Frank Rich has a nice column in the NYT about how sick America is of Dubya, in which he also attempts to figure out how such a small, mediocre man could have caused such epic destruction here and overseas:
Even the banality of evil is too grandiose a concept for 43. He is not a memorable villain so much as a sometimes affable second banana whom Josh Brolin and Will Ferrell can nail without breaking a sweat…. He is smaller than life.
The last NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll on Bush’s presidency found that 79 percent of Americans will not miss him after he leaves the White House. He is being forgotten already, even if he’s not yet gone. You start to pity him until you remember how vast the wreckage is. It stretches from the Middle East to Wall Street to Main Street and even into the heavens, which have been a safe haven for toxins under his passive stewardship. The discrepancy between the grandeur of the failure and the stature of the man is a puzzlement. We are still trying to compute it.
(…)
Americans essentially stopped listening to him after Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005, but he still doesn’t grasp the finality of their defection. Lately he’s promised not to steal the spotlight from Barack Obama once he’s in retirement — as if he could do so by any act short of running naked through downtown Dallas. The latest CNN poll finds that only one-third of his fellow citizens want him to play a post-presidency role in public life.
(…)
But the brazenness of Bush’s alternative-reality history is itself revelatory. The audacity of its hype helps clear up the mystery of how someone so slight could inflict so much damage. So do his many print and television exit interviews.
The man who emerges is a narcissist with no self-awareness whatsoever. It’s that arrogance that allowed him to tune out even the most calamitous of realities, freeing him to compound them without missing a step. The president who famously couldn’t name a single mistake of his presidency at a press conference in 2004 still can’t.
I think Rich is close, but doesn’t go quite far enough. The reason that Bush was able to “accomplish” so much, and the reason it’s all been disastrous, is that he has the mentality of a toddler. Everything is “Me! Mine! Gimme! Gimme! I want! I want!”, with that terrible two-year-old’s single-minded focus on screaming and stamping without pause until he gets everything he wants. Consequences are irrelevant. Everything outside his narrow scope of “I want!” is uninteresting.
But in Bush’s case, he’s a toddler surrounded by the world’s most high-powered and unethical lawyers and PR spinners, to give his unreasonable and self-centered demands a veneer of plausibility and legality. “When my client says, ‘I wanna ice cream, gimme gimme now!’, what he means is that pursuant to Article II of the Constitution, the President’s powers during wartime clearly include unlimited ice cream at any time of his choosing.”
And the Democratic opposition, like weary, harried parents who live in fear of their little darling’s tantrums, eagerly give in to his every whim, just to make him stop shrieking and throwing things. Of course, it never works and he always wants more, but they’re so cowed and shell-shocked that they don’t even care any more, they’ll do anything just to make it stop – and God forbid they should ever try to discipline him when he sets the dog on fire.
Or, alternatively, maybe we just got the government we deserve…
Related posts:
- More Innovation from Wall Street: Securitized Viaticals
- Melissa Bean’s Ex-Chief of Staff Now Lobbying Against Financial Regulation
- Late Night: Among the Republicans’ Chief Weaponry is Lying, Hypocrisy, and a Fanatical Devotion to Torture
- Chuck Todd: When You Tell People What’s in the Health Bill, They Like It
- Chief Justice Roberts on Michael Jackson: Let Him Carry His Own Lantern





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

there’s a word coined just to describe him – ignoranus. ignorant azzhole.
Bush beat Gore or came close to beating Gore. If Gore had not been such a flake with such a badly run campaign, it should not have been even close. Bush beat Kerry. I blame Gore and Kerry. How could we survive with three flaky legacy kids running for president in two elections?
Wah-ah-ah-aaah!!
Bush may not be quite as dumb as you might think. He was a corporatist bought and payed for by the corporations and we have had eight years of payback to the corporations. He could care less about average americans. It was all about letting corporations run every agency in government to their benefit.
258 hrs & 12 min
That video is hilarious!
The next concern is how scary is this picture. When I was watching the Torturing Democracy piece earlier in the week, I kept seeing all this awesome and dangerous hardware: bombers, tanks, all the power of war and death. Torture practices at numerous sites. All the war power, life & death, in the hands of this narcissistic, sadistic, cretin. I tremble to think he is the govt. we deserve (reminding me of Rumfield’s remark of going to war with the army you have ;). When I feel this level of sickness in my soul, I peer out and wonder if we will find our way back. No, Im not sure.
I think foothillsmike has it right. All W cared about was playing dress-up and making people suck up to him. He’s a bully.
Rich should have written that piece 6 or 7 years ago.
OT Robert Rubin will resign his position on the board of Citigroup in the spring.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28581970/
For some reason I find this funny in a kind of unfunny way.
As a Chicano from the Sonoran Desert, my assessment is–if one thinks as Bush did and as a proponent of the John Bircher Philosophy for Thought and Action, his political behavior, is easily understood. Thus, calling him self-serving at best, and a narcissist at worst, is far off the mark. Consequently, his affection and affliction for the Lee Atwater-types in America, demonstrates, America’s penchant for dismissing reality.
What I do not understand is why the Democrats want a filibuster proof majority when they never tried to filibuster even the most egregious attack upon the Constitution! Truly a party of old men who simply want to get along with the rest of the Geritol set.
Assumpsit
Good. Fucking. Riddance.
Just ten more days of that ignorant word mangling shit stain and his entourage.
Bush didn’t beat Gore, the Supreme Court intervened and appointed Bush, and Diebold beat Kerry, not Bush.
Would you explain your opinion that rejects narcissism? Seems pretty fitting to me, so I am interested in your conclusion.
Bush, Gore and Kerry, flakes the three of them, especially Gore and Bush.
