Exit poll results are beginning to come in from today’s election in Israel and while it looks like Livni and the Kadima party have won the most seats, it is unlikely they will have the needed support from other parties to actually form a majority coalition. President Shimon Peres, who names which leader will make that attempt, will most likely turn to Netanyahu as the one able to pull together the needed cross party support.
While the final results are uncertain, they are all too clear – no matter which candidate wins in the end, the leadership will be one of the hawks. Livni, who not so long ago was trumpeted as the new “progressive” option, has since done everything she could to prove herself as bloodthirsty as her brethren. Netanyahu’s thuggish but oh so popular posturing set the bar the others decimated Gaza to meet. Neither direction offers hope of genuine and just peace.
Avigdor Lieberman of Yisrael Beinenu, the party with the third highest seats won, will be the kingmaker – and Israel’s Lieberman, having now been outed by Ha’aretz as a follower of the murdered, and formerly banned racist Meir Kahane is the subject of a chilling essay by Gideon Levy who continues to speak with an honesty that is unknown here in the States either about Israel or about ourselves.
Levy, in decrying Lieberman’s significance for Israel, writes:
The prohibited has become permitted, the ostracized is now accepted, the destestable has become the talented – that’s the slippery slope down which Israeli society has skidded over the past two decades.
And those words made me pause. They ring true not just as a descripion of the depths Israeli politics has reached, but also as an apt description for our own recent governance. And just as Lieberman’s racist agenda is aimed at Israeli Arabs and Palestinians, so too our foreign and military policy has become in many ways centered on a "war on terror" that is hard to separate from a "war on muslims."
While we often discuss Israel’s dependence on the oh so generous supply of arms and funds which Washington supplies, and the stranglehold the Israel lobby maintains on our politicians, we rarely look at the extent to which our military tactics are modeled on Israeli methods. I was first struck by the interconnection when reading Robert Fisk’s descriptions of the Israeli war on Lebanon in the 80s in his book, Pity the Nation. The parallels to our tactics in Iraq jump from each page – the missiles shot at Red Crescent ambulances mirrored in our attacks on Red Crescent ambulances in Fallujah for example, the devastating air strikes on residential neighborhoods – translate from Beirut to Sadr City with all too much ease – and the pretense of innocence surrounding Sabra and Shatila is sadly close to the US support for SCIRI death squads whose victims, while spread over a longer time, are no less mangled and murdered. Even without the persistent reports – most notably from Seymour Hersh – of Israeli advisors to US forces in Iraq, the torture and assasinations, the wholesale detentions, abuse and the “justifications” of our prison camps in Iraq recall over and over the well reported human rights violations of Israeli treatment of Palestinians prisoners.
As we’ve watched with horror the Iraeli attack on Gaza and the resulting devastation of lives and homes, we may have forgotten how closely that devastation mirrors the results of our war on and occupation of Iraq. Gaza, already debilitated by the Israeli blockade, faced three intensive weeks of brutality while we have maintained our destruction of Iraqis and their society, already debilitated by our sanctions, over years. Yet the results are horribly similar.
This parallel is actually one that the Israeli press draws as well – but with a twist. In response to the global outcry over their attack on Gaza, the Israeli press often made the argument that the IDF is still more humane than US forces in Iraq:
The truth must be said: For years the army has demonstrated insensitivity in regard to killing Palestinian civilians, certainly in times of heavy fighting… Israel does not implement murderous methods like the Russians in Chechnya, or violence on a par with American actions in Iraq.
Israeli sources have also consistently referenced American use of White Phosphorus as a justification for its own use – for example, Mark Regev, spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said:
“The type of munitions used by Israel are similar, if not identical, to munitions used by other Western democracies, including Nato members.”
And in an article describing the PR talking points the IDF was using, we find this contrast:
Specific headings of the talking points convey the assumption that would-be advocates will face questions on proportionality, use of incendiary weapons, including white phosphorous, and treatment of detainees.
On the last, the talking points stress that, unlike the status in some countries of "unlawful combatants" – a loose term that allows the detention of persons indefinitely with very little supervision or limitations – the status of "unlawful combatants in Israel is regulated by law with detailed procedures and strict scrutiny."
