or wants to re-visit:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…..102745/165
I truly hope this means war between the White House (via Rahm) and the House (via Pelosi). I don’t want Obama to get ANYTHING from now on unless RAHM gives in.
I want Pelosi to fight anything and everything Rahm champions and I want her to kick the legs out from under the Blue Assholes in the House.
NO “entitlement reform” unless it means 1) eliminating the cap on income subject to SSI tax, and 2) allowing the federal government to negotiate better prices for medicare and drug prices. Anything else? NO WAY because that means cuts and means testing which guarantees that they will both disappear within a generation because they will be labeled “welfare”. Totally at odds with the how and why they were designed in the first place.
NO PRVATIZATION OF ANY KIND FOR SSI. It is INSURANCE, not an investment.
Listens to “all” sides: once.
It seems that he’s simply expressing his approach, and letting people know why he doesn’t necessarily do things they way THEY want him to all the time.
He consistently uses the cliche of “disagree without being disagreeable,” and clearly explains why he thinks this is important in actually getting things passed, and winning elections. Not my first inclination, but how can anyone argue with his results so far, especially given how f-ed up everything is at the moment? Perhaps he knows more about this stuff than you or I?
I read a while ago about how he invited David Sirota to spend a day with him after reading one Sirota’s posts. Obama wanted to discuss the issue more with Sirota, and I remember hearing about other events like this from Obama. He always inviting people to give feedback, and even setting up structures for people to do just that at levels never seen before. To me, this deserves applause.
I couldn’t care less if he doesn’t come back to Dkos again, especially since he’s reaching out all over the place. Can’t really blame him anyway after skimming the comments, since it’s as if he didn’t write anything. Echo chamber central. Perhaps he’s a little busy anyway?
Thanks for an informative post. I’ve read so many rumors and so much speculation that I’m not sure who or what to believe any more.
I think President Obama makes a lot of sense when he says “Don’t make the perfect the enemy of the good,” especially given the current make up of the Senate and the urgency of the situation at hand. At the end of the day, they probably did what they had to do to get the bill passed quickly. Hopefully they will continue to pursue funding for the worthy programs that were eliminated from the bill through the appropriations committee – and hopefully after 2010 elections the Dems won’t have to rely on any Republicans in the Senate for anything.
This is so interesting.
“Rahm this. Rahm that.”
Who does he work for? Who made Rahm his first staff appointment?
Rahm doesn’t do anything without the President’s say-so and authority. Trying to make Rahm into the boogie-man (as deserving as he is) doesn’t jibe with the way administrations function. Rahm has been doing Obama’s bidding throughout this sausage-making.
And, for better or worse, what’s emerging as stimulus is what the President wants.
My post is lengthy, so I have went to Oxdown in order to respond accordingly.
Jaango