I was on a call today with Caroline Frederickson of the ACLU, talking about their efforts to push rule of law issues to the fore with the incoming Obama Administration and the 111th Congress. They’ve posted a link to their full agenda here, including a link to ACLU’s recommendations to the transition team.
The report itself outlines any number of issues we’ve been talking about for ages as needing reform, including broad-brush emphasis on:
The branches of our government, co-equal in theory, are out of balance. The executive branch has overreached – engaging in unlawful and immoral torture, conducting warrantless wiretapping, illegally detaining innocent individuals without judicial authority, spying on citizens based on race, ethnicity, religious or political views. The legislative branch has acquiesced in many of these efforts and failed until recently to exercise its oversight authority to call the administration into account. The judicial branch, meanwhile, has curtailed programs designed to protect vulnerable populations from discrimination. It’s time for a new paradigm.
Congress must conduct a full investigation into the abuses of executive authority in the years since 9/11 and the new administration should promptly appoint a special counsel to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute those who may have broken the law. Just as importantly, Congress must undertake, and the President must support, a comprehensive legislative program to restore the rule of law and the rights of individual Americans, including the following:
– Restoring appropriate limits on governmental power
— Re-establishing and advancing each individual’s right to live free of discrimination; and
— Setting meaningful standards to re-establish and preserve the right to speak freely.
Particular issues highlighted include reforms to: interrogation and detention; PATRIOT Act; REAL ID; state secrets; drug sentencing, juvenile justice and civil liberties strenghtening, including issues of racial profiling; employment discrimination; and strengthening first amendment protections, including issues surrounding FISA and elsewhere. More on this going forward, I’m certain.
Additionally, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) held a press call yesterday regarding the need to close Gitmo, including issuing a fairly thorough report on a number of the issues involved in that. The call included some difficult discussion about some of the juvenile detainees — kids who were picked up as teenagers and who have been held at Gitmo for years.
Said Vincent Warren, Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, “On the seventh anniversary of the arrival of the first detainees it turns out the single most important factor in determining who still remains at Guantánamo is nationality— whether we’re talking about the approximately 60 men who cannot be returned home and need other countries to take them in or about which countries have had the clout to get their people home. Closing the place down is not the great challenge it’s being made out to be. Let us close Guantánamo without delay and close this shameful chapter in our nation’s history. Let’s do it and be done with it.”
Yesterday on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” President-elect Obama called closing the infamous prison camp “more difficult than a lot of people realize,” yet the attorneys who filed the first cases on behalf of the detainees and are more knowledgeable about the issue than most disagree.
“One of the most important things President Obama can do is shut down the fatally flawed military commissions on Day 1,” said Lieutenant Commander William Kuebler, U.S. military defense counsel for Canadian juvenile Omar Khadr. “If he does not act in the first six days of his administration, he will be the first president in U.S. history to preside over the trial of a child soldier for war crimes.”
CCR has also issued a number of white paper reports for which they have been meeting with the Obama transition team and members of Congress in an effort to push forward a rule of law agenda in upcoming months.
Additionally, the NYTimes recently printed three op-eds on restoration of the rule of law and accountability for torture and other lawbreaking the last few years from Dahlia Lithwick, Jack Balkin and Charles Fried. I found Dahlia’s particularly compelling, especially this quote from Robert Jackson:
“Law shall not stop with the punishment of petty crimes by little people. It must also reach men who possess themselves of great power.”
Amen. I am awfully glad to see this discussion in such a highly public forum.
There have been a number of mixed signals in recent days about all of these issues. But some very hopeful ones as well, including some coming from members of Congress (more on that to come). Restoration of the rule of law is not going to happen overnight — but the fact that people are not only thinking seriously about needed changes, but pushing hard for them? That’s the most hopeful sign of all.
