<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Stimulus Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boogiecheck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1792219</link>
		<dc:creator>boogiecheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1792219</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spend directly or give to people who will spend&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marginal prospensity to save is what economists call the fact that if you give a rich man a hundred dollars he probably won’t spend it and if you give a hungry man a hundred dollars he probably will.  This is why food stamps have the highest stimulative effect and why tax cuts for corporations effectively have almost no stimulative effective. So when you’re designing a stimulus you want to give money to people who will spend it, or you want to just spend it yourself.  And, in fact, if the government spends it it gets spent a lot more effectively in many cases.  The government isn’t going to run out and buy a TV made in China, after all, it’s going to insist on buying American as much as possible.  The stupider the stimulus bill for Americans, the happier foreign manufacturers will be. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to see Obama push for the minimum wage to be raised to $10 an hour. THAT would stimulate the economy greatly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He talks of creating 3.5 million jobs…but what kind of pay rate??  I suspect it would be much less than a living wage…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Spend directly or give to people who will spend</p>
<p>Marginal prospensity to save is what economists call the fact that if you give a rich man a hundred dollars he probably won’t spend it and if you give a hungry man a hundred dollars he probably will.  This is why food stamps have the highest stimulative effect and why tax cuts for corporations effectively have almost no stimulative effective. So when you’re designing a stimulus you want to give money to people who will spend it, or you want to just spend it yourself.  And, in fact, if the government spends it it gets spent a lot more effectively in many cases.  The government isn’t going to run out and buy a TV made in China, after all, it’s going to insist on buying American as much as possible.  The stupider the stimulus bill for Americans, the happier foreign manufacturers will be. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I would like to see Obama push for the minimum wage to be raised to $10 an hour. THAT would stimulate the economy greatly.</p>
<p>He talks of creating 3.5 million jobs…but what kind of pay rate??  I suspect it would be much less than a living wage…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791973</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791973</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;and the buck stops where???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We don’t actually want it to stop anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right now dollar is falling because we ship a lot of them overseas in exchange for oil &amp; Wal-Mart goods. That helps China and some other countries grow like crazy. They tend to move towards more sound more Americanized economies and possibly Democracies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This causes Americans to buy from overseas at good prices, but our own employment begins to suck eggs and our incomes fall until our economy struggles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, and this is where Bush went terribly wrong (probably for personal reasons), you don’t let this go on too long or let it get too close to the edge or you collapse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next step is to reverse this (to some extent) and grow the American economy like crazy while the others slow. The dollar rises. Americans earn more for producing more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everybody would be happy during most of the moments in this dynamic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep the dollars flowing and keep people working and keep trade going. That’s a big part of what made America a nation instead of 50 states with trade barriers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, the financial market bubble was just insane and somehow our MSM failed to notice it or tell us until it had burst — and even then they seemed to NOT know what caused it to begin, grow or burst.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and the buck stops where???</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We don’t actually want it to stop anywhere.</p>
<p>Right now dollar is falling because we ship a lot of them overseas in exchange for oil &amp; Wal-Mart goods. That helps China and some other countries grow like crazy. They tend to move towards more sound more Americanized economies and possibly Democracies.</p>
<p>This causes Americans to buy from overseas at good prices, but our own employment begins to suck eggs and our incomes fall until our economy struggles.</p>
<p>Then, and this is where Bush went terribly wrong (probably for personal reasons), you don’t let this go on too long or let it get too close to the edge or you collapse.</p>
<p>Next step is to reverse this (to some extent) and grow the American economy like crazy while the others slow. The dollar rises. Americans earn more for producing more.</p>
<p>Everybody would be happy during most of the moments in this dynamic.</p>
<p>Keep the dollars flowing and keep people working and keep trade going. That’s a big part of what made America a nation instead of 50 states with trade barriers.</p>
<p>Of course, the financial market bubble was just insane and somehow our MSM failed to notice it or tell us until it had burst — and even then they seemed to NOT know what caused it to begin, grow or burst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novista</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791903</link>
		<dc:creator>Novista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;P.S. Irving Fisher is worth some study, too. He put his money where his mouth was before the ‘29 Crash and lost the lot. Several years later, after contemplating ‘where did I go wrong?’ he had a much better analysis that’s largely been ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those who still believe in market equilibrium might reflect on the hypothesis that it’s a fractal world. Got to watch out for those non-linear equations. Computer models … feh! “the map is not the territory!”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Irving Fisher is worth some study, too. He put his money where his mouth was before the ‘29 Crash and lost the lot. Several years later, after contemplating ‘where did I go wrong?’ he had a much better analysis that’s largely been ignored.</p>
<p>Those who still believe in market equilibrium might reflect on the hypothesis that it’s a fractal world. Got to watch out for those non-linear equations. Computer models … feh! “the map is not the territory!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novista</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791894</link>