The presentation goes on to detail that such detainees are guaranteed "the right to meet with legal counsel; judicial review by both the district and Supreme courts on decisions pertaining to the detention and the legitimacy of the detention itself, and suitable detention conditions."
Given what we’ve seen in Guantanamo, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, they have a point.
Watching the Israelis elect a new government based on a coalition of one or another hawkish politician and the extremist Lieberman, we should also pause to think about these parallels. And as we wait to see what the new US Afghanistan strategy will be and how swiftly and how completely we withdraw from Iraq, we cannot speak of our horror at the recent events in Gaza without also acknowledging our own government’s “skid” down that same “slippery slope.”
h/t Erdla for the Gabriel Ash Primer on Israeli Elections linked above.
Photo: "Graffiti like this is often found on Palestinian houses near the Israeli settlements in Hebron. Dec. 28, 2002 – Hebron, West Bank, Palestine." A Christian Peacemaker Team photo, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License




73 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Great post, Siun. You’ve really hit the nail on the head.
(My one very small quibble is that I don’t think Co-Dependent is the right term. Co-evils seems closer to the mark.)
Diggable.
Lebanon and Gaza were about shock and awe, the idea that massive air power could win a war, something which was proved in both cases to be false.
I think the Israeli elections, like the assault on Gaza, are more important indicators that the two state solution is dead and gone. Israel is currently opting for an apartheid prison state which will ensure its pariah status. Given the increasing likelihood of a worldwide depression, Israel is going to have to bear more of the costs of its experiment in ghetto-izing 40% of Israel-Palestine’s population.
Thanks Laura!
It’s been percolating for a bit here as I read the various comments in the Israeli press. It’s interesting to see what really reads as considerable hostility to the US – both in the comparisons and in the “if the yanks aren’t ballsy enough to attack Iran we’ll do it ourselves” pieces that have been rather frequent for a year or so.
Amen, Siun! You are right on the money. Elliot Abrams, I’m looking at you.
A further parallel is the Israeli tactic of ghetto-izing the occupied population, which is exactly what the “surge” did in Iraq. Lots of ethnic cleansing, surrounding sectarian communities enclosed by cement walls reminiscent of the wall Israel is building to contain the Palestinians.
Its the divide and conquer strategy, too: Israel ghettoized the West Bank and Gaza, making traffic between the two very difficult, which had the effect of splintering Palestinian leadership into Hamas vs. Al Fatah, and giving that split a geographical basis.
It is just the opposite of what we should be advocating.
Obama has a lot of heavy lifting to do to reverse these tactics.
Bob in HI
Thanks, Siun. I’m beyond fed up with both the US and Israeli govts over Palestine.
All the possible Israeli governments are committed to an anti-peace pro-apartheid agenda.
Good point on the wall/walls … so many parallels and so much that needs change, eh?
I did read – and found flabbergasting – that … trying to remember if it was Olmert or Barak … suggested spending several billions to build a tunnel between Gaza and the West Bank last week. That seemed to confuse
the Israeli reporters as well!
Siun, great read and thanks for the Israeli election update.
Sad to say, their skid, and ours, are really just a process from a template.
Said template is how you funnel wealth upwards, control the masses, and impose some sort of unitarian hegemony locally and globally.
Today it’s muslims, they just are convenient being on top of all that oil and in the way of the future of the 1%..
In past years those in the way have been, well, no one needs me to cite history. Those oppressed merely fill a spot on the template.
Someday, it will be our turn, no doubt. And Israel’s. Irony, it’s not just for literature anymore.
OT Obama against the principle of bank nationalization, another brick in the wall of the coming depression. From ABC via TPM, Obama says:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpoi….._sense.php
Hugh, also OT – you might enjoy this interview with Tom Geoghegan about the economy … made a lot of sense to me: http://www.geogheganforcongress.com/?p=734
Thanks
Good evening, Siun:
It would be a relief to think that our nation’s fate was not tied to that of Israel, but as you make clear, the similitude of ‘policy and ‘posture’ and the shared poverty of any mature and thoughtful means of dealing with those with whom we claim to ‘differ’, suggests that a conjoined belligerency is, most likely, our sad, even pathetic ‘future’.
Sooner, rather than later, terrible disaster, and national calamity will make its presence known in both nations.
