Yay! The US may finally have a leader who wants to avert global warming. Boo! Looks like we’ll be eating toxic swill while we do it. Um…President-Elect Obama, can we have a second helping of Change, please? Of course, PEO, we’ve every reason for gratitude on the energy and science picks. Change away from global mass death is change we really can believe in: survival rocks!
What a wonderful gift to find the Federal Climate Tree all decked out with Change. But the second half of the sustainablity recipie requires safe food, air, and water. Sadly, PEO, the Federal Yule banquet Chez Obama served up looks pretty rancid. You found brilliant talent for the science crowd: you know you could get some geniuses to stay down on the farms. So how you’re appointing Nobel Prize level talent in science, but you chose the Three Stooges to run land, farms, and the environment?
What’s on the menu at Interior? Better come with a big appetite: Interior controls one in five acres in America, including the vast Bureau of Land Management holdings. Interior supposedly regulates mining, energy leases, and royalties on oil and gas taken from Federal lands (including Native American lands). Some DOI lands are leased for farming; across the arid West ranchers and farmers lease BLM lands and/or irrigate cops with water from Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation dams. DOI’s land holdings are so vast that the chemicals used on them affect water supplies and private lands "downstream" from Interior lands. Thoug he’s not as bad as the Bushies, Obama’s Interior pick Senator Ken Salazar doesn’t appear at risk of waking up to a call from Stockholm. He also doesn’t seem likely to get the Right Livelihood Award.
Oil and mining interests praised Mr. Salazar’s performance as a state official and as a senator, saying that he was not doctrinaire about the use of public lands.
[snip]
He has also supported robust research on technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal-burning power plants, something the coal industry favors.
He also backed a compromise that would let oil companies drill for natural gas in limited parts of the Roan Plateau in northwestern Colorado, a plan that most environmental advocates opposed…
Pam Kiely, program director at Environment Colorado, said [snip] he had not spoken out forcefully against oil and gas development in millions of acres of national forests and roadless areas.
When even the NYT notices Obama’s Interior pick wasn’t keen to regulate what Interior regulates, that doesn’t look too tasty.
What’s on the menu at Agriculture? Farms and forests. Smokey Bear and Bessie the cow live here. USDA runs the Forest Service and the Farm Bill, and supposedly regulates various aspects of produce, dairy, and meat/poultry/fish safety. USDA also looks over large areas of farmland set aside in conservation programs funded by the Farm Bill. If you eat, Obama’s Ag choice affects you. That’s why Iowa Gov. Vilsack is such a rancid pick. Monsanto’s pet scientists told us Frankencrops wouldn’t pollute normal seeds; Monsanto’s lobbysists moonlighting as revolving door "regulators" at EPA and USDA made the whole scam happen. Now GM crops are shown to decrease fertility and life-span…after Frankenseeds contaminated US corn, soy and crops. Genetic pollution is forever. That’s why small farmers have started to pass local ordinances banning GMO seeds. Vilsack spiked that protection for Iowans
In the year 2005, Vilsack championed a law in Iowa that’s been introduced all over the country, backed by Monsanto and the Farm Bureau. This law, this preemption law, as they’re called, basically takes away the right of municipalities or counties to regulate genetically engineered crops. Vilsack rammed this through, even though it’s extremely unpopular with not only consumers, but small farmers.
Vilsack’s a loyal Frankengov for Monsanto and the rest of Mutant Ag. He supports "Pharma-crops": food crops genetically altered to make drugs. Luky us! Genetic contamination can give us drugs in our food, I guess.
Small surprise that
In 2001, the Biotechnology Industry Organization named him "governor of the year" for his "support of the industry’s economic growth and agricultural biotechnology research."
Yep, Obama’s pick for USDA chief: Franken Ag’s pet governor.
Vilsack’s a full service destroyer: he doesn’t just push toxic crops: he pushes lakes of shit. Oh, I’m sorry: the Big Ag term for "lakes of shit" is CAFO.
As a state senator, he voted for the infamous House File 519 in 1995, which stripped counties of the right to impose restrictions on CAFOs.
Gee. I wonder what he did for lakes of shit — er, CAFO’s – as Governor? Oh. He made Iowa safe: for lakes of shit.
Vilsack could have but did not draw up stricter state pollution regulations of CAFO’s than EPA regs. Vilsack sided with polluters against public health.
A 2002 study by the University of Iowa and Iowa State University said Iowa Dept of Natural Resources needed to act to approve protections of public health near confined animal factories (CAFO’s).
He lowered the recommended air quality standards allowing twice as much health-threatening levels of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, particulates and odors emitted from animal factory sewage lagoons, confinement houses and the fields manure is spread on.
