It may not have been intentional. Obama was still in his first term when he hit the campaign trail, so it was only natural that he would forge most of his close connections to DC insiders within the Senate. But as he filled out his administration with one Senator after another, he precipitated a desperately needed shakeup in that musty, ancient, bloviating and self-important entity that considers itself "the most exclusive club in the world."
The musical chairs began when Democratic leadership decided the Senate Appropriations Committee, which is in charge of disbursing more than $1 trillion a year in federal spending, was too important to be chaired by the 91 year-old Robert Byrd (who was sending his aides to the meetings he didn’t sleep through). But they observed those august rules of Senate seniority and replaced him with the largely ineffectual Daniel Inouye, 84, so that hardly signaled radical change.
Inouye’s decision to take over Appropriations meant he had to give up Commerce. Then Biden’s departure from Foreign Relations triggered a mad scramble for powerful committee chairmanships that ended with Kerry taking over after he failed to receive a cabinet appointment. Mary Landrieu took over Kerry’s chair of small business. Rockefeller gave up Intelligence and took Inouye’s seat at Commerce, and Diane Feinstein assumed the Intelligence helm.
And that was that. The Senators decided amongst themselves how power would be distributed — they swatted away the pesky gnats who questioned their right to decide what goes on in their club and handed a gavel back to Joe Lieberman, and everyone set out to assert their new authority and exercise control of their new turf.
We are not amused howled Feinstein when Obama had the temerity to offer Leon Panetta the helm of the CIA without consulting her. Jay Rockefeller and Evan Bayh were sighing about how this is very disconcerting indeed, and they are hailing Feinstein’s decision to do something she never did to George Bush — put forward her own candidate, Stephen Kappes. They are flashing the ever fashionable fuscha terror alert button and wagging their fingers about Panetta’s lack of intelligence background, but the message was clear — this challenge to their authority was not acceptable.
They all sound like Sally Quinn.
There is insufficient space here on this blog to recount all the things that the Intelligence Committee has screwed up in recent years, but suffice to say that Feinstein enabled most of it. She has been a key Bush ally who cast critical votes in support of his most extremist assertions of power. Her default position is consistently to protect establishment power, and she never batted an eyelash about casting votes that were worth billions in defense contracts to firms owned by her husband. There are few people in public office more territorial and consumed by a sense of entitlement than Diane Feinstein.
Bush neutralized meaningful opposition to his worst, most extra-legal and noxious actions from Congressional Democrats by bringing them into the fold, flattering them and playing to their own sense of self-importance as he explained to them the things he hid from the public. Chief among those were Jay Rockefeller, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Jane Harmon (who was evidently a Feinstein favorite for the CIA post).
If someone truly were to come in from the outside and try to find out what happened at the CIA with regard to torture and illegal spying, the complicity and ensuing silence of this entitled crew risks exposure. They’ve already demonstrated they’ll do just about anything to keep that from happening — that’s how we got retroactive telecom immunity in the first place.
It’s notable that Ron Wyden, who also sits on the Intelligence Committee, was consulted about Panetta and approved of his choice.
I have no idea if Panetta would make a good CIA chief or not. But if there is a better place for someone to come in and start shaking up Washington DC, I can’t think of a better place for Obama to start than the club currently in high caterwaul about his appointment.



76 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
In Evan Bayh’s defense — now there’s the start of a sentence I never thought I’d write — he was on Rachel Maddow last night and surprised me by actually supporting the Panetta nod.
Can we play the William Tell Overture for that game of musical chairs?
The question is: does Obama work with them to get stuff done (that’ll be largely stuff of which they approve, which means it’ll suck the rest of us) or does he work in spite of them to get stuff done (that’ll be stuff of which they disapprove, which means it might actually benefit Us, The People)?
Any genuine Change we Can Believe In is surely hampered by the continued presence and grandiose egos of Feinstein, Hoyer, Reid, Pelosi et al. Wankers, all.
