Ruth Marcus seems to view Washington DC as a giant slumber party, and obsesses on who should be invited (Caroline Kennedy, by all means!) and what games should be played. 

She obviously got a lot of negative letters for saying that it’s just more important to make sure bad things don’t happen again than it is to have trials n’stuff that people at the party might find embarrassing and uncomfortable, so she’s at it again — this time on the icky subject of whether it’s prudent to prosecute people for torture:

[P]unishment is not the only way to prevent wrongdoing. If someone is caught breaking into your house, by all means, press charges. But you might also want to consider installing an alarm system or buying stronger locks.

It would also be expensive, we won’t be able to do a lot of other fun things if that’s how we spend our time, and Obama really isn’t interested so let’s not bother.

No, it isn’t from The Onion.

I happened to read Jane Mayer’s book when I was on vacation, so probably a bit touchy on the subject.  But if there’s one thing to be thankful for amidst the death rattle of print journalism, it’s the prospect of no more Washington Post and this kind of clubby, banal DC prating.

Update:  Glenzilla writes that torture prosecutions have begun in the US — against Liberia.

Related posts:

  1. Vote: Which Democrat Doesn’t “Walk the Talk” On the Public Option?
  2. Torture by Numbers: 264 Hours of Sleep Deprivation
  3. Ramzi bin al-Shibh’s Lawyers Barred from Info on the Torture that Drove Him Crazy
  4. What If Civilian Trials Prove Torture Wasn’t Necessary?
  5. Torture: How a Review Gets to Grand Jury in Five Days or Less