As governor, Vilsack set a weaker standard than the surrounding states.
What’s on the menu at EPA? Mostly stuff you don’t want to eat. Broadly speaking, the EPA is repsonsible for keeping the stuff we want to breathe and eat and drink free of the toxic stuff that make a few of us a lot of money, and all the rest of us sick. The Bushies sabotaged EPA with a bunch of revolving-door picks from industry, who just ignored or buried science info that hurt their masters’ bottom lines. That’s how under both Poppy Bush and Clinton Monsanto and other MegaAg corps forced GMO Frankencrops onto US farms using a "revolving door" Monsanto lobbyists doing temporary goverment service. After eight years of Bushie destruction and decades of assualt under Reagan/Poppy/Clinton, EPA requires a strong leader who can revive the agency and stand up to industry. That’s why – except for those who like to eat and drink poison – Obama’s EPA pick is downright toxic. The best even Lisa Jackson’s defenders can find to say of her tenure at New Jersey’s equivalent of the EPA runs along the lines of:
Jackson is "a skilled administrator who’s willing to listen" and the "best DEP commissioner that New Jersey had for a long time." Jackson’s agency "has suffered from a slate of budget cuts by Democratic and Republican governors alike, and thousands of staff positions have been lost over the years."
Glad to read Jackson’s a good listener. What does Scientific American have to say about her administering?
In a report released this summer, the EPA’s inspector general slammed New Jersey’s failure to clean up several toxic waste sites in a timely manner, and accused the state’s environmental agency of going easy on polluters and failing to seek necessary support from the EPA. The report said the department bore at least partial responsibility for "not implement[ing] agreements on cleanup milestones, Agency responsibilities, and enforcement actions."
"If the EPA is saying that New Jersey’s enforcement is bad, you know there is a serious problem," says Robert Spiegel, executive director of the Edison Wetlands Association, a New Jersey based non-profit that closely monitors several Superfund sites throughout the state. Spiegel says he had urged Jackson to take more immediate action on some sites, and that Jackson’s field staff had done the same, but their pleas had been ignored.
New Jersey, long a center for the chemical manufacturing industry, has gained notoriety in the environmental community for its widespread pollution.
Gee. Doesn’t look a big steaming helping of adminsitrative competence. But hey – it’s just keeping poision out of our food and water and air. Why not bring in the person who ran New Jersey’s environment agency so poorly it made the Bushie EPA look good to clean up the Bushie EPA? She’s got nowhere to go but up, right?
Why, she’s even signed onto Corzine’s sleazy way to outsource enforcement: to industry.
Jackson has also supported a controversial Corzine-backed proposal to outsource the department’s cleanup efforts to consultants, which would potentially mean cleanups conducted by groups that also work for the companies responsible for the contaminated sites.
Hey, at least Lisa Jackson’s good at Shock Doctrine. Too bad about our land, air, water, and food. And too bad about that whole Change thing: looks like Jackson’s happy to keep the revolving door well-greased.
In one of her first acts, Jackson appointed the lobbyist for the New Jersey Builders Association as her Assistant Commissioner to oversee critical water quality and land use permits. Jackson later convened an industry-dominated task force to rewrite DEP policies and relaxed pollution enforcement through policies more business-friendly than those under Gov. Christie Whitman
Well, maybe she’s a people person, right? According to PEER, not so much:
DEP employees describe Ms. Jackson as employing a highly politicized approach to decision-making that resulted in suppression of scientific information, issuance of gag orders and threats against professional staff members who dared to voice concerns. These reports raise troubling questions about her fitness to run an agency of much greater size and complexity.
I dunno if it’s part of the invisible global three-dimensional chess game or just cause I’m so dense, but I don’t get it. For a smart guy who can pick smart people, how did Obama end up choosing such a bunch of Stooges for Interior, USDA, and EPA? Doesn’t a smart community organizer know that industry cronies at regulatory agencies are what got us into this mess? I mean, isn’t that what the Hamilton Project is all about, right?
Guess I’ll never understand; I’m just too crass to see the subtle treasures in the CAFO’s.
Bon appetit – and Happy Yule.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

With Franken on deck to becoming senator, I think we need a new Frankenstein term or this’ll get confusing.
- Tom
It seems like Obama has been in a rush to get his staff in place that he hasn’t given enough consideration to some of his picks. These choices amount to a big steaming yule log with flies a-buzzin’.
Mutant? How’s this sound: Mutantseeds, Mutantgov, Mutant Ag’s pet governor.
I would think it’ll be a while before an actual mutant gets elected to office, but with the going’s on you mention, it could be sooner than we think!