Video from Rachel Maddow interview with Gitmo defense lawyer AF Major David J. R. Frakt
Related posts:
- Restoring the Rule of Law: Absence of Action is a Policy Choice, Too
- White House Denies Existence of Indefinite Detention Order; ACLU Demands Accountability
- CIA Torture Report Remains Under Wraps; Has Rule of Law Resurfaced?
- Harry Reid “Would Welcome a Legislative Proposal” to Repeal DADT
- On the Rule of Law and Crimes of Torture





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Christy, you are one busy person!!
Perris, STILL your weary heart!
From Jack Balkin:
I hope that Obama can figure this out, no light then we are doomed to keep doing the same crap.
It’s been a bit of a crazy week, I’ll give you that…
The example I keep giving with people who are more inclined to forget and forgive is this: look how many Iran-Contra and Nixonian asshats we’ve had to deal with the last eight years. And look where that got the country.
I think that make the point rather bluntly.
I thought folks would appreciate that there are folks — beyond us and a few other bloggers — who are pushing on accountability and honesty and restoration of the rule of law.
bingo christy, bingo
neither cheney nor rumsfeld would have been here to do this had they been held to account for their past crimes
Christy, your doing yeomans work here keeping ontop of this issue. Thank you. I have been thinking that we might get some important clues from Holders hearings on thursday but after todays Clinton hearings I am not so sure.
162 hrs & 44 min
Dems have been missing in action in the past in calling out the mis-guided crap of the Reagan and Bush 1 administrations. They guys were never held accountible. Negroponte with bloody hands had power under Bush 2, that should have never happened.
I figure someone needs to do it. Might as well be me, right?
You will be making the world safer for Peanut and many other little ones.
Thanks for doing it
162 hrs & 40 min
we’re told obama plays pretty good poker, let’s hope that’s the case and why we haven’t heard much from his camp
I am greateful conyers got his report out while bush was still in office otherwise it would look like they couldn’t face him down while he was president
now let’s hope this gets done
Well, that’s pretty much why I started blogging in the first place. I was so disgusted by the Plame outing — and what that meant about the utter disregard for the internal safeguards and rule of law issues that got stomped on — that I couldn’t sit back and be silent about it.
And here I am. *g*
Thank you, CHS! Digg this important post, firedogs.
It looks like Sen. Whitehouse has the same sentiments:
Excellent. Thanks much for the citation!
Whitehouse said that his Judiciary committee will have hearings on rendition, detention and torture regardless of what Obama does. He said it’s their job!! Gotta love that guy!
that’s it, I am having too good a day
Jinx!
i used to think so highly of senator whitehouse. really thought he meant what he said about rule of law and oversight and so forth. but his votes in committee and in the senate wrt to telco immunity said something very different than his words. we could have worked through the courts to find out what happened on that matter – instead of having to rely on what have been to date exceptionally lame oversight hearings. whitehouse was one of those who prevented that from happening.
well maybe he will yet make amends. He now has the opportunity to do so.
“Congress must conduct a full investigation into the abuses of executive authority in the years since 9/11″
I think that this should include the time prior to 9/11, considering that Telcos were approached prior to 9/11. I’d like to know when the Patriot Act was actually authored…before or after 9/11. Also, I’d like to know who and when the architectural plans for the gigantic embassy in Baghdad were originally drawn up. Things like that. Just sayin’.
Christy, once again, you have reported a critical issue, the village idiots continue to ignore.
But the irony…the R’s are such…what is the word…hypocrites. At Hillary’s Senate Hearing the Kritters are now so, so concerned with accountability, disclosure and oversight.
How can they remember how to do their job, after failing to do it for eight years? The answer is acting, but they are bad actors. But the award for Worst Actor As A Senator has got to go to David Vitter. His probing questions of Hillary, are priceless. He has got experience with probing, having probed more than one prostitute.
Please Senator Whitehouse. By all means discharge that responsibility. Not only that, but inquire, investigate, prosecute, execute, punish, prevent, remind, cajole, natter nabobs, implore, lead, be resolute, steadfast, strong in the knowledge that you are right.