It need not be so.
But the forces of greed and unconscionable arrogance will, one fears, hold sway; the greed of those who profit from death and the arrogance of those whose understanding is far, far less than meager will drag us all into the abyss …
There is an awful poetic justice in this, for certain, but the cost to the rest of the world must, at some point, become more than may be tolerated or borne.
Then, as well shall have few supporters and even fewer friends, we may find that hubris has more of a price than simple economic depression.
Daily, it would seem, we work blithely and most diligently toward our own unhappy end …
Will our ‘end-times’ bring about the end times of the capacity of the planet to support human life?
Only time will tell. And its lips are sealed.
But what do our hearts and souls have to say on the matter?
Ah, that is the question.
A thoughtful essay on how inhuman the war-fighting practices of both countries have become and how alike.
The elections in Israel is going to produce a government that will continue those practices and the policies that produced them. Our election produced a differently-minded government.
We are on the way out of Iraq and our policy in the Afghanistan will be revised.
I certainly hope you are right Macaquerman … and we move away from the path DWBartoo describes so well.
How about “evil and bloodthirsty” Israel and America will be vanquished by the peace loving followers of Allah and all will be right with the universe?
NPR reported the outright falsehood that Hamas had taken control of Gaza by force. Also reported the standard line that Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by the US, and IIRC, NATO. NPR reported that Hamas stole supplies from NATO, ergo Israel doesn’t want to send supplies because they get stolen by Hamas, and on and on.
No mention that Hamas was duly elected by the people of Gaza. AND that BUSHCO pushed for premature elections that resulted in the election of Hamas.
As we already know, so-called liberal-media-bastion, NPR disseminates Israeli and American right-wing propaganda.
How about if we choose now, to step back from the abyss and wage peace?
Any chance of that, do you think, Raven?
Or is there no other choice but to proceed to lay waste our own sanity and then the world?
Do we have ANY choice, what do you think, my friend?
DW
Which one is the evil twin?
New post
Coeval evils. Coevils.
Dunno, can evil and bloodthirsty people change? I see little evidence from either side that change is possible.
it’s not an outright falsehod.
Hamas was elected in a democratic election and then proceeded to purge all of Fatah supporters from their posts, shooting a fair bunch of them in the process.
It’s about less than a half-truth.
oh, they wouldn’t do that
That is the dilemma for the intelligent ape, is it not?
Are we speaking fundamental human ‘nature’ or learned ‘responses’?
It think it the latter.
However, the vexing question(s) which surround this favorite ‘pastime’ of human(un)kind reminds me of a long out of print tome entitled “The Human Race” by Willy Maykit and Betty Whoant.
I lean toward Ken Wilbers “Fuck it or kill it” theory.
edit (function?) sheesh …!
“I think it the latter” ….
who is evil and blood thirsy?
I’m not familiar with that philosophy.
Could you elaborate a wee scoach?
Given that UNRWA (not NATO) accused Hamas of stealing the supplies, and Hamas apologized for the “misunderstanding,” shouldn’t this part be accepted as truth by now?
I’d describe the situation as a bit more complex than that … this outdated wikipedia article seems about right as far as it goes – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah-Hamas_conflict
Several Palestinian sources has suggested back in November that one reason Israel provoked Hamas with the first incursion on 11/4 was because talks between Hamas and Fatah were starting to make some progress … I have no idea how accurate that is but it’s an interesting bit to consider. Fatah’s reactions to the attack on Gaza have certainly been rather disheveled and have not, I think, helped their position. At the same time, Israeli crackdown’s on the West Bank during Gaza, something we have not talked about which I regret, were quite intensive and it’s hard to tell how much that influenced Fatah’s changing positions.
read the post
Here is a quote from a similar-minded essayist:
His name is David Duke
Following on, Raven, do you mean the Ken Wilber published by Shambhala,
“Integral Psychology” etc.?
Or someone else entirely?
I have been planning to write something on this when I get some time. Looking at UNRWA reports, UNRWA did accuse Hamas of taking supplies – 350 blankets and 10 trucks with a wider selection of supplies. Hamas apologizd and returned the items after UNRWA called them out and also threatened to shut off aid shipments. Hamas said it was a problem with the chaos at the shipping location but a second source suggests that Hamas also is unhappy with the fact that UNRWA supplies only go to Gazans who are registered as “refugees” rather than all Gazan residents – and that they were taking the supplies to distribute to Gazans who did not qualify under UNRWA’s guidelines.
