It’s been a long haul for Lilly Ledbetter. But today, President Obama signed the Fair Pay Act into law that bears her name.
This law will not go back and restore all those years of less pay for being a woman. Nor will it equalize her pension — based on her lesser pay amounts — even though Lilly was widowed in December and could probably use the extra money these days.
But it at least helps all the women to come behind her, and their families…and all the analogous civil rights cases to come. That is something enormous.
Gail Collins detailed some of the foremothers of women’s workplace equality today. To her list, I’d add Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Here’s what President Obama had to say at the signing of the bill:
Well, this is a wonderful day.
First of all, it is fitting that with the very first bill I sign – the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act – we are upholding one of this nation’s first principles: that we are all created equal and each deserve a chance to pursue our own version of happiness.
It is also fitting that we are joined today by the woman after whom this bill is named – someone Michelle and I have had the privilege of getting to know for ourselves. Lilly Ledbetter didn’t set out to be a trailblazer or a household name. She was just a good hard worker who did her job – and did it well – for nearly two decades before discovering that for years, she was paid less than her male colleagues for the very same work. Over the course of her career, she lost more than $200,000 in salary, and even more in pension and Social Security benefits – losses she still feels today.
Now, Lilly could have accepted her lot and moved on. She could have decided that it wasn’t worth the hassle and harassment that would inevitably come with speaking up for what she deserved. But instead, she decided that there was a principle at stake, something worth fighting for. So she set out on a journey that would take more than ten years, take her all the way to the Supreme Court, and lead to this bill which will help others get the justice she was denied.
Because while this bill bears her name, Lilly knows this story isn’t just about her. It’s the story of women across this country still earning just 78 cents for every dollar men earn – women of color even less – which means that today, in the year 2009, countless women are still losing thousands of dollars in salary, income and retirement savings over the course of a lifetime.
But equal pay is by no means just a women’s issue – it’s a family issue. It’s about parents who find themselves with less money for tuition or child care; couples who wind up with less to retire on; households where, when one breadwinner is paid less than she deserves, that’s the difference between affording the mortgage – or not; between keeping the heat on, or paying the doctor’s bills – or not. And in this economy, when so many folks are already working harder for less and struggling to get by, the last thing they can afford is losing part of each month’s paycheck to simple discrimination.
So in signing this bill today, I intend to send a clear message: That making our economy work means making sure it works for everyone. That there are no second class citizens in our workplaces, and that it’s not just unfair and illegal – but bad for business – to pay someone less because of their gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion or disability. And that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory, or footnote in a casebook – it’s about how our laws affect the daily realities of people’s lives: their ability to make a living and care for their families and achieve their goals.
Ultimately, though, equal pay isn’t just an economic issue for millions of Americans and their families, it’s a question of who we are – and whether we’re truly living up to our fundamental ideals. Whether we’ll do our part, as generations before us, to ensure those words put to paper more than 200 years ago really mean something – to breathe new life into them with the more enlightened understandings of our time.
That is what Lilly Ledbetter challenged us to do. And today, I sign this bill not just in her honor, but in honor of those who came before her. Women like my grandmother who worked in a bank all her life, and even after she hit that glass ceiling, kept getting up and giving her best every day, without complaint, because she wanted something better for me and my sister.
And I sign this bill for my daughters, and all those who will come after us, because I want them to grow up in a nation that values their contributions, where there are no limits to their dreams and they have opportunities their mothers and grandmothers never could have imagined.
In the end, that’s why Lilly stayed the course. She knew it was too late for her – that this bill wouldn’t undo the years of injustice she faced or restore the earnings she was denied. But this grandmother from Alabama kept on fighting, because she was thinking about the next generation. It’s what we’ve always done in America – set our sights high for ourselves, but even higher for our children and grandchildren.
Now it’s up to us to continue this work. This bill is an important step – a simple fix to ensure fundamental fairness to American workers – and I want to thank this remarkable and bi-partisan group of legislators who worked so hard to get it passed. And this is only the beginning. I know that if we stay focused, as Lilly did – and keep standing for what’s right, as Lilly did – we will close that pay gap and ensure that our daughters have the same rights, the same chances, and the same freedom to pursue their dreams as our sons.
Thank you.
And thank you, Lilly — for standing up when so many others would have just stayed silent. Bravo.
(YouTube — President Obama’s remarks on the signing of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.)
Related posts:
- Who Has Signed On to DeGette Letter to Block the Stupak Amendment?
- BREAKING: Reid Puts Public Option in the Senate Bill
- Breaking: Obama Writes Letter Opposing Inclusion of Graham-Lieberman in Supplemental
- Obama Continues to “Believe” Public Option Would Improve Quality, Lower Costs
- BREAKING: Stunning al-Haramain Filing Shames Obama; Shows Duplicity of Officials





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Here Here for equality!
