In 1934, we came closer than we’d like to think to losing our freedom. A military coup, plotted at the behest of America’s richest industrialists and media moguls, was being plotted against President Roosevelt in order to stop his New Deal. The plan was to mobilize the American Legion, whose leadership was packed with conservatives, as part of an army of 500,000 men to march to Washington and pressure FDR into resigning. The plan, inspired by the "Bonus Army" march during the Hoover Administration, required among other things the backing of key media figures to ensure that the plotters had complete spin control, as well as a charismatic figure around whom the public could rally. The figure the plotters picked was retired Marine Corps major general Smedley Butler, who was a hero for his bravery during World War One. That was a mistake, as General Butler was an honest and principled man; he played along with the plotters just long enough to get a feel for how deep the plot went, then took the news straight to the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Unfortunately, then as now, the Democrats in power were too lenient, or too awed at the prospect of sentencing members of the DuPont, Morgan and Mellon families. (It’s also rumored, as a BBC Radio 4 documentary states, that Roosevelt was focused on getting the New Deal passed, and offered leniency in exchange for Wall Street’s dropping its opposition to his programs.) Only the persons who had personally tried to recruit Butler were actually punished, and the event was soon forgotten; Butler was painted by the press as a crank, an image he unwittingly reinforced when he, as a veteran of several American wars of choice, came out against getting involved in fighting Hitler because he feared that it was just another war being waged on the behalf of the titans of industry. He died in 1940, a figure of scorn, even though he was at the time the most decorated Marine in the entire history of the Corps, and had nearly been made Commandant a decade earlier.
If this all sounds vaguely familiar to you, it’s because this incident, combined with the rumored coup plotted against President Kennedy by US Air Force general Curtis LeMay (LeMay was angry with JFK because he wanted to nuke Cuba and Kennedy wouldn’t let him), was an inspiration for the novel and film Seven Days in May.
It’s all coming to mind to me because of this particular story (CNN and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, via my co-blogger Charles at Mercury Rising) :
A military judge Thursday refused to delay proceedings against the accused mastermind of the bombing of the destroyer USS Cole despite President Obama’s call for a temporary halt to trials of suspected terrorists.
Obama ordered a 120-day delay of pending cases at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on his first day in office, requiring prosecutors to seek delays in the 14 active cases before military commissions there.
But the judge, Col. James Pohl, refused the government’s request for a delay and ordered arraignment for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri to go ahead as scheduled February 9.
As Charles points out, this stinks to high heaven, for several reasons: 1) al-Nashiri was waterboarded (the tapes were destroyed); 2) the case uses military commissions which are unconstitutional and inconsistent with the Geneva accords; 3) Obama issued an Executive Order, and Col. Pohl is giving him the middle finger.
If Colonel Pohl had tried this against Bush, he would have been busted down to Captain (if not worse) so fast his head would spin. But Charles and I both suspect his actions have approval at high levels in the military, which is not content with botching occupations and wants to get into the judicial business, if only to cover up its many, erm, indiscretions. (The repeated insubordination of General Raymond T. Odierno, backed up by prominent Capitol Hill Republicans like John McCain, only reinforces my suspcions here.)
Now, there might not be anything to my suspicions. But it won’t hurt to shine a good strong light in a few dark corners and see which cockroaches start scurrying.



57 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
I haven’t had time to read the whole text but someone tell me, whas prescott part of this attempted coup?
I think you’re right and those who ordered criminal acts against POWs are trying to stall and cover their asses.
Barack has so many fights on so many fronts … I’m glad Ali is in his corner !
Prescott Bush was part of it. Listen to the BBC radio broadcast below. And Butler was right about WW2 being another war for the titans of industry. Prescott Bush and his boss Averell Harriman had their assets seized because they were funding Hitler. They were even instrumental to Hitler’s rise to power, and they funded his private army. Hitler told the titans of industry that they would run the country, so long as they put him in front of it. Even the titans in England supported Hitler.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hi…..0723.shtml
It wouldn’t surprise me. The Guardian tells about his dealings with Hitler — done during wartime.
And who was the first civilian head of the CIA? Averell Harriman’s lawyer. They went from front door coup to back door coup.
And who was the Ambassador at Large for Southeast Asia when Kennedy decided to pull out of Vietnam? Averell Harriman. Guess what? Harriman wanted to escalate in Vietnam.
Why am I not even surprised?
So were Sec. Def. Gates in all of this? He doesn’t look good if he allows the insubordination to continue.
Essential reading on all the Bush details during WW2, The Unauthorized Biography of George HW Bush:
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
Gates seems to be in Obama’s corner. Odierno, not so much.