“the most exclusive club in the world.”
i thought it was “greatest deliberative body in the world.” The first i couldn’t say. But Jews and blacks have gotten in so it can’t be “exclusive.” The second (greatest deliberative body) is rank bullshit.
There is, of course, the view that Feinstein and Rockefeller are upset about Panetta because they also could find themselves accused of war crimes for approving torture and defending themselves against felonies for approving eavesdropping they knew to be illegal. Of course they would want a CIA Director just as guilty as they are.
I guess I don’t get this. What are Feinstein and Rockefeller pissed about? They weren’t consulted at all/had no input? Or that they weren’t told first who’d been selected before it hit the media? or both?
The Thieving Magpie works for me…
I favor “Are We Like Sheep?”.
agreed, and well put. stand up to OB after 8 years of playing dead for W?
it is Dianne.
we live in a pretty funny world when a former congressman, omb head and WH COS is considered an outsider.
what do they drink in the morning in that village?
DiFi has found her voice after spitting out the crap Bush has been shoveling into it for eight years.
This tired woman should be retired.
-G
hey Jim W, liked the “Exchange Artists” diary.
Okay. Getting out my flute. :)
notice the media spin is a regurgitation of the dragonwoman rather than “possibly corrupt congreswoman fears her past misdeeds will come to light with appointment of paneta”
wtg obama, hopefully this sticks
It’s actually All we, like sheep have gone astray. We have turned, ev’ry one to his own way.
Ain’t that the truth.
Beautiful, Jane. And right on the money. This is how I saw it after hearing about Panetta’s background. This is really good news on all fronts. And yeah, DiFi wants someone in there who is equally guilty. Oh, and Wyden was consulted? Obama is very interesting to watch, no?
Hey Di Fi:
Look over the legal appointments. Not a whole lot of John Yoo-style torture love.
Think you’re on the wrong side of this one?
One of the pleasant by-products of Obama’s “lack of experience” is that he can turn to the DiFis of the world and say “Um, I owe you what exactly?”
I hope everyone’s read this today:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01…..wanted=all
“I feel ashamed what the Americans did to me in this period,” Mr. Iqbal said, speaking for the first time at length about his ordeal during several hours of interviews with The New York Times, including one from his hospital bed in Lahore.
But of course Difi, Jay Rockefeller, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Jane Harmon have no shame.
This reveals the depth of the problem in stark relief. It’s NOT just Republicans, but the institution at-large. I think we really knew this all along, and I wouldn’t even think of arguing that we aren’t far better off with Obama at the helm than we would have been with McCain. But, my goodness, there’s still a mountain of work to do, isn’t there?
Hard to pick the most essential slot to be filled in the wake of BushCo, isn’t it? What a disaster. What a shameful disaster. I’m hopeful (which is getting harder to be) that someone(s) with great knowledge and no small amount of clout will dig through the mess that is the SEC et al and bring fear and loathing onto Wall Street and environs.
Actually, this
http://search.yahoo.com/search…..8;ei=UTF-8
would musically work really well.
I can see them all skipping around the row of chairs. HA.
btw, loving “in high caterwaul,” Jane.
Atrios considered DiFi too:
No kidding. Take a look at this when you have time. And then gird your loins big time in the face of Poppy’s declaration that Jeb should be president one day. Read my lips. No. More. Bushes.
LOL!
GOOD un’, demi.
Jane!
I like David Schuster too. Glad he’s back in the good graces of MSNBC and talking to Firedoglake blogger Jane Hamsher! Thank you for your astute observations. Obama stirred up the Senate, big time! Any chance he set Reid up with a backdoor appointment of Burris ala Rahmbo?
Aww… Then there’s Rossini’s Silken Ladder, heh. played by a youth orchestra yet. Even they are smoother than our senatorial keystone cops.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TU-6tku6GY
One way of looking at this is it is the pressure point for the whole mess. It’s where the hubris and the secrecy and the fear all came together to support criminal policies with propaganda. And the Ds were co-opted, apparently without a fight. And the problems at the DOJ supported this mess.