While clearly Hamas was wrong to take the supplies, I have trouble seeing this as justification for the continued blockade by Israel which imposes a much more severe hardship on Gazan residents.
You don’t know Ken Wilber’s work? I have to admit most of it is WAY over my head but in “A Brief History of Everything” he describes the testosterone oxytocin continuum whereby men want to fuck it or kill it and women want to nurture and hug it. He contends that there was a biological reason for this continuum called “survival”. He also thinks that it is unnecessary today’s world but old habits are a bitch to break. (apologies to Ken)
You might describe the situation as more complex, as it must be, but that’s damn sure what happened.
If you can explain away the Fatah guys shot and pitched off roofs, you’re a more skilled writer than I imagine, and I think you write quite well.
We is talking about the same Ken.
Haven’t read “A Brief History …”, but it’s on my list.
BTW- that picture of the door, am I wrong in thinking that’s an old photo, like from 1985, taken in Tehran?
KenoshaKid – I am very happy to have a respectful discussion of the issues but your description of me as “similar-minded” to David Duke is quite beyond the pale.
Then again, perhaps claims of anti-semitism are the extent of your ability to debate?
It ain’t that brief. “Grit and Grace” is an incredible but heartbreaking look at short marriage and his wife’s death from cancer.
Haven’t I heard chants of a similar bent from the “Arab Street”?
As that sign.
As far as I know, the photo is:
Photo: “Graffiti like this is often found on Palestinian houses near the Israeli settlements in Hebron. Dec. 28, 2002 – Hebron, West Bank, Palestine.” A Christian Peacemaker Team photo, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
On the Hamas-Fatah battles, I would not claim that *either* side were pacifists, just that the killings were not all by Hamas.
Yes, habits are a bitch.
But, As Mark Twain said, “Quitting smoking is easy. I did it a thousand times.”
Kinda seems like it might be worth the effort to, at least, try, doncha think?
‘Course, as you said the other night, this might well be one of those things over which individuals, alone, can have but little effect?
Still, being contrary (as you know), I’m inclined to try anyhoo.
That’s kind of MY learned ‘response’.
Can’t claim lots of ’success’, but, then (and now) I’m a slow learner …
It’s the journey not the destination.
Siun, you have no trouble assigning blame for kilings most of the time.
Why, in the name of truth, can’t you simply say that Hamas purged Fatah from Gaza and killed a bunch of them doing so?
Every time you get to where Hamas acts wrongly, you dance around it. Why?
Accepting that Hamas fucks up isn’t going to lessen the cause of the Palestinian people.
Blinded by the light
The phrase “the stranglehold of the Israel lobby” sends up red flags.
Bloodthirsty doesn’t?
If you’re gonna be more sarcastic than me, I’ll feel unfulfilled.
I may not have human rights, but macaques are people too!
My bad, back in the bunker.
Macaquerman, describing the battles between Fatah and Hamas *solely* as a Hamas purge of Fatah from Gaza misstates the facts which is why I pointed to the wiki article which describes the killings by both sides in much more detail than I can do.
The language “Hamas purged Fatah” is just not very descriptive of pitched battles in which both sides did awful things.
I’m trying to think of something analogous to you likening Siun to David fucking Duke. If that’s your reply to a ‘red flag,’ you need to try decaf.
If you haven’t been reading Siun carefully these past years, you are forgiven. Go read before you bring that crap, please.
Life is a dance with death, ending in union.
Daring to risk waging peace is a bit like meeting someone “interesting”, but wishing that the other would approach first …
I say, let us be bold, as faint heart hath won but little …
It is better to be magnanimous when one is powerful than to expect fair treatment when one is weak from the exhaustion of trying to destroy another.
And ‘habits’ which are lucrative for the few, but involve pride, prejudice or the sense of godly purpose for the many, are surely the most difficult of human “games” to change.
Among such “games”, warfare and economics are the most intractable … as, in the latter case, we are certainly beginning to learn. And a painful education it shall be.