- Tom
Native Americans have a slightly different take on Salazar
http://www.indiancountrytoday……37254.html
It’s looking like what’s on the menu is what Americans demand. Costco now has organic hamburger from one of the Dakotas. More expensive, but if Costco shoppers buy it, there’s a real demand.
Fortunately, the good folks at Monsatan offered up yet another
revolving doormole for Obama’s transition team in charge of USDA, thus sparing The Leader from tiresome details such as the safety of our food supply.Heh. Obama’s looking after his donations for his reelection campaign. After all, with the doo doo that W left him, he’s gonna need overwhelming financing to counteract his failed first term.
In addition, it is very clear to me that Obama has carefully studied ever recent administration & concluded that W’s innovation: the perpetual campaign: is the way to go. Expect servings of hope at every turn in the road.
Good point. Finding a replacement doesn’t seem easy.
I can’t seem to get past “Igorfoods”, myself…
Dayam, Doc, ya always have to rain on the parade, eh? Btw, I agree that Vilsack and Jackson do sym bolize the Bush doctrine of having the fox guarding the henhouse…! 8-(
i’m sure this is gonna come back on Obama, and that’s going to be the TRUE TEST POINT.
PERSONALLY?
i’m just glad as hell to see Salazar OUT
*of the senate!
he’s an asshat from WAYBACK.
Why, Kirk! I’m surprised — don’t you know The New Politics involves bringing everyone to the table, even the people who’ll shit in your food?
Digg this post please
My milk doesn’t have rGBH, although it has a notice on it that rGBH wouldn’t hurt me if it did.
The power of the rGBH lobby, I guess — even though I’ve gone out of my way to choose non-rGBH milk, and the milk processor has congratulated me on my choice, they are required to remind me that it is harmless.
You wouldn’t think that a maker of a harmless additive would require such a widespread notice, would you, that it needed to appear on products without their additive in it?
Who would be good for Agriculture, Interior and EPA? Any opinions?
I don’t have enough political knowledge in these areas to even know who would be better appointments.
I think I can see Salazar fitting the Obama pattern for a ‘gofer’ department secretary:
Experience Needed to Hit the Ground Running: check (He was director of public land management in CO at the beginning of his career)
Can Build Bridges: check (He does have good relationship with hunters and fishing, and more conservative conservation groups, as well as industry)
Innovative Thinking: check (Supports both strong eminent domain powers and this Payment in Lieu of Taxes thing -and here I am already getting out of my depth. My understanding is that this is plan for feds(?) to fund local govts with lots of public land, and that can permit industry out of taxes and fees, when it is abused, and I tend to assume something like that will be abused) (though maybe here Innovative Thinking shades into Incoherent or Grab Bag Gimmick Thinking, which I think the Payment in Liew of TAxes thing may be)
I think he is also very hostile to CA and AZ getting more Colorado River water, which I think is good. We water hogs down here have to clean up our house before we go grabbing more water. Though I don;t know what ideas he has for upper Colorado River users.
I think he has also opposed some dirty oil shale proposals, though not sure about that. So he has a line somewhere.
Anyway, none of this is in paricualr defense of Salazar, and I would like to know some more about feasible and poltical possible and useful alternatives.
After all, if we do know of some good alternatives, we can at least pesterate and badger and bug Chage bunch before it is too late.
I know a little about farmin’ and ranchin’ and Vilsack is the only proposal I am really unhappy about, other than the Treasury dude, whose name I cannot remember how to spell.
“The lady doth protest too much.”
Yep. Shit is the new post partisan.
Friends of Taylor describe him as a “cattle prodigy.”
Well, if people here can identifying any nominee who is not a very strong advocate of good consumer information labeling, I will sure send let Change.gov know that they are very very unacceptable and bad nominees.
I’m very happy to have a Lieberman ally out of the Senate, and that’s exactly what Salazar was. I devoutly hope the governor chooses Mayor Hickenlooper (sp?) of Denver, who is a brewer (!) to be the next Senator.
And every single state legislature should have on its agenda a special-election law taking the power of abandoned-seat-appointment away from their governors. It’s outrageous.
I am SHOCKED to learn that President-Elect Obama has not selected a totally progressive candidate for every single position in his new administration.
Dang! I thought that he was a 100% leftie, and would stand for every single thing that I stand for!!
I, for one, am THRILLED by his science appointments and for many of his other political and cabinet appointments. I am hopeful that some other positions may be moved to the left by the ‘will of the people’ if enough of us squawk loud and long enough.
I am unsurprised by the deviations, when some of the Obama appointments are not my first or second choices.
