Charter 08 is a document signed by prominent civilian leaders in China calling for Democracy and the rule of law. It was issued on the 10th of December, in emulation of the Czechoslovakia’s Charter 77. For all the jokes about Guns and Roses’ most recent album, it seems that Chinese Democracy is going to be even more delayed, costly, and anticipated, than Chinese Democracy.
What did it call for? Amending the Chinese Constitution for Separation of Powers, Democratizing the lawmaking process, Independence of the judiciary, Public Institutions for the Public, Election of officials, an end to internal citizenships, Freedom of Association, Assembly and Religion, Rights to Property, Fiscal Reform, Social Security, Protection of Environment, and a Federal System. In short, a Chinese Democracy with many of the same ends and means as Democracy has around the world.
For a moment there was some wishful thinking about making Beijing sweat over the declaration. However, many of the signers were arrested within hours. Memories of what Beijingers call "The Accident" are still fresh on both sides. However, with the new western year, a crack down has started in earnest:
At least 70 of the Charter’s 303 original signatories have been summoned or interrogated by police and China’s powerful Central Propaganda Department has warned all domestic media not to interview or carry articles by anyone who signs the charter.
The interrogations gathered momentum this week and all those called in have been ordered to retract their support for the Charter. The government appears to be concerned by the heady language and the prominence of many of the signatories, who include mid-level government officials and Communist party academics.
Liu Xiaobo and Zhang Zhuhua were arrested before the declaration was even formally launched, and Liu was detained without being able to contact anyone for nearly a month. Central Government has accelerated it’s pace of detentions and increased pressure for all of the signatories to denounce the charter. Several signers have made it clear that they are under informal house arrest, but believe it is unwise to publicize this at the present time.
The real engine is that China is about to enter a period where the easy growth of this export led boom is going to come to an end. Hard choices will have to be made. However, there is no powerful Democracy movement on the ground in China, instead, a great deal of rootless anger, and a great deal of wishful thinking. The central government has moved to coöpt economically successful members of the business class, and fold them into the party and the decision making process. Charters are heroic, noble, and stirring. But there are still more people in China risking jail to pirate Chinese Democracy than willing to risk jail for Chinese Democracy. Democracy is a flower, it grows out of the soil, and not the air. Power grows in places other than the barrel of a gun, and charters can be part of that, but not until people who read them have the ability to make them real.



30 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
an end to internal citizenships
Anyone know what that means?
Thanks for this post Stirling. Terrible situation. I wonder if we have people this brave here.
In Russia your internal passport is for a particular region. Perhaps it is equivalent.
Oh yes, you’re blogging with them every day. *s*
And thanks for the explanation.
Digg is open
Hey I loathe external passports. The very concept of an internal passport…Can we please get rid of international borders? /rant
Ah’m a ceetizen of the world. Passports? We doan need no steenking passports.
Oh yes!
Yes. Yes. Humans without borders.
(While respecting certain personal ‘boundaries’, borders are cages and excuses for war.)
If only the species had the imagination …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEOkxRLzBf0
From communism to fascism in one easy step. There’s not much difference imho.
I suppose if one were to take no borders to the next step, there would be no ownership of property. At least significant and temporary (generational) limitations.
Like Soviet Russia, China isn’t communist. Bureaucratic dictatorship a la Uncle Joe. Same with Cuba. What the ruling elites call themselves is one thing, the reality is quite different. Nor are they socialists.
Agree. So it makes no difference whether dictators, technocrats (Chinese leaders are all engineers as near as I can tell) or business people are in charge. I was just applying the labels that polisci types might apply. Your comment is the reason why I said there was little difference.
An anarchist is anybody who doesn’t need a cop to tell him what to do. Ammon Hennacy.
In China people have residence permits, until 2003, if someone did not have their national ID card and permit, they could be detained. A university student,Sun Zhigang, was detained, beaten to death. The death was covered up and reporters that wrote about it were jailed. The scandal broke, and laws were relaxed because of the out cry.
(http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2005/05/rise-of-rights/)
However even with this people from the country side do not have full freedom of movement, and must purchase “temporary” residence permits to work in cities. An estimated 13% of the population of Beijing is on some form of temporary residence permit.
What did socialism ever give us –outside of Social Security and Medicare the two most popular programs in government?
Tonight’s Lou Dobbs poll
Do you agree with the Senate Democratic leadership’s decision to block Roland Burris from taking over President-Elect Obama’s Senate seat?
Yes 57% 608
No 43% 452
Total Votes: 1060
Notably, China has no social welfare programs.
Just voted. Was amazed at how few people voted. How much longer is Lou Dobbs on air? Or is that just holiday lows?
Good point.
They announced it on air moments ago.
When I was in China in 2000, I was watching some strange Chinese program on TV. IIRC, it was dubbed in English. The story was that a young woman who worked very hard had saved (imagine a young Chinese woman saving when the average American doesn’t) a significant sum of money for her, for possible family problems. One arose, but at the same time the young woman’s apt burned and she had literally saved her money under her mattress and it was lost. It was heart wrenching, but taught me how naked ordinary Chinese are wrt adversity.
Any one who watches Lou Dobbs has to be a spy or have loose screw
424 hrs & 0 min
Lou Dobbs is a traditional populist. Started his anti-immigrant rant because it hurts U.S. workers at the lower end of the skills level. He’s gone OTT since then. Watched tonight because choices are limited.
I rarely watch CNN. Lou is not on, MSNBC is doing Prison TV or some such… and reports on Israel are dominating CNN now.
His
interrogationinterview techniques would not be allowed in very many police departments in this country.423 hrs & 56 min
There is a decent football game on espn.
423 hrs & 55 min
Update:
Yes 53% 812
No 47% 716
Total votes: 1528
Borders are important for knowing where this or that law and judicial system extends. But, travel should be relatively free. Most people don’t care to travel far from home except for business and entertainment. Exactly who might travel into or out of a country that might be a problem? Terrorists or anyone who might travel for nefarious purposes. Perhaps some day in the future there will be less hatred and free travel can become a reality. We’re edging toward it with greater international trade, communications, news, education and other things. Considering the world of 1900 we’ve come a very long way toward the peace Woodrow Wilson imagined and we will inevitably find it to our benefit to continue this trend. But, don’t expect it to happen overnight.
After we, as a species, end the ‘value’ or ‘profit’ of war, rendering war itself unattractive to the last group which ‘benefits’ from its ‘application’,
and after we, as a apecies, come to grips with global climate change …
and after we, as a species, decide that there is, after all, ‘enough’ of the fundamental necessities of life, to ‘go around’, assuming we wish to consider human beings as one of our ‘better’ ‘investments’ …
and’ after having made THAT decision, as a species, we might consider protecting that ‘investment’ by futher investing in the well-being of this ‘principle’, for that is what it must become, then universal healthcare and eductional opportunity for all each person’s life will seem a trife, indeed.
and, after having done these few, simple things, we may begin, as a species, to dispense with the notion that human beings, are at heart, simply beasts, clawing and tearing their way to excess.
and then, we may look to considering that we have to begin, as a species, to look at old problems in a new way …
Fortunately, for our sakes, and life as we know it, we have all the time in the world.