The economy *may* be a horse of a different color but it was largely done in plain sight by comparison. It was a herd and blind corporate hunger for profits. As people suffer, this will have its own arc.
But without something like a Panetta appointment these black holes would have been circled forever. And he’s gone against his leadership in the past … so if Obama didn’t want a fresh view, I don’t see how he would have appointed Panetta.
May I (continue to) recommend Elliot Spitzer!
Thanks…teh damned borg here is blocking YouTube though. Grrrrrrrrrrrr.
Marion in Savannah @ 24: Trapped, trapped, trapped I say by her own words! Lovely!
Oh, and …. NO. MORE. BUSHES. EVER…. SRSLY.
I’m back reading late medieval and early modern French history again. It’s all about the tensions between the King and his ‘overmighty subject’. Sen Feinstein is an overmighty subject, who wants to keep her thumb in the pie, not for any policy reasons, but just because she’s a baronne, with a coterie of her own to protect. I think Obama sent her a message. My guess is that he has his people lined up, and Panetta will go through. This is a huge appointment, and he is not going to be bullied by a bo-toxed bitch.
In complete agreement. I’ve watched Feinstein sleep, prevaricate waffle and dither through too many committee hearings, the 2007 US Attorney expose being the one exception in memory, to pay attention to her snit or want her chosen best boy running CIA.
She has her nose out of joint? Good sign. What is the saying- if you’re taking heat from both sides in politics, you must be doing something right.
It would seem that Obama is bypasing Israeli government leverage in the leadership of the U.S. inteligence community.
From Slam-Dunk Tenet to the Vermin Exterminator Panetta. I like it.
Try it, You’ll like to too.
Imagine a CIA leadership riding on a two-wheeler, instead of the tri-cycle trolls of the last 30 years. This will really stir-up the intelligence schoolyard.
Go Leon!
Thanks, but giving credit where it’s due, foothillsmike started us down this musical path with a comment on the previous thread saying that Condi Rice is going to speak at the UN today. He said maybe she should play her piano. I’m just coming up with some tunes. :)
GAWD! i love Jane’s posts the most!
and that’s saying quite something considering the quality of talent here at the Lake.
just, NO ONE does it like jh!
i’m interested to see how ray mcgovern and the rest of VIPS weigh in on panetta. in the mean time here’s rush holt’s statement:
p.s. rush holt is the member of congress who really fought for us during the fisa fight.
Luv the pic of Panetta. And just the thot of DiFi in a stew over maintaining decorum and continence or somethin’. I haven’t laughed so hard in weeks. Send her some astronaughty-diapers.
Thanks Jane.
It’s an awful serious world out there, but no one’s made laughing at idiots a crime yet, not quite….
Digg this!
would that i could share it with the entire www readership.
perfectly said, Adie!
Me, too (re McGovern and VIPS). Name-dropping alert: A few years ago, I had dinner with Coleen Rowley and McGovern in D.C. He is an immensely impressive man!
We should all call her up and tell her she’s damned lucky not to be standing trial at The Hague as one of Bush’s co-conspirators.
Rick Perlstein has a nice post up re: how Panetta resigned from Nixonland when it became clear to him that civil rights was far, far from the agenda despite Tricky Dick’s inauguration rhetoric…
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-…..on-panetta
wow. most name dropping leaves me cold – but that is way cool. i’m a big fan of both of them.
Oh Phooey! It works well for me. Mebbe if you type it in. Here’s the link. Don’t just copy and paste. At least my machine doesn’t like that.
Try directly typing. Or go to the site and copy that anew. or sumthin? dang.
2 copies to try below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TU-6tku6GY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TU-6tku6GY
Oooh, good catch, Selise! Thanks.
In a just world, Dianne Feinstein would be standing trial for complicity in war crimes. I think she needs to be reminded of that, don’t you?
415-393-0707 (fax: 0710)
202-224-3841 (TTYD: 2501; fax: 228-3954)
She shoots, she SCORES!! *g*
Can hardly wait to see video of this smackdown of Congress Critters.