Take a breath, fellow citizens. The man has not yet even been inaugurated.
Not sure what I meant to reply to @1, but I think it was somethign eCAHNnomics said.
What’s so astounding is that Monsanto’s reach is global… Africa suffers and thanks to Viceroy Bremer’s rule #88, the Iraqis are beholden to them…! 8-(
I can’t go as far as you, but tend to be sympathetic. But I do think just complaining is not useful. Anyone have some good suggestions for better nominee than Vilsack, I will study up and let the Hope & Co. know about it.
Some of these nominations can be explained on your theory. It is my theory too, but it is just a theory.
Maybe we should start referring to Obama as XYZ, so people don’t let their hopes and disappointments get in the way of being just as wary, and advocating for what you think is best policy just as strongly as if McCain had won. I think that should be the approach.
Hickenlooper is a business person. Salazar defeated Pete Coors who would have given Inhoff a run for the worst sen. Hickenlooper has done some decent things to combat homelessness but we still have had over 150 deaths so far this winter.
I agree Salazar’s made some good choices (including the legislation for Native Americans cited in foothillsmikes comment) I’d prefer him to any Bushie there.
Rep. Raul Grijalva would have been perfect for Interior.
Mary Nichols would be great at EPA: only consolation is that we in CA get to keep her.
Off diesel…no thanks. G
Jackson?
to be fair, Monsanto mole Taylor is at least reported to have supported consumers rights to know if their milkcows were on bovine growth hormone. Of course, Monsanto’s other moles blocked mandatory labelling of GMO foods.
I think we are not highlighting left vs. right, but rather appointments that seem to be productive for the planet’s and the human race’s sustainability vs. those that aren’t.
A Q remains about whether the acceptable science appointments are cover for Obama’s lust after corporate donations. Too soon to be conclusive.
thanks for the link. A couple listed there seem more progressive, without being outrageously too “lefty”
I would not mind an outrageous lefty for Agriculture, but I don’t know enough about agriculture politics to think of one. I really don’t like Vilsack in that position. Partly, to be honest, because I do not like Vilsack on a number of nonagricultural positions. I am not even sure he would make a good ‘gofer’ dept secratary (he seems stubborn and self-righteous to me) which is what I am hoping that a few of these appointments are for.
Monsanto tried to bribe Health Canada into allowing rGBH in 1998. There is an important article about Monsanto at OpEdNews today. Earlier, I could not get the link to work. If that happens again, the heading is ‘Raids on Seeds (Life itself)..by Monsanto’.
http://www.opednews.com/articl…..15-45.html
http://www.ethicalinvesting.co…../10009.htm
Forgot to mention: thanks for this great question. *g*
Tom Philpott at Gristmill has written a lot on the USDA pick. He also has suggestions from the sustainable ag community:
I am sure Obama will, by force of his will alone, get these corporatists to shed their skins and views in order to implement The New Politics. What might that be, do you suppose?
Kirk is in the trenches, well informed…an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Bush has industry regulating industry. Bad bad bad. getting the right people up front to set a sound policy is of the utmost importance, So I support that effort. if you knew what Dr. Kirk knows from GMO permanent impact to the genetic stock that is strenghtenedby recombinant with native palnt stock to bio accumaulation of toxics in the watershed that are know carcinogens and mutagens you would be yelling warnings to the critters.
It is time for profit to take a second seat to health of our biosphere. Profit means squat if you are not healthy enough to enjoy it.
Lisa Derrick front-paged from the Silo!
Bush Aide Pleads Guilty: Promoted Republican-Style Democracy for Cuba
thanks for your interest!
On a meta-level, the FDA pick is now the backstop for our health and safety.
Philpott tells how we prolly won’t be seeing any lefties among “acceptable”choices to head up USDA
Jim Hightower for AG a KOS high pick?
CT, our rainy season here is so brief one tries to make the most of it *g*
Hightower knows his way around the farm environs and is a popular democrat, why not him?
Well, he was former Ag Sec in Texas. I’d be absolutely thrilled, but Team Obama would shit soya bricks.
Who would be good pick Interior? That wonderful man, AZ Rep. Raul Grijalva. A great injustice has been done by Obama-Emanuel in bypassing Grijalva for Interior Secretary.
See ALL the discussions and outrage at the public lands Blog http://www.wolves.wordpress.com . There are many, many Posts about this all over the past week.
Plus, selecting a rancher shows Obama is casting aside science related to the horrendous ecological effects of cattle grazing in the arid West.
Uranium mining and hedge funds, the foreign-owned Nevada gold mines, and Obama kowtowing to miners and Big ranchers all factor into the atrocious Salazar pick.