Huzzah!
Can I just say how nice it was to finally be able to type this up? I got to meet Lilly in Denver and she is such a sweetheart. Good for her for continuing to fight when so many others would have just given up…
Thanks, Christy for the post and for all of your superb writing on this subject. Its about time.
Feels like I’ve been writing about this issue for years…because, really, I have been. It’s been a long time coming, hasn’t it?
I still can’t believe that we needed another law to fix this ” All Men are created Equal”
All Men and Women since we are enlightened a bit more than the founding fathers were Should also get paid equal for the same job.
You’ve come a long way, baby.
I think that was a line from a commercial way back when but it just felt right.
This is progress and I LIKE IT!!
i never read this bill, but on the previous thread ecahn mentioned that what was passed was washed down and there was only a two years restoration.
hopefully ecahn will give more info and/or does anyone know more about this? or do i need to read the bill?
Will the Supreme Court find a loophole in this law to aid big business?
It restores the law to what it was interpreted as before the SCOTUS decision in Ledbetter — meaning that you can file the claim within 180 days of discovery of discriminatory practice. My understanding in reading through the bill was that there was no expansion of the rights, merely a restoration to what they already were believed to be before Roberts and Co. got their hands on the decision.
Good Question a lawyers opinion though would be good.
How about if you can’t afford a lawyer?
It isn’t often that our political elites do something right but they did here and they should be applauded for it. Most of the credit, however, goes to Lilly Ledbetter who fought this issue to the Supreme Court and forced our political Establishment to act. Good for her. Good for the Congress and good for Obama. Now on to Employee Free Choice.
It’s a beautiful thing. How could this so-called modern culture support such backwardness for so long?
I didn’t read it either. But on NPR this morning, they said that there was only a 2-year restoration for pay inequities and nothing wrt pension. Seemed pretty weak if that’s an accurate report and I understood it correctly. Anyone who knows more, feel free to inform.
The 22%ers have yet to evolve?:)
Most cases of employment discrimination are litigated on a contingent fee basis — meaning you hire a lawyer who agrees to work for a percentage of whatever verdict you get. At least that’s how it works here in terms of the plaintiff’s bar in most labor cases I know of…
Can be different in different jurisdictions, I’d assume, but contingent fee in these types of cases is a fairly standard way to go about it, I am pretty sure.
Cbl rarely lets it out but she is a crusader from way back. (and because we have been inseperable for 20 years that makes me one also) We have been rooting for this one for a while. Perhaps true social justice across the board is achievable.
Sorry but that created equal stuff ends when the sperm meets the egg. Equality ends there.
thanks! much appreciated.
I wonder if Ms Ledbetter can make a few bucks showing the Democratic leadership how to develop some backbone. This is a wonderful day. I have not felt this proud of our Congress, when it come to equal rights, since the passage of Title 9 in1972.
i am not surprised in the slightest to know that – cheers for cbl2 and oldnslow too!
Christy, thanks for getting behind this and staying there. Honestly? I doubt I’d have known (much) about Lily Ledbetter’s situation had I not read about it here. Amazing how often that happens re FDL! *g*
D’ya think the 78% should spread the word?
(blushing demurely) Thank you, Selise.
Cool!
This has been a bit of a pet issue for me, I’ll admit. My granny had to work three jobs buying back her own home when my grandfather sold their business and house out from under her and took off with a secretary.
My mom, aunt and granny had next to nothing as she worked like crazy to buy back her own home while he lived high on the hog at a time when men owned the property and women got what they were given. Sad to say.
I grew up in a family of very strong women who worked very hard for what they have, and I really respect other women who do the same. Lilly is truly a gem of a human being, having been blessed to meet her when I was in Denver. And I’m so glad, for her sake, that this has passed and been signed finally.
ot – whitehouse up at senate budget committee hearing on global economy:
bush created $8 trillion in debt compared to where we were heading at the beginning of his administration
ss and medicare is $50 trillion in unfunded entitlement
clear and present economic danger.
we can’t nickel and dime about a trillion or two.
but we’re letting ceos rip off $10’s of billions while having to fight over whether or not to save the auto industry. people are losing trust in the gov. what does this mean for ability to govern?
Oh my!
Was Obama scolding the Supremes?
Yes. Yes, he was. And he’s right — he took a page from Justice Ginsburg’s vocal dissent from the bench, there.
Sure The 22%ers have yet to evolve that and GOP Sociopaths without Empathy for others cannot be said to have a Soul.