And who was married to Pamela Harriman?
If the troops in Gitmo can’t seem to follow the Commander in Chief’s direct orders then they should be assigned a small berth at another federal facility – Leavenworth prison, after a fair and breif trial of course.
Right, Clinton’s top financier who Clinton appointed as Ambassador to France.
So why would Obama cave to this if he really has issued the command. Isn’t he The Chief Military Commander of all the armed forces? He has the power to dismiss this guy. Why hasn’t he?
Maybe its because, just like Reagan, he wants to be all things to all people. Where exactly are his principles. I’m thinking about the stimulous bill. I’m thinking of his promise to repeal Bush’s tax cuts. Then I’m thinking of the 33% of the bill that includes more tax cuts and the 18% of the bill that is actual spending projects – you know, infrastructure. Just what does Obama really stand for? Anybody?
As a civilian, he may not be aware of just how serious this insubordination may be. And again, Democrats, for good or ill, tend to be more lenient — look at how long it took Truman to finally tell off MacArthur.
The stimulous is funding shovel ready projects. The states develop their priorities then start working on their plans somewhat ahead of time but not that far ahead as costs or priorities might change. What is represented in the stimulous bill is not all that will be funded this year as there is still the regular annual funding coming from gas taxes. This is what the states had anticipated as they brought their plans to the shovel ready place
the “brown shirts”…very similar to “blackwater”
By the way, Jules Archer, the author of the book The Plot to Seize the White House (which was reprinted in 2007), was alive and fully sentient until fairly recently. He died on November 13 of last year, nine days after Obama won the election.
This is really scary. I met some Naval Officers in Panama, and they had very hostile feelings about Obama. I asked if the high ranking admirals had taught them to think like this, and they denied it. But I suppose if you’re fed a steady diet of FOX news and Limbaugh, and taught to follow orders, that’s what you get.
I’m sure Obama is getting some good advice from the senior officers who stood behind him while he signed the EOs.
I look forward to seeing what he does with the insubordinates.
Then there’s the CIA…
And how does having all of the National Guard forces busted fit into this?
Thanks PW, I had no idea about this.
digg is open
It was my perception that Obama had quite a bit of support from the military. Maybe it is just the enlisted but still must count for something.
Digg it! Lest we forget.
Digg Boo’s … lest we dilute it.
Interesting to note the time frame. The first ever Republican smear campaign which tried out the tactic of bamboozling the public with attack ads was being tested in California that year. Muckraker Upton Sinclair was the actual winning Democratic governor candidate in 1934, which brought out Mayer and the other dinosaurs in a campaign of lies which worked, largely because no newspaper in that land of the free would dare accept even one ad from the Democrat. Even Roosevelt abandoned Sinclair, who eventually came to terms with his treatment, although we’ve been living with this vice of Extremism in defense of Extremism ever since.
Note also the Pentagon discretely set up defenses against a psychotic ploy by Nixon when he was obviously losing it late in his day. Note also I thought the case of the officer corps press conference was settled forever when Truman canned McArthur, who then proceeded to just fade away …
Butler is a local hero—born in the town I’m now living in. His name is engraved on a stone wall on the courthouse (which is the county seat) along with Bayard Rustin and a few others. His middle name, Darlington is everywhere here.
War is a Racket is a must read (very short but to the point)
not just the military insubordinates—I want to see what he does with the DoJ implants and those at EPA too—along with all the rest, of course, but those are big swamps that need draining.
Do I understand you to be upset that a judge refuses to do what the Executive branch wants? You’re worried about the judge’s independence being a threat to our liberty?
Crawford the Convening Authority can overrule Pohl. Given the chaos in Guantanamo, it is difficult to say why Pohl is acting as he is.
If you haven’t yet read James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters, which was published last spring, I strongly suggest you do so. There are two major thrusts to the book. First, he builds a strong circumstantial case for asserting that the lone gunman theory of the Warren Report was in fact part of the cover up of a conspiracy that was coordinated from within the CIA, but abetted to varying degrees by people from other federal departments and elsewhere. For this part of the book he draws heavily on the work of others, including intimidated people who came forward decades after the events of the assassination and cover up.
Where he breaks new ground, however, is in pulling together the threads of JFK’s foreign and national policy thinking to show that he was at odds with the prevailing “Cold War Theology,” to use Douglass’s term, dating well back into his days of service in Congress, and also showing how the gulf steadily widened during his presidency. Here again he builds a compelling inferential case for the motive, namely that his assassination was the work of Cold War theocrats inside and outside of government who genuinely believed that his underlying policy objective of avoiding nuclear war by diplomatically resolving conflicts with the USSR and Cuba was a lethal threat to American national security.
