As Barack Obama spoke of hope in a Wilmington park named for Harriet Tubman and abolitionist Thomas Garrett, just north of the Mason-Dixon line, some Republicans were still setting loose the dogs along the freedom trail.
Last week, Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and some embarrassed but silently capitulating GOP state senators destroyed legislative tradition and subverted procedures intended to protect against "the tyranny of the majority," to pass a regressive voter identification bill. Twelve Angry Democrats in the Senate did their best. But they were outnumbered. In the Right’s theory of democracy, minorities should sit down, shut up, and do what they’re told.
The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for barriers to voting, of course. The court’s opinion in the Indiana voter ID case was bad enough. But Judge Richard Posner, of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, did a more honest job of articulating the elitist logic of voter suppression when he penned his opinion approving the Indiana law.
Posner acknowledged that Democrats would likely suffer from the law. The votes of poor, the elderly, African-Americans, Latinos, and other minorities might be lost. "…the Indiana law will deter some people from voting," Posner said matter-of-factly.
This doesn’t bother Posner, who once wrote that political participation distracts citizens from their more important obligation: buying stuff. Time taken for voting and other forms of participation is time people aren’t in the malls, and that will hurt the economy, he said. I’m not making this up. It’s in his book, "Law, Pragmatism, And Democracy."
I was on the floor of the state Senate shortly before this debacle began. I heard loudmouth GOP Senator Dan Patrick, a hate-radio host, calmly (for once) explain to reporters that because there are more Republicans (19) than Democrats (12) in the upper chamber, important decisions should be left to the exclusive authority of the majority.
Patrick was arguing for an end to a "two-thirds" rule, by which any 11 senators could block debate on a bill. That rule, following the careful logic of the Framers, was intended to guard against the "tyranny of the majority," always a dire threat to democracy.
Patrick doesn’t know this, obviously. Neither does Dewhurst. Neither did George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, or a host of other spoiled authoritarians who long for the days when white skin and greenbacks meant they could tell everyone else what to do. Under penalty of torture, even.
The good news is that democracy is resilient. Voices have risen in protest against these authoritarian excesses. No more Tom DeLay. No more Bush or Cheney. No McCain.
The bad news is this democratic resiliency is the very reason the Right wants to pass new restrictions on voting.
All this came home to me this weekend, just as Obama delivered his message of hope in Wilmington’s historic Tubman Garrett Park. Nancy Becker, my sweetheart Margie’s mother, is throwing an inauguration day party in Austin. Her dear friend, Betty Garrett, married Jack Garrett, the great-great grandson of abolitionist Thomas Garrett. Betty has come to Texas to celebrate with Nancy. She told me the story.
When Tubman Garrett Park was dedicated a decade ago, Betty’s granddaughter Megan, who couldn’t quite see over the podium, read a letter written by William Lloyd Garrison to her courageous forebear. Thomas Garrett suffered mightily for keeping 2,000 or so escaped slaves safe in his home as they traveled to freedom on the Underground Railroad.
Two traditions, one of freedom, the other of oppression, and both were alive at the founding of American. They are alive today, among our families and friends, among the families and friends of our opponents. I am lucky to have a representative of the tradition of freedom with us in Texas this week as we celebrate the new presidency of Barack Obama.
Those who would suppress the votes of their fellow Americans live in the tradition of slave-owners and bigoted fools whose hope for supremacy depends upon the oppression of others.
Follow the drinking gourd. The dogs are still behind us on the trail.



42 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
ZED!
“This doesn’t bother Posner, who once wrote that political participation distracts citizens from their more important obligation: buying stuff. Time taken for voting and other forms of participation is time people aren’t in the malls, and that will hurt the economy, he said.”
Glenn – sorry, as the joke goes, “That’s not my chob, man.” American’s woke up and discovered what their ‘job’ was in time for the election in November.
Yes, they did. But it was like the first day on the job. Many more workdays to come.
That is true, Glenn — but I also think that Americans actually LIKED that ‘first day of work’ and want to keep that feeling of participation and fighting for the right thing going. It may seem sort of silly to talk about all the people out there in the US (and actually overseas also) who are holding Inauguration Parties next week but I think that is a continuation of it..that feeling of ‘we, the People, did it!!”
There must be hundreds of thousand of inauguration parties. What a great, hopeful, sign. I hope I’m not ignoring the hope. It’s just that I hear the baying of the hounds still.
OK Pups after some problems with DIGG site I was able to open the DIGG for ya to support the Lake and this fine Post by Glenn. So go Digg this post.
Glenn the tactic of suppressing the vote is
SOP for the Republicans as they know that if everyone votes they will never win an office either local or national. They sure don’t play very nicely. We need to have new voting law that allows all citizens to register and vote. SCOTUS as it is now constituted will always favor the Republicans…. they were put in office by them.
You’re so right. I’ve been writing about voter suppression for a long time. A surprising number of people simply don’t look at it as the crime it should be. What crime deserves more severe punishment in a democracy than subverting the institution upon which it depends — voting?
Glenn – I’m hearing the noise too — and perhaps I’m misinterpreting the noise, but I’m thinking ‘the baying of the hounds’ is US. (not to flog my own stuff, but I wrote on this: http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/3076)
I think it’s ‘the great national howl for justice’. When we’ve got people like Nancy “Impeachment is off the table” Pelosi saying today on Fox Snooze that she thinks that the Bush Administration needs to be investigated for the AUSA firings, that means she is hearing it too.