March of the Dead to Greet Congress on Tuesday
Submitted by davidswanson on Mon, 2009-01-05 00:48.
WHAT: A long column of figures dressed all in black with white death masks and bearing the names of those killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The march will be followed by a dramatic nonviolent action intended to awaken Congress to the need to end the wars.
WHEN: March from noon to 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009. Additional dramatic action 2:15 p.m.
WHERE: The march will approach the U.S. Capitol on Pennsylvania Ave. SE and turn north on 1st Street to pass between the Capitol and the Supreme Court, turn west on Constitution Ave. to pass the Senate office buildings, turn south to pass the west front of the Capitol, and turn east on Independence Ave. to pass the House office buildings. Members of the media wanting to cover the additional nonviolent action should meet representatives of the March of the Dead in front of the Supreme Court at 2 p.m.
WHY: “We will be conducting the March of the Dead as the 111th Congress is being sworn in,” said Laurie Arbeiter of the Activist Response Team, creators of the march. “We demand that this Congress end the terror of war, get out of Iraq and Afghanistan, stay out of Iran, Pakistan, and Syria and stop all support of Israeli foreign and military policy that results in massacres like the current one in Gaza.”
“The power to begin and end wars rests with Congress,” said David Swanson of AfterDowningStreet.org, “and the responsibility of Congress is to represent the American people. We have now for the second time elected a Congress to end the occupation of Iraq, and this time we will insist that it be ended. A treaty unratified by the Senate cannot legalize three more years of war. And the human impact of long-distance slaughter cannot be kept from the eyes of Congress members if we make up our minds that they will see it.”
Knut – this is not appropriate language here. You wanna object to her policies? Find other words. Calling someone a bitch is unnecessary to make your point.
i still don’t know what i think about the panetta nomination, but i do give some weight to holt’s statement. first because he was willing to call out his own leadership on the house floor over the fisa fight and second because it’s so measured that it doesn’t ring false to me.
would really like to see holt as chair of the house intelligence committee.
Now Knut!!! For SHAME!!! *wagging finger*
Try the left eye. Now try the right. Now both together.
How many fingers do you see?
a three pointer!
I just called his office to thank them for backing someone who is foursquare against torture. Rush Holt is a good’un.
is that a new rule?
interesting… that extra quote of the original offense. huh! go figure.
Thanks again, tried different ways, but teh stoopid borg has completely and thoroughly blocked it.
i *hope* panetta is against torture.
but it seems too early to tell for sure. after all, bush says we don’t torture…. so i’m waiting for actions to back up panetta’s good words.
Try updating your media player, Java and shockwave. I had similar problems earlier and that fixed them for me.
seriously egregious – what gives? i didn’t like what was said either – but it hardly seems out of line for jane’s blog. unless the rules have changed.
WarOnWarOff found this tidbit from Panetta’s past, where he did the right thing rather than put up with a corrupt president.
Granted that was over three decades ago, but at least we know his deeds and words have matched up in the past.
i think it’s o.k., just so long as you make sure everyone knows exactly which quote was the offending one.
apologies. I’m just impossible today. I just got back from single-handedly recycling 5 humungous monitors, keyboards, towers, hard drives, soft drives, drives for the drives that wouldn’t work in the first place, etc. etc., all the way from our basement up the endless steps, into our ancient but trusty little Corolla, pumping up a leaky tire in said little car, driving across hill and dale, unloading the whole kit & kaboodle all by me-own-self. And getting home in one piece. Nothing broken. No ‘puter-parts broken or even scratched, nothing strained, not even on me.
Then I picked up the new free-groceries card I’d earned recently, and bought the most sinful ice creams I could find, for me and Mr. Adie to indulge ourselves shamelessly later today, after we eat all our vegetables, of course.
I am proud. I can do anything I want to, just so long as I don’t hurt any living thing in the process.
So, Go on. Try to hit me. Just try!
that’s the kind of thing that makes me think this *might* be a really good nomination. i’m just going to fence sit for awhile.