Still, yet we also choose to live by the sword … and there are intimations as to the consequence of that, as well.
Some days, it seems we featherless bipeds might learn, and thereby ‘mend’ our ways … but on too many days there is little evidence of any grasp whatever.
And then, I remember, we are on a little, rotating, slightly tipped planet, circling, at just the right distance, a second-rate star …
We live on paradise.
In the vast immensity of the universe, I know of no other place we might call home.
Silly me.
Nah, pull up a perch and peck awhile.
Would it be descriptive of shooting hospital patients and pitching policemen off of ministry roofs?
Pitched battles are fights, these were often something else.
But speakig to me larger point, are you incapable of plainly describing crimes committed by Hamas as crimes committed by Hamas? If so ,why?
It seems to weaken the moral force than your writing brings to bear so well in other instances.
my bad. i was wondering who you thought was evil and bloodthirsty.
not at all, that’s what I thought you meant
Macaquerman, I appreciate your concern … but here’s the problem I have: I have not researched the Hamas/Fatah war and so I am not certain of the facts. Given the unreliability of our usual sources, I tend to be agnostic until I have looked at multiple sources myself. Too often I discover that the accepted account is … well … not so accurate, like all those claims that the air strikes in Afghanistan killed only militants when in fact they were a wedding party. Working on such issues has made me mighty wary of adopting any given description unless I can back it up. That is not a preference for Hamas, but a caution given the all too slanted nature of our media.
That’s one reason why I try to use multiple sources for the posts I write – and lean rather heavily on sources like Ha’aretz and Jpost for example for a lot of my Gaza writing. If they are saying X happened even when X is pretty awful, the info is more reliable. Similarly, I avoid using – or rather relying – on sources like PressTV which often has great material but also has such a strong slant that I triple check and only use in conjunction with other sources.
Perhaps more ocd than immoral?
Friends and new acquaintances, just reading you all makes me tense. If I were commenting I would pause about now and take a deep breath, though obviously that’s just me.
I like your description of your methodology, it’s impossible to argue with multiple sourcing.
But, in the case of the hospital executions of the wounded and the roof pitching you can go to the BBC, Ha’aretz, the Daily Star, Asharq al-Awasat and others I no longer recall.
But again why can’t you say it plainly that sometimes Hamas murders and does other things that are neither further the cause of the Palestinian people nor accord with human decency?
My wife refuses to believe the puppy ever shits on the carpet, but has a hell of a time figuring out who’s shit it is.
Sometimes, it’s shit, Siun, and you gotta say so.
My puppy never does either … ;->
I believe I said above that both sides did awful things and mentioned killings by both sides – and I would never argue that Hamas has not done things I find dreadful and “not in accord with human decency.” What concerns me in your statement is the emphasis solely on what Hamas has done rather than on the bilateral nature of those battles and the resulting brutality.
There’s also a broader question here – of how we (big generic we) push peoples like the Palestinians into ever more desperate situations – and then point to the inevitable and brutal reactions and say “see, they deserve it.”
That is not to say that some – whether Hamas, or Fatah, or Iraqi nationalists or many other indigenous movements faced with what I would call imperialism – are not just plain awful people who do awful things. But I believe we often encourage or instigate the pathology we then decry. And I also find we are much more willing to look at those incidents of brutality than we are at our own. So we go “look at those horrid Hamas guys” but are less likely to say “look at those brutal IDF guys” or are horrified by IEDs but quite blase about air strikes on homes in Sadr City – and it is that imbalance that has my attention.
I hope your puppy is well and stays well.
I don’t think I have a problem decrying the indecency shown by the IDF, Fatah or Hamas. In the last couple of weeks, I’ve certainly done my share of showing disgust at the Gaza bombings.
As you have shown your disgust for the same.
If I was harping on Hamas tonight, it was because I have noticed a reluctance on your part to critisize their crimes. I pressed you because of the reasons I went on and on about.
I’m concerned to see that the plight of the Palestinians is eased and fear that zealotry is pressing them on every side.