		<dc:creator>Novista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791894</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to reign on your parade, Ian … but in the Restructure item … it’s &lt;em&gt;reining in&lt;/em&gt; as in ‘reining in the horse’ (or the horse’s ass, as in the case of speculators’ excess.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cautionary tale: in 1964, Cincinnati’s 35-year-old bond issue finished. The money was raised for a subway system that wasn’t. About half a dozen stations were done in the central business district, and the tunnel extended north to about near the Viaduct. Moral of the story: if you start an infrastructure stimulus project, make sure it gets finished and used …&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, another economist to read is: Steve Keen (Australian) who applied Minsky’s ‘financial instability hypothesis’ and recognised the bubble problem in late 2005.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to reign on your parade, Ian … but in the Restructure item … it’s <em>reining in</em> as in ‘reining in the horse’ (or the horse’s ass, as in the case of speculators’ excess.)</p>
<p>A cautionary tale: in 1964, Cincinnati’s 35-year-old bond issue finished. The money was raised for a subway system that wasn’t. About half a dozen stations were done in the central business district, and the tunnel extended north to about near the Viaduct. Moral of the story: if you start an infrastructure stimulus project, make sure it gets finished and used …</p>
<p>Now, another economist to read is: Steve Keen (Australian) who applied Minsky’s ‘financial instability hypothesis’ and recognised the bubble problem in late 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katymine</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791785</link>
		<dc:creator>katymine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ian in the Health Care initiative that was discussed last night, one point is the pay for nursing instructors. Locally I know a lot of nurses over 50 who have advanced degrees but cannot find decent paying jobs that reflect their education.  As part of that we need to pay health care teachers a wage that would draw them out of their semi-retirement and provide a decent wage. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want high speed trains. Once you have used them…… what we have in this country you might as well go back to coal fired steam trains…..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian in the Health Care initiative that was discussed last night, one point is the pay for nursing instructors. Locally I know a lot of nurses over 50 who have advanced degrees but cannot find decent paying jobs that reflect their education.  As part of that we need to pay health care teachers a wage that would draw them out of their semi-retirement and provide a decent wage. </p>
<p>I want high speed trains. Once you have used them…… what we have in this country you might as well go back to coal fired steam trains…..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesgpc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791782</link>
		<dc:creator>wesgpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Doh! Thomas Palley has his own blog.&lt;br /&gt;
I thought his piece was a guest post on the Economist’s View blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palley wrote that piece that selise quoted at comment 8 in April of this year. So I guess another wonky economist who saw where things were going.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspalley.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thomaspalley.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh! Thomas Palley has his own blog.<br />
I thought his piece was a guest post on the Economist’s View blog.</p>
<p>Palley wrote that piece that selise quoted at comment 8 in April of this year. So I guess another wonky economist who saw where things were going.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thomaspalley.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomaspalley.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791761</link>
		<dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791761</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Those are good points.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are good points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791757</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL! i’m right behind you with the flacking. started reading some stiglitz a few years ago because of what he had to say about trade. but have learned to appreciate his ideas in other areas also.  recently have listened to a few podcasts of galbraith the younger and like his ideas too. haven’t read his book yet though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;actually, i love to get stiglitz, galbraith, baker, krugman, roubini and probably a few others like naomi klein into a room for a weekend to come up with an alternative plan. hugh and ian could facilitate / moderate. oh, and i’d like to be a fly on the wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! i’m right behind you with the flacking. started reading some stiglitz a few years ago because of what he had to say about trade. but have learned to appreciate his ideas in other areas also.  recently have listened to a few podcasts of galbraith the younger and like his ideas too. haven’t read his book yet though.</p>
<p>actually, i love to get stiglitz, galbraith, baker, krugman, roubini and probably a few others like naomi klein into a room for a weekend to come up with an alternative plan. hugh and ian could facilitate / moderate. oh, and i’d like to be a fly on the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791750</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791750</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only reason I’m saying force them to create industry here, is that without industry, we are toast…and there will be no economy at all to support projects that are good for things like the environment. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i completely agree with the goal - just want to advocating thinking about pursuing it in a different way. also, when it comes to organizing labor, especially in anti-authoritarian ways, i think we are light-years behind. might be a benefit to us if we have allies to learn from.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only reason I’m saying force them to create industry here, is that without industry, we are toast…and there will be no economy at all to support projects that are good for things like the environment. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>i completely agree with the goal &#8211; just want to advocating thinking about pursuing it in a different way. also, when it comes to organizing labor, especially in anti-authoritarian ways, i think we are light-years behind. might be a benefit to us if we have allies to learn from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791744</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/01/13/economic-stimulus-principles/#comment-1791744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Study abroad I would say is essential.  We only really internalize a language when we are immersed in it and that only really comes from living in a place where you have to deal in the target language.  Also language is more than the sum of its parts.  There are all kinds of cultural clues and references which you can only learn by living with native speakers, and which for them are as much a part of the language as nouns and verbs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study abroad I would say is essential.  We only really internalize a language when we are immersed in it and that only really comes from living in a place where you have to deal in the target language.  Also language is more than the sum of its parts.  There are all kinds of cultural clues and references which you can only learn by living with native speakers, and which for them are as much a part of the language as nouns and verbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
