2296901210_05efd982bd_m.thumbnail.jpgI’m not generally one for projecting meaning into silence, but I think it’s worthwhile to consider what David Axelrod didn’t say about the Gaza strikes on Meet the Press this Sunday.

As Glenn Greenwald notes, 71% of Americans don’t think the US should take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  Despite this fact, the statements of Republican and Democratic leaders alike are in lockstep with George Bush.  Reid, Pelosi, Hoyer and Berman all unilaterally support Israel’s actions –  their releases could have been written by Bill Kristol.

Barack Obama himself has demurred, saying "there’s only one President." So the only statement so far coming out Team Obama is from Axelrod.  

As M.J. Rosenberg writes:

On Meet The Press this morning, David Axelrod was asked about Gaza by David Gregory. Gregory reminded Axelrod that the President-Elect had visited Sderot earlier this year and said that Israel had the right to defend its people against the mortars. What does he think now?

Axelrod said, predictably, that we have one President at a time. He also said that Obama understood the "urge" to respond militarily.

"The urge." That’s it. None of that "of course Israel has the right to defend itself" stuff which was Bush’s response to everything. Not this time. Israel’s right to defend itself is not the issue: this particular onslaught is.

When Obama feels strongly about anything, the "one President at a time" mantra is abandoned. When he wants to avoid being boxed in, he invokes it. Under pressure to follow Nancy Pelosi’s example and just endorse the attack, Axelrod punted. Big time. I hope the Israelis understand what this means.

I wish Axelrod said more but, in this case, silence was golden. Axelrod sent a signal. After Jan. 20th, America will be an "honest broker." That is what both sides need.

I have no idea if this is a valid assessment, or how Obama will ultimately choose to address the Israeli/Palestinian situation.  But what is incontrovertibly true is that the US is scheduled to give Israel $30 billion in military aid over the next ten years, and that Israel used US made missiles in the current strike. 

Axelrod:

He’s going to work closely with the Israelis. They’re a great ally of ours, the most important ally in the region…But he will do so in a way that will promote the cause of peace, and work closely with the Israelis and the Palestinians on that — toward that objective.

Parsing Obama’s silence is always tricky business, and he’s never given any indication that he would drift from the status quo.  But the fact that he is not immediately echoing the "suffocating orthodoxy of our politicians" cannot be comforting to those who depend on US support to finance and launch campaigns like the one currently underway in Gaza.

Related posts:

  1. Israel Gearing Up For Iran?
  2. Gaza – Some Things Never Change
  3. PA Pres. Abbas to “Step Down”; Was Suppressing Goldstone Worth It?
  4. Biden on Iran: ‘Some Real Doubt’ About The Electoral Outcome
  5. Bush Duplicitous, Deceitful, Dangerous to Global Stability