We The People are jaded. We think that the powerful can break the law (and get caught) yet suffer no ill effects; while we bear the full brunt of the punishment provided by law if we get caught breaking the law.
while there is breath, there is hope.
but he hasn’t done it yet – hasn’t even expressed any remorse.
btw, if you think my comment was bad, you should have seen the first one i wrote (and deleted before posting *g*)
the other piece of this is during the last congress even though the dems barely had the majority, they had a totally uncooperative DoJ that did their best to hide their dastardly deeds. The odds were against any kind of successful oversight. With a cooperative DoJ and access to documents lots more is possible.
So lets send him some roses and chocolate and urge him on. Who knows? could help.
How do you do it, Christy?
I donate to ACLU. Without their FOIA demands we would not even know about a lot of this secret government crap. Thanks for showing them your appreciation.
and worst of all: Henry Kissinger! He mentored that younger (then) bunch of thugs. His crimes were kept hidden. And they were many and heinous.
Hell, send me some roses and chocolates and I’ll call his office myself. *G*
they didn’t need a cooperative doj for the telco lawsuits. congress didn’t need to do anything – in fact, in this one case, doing nothing would have been perfect.
by all means send him roses and chocolate. but i’ve got better things to do with my $ and i know for a fact the telcos will outspend me. which, quite frankly, in the end seems to be what mattered. i’ll cheer when he does good, but no longer will i cheer for sounding good when it’s not backed by action. whitehouse has always sounded good – that’s what fooled me.
….back to reading some of conyers’ report.
(Okay, I’d call his office anyway. But there’s no harm in teasing…)
now that’s a destination for flowers and chocolate i can get support! *g*
Honestly, I pigged out so much over the holidays, I’m not certain that I could eat another bite of chocolate for a while. Way too many cookies at our house this year. *G* (And it was my own fault. I went into a baking frenzy. Anyone else bake for stress relief?)
I would blimp out if I did! Boy, fresh baked goods are so wonderful. I don’t bake, but I make huge soups, stews, etc., way too much at a time. I like cutting up all the ingredients and playing with herbs.
stress relief? What’s that? I didn’t think we were supposed to be relieved of it. *g*
Well, I’m not — but I certainly make everyone around me gain weight in the process. I’ve sworn off baking for the month of January as penance.
I did make some home made croissants with a bit of whole wheat pastry flower thrown in for my New Year’s Eve with the bloggers dinner. After several months without wheat or dairy, it is a relief to be able to eat those again.
Christy:
I can personally vouch for these issues being hi-lighted in my little corner of the country
They are wonderful, aren’t they? I’m especially loving the breadmaker we got for my birthday. I can whip up a healthy loaf of whole grain bread and not wear my achy fingers out with the kneading. It’s really a bread miracle for me.
And now, just typing that, I’m having that “throw in a loaf” feeling. LOL I suck…
How are you feeling these days? Any better?
Oh man…homemade bread…yummm…sigh…now I’m starving!
good days and bad days. Still no diagnosis. It is more frustrating than I can say here. Today was good, yesterday bad. Much of last week not so good. Fortunately when Scarecrow was here for a visit I was feeling OK. New Year’s Eve was nice.
Have you seen a rheumatologist yet? (Maybe you’ve said that you have/have not, and I’m just forgetting. Fighting off an icky infection at the moment and my brain is fuzzy.)
not. problem mostly abdominal—quite possibly adhesions which is a real bummer.
Oh, so sorry to hear it. Wish there were something I could do to help. I’ll just send out some good thoughts and prayers for you from here. And a gentle hug.
Sorry — didn’t mean to make you starving!
Thanks for keeping on this, Christy.
Excuse me, didn’t the WH mislead the congress into going to war in Iraq? Wasn’t the war a crime against a whole population?