Hi Busted…
Hey, Eli!
for some bizarre reason I’m having a strange feeling of deja vu…was this at Oxdown over the weekend?
FunnyDiva
New post
Sounds like buyer’s remorse. This was the dude who thought farting in public was funny and who everyone wanted to have a beer with. It was hilarious when he said millionaires were his base, and great when he made Gore look like a self-important know-it-all, and Kerry look like a guy who wasn’t brave enough to defend his own bravery medals. Now, after he’s ruined the empire like every other enterprise he’s ever touched, everyone blames him for simply being himself.
I am not sure that anyone could say definitively what the motivations of a GWB might be without knowing him on a personal basis. One could make an argument that he exhibits a lot of traits of someone desperately in need of attention or on the other hand needing power.
257 hrs & 32 min
I’d like truckloads of shoes dumped at the gates of his fake ranch on 21 Jan.
10 days 17 1/2 hours.
Sorry, Hi Katymine.
I was working….
IMHO…. GWB was born a millionaire from millionaire who lived on a compound in CT and Maine. He NEVER had to mix with regular people, never had to deal with the ups and downs of life. He has lived an insular life ALL of his life where he has never developed such things empathy and community like most of the rest of us.
Justin Franks book “Bush on the Couch” gives a view of a man who never had to face anything. Again IMHO it creates a very bent person.
a psychopath. surrounded by other psychopaths.
You are correct that Scarecrow is more on point, indicting not only Congress, but also voters and MSM. Rich could just as well written–The men (Congress) who emerges are a narcissists with no self-awareness whatsoever. This has always been so, but is more so, if possible, starting the last two years of the Clinton admin., when Gingrich and Co duped votes with “Contract with America”. GOPers have essentially remained a powerhouse in Congress since, and invertebrate Democrats continue to wilt with GOP obdurateness. While voters deserve the Government we have, voters are too unaware and unsophisticated to see how corrupt our politicians are or how they are gamed like so many rubes by politicians and MSM.
Are you asking me? I don’t reject narcissism as an explanation, I just think it’s an incomplete assessment. He’s not just a narcissist, he’s a narcissistic toddler.
We needed that Nanny from the TeeVee. She could have whipped the parents (dems) into shape while getting that little brat into a corner where his tantrums would have been starved for attention.
But NoOOOO. We have this. Another exit interview, please.
Thanks I was asking #9, and I failed to hit the Reply. Yes, it really is just a beginning, isn’t it?
I agree. By the Mission Accomplished-codpiece fiasco, we knew a baby was not in charge.
I can agree with you only in your first sentence. Agreed…he couldn’t possibly be as dumb as I think he is or he they’d have to stamp 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue on his hand when they send him out the door so that he can be returned home by the kindness of a stranger.
It would sure narrow the field if candidates for high office were required to do more than produce a few medical reports or tax returns. Just imagine if personality inventories were required…then the voters could actually decide if they wanted to vote for psychopaths or narcissists or other personality disordered politicians.
Wasn’t there a Star Trek episode about such a character?
In response to RevBev at 13.
So here goes. Bush is a bigot but not a racist. A bigot is an ‘enabler’ and the racist is a narcissist. And therein, is the difference.
Perhaps, a local example is pertinent? Republicans have been in charge of politics here in Arizona since 1980. Thus, the Arizona Department of Public Safety was sued by the ACLU earlier in this decade. The DPS eventually entered into a consent decree not to racially profile. As part of this consent decree, Napolitano agreed to establish a traffic stop committee, and last month, this committee came forward with their recommendations. As part and parcel, the person stopped must sign off on a ’search’. And if the driver refuses to sign-off, the law enforcement officer must, by either video tape or audio tape justify the traffic stop and for later review by supervisors. Consequently, the officer has to complete a form and premised on ‘probable cause’ and not on ‘reasonable suspicion’.
And this same behavior can be seen at the national level and where ‘reasonable suspicion’ has enabled a pandemic environment to be created. And who has been the target of this ‘reasonable suspicion’? Would you believe Brown People? And Gitmo is premised on ‘reasonable suspicion’ when one understands that the overwhelming majority of those detained, were subjected to a ‘bounty’ and were later sold to Americans for incarceration. Of late, even the DOD, has yet to provide factual data or incriminating ‘evidence’ that the recently released detainees/criminals have become re-engaged in terrorism.
Yeah, the Chimp did everything his corporate massas demanded and is escaping unscathed. His replacement is CHANGE but cannot quite hide the sly genuflecting to the same interests. The corporatists may feel that all that upwardly redistributed wealth will protect them.
The USA IS NOT immune to the forces of history and when the depression hits the streets, it will get bloody. Unlike our grandparents and great grandparents, today’s American has little temperament for suffering or crisis. I hope I’m wrong but I doubt it.
Amen.
“And the Democratic opposition, like weary, harried parents who live in fear of their little darling’s tantrums, eagerly give in to his every whim, just to make him stop shrieking and throwing things. Of course, it never works and he always wants more, but they’re so cowed and shell-shocked that they don’t even care any more, they’ll do anything just to make it stop – and God forbid they should ever try to discipline him when he sets the dog on fire.”
How freaking ironic.
Frank Rich’s asinine lameness in 2000 helped bring us Bush in the first place. What a steaming pantload of unintentional irony he is.
I guess my wait for his acknowledgment that maybe Al Gore was actually not the same thing as George Bush will have to continue (and don’t worry, I’m not waiting up nights). His juvenile who “wouldn’t want to hang out with a cool cowboy” bullshit of 2000 will be a permanent stain on his career, and yet now he fulminates in righteous indignation.
Ass.
Hole.