I think we are approaching the end game with respect to Israel. Not that the Jewish state will be destroyed — at least not immediately — but it’s influence over US policy will recede. Americans in Depression have more pressing things to worry about than their collective guilt with respect to the United States’ response to the Holocaust. That was then, this is now. I don’t see the American military under Obama permitting an air strike on Iran as long as we have planes to scramble in Iraq. (Once we leave, it’s another matter altogether). The Depression is going to put an even bigger crimp in Israel’s economy. Israel can’t afford a long war, and it is losing the capacity to win a short one.
War? You mean army to army? With whom?
You can’t change the past, but if they want they can go in a new direction (as America is trying to do with the change from Bush to Obama).
I think Livni should discuss with Netanyahu two possibilities:
a) Netanyahu might become the Defense Minister and work very aggressively to build a wall and DMZ to separate Israel from it’s neighbors. This puts the issue of self defense squarely on the Right and gives Livni’s Foreign Minister time to smooth the way in the region with European and American help.
b) Netanyahu might push his supporters to give sufficient votes to Livni to make her Prime Minister and to have the government she wants, so she can perhaps use Ehud Barak as Defense Minister as I suggested in a).
They have an odd situation where the government is easiest formed by the Right, but the public have narrowly said they prefer Livni lead the way. This can only be resolved with a compromise.
Are they capable of compromising on something this important?
The US made that the official policy. One would think that under the circumstances of the past two years of the intense blockaid, and after this latest slaughter, that would have been rescinded; it has not been. There is a movement now with CAMERA etc. to have the designation of refugee removed from everyone. They don’t want to feed the family of any Hamas member. The US is UNRWA’s largest donor..they have no choice. The US is ok with not feeding the starving men, women, and children of Gaza.
Is Hamas wrong? Who among us would not take food and blankets under these conditions? The rules are wrong. The US gov’t is wrong. People need food and water to live. They are being denied the basics of life. To any resident trolls..don’t bother.. you won’t get a response.
” We are a delegation of 8 American lawyers, members of the National Lawyers Guild in the United States, who have come here to the Gaza Strip to assess the effects of the recent attacks on the people, and to determine what, if any, violations of international law occurred and whether U.S. domestic law has been violated as a consequence
This delegation is seriously concerned by our initial findings. We have found strong indications of violations of the laws of war and possible war crimes committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip. We are particularly concerned that most of the weapons that were found used in the December 27 assualt on Gaza are US-made and supplied. We believe that Israel’s use of these weapons may constitute a violation of US law, and particularly the Foreign Assistance Act and the US Arms Export Control Act.
A report of our initial findings will be compiled and submitted to, among others, members of the United States Congress. We intend to push for an investigation by the United States government into possible violations by Israel of US law. We also hope to contribute our finding and efforts to other efforts by local and international lawyers to push for accountability against those found responsible for the egregious crimes that we have documented. “
http://www.freegaza.org/en/hom…..gaza-strip
” In pictures: ” My street in Gaza.” “
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7844948.stm
http://thereport.amnesty.org/e…..-authority
for a view of the PA/Hamas clash
” If drivers on the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway were wondering who was responsible for hanging banners over the highway calling to “Free Palestine” – they might be surprised to discover it was an initiative by Jewish activists.
“Even if foreclosures and unemployment weren’t decimating our neighborhoods, surely there are better uses for $3 billion a year than helping the Israeli government commit war crimes.” “
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1063418.html
” Medea Benjamin, Tighe Berry and I were allowed by the Egyptian government to cross the border into Gaza last week, but for only 48 hours. At the end of the 48 hours, the Egyptians, under pressure from the Israeli and American governments, sealed off their border with Gaza putting Gaza again in an economic and political vice, as it has been for the past 16 months.
One doctor told of treating wounds that had been made by the DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosive) bomb which is designed to produce an intense explosion in a small space. The bombs are packed with tungsten powder, which has the effect of shrapnel but often dissolves in human tissue, making it difficult to discover the cause of injuries. One doctor said it looked like their legs had been sliced off. Another UK doctor told of treating a person who had been wounded by white phosphorous and then having the wound begin smoking from remaining particles of the phosphorus in the wound.
Ann Wright was in the US Army and Army Reserves for 29 years and retired as a Colonel. She was a US diplomat for 16 years and resigned in March, 2003 in opposition to the war on Iraq. She is the co-author of “Dissent: Voices of Conscience.””
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/39744