Dugg..but it’s not showing up here.
Can’t resist asking any longer. Is that cute pupper one of yours?
Another option is to start a funding drive that would support ACORN to go in to these states and start a process of getting those who would be disenfranchised the necessary identification to vote. This would have the added benefit of causing wingnut heads to explode
47 hrs & 10 min
We’re singing over the barking. And gotta keep it up.
There are some who would just as soon keep us in the past !!
it’s a cute one
If history is a guide, they always fail.
“What does not change/is the will to change.”
–Charles Olson
Thanks very much Glenn.
It sure would be nice IF voter suppression was made a felony with a minimum of 10 years of solitary for every instance of the suppression. That just might just stop this nonsense of taking away the most basic freedom of a citizen to vote the way they want to! I would be dancing in the street to see such a law passed. All these stupid requirements are plain stupid… beside in California they use the voter lists as a source of jurors the “Other” civic duty you have. Also maybe like Australia if we had a law that fined you if you didn’t vote might really bring out the vote so no one could complain about who got elected..
Hey BB staying warm? You must miss SoCal big time at this time of year.
Musta cleaned the shit out of her ears.
Plus: same day registration, election-day holiday.
The Rethugs set themselves up for all this grassroots activity and then can’t stop whining when all their crap is OBE.
OT I mentioned earlier today that the NYT needs a big infusion of money because for some reason its commitment to shitty reporting hasn’t turned out to be the successful business model Pinch Sulzberger thought it would.
Well this is the kind of reporting that got them where they are today:
Obama Urged to Move Swiftly to Rescue Banks
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01……html?_r=1
That would be their crap assets if anyone is wondering.
Dugg.
Thanks.
Oh, JHFC.
,
That should read “………how to relieve banks of their rapidly deteriorating a$$holes.
Nationalize them! Sell off pieces
46 hrs & 43 min
Oh and do you think they are hiding their real profits in those overseas “Tax havens” Gee maybe even the people’s money they already got and won’t lend out! Any Bank that has overseas Tax hideouts should be allowed to just die or pay the back taxes they should have paid had they not hidden the money overseas. They sure don’t deserve to to give one red cent!
I think their plan all along was to establish enough institutional barriers to attacks on their power that public opinion would be, more or less, irrelevant. Obama was a surprise. The level of public engagement committed to their undoing also surprised them.
2008 could be to them what 1989 was to Eastern European totalitarian regimes. The trick is, though, to use restore real democracy and use it’s barriers to thwart a return of the monsters.
What they don’t realize is they’re setting themselves up for an even greater debacle in 2010.
If the banks are nationalized does the ownership of the subsidiaries transfer also?
46 hrs & 37 min
Yes, they are. Their conundrum is the actions they want to take to prevent the 2010 debacle are the very actions that could bring it about.
To quote their most famous moron, “Bring it on.”
Here’s Wisconsin’s neocon
toolAttorney General: Van Hollen appeals voter rulingBut when it comes to drunk drivers, he’s a squish.
First drunken driving offense shouldn’t be crime, Van Hollen says
Oh, man, the pooh bahs at Citi, et al, would start leaping from windows if they were nationalized.
Did this guy’s mother have any children that lived?
Typical. They get positively frantic when their efforts to thwart the will of the people are themselves thwarted.
Maybe they will all have to follow Vitter’s lead and start wearing diapers *g*
46 hrs & 29 min
Gotta go feed the strays at work. Later.
Namaste.
Can I watch them jump??? After how they have screwed the pooch they deserve to be penalized heavily for their actions especially because they wont lend out our money(bail out) and because of the rates they are all charging for credit cards as high as 30%+!! WTF kind of “lending” is that… sounds more like a loan shark to me!
Let me get this straight. The Party of Lincoln upholds the tradition of slavery? Now I understand.
History instruction at your school stopped at 1865, eh?
Events of the “Redemption” era and the Compromise of 1877 make nahant’s proposition at least defensible.
I hit the wrong “reply to” button. I wasn’t refuting nahant. Did the G.O.P.’s platform change to pro-slavery sometime after 1865? My school certainly didn’t teach that.
Several thoughts:
1) You guys who are so upset about the (possible) elimination of the “two-thirds rule” in the Texas Senate do realize, I hope, that this wonderful, progressive rule which the bad anti-freedom majority guys are trying to eliminate is an EXACT analogue of the filibuster provisions in the U.S. Senate? When the 40 or 41 or whatever minority of — ahem — the other party begin to filibuster profusely in the next two years, which seems quite likely, I hope — and am certain, good freedom lovers that you are — that you will be as tender and solicitous of their rights, and those of their supporters, as you are of their analogues in Texas. Only seems just, eh?
2) Concerning the main point of the article, the greater documentation requirements for voting, and not addressing the pretty poor arguments against it, I have another “consistency” question. I assume that given your rabid (well, “rabid” is such an ugly word. How about “extreme?”) support for voting rights that you will all immediately advise Pelosi/Reid, or whomever represents you in Congress, that you totally oppose the labor bill laughably (and cynically) entitled by its authors the “Employee Free Choice Act?” You know, the one that takes away workers’ secret ballot rights. (They ARE so inconvenient sometimes, and sometimes even lead to the WRONG RESULT. (Gasp!!) Please assure me that’s so, and I can go to sleep happy tonight.