Fried tried to argue unsuccessfully against prosecution on NPR yesterday. Jonathan Turley was also on the program. Turley’s response to “looking forward” was to bring up a scenario in which he could use that argument to win a case for a criminal defendant. Armed robbery? Judge, that’s in the past…
Fried also tried to argue that there were (allegedly) only four occasions when torture was committed, therefore shouldn’t be prosecuted. Only four, well, that’s okay then.
I noticed that when Cheney was asked about waterboarding…his answer was that only 3 people were waterboarded…but he didn’t say how many times each of them was waterboarded.
once cheney says something we can usually count on it being a lie
Christy, as I was griping to my husband about Obama and his tendency to “look forward” on the whole “who stomped on the constitution” thing, he remarked to me that Obama should follow the example of South Africa at the end of apartied: focus on identifying the grave crimes that were done in the name of this policy and issue an acknowledgment and apology.
Personally, I’d prefer to have folks behind bars, but if, for some reason Obama is too weak to be the principled individual that Jonathan Turley urged him to be last night on Keith or Rachel, at least let’s admit that crimes were committed, apologize to the victims, and swear never to do them again.
It’s the very least we can do, on an issue on which too many are looking for the least that can be done.
PS – is there any way a FDL author can write an entry covering what WAS done in South Africa and discuss whether this might be an option for Obama? My husband’s off on another island, so I can’t plumb him for this chore.
Personally I think that is way to humane for those wretched criminals. How can we try to spread democracy around the world when the very nature of democracy depends on adherence to the rule of law and we’re not willing to stand up for it ourselves?
There’s a quote from Martin Luther King Jr. that I will be using in my sermon on sunday:
If not now, when? (Hillel)
paul rosenberg wrote a great post on the context of mlk’s letter (the letter from the 8 white moderate clergymen that prompted mlk’s response) and applied it to our current situation.
anyway, just thought it might be something you would enjoy reading….
This seems like an appropriate EPU place to post an O/T alert.
I learned on Rachel Maddow’s show that the IVAW will be liveblogging the Shinseki hearing tomorrow. Y’all can read it at their blog if you’re inclined. Should be interesting.
And Christy, girl, you en fuengo today! RULE OF LAW, Yeah!
With regards to accountability: In Bush’s last press conference, he blatantly refused to answer the question on whether he would issue so-called pre-emptive pardons to administration officials who could face criminal prosecution for stuff done in his administration: (water-boarding, firing of US attorneys, etc.)I’m inclined to believe those pardons are a coming. Question: Can this be legally sound to give a pardon to a person who has yet to be indicted for a crime?
Perfect. Love that quote.
Good point.
Christy,
I’ve been at work, so I haven’t had time to comment, but I just want to say how grateful I am to you for writing these diaries. They give me hope and inspiration, and motivate me to donate to ACLU and CCR. The ACLU has had a great track record this year, and I feel that they represent me better than my Congresscritter does.
Mahalo nui loa,
Bob in HI
Christy,
To what address shall I send your roses and chocolates?
Gratefully,
Bob in HI
I have an ACLU card, I wish I were a lawyer, I wish I could do more. I wish I could talk to someone who knows what really happens at the highest levels. Maybe this is what happens: Bush meets Obama with Laura and Michelle present, the Obamas have no wires, no recording devices, Bush says Tell me you won’t prosecute ‘us’, say it plain, or I’ll issue orders for martial law and you’ll never take office. Say it.
Pop always told me if you don’t ask, you don’t get.
Sure. Jerry Ford and Nixon, Jimmy Carter and draft evaders.
Thanks, RevDeb. Beautiful quote. I hope someone sends it to Obama and/or Eric Holder. Don’t know how to get through to these folks.
And BTW, RevDeb, I totally agree with you. That’s why I’m so steamed and frustrated about this whole situation.
What ever happened to that lofty, inspiration rhetoric Obama treated everyone to during the campaign? Just words?