OT
The Sec’t of the Senate turned Burris away this morning.
really??? Whoot!!!
adie – you were just expressing your opinion. i’m not going to take issue with that (i didn’t like what knut wrote either, although for me it’s a matter of context and not the actual words used). it’s different though, for a front pager to make a statement about what words are acceptable here because that implies the authority to enforce. that’s why i asked if it was a new rule – because it certainly hasn’t been in the past (for example, see this old post of jane’s: Why Kate O’Beirne is a Dangerous Bitch).
holy cow! thanks for that update.
love ya, Adie: enjoy the ice cream!
There’s something to be said for hiring a really savvy, really smart guy who has his head on straight, and can tell schmooze from good solid intelligently conceived policy, recognizes #*&% and shinola as it were, a good judge of people, a person with valuable experience and a proven track record from dealing with policy, demanding proof and solid explanations without flinching or being distracted by sprinklings of cat litter on the floor.
I think I’m more than willing to withold judgement until we have more evidence. I like what I’ve seen so far of Obama’s intriguing style. It’ll take some adjustments to become accustomed to having a President with a brain, but I’m willing to give it a decent effort.
It turns out I know Leon Panetta from my days living in Monterey. It’s always possible to move to the dark side , but I can tell you – Panetta is one of the last remaining good guys. He knows his stuff and he’s just plain a decent person. IMO you couldn’t find a better fill for this job. This is refreshing.
As for DiFi? We are not amused either
thanks. I wish we could share with the whole gang here.
previous: (62) – indulging in some silly.
can we all please calm down here just a tad?
babies and grandmas and cab drivers and roofers and people’s sons and daughters are dying right this very minute, with no health care, not even electricity and water reliably available.
perspective, people.
apologies, egregious. i know you have a job to do. i appreciate the style and substance of how you accomplish that difficult job.
don’t be distracted by clowns like me.
nothing to see here folks. move along…
I think that there is much to commend the Panetta nomination. Take, for example, the current Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Silvestre Reyes of Texas.
He is now free from having to play footsie with the Republicans and the Bush White House. Being free to roam the halls of Congress to craft the much-needed political support for Obama’s agenda for change relative to utilizing the overall strategic objective of intelligence-gathering in order to craft public policy, speaks well for both Obama, Panetta, and Reyes.
On the other hand, the DOD has garnered both the resources and assets, and political support for intelligence-gathering, poses an ongoing dilemma for Obama. Will the DOD willingly surrender what it has gained under a Bush Administration? Thus, another political battle will commence in calendar year 2010, when Obama attempts to rein in the DOD for crafting public policy. And from therein, a Gates exit can be expected.
Just a Passing Thought.
Suggest u re-read this above at #62. T’was pure unadulterated snark, & I should have added the [/s]
You’re sweet, but don’t need to sooth my fevered brow, for ’tis not overheated atall atall by anything at the Lake; it’s just painfully askew from paying far too much attention to world events than is healthy for the soul down deep inside. We’re the lucky ones. I mourn for the others whom I do not know how to help.
I even ache for this beautiful critter, whose home range is right smack dab in the middle of the war zones of the ME and SW Asia.
http://z.about.com/d/animals/1…..567001.jpg
Oops! Almost forgot another winner for DiFi background mewz-ack.
Try to picture the missy DiFi teetering along through the marble hallways in her best stiletto feetswear.
Grieg – Hall of the Mountain King.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzyi3C4gNnE
Now watch it and try to convince me the 2nd chair bassoon isn’t chewing gum.
Don’t laugh. Our sonny used to play next to a geezer-wheezer who chewed… something… while playing tuba. never plugged up the instrument, that we know of. made it a little hard to watch the band without cracking up though.
oh the joys of music may yet save this world….
Jane wrote:Chief among those were Jay Rockefeller, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Jane Harmon (who was evidently a Feinstein favorite for the CIA post).
You forgot Selvestre Reyes on the House Intel.But folks call & register your disgust at Feinstein & Rockefeller:Feinstein # 202-224-3824
Rockefeller:#202 224-6472