Today the EPA announced arsenic levels downstream from the TVA’s toxic coal ash disaster exceed permitted levels by over a hundred fold.  Actually, by 149 times permitted levels.

Arsenic levels more than 100 times the acceptable amount have been found in a river near a massive coal ash spill in East Tennessee, federal environmental officials say.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released data Friday showing total arsenic levels in one sample were 149 times the maximum acceptable level.

The water sample from the Emory River near the spill site also showed a total concentration of lead five times above normal and slightly elevated total levels of beryllium, cadmium and chromium.

Meanwhile, samples taken near the Kingston water treatment plant – which is upstream from the spill site – were found to be within the federal limits, except for thallium, which was found at levels three times the maximum limit, according to the EPA data.

Under the Rethugs, the EPA’s political "leaders" have shown we can’t ever trust them to tell the truth, much less protect us.  Here are three sets of questions:

(1) Given that heavy metals can often be measured in under 24 hours, how many days has EPA known of arsenic concentrations 149 times permitted levels, lead levels five times above permitted levels, and elevated levels of the very toxic metals beryllium, chromium, and cadnium? When did EPA first have this data?  If there was a delay in release, why?   Did EPA share this data with TVA before notifying the public?  Are Bushie political appointees once again preventing EPA staff from timely release of critical information to the public?

(2) Given that lead (and very likely arsenic) are neurotoxic at any concentration, and heavy metals in sediment "bioaccumulate" in the microbes and invertebrates living within and in the sediment, how many decades (or centuries) must elapse before fish and shellfish in the poisoned waterways may be safely consumed?How can EPA possibly hope to decontaminate the billion gallons of toxic coal waste which will spread heavy metals across land and water as the ash dries up and blows about?

(3) Does what passes for the EPA (and TN’s equivalent agency) have any explanation for high thallium levels at the Kingston water treatment plant upstream from the spill?  [hint: will GIS mapping of the Kingston plants' emission plume correlate with the watershed upstream from the Kingston water treatment plant?]

Related posts:

  1. Max Baucus Wastes Months, Fails; New York Times Misses It
  2. Who Should Be Allowed to Participate in Democracy?
  3. Late Night: RACISM ALERT!11! Rush Limbaugh Not Allowed to Own Football Team Because He Belongs to Oppressed Minority Class (i.e., Rich Screechy White Twits)
  4. I was the X-Files Editor for the New York Times
  5. FDL Book Salon Welcomes Robert H. Frank, The Economic Naturalist’s Field Guide: Common Sense Principles for Troubled Times