I generally am not inclined to conspiratorial explanations of historical events; plain old fuck-ups explain a lot more. But this book has me seriously rethinking this. I’ve read that Douglass is also working on similar books regarding RFK, MLK, and perhaps Malcolm X.
Anybody want to bet me that those traitors in 1934 didn’t accuse FDR supporters of not being patriotic?
Re my comment #29, above, Douglas in JFK and the Unspeakable asserts that Kennedy’s decision to not support a major escalation of US involvement in Vietnam was the final straw that set the JFK conspiracy in motion.
…and Churchill’s son….
I would love to see a six-degrees chart made of all the players…and their heirs
Assasination has ever been in the right wing tool box. Some people just need to avoid small planes.
You’ve got a mistake in there, PW: HUAC.
HUAC did not yet exist in 1934. Smedley Butler informed the McCormack-Dickstein Committee. See the Wikipedia page on the Business Plot.
HUAC took the place of the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1938.
Oh, BTW.
Obama does NOT have a choice now.
He either sacks Odierno and Pohl, or he invites a coup attempt.
And this time, I don’t think they’ll pick the wrong general.
It is true. The people have never really run this country. All things are modified by threat of assassination, assassination or ruin.
Chuck, you can read the minutes of the big meeting where all the forces tried to convince JFK to support a coup in Vietnam, and Kennedy is very skeptical of the whole escalation effort. Harriman was one of the participants:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/N…../index.htm
Thanks! Douglass asserts that Henry Cabot Lodge, whom JFK appointed as ambassador to Vietnam, was a major fox in the Kennedy hen house when it came to getting his policy initiatives effected. His foot-dragging short-circuited JFK’s attempts to get the Ngo brothers (Diem and Nhu) safely out of the country during the coup.
PS: Are you the Bill Walker that is/was a MN district judge?
Hi, PW. You always have thought-provoking posts.
Oddly enough, I was looking through some history books at the used bookstore yesterday, and came across both The Plot to Seize the White Houseand War is a Racket.
As far as the judge’s declining the request (it was a request from prosecutors, not an order; the prosecutors were ordered to make the request) for delay, I’m not yet sure what to make of it. Haven’t had time to think about it. Judge’s don’t have to grant requests for delay, and often don’t. (IWAL in the past) I would normally come down on the side of judge’s having independence – don’t really want Presidents to be able to order judges to do this or that. I mean, two weeks ago it was a completely different President, so….
Have to make some errand runs, but I’m going to follow up your links and comments later.
thanks for bringing it up–definitely want to keep shining those lights into corners!
(Even now, there’s so much to keep up with!)
I agree: War is a Racket is a must read. The plot hasn’t changed since Butler wrote it and was vilified for writing it, only the characters.
Maj. General Butler twice won the Medal of Honor, so he knew a thing or two about courage in the face of seemingly overwhelming odds. Pity today’s Dems know so little about courage when they have the wind at their back and a following sea. Time for them to stop letting bloggers and late-night comics carry all their water.
No, I’m not a judge. Have you seen this documentary pointing to young GHWB as one of the Kennedy conspirator?
http://video.google.com/videop…..38;q=jfk+2
There are two documents linking him to that fateful day. I’m not sure how many links FDL allows in one post. When he ran for president in ‘88 he had to answer questions about one of the documents, and claimed it was another George Bush…
This military judge may have been acting within his discretion. Obama can settle the matter by shutting down these kangaroo courts. These prisoners all need to be re-vetted. Most should be set free with an apology and compensation. A few deserve trial, though that will be difficult because of the criminal abuse meted out at President Bush’s orders.
The military’s top brass thought they could handle the young President Kennedy, too, especially extremists like Maxwell Taylor. Obama should be able to handle them ably.
Most of their concern will be about their own futures and the future of their branch of service. Some of them, too sycophantic to Mr. Bush and his war, war, war instead of Churchill’s famous jaw, jaw, jaw, should be quickly retired with full pomp and circumstance. Let them continue their wars moving salt shakers and walnuts across the linen covered tables at the Army & Navy Club. Replace them with leaders willing to lead our military against tomorrow’s threats, not Mr. Cheney’s bogeymen, men and women who recognize that following orders applies only to orders the comply with the law and the Constitution.