No wonder you’re such a social justice advocate! I didn’t know this story. I was once married to a man who more or less did the same thing. Kinda riles the gizzard, doesn’t it?!
Sorry for the offtopic. But I am a little bit in shock.
Salon:Postmaster General: Mail days may need to be cut. Pardon me if I am just a little suspicious that this is more shockdoctrine rollover from the Chimp regime. I wasn’t too happy when they got rid of the overseas book rate. Does anybody know what is going on?
To be twisted to screw people over! Justice/Laws are a restraint on freedom we accept in order to be protected, not exploited!
Go, Granny, go Granny, go Granny go.
Read a little about that this morning, too — the theory is that with the declining economy, commercial mailers are falling off as well. Since most folks use e-mail rather than regular letters these days, the postal profitability isn’t what it used to be without commercial mailers (catalogs, solicitations, etc.).
So they are contemplating cutting back to a 5-days-a-week delivery instead of 6. Only contemplating at this stage, though.
The prosecutor from the Illinois House of Representatives has just finished his summation before the Illinois Senate in Blagojevich’s impeachment trial. Blago is currently in the building and will shortly make a closing statement of his own. You can listen to a live stream here:
http://will.illinois.edu/
Click on AM580Live for listening options.
Siun’s up.
I could be wrong. But I always suspect Bush appointee malarkey and mismanagement in the works with agencies. So I feel there is always something going on behind talk of solvency. When I’ve heard USPS referred to as a “monopoly,” and I know how much the Chimp administration loves private vs. public, I suspect the USPS is being considered the last bastion of commie-ism (especially when it was apparently referred to as the “university” during the depression, being a great employers of university professors et al.) . . .
I don’t like it. A friend of mine used to say there are two great things about the U.S., education and the postal service.
thanks listening now. sound like just commentary – do i have the correct station?
Selise, did you catch the hearing when the post master general said all this?
never mind – they just confirmed blago 90min statement coming up.
no i’m sorry, i didn’t. :(
It also seems like this approach has been brought before in 2001 with Bob Barr not liking it one bit.
Lawmakers came down hard on the U.S. Postal Service”s plan to explore eliminating Saturday mail delivery, with one House member calling it a “fatal mistake” that could destroy the agency. “This is one of the most self-defeating proposals I”ve heard in my life,” Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.), said yesterday.
“If there”s one thing the Postal Service could do that would guarantee its demise, it”s eliminate service on Saturday.”
Facing $2 billion to $3 billion in projected losses this year, the Postal Service has announced numerous cutbacks over the past months. On Tuesday, agency officials said they would investigate the possibility of ending virtually all Saturday mail delivery and closing some post offices and facilities. The changes would require congressional approval.
Postmaster General William J. Henderson told the House Government Reform Committee on yesterday that the poor economy and declining mail volume had hit the agency hard. He urged changes in the law to give the post office more flexibility in setting rates and services to contend with rising costs. It now takes almost a year to change rates.
Thanks!
There is also an archive link down the page on the left, if people miss it.
I missed the beginning so, will be looking for it later.
The Rush Limpballs Party says it’s bad for businesses if they have to pay women the same wage as men. I’m sure they will be bleating that this will cause businesses to lay off more workers or just go out of business altogether. Why can’t those damn women stay in the kitchen with Dick Armey’s wife?
Limpballs/Bible Spice 2012!
Thank you Christy.
This is a good day.
I can’t remember the last time we had six day deliveries in Canada. I can, however, remember when we had two and three delivers per day in the United States. Granted, I was young, and a postage stamp was 3 cents, but all the the same …
Anybody familiar with the biggest gender discrimination class-action lawsuit EVER filed in this country? Dukes vs. WalMart?
I don’t know if today’s ruling will have any effect on that case ,but it has NOT yet gone to court.
I certainly don’t see how Lily Ledbetter act could HURT the Dukes case!
Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dec 20, 2008 … Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is an ongoing (as of 2007 [update]) U.S.$11 billion sexual discrimination lawsuit, and the largest civil …
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dukes_v._Wal-Mart_Stores,_Inc. – 25k – Cached – Similar pages
ERA: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores. As the first step in our Retail Discrimination Project, ERA and its co-counsel filed a class action sex discrimination lawsuit …
http://www.equalrights.org/professional/walmart.asp – 14k – Cached – Similar pages
Women vs. Wal-Mart – Salon.com Nov 22, 2004 … Dukes was fed up — and she wasn’t the only one. The suit, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., was eventually expanded to represent 1.6 million …
dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2004/11/22/wal_mart/ – 35k – Cached – Similar pages
Congratulations for apparently winning the battle over this issue. That said, it’s a bad law predicated on a badly misunderstood statistic.