I don’t think it the high ranking (generals, admirals) officers we have to worry about so much as the ones coming up *. While many of them are quite conservative, I believe they for the most part still respect civilian authority. The Talibangelicals have been making a concerted effort to seed the service academies with their spawn over the past couple of decades and have been succeeding quite well. Mikey Weinstein and his associates at the Military Religious Freedom Foundation are getting more and more reports of in-your-face evangelism on the part of Army field grade officers (O-4 thru O-6) and their equivalents in the other services. The chaplain corps have been almost entirely taken over by the movement. Weinstein wrote in his book that when he was a cadet at the USAFA during the 1970s there were 4 chaplains: a Roman Catholic; a Jew; and two mainstream protestants. At the time of the events involving his sons at the Air Force academy about five years ago that led him to set up the foundation he wrote there were about 15 chaplains. All but two or three were evangelical Christians, and they drew heavily on the resources of the Religious-Industrial Complex that is the nearby city of Colorado Springs. And there were 500 fewer cadets!
I read a comment on a military-oriented blog a while back in which the writer lamented the fact that while in his day the typical safety alternatives of hopeful service academy appointees included the likes of UMich, Berkeley, Texas and Georgia Tech, these days it’s more likely to be campuses such as Wheaton, Regent, and Oral Roberts. It’s my understanding that the religious right is also populating the ROTC programs. Religious fanaticism and guns in the service of the state don’t mix!
* That’s not to say that our military leadership is not a cause for concern for other reasons. See Don Vandergriff’s and G. I. Wilson’s Chapter 3 in America’s Defense Meltdown, which you can download for free in PDF here.
It’s unlikely that anything Curtis LeMay did after the Cuban Missile Crisis inspired the novel “Seven Days in May,” which was published in 1962. The Cuban missile crises took place in October, too late in the year to have much to do with inspiring the book, given publishing lead times.
“Religious fanaticism and guns in the service of the state don’t mix!” Are you disparaging the Federal Bureau of Investigation for any particular reason?
Why not talk about religious fanaticism and guns in the hands of the police? You don’t live in Los Angeles, do you?
Here’s a TV interview with Prescott Bush where he’s asked if there’s a small cabal actually running Washington. He dismisses the notion:)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8pFS0P8i38
Just remember that psychosis has many, many faces and most of the time it is presented as being correct and normal or given rhetorical names such as “traditional”, “family values” or even “holy”.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.c…..ishop.html
I watched the video. It didn’t say what you said it did.
I am presently reading the book you reference, JFK and the Unspeakable, by James Douglass. I am reading how things came down in the 50’s and 60’s and the picture is very different than that we were fed by the newspapers and TV news back then. (I was then in my late 20’s).
As I read, I am repeatedly struck by the likeness of JFK’s position then regarding Cuba, Vietnam and dealing with Kruschev’s Russia and the dire problems Obama faces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, the Israeli/Palestinian conflicts, the ugly CIA as revealed by ‘Cheney’s Law’, etc..
I highly recommend this book. (I ordered it from Amazon.com).
Here is the YouTube link to a 58 minute talk about the book by the author. Well worth watching.
Talk, JFK and the Unspeakable
prescott bush was a nazi traitor.
bush 41 was a drug dealer and involved in operation paper clip.
bush 43 was an idiot surrounded by nazis.
the nazi family bush has a long history of trying to kill our democracy.
we still have a chance in jebediah.
keep your fingers crossed.
Robert Gates knows everything that’s going on and if Obama is soft Gates should be demanding the resignation of that colonel. Officers aren’t above being court-martialled. But then again Gates was a mole on the NSC while Carter was president and he was allegedly present in Paris when Poppy and Casey made their October Surpirse promises to the Iranians.
Gates should be out of the friggin government now.
More evidence that assassinations and coups d’etat have always been a part of the American oligarchy’s modus operandi. Without employing murder and war for profit, they could not have held onto their power for so long.
Tim Fleming
http://www.eloquentbooks.com/MurderOfAnAmericanNazi.html
http://leftlooking.blogspot.com
I have been contemplating these same things and working on a post about them. When I finish I may put it up on Oxdown as well as my own blog.
Thanks for the video link.
Posting a link to a work of fiction seems like a surprisingly meager offer of “proof” of perfidy.
Minnesotachuck, I’m glad to know that someone else sees these disturbing similiarities. This would be a book that Obama should read. If he bucks the system it is likely to lead him on the same journey.
I am particularly amazed at the convoluted false-flag operations that the CIA/military/mafia/war profiteers dreamed up – - and used successfully too often.
Please do an article on Oxdown. I’ll be watching for it.
I did a search for your blog using your name here….got nowhere. So, what’s the url for your blog?