Good essay, Dr. Murphy.
The only science pick by Obama – so far – that might come after agribusiness very soon is his NOAA pick, Dr. Jane Lubchenco. She has spoken widely about the relationship between oceanic “dead ones” and toxic river runoffs, and about how quickly we need to try to counter ocean acidification. I can’t imagine her attenuating her message at NOAA just to make sure Obama’s coffers get filled by Monsanto bucks for 2012.
OTOH, NOAA isn’t huge, and Bush has all but dismantled it over the past eight years.
ET, in the first version of this post I used your excellent Oxdown diary about Lubchenco for NOAA as an example of Obaam getting it right. I can’t imagine her speaking anything but truth. Thanks for your post on her: you learned me.
Fluffing K Street while serving friends a big steaming pile?
Oh wait – you said new
I’m stuck in my Rainy cycle right now, what’s an inch more…? *g*
Btw, fortunately it’s wetter than the last couple of cycles… We need to make up a lot of inches before we hit the historical norm…! ;-)
Gosh…..
I missed your first post. Anyway, more science, more scientists, more awareness about how perilous our situation already is. Enough of the “if we don’t do something by 2015 or 2025 or 2050″ bullshit.
spew!
(just saw this)
Michelle Bachman can be the datum point.
I’m sorry, I can’t edit for beans tonight: I was unclear. To keep the post from collpasing under its own wieght, I cut out the section about the specific good science/enegy picks. FOrtunately, other good peeps here at the Lkae had covered ‘em!
Here is a link to a Blog Post and article on why Progressive did not get chosen for Interior. Because Obama and Rahm take the Progressive vote for granted, among other things.
http://wolves.wordpress.com/20…..-grijalva/
Read the interview at the link in the Post to the AZ paper. Instead of Grijalva, Obama chose Ken Salazar a promoter of prairie dog killing and a beef rancher in the water-starved interior west. The Demarcated Landscapes blog, on the ground in Tucson, also has several Posts on the awful Salazar pick, and everybody’s reaction to that giant cowboy hat Salazar wore and the symbol it sent.
Is it too late to ask the Human Subjects Committee to cancel the experiment? Crimes against Nature.
thanks for the links. I will definitely submit a protest about Vilsack -as soon as I educate myself about a better choicd! :-). I know the issues well, but not the ag politicians.
The most promising point about Salazar mentioned on one of your links, is that Obama wants him out of the Senate. I assume Ritter will appoint some one better.
I guess that is not high praise for Salazar as an interior secretary. Competent moderate was the best thing I read, several times.
ROTFLMAO
And Tom Price is lined up right behind her.
Thanks for those links too. And I agree, the Big Hat should go, if Salazar thinks it helps his image. If the Big Hat is part of his identity, then he can do what he wants, I guess.
Ooh, ooh, howza about Marsha Blackburn…?
In isolation, getting Salazar out of the Senate seems a good idea. Taken with the other appointments though, it feels like more of the same. And Grijalva may be just what’s called for.
I have a sister who lives near Tucson, I will have to ask her about Grijalva.
I’ve been wondering about that too, for some of these food and environmental issues, where is the Human Subjects Committee? Goes for health care management too. They need one to keep them (or get them back) on the high road, in my opinion.
thanks for those links: “wolves” is a great blog (though my writing’s prolly not up to their standards *g*), and I look forward to checking out Demarcated Landscapes.
Good on ‘ya for getting the word out.
Ending our role as involuntary human subjects demands the precautionary principle. The pp places the burden on industry to demonstrate absence of harm before releasing new substances or technologies.
Until then, we are all helpless human subjects in innumerable uncontrolled trials of how – together and in combination – the tens of thousands of chemicals flowing through our air, food, water and bodies affect our personal health.
Thanks – I did not know this. You learned me.
I remember that unfortunate back-and-forth incident. Blame it on blisters in someone’s hiking boots, or something …
Ouch! Hope all affected parts are fully recovered – and truly glad to see wolves’ great work and seem them linked here.
“see them linked”
So we have the high-flying Science Team, and then those actually in charge of the Federal Agencies implementing decisions being really questionable. I am becoming afraid that the high-flying Science Team may be window-dressing? Cover for continued assault on the environment by industries which are increasingly foreign-owned and/or controlled.
EDSP
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program over 86,000 domestic chemicals have to be classified as to the health and environmental risks they bring…USEPA was sued by The National Resources Defense Council to comply.
Here is a petition against Vilsack’s confirmation from the Organic Consumer’s Association
One more link to another petition
It’s a KOS diary that links to a petition talking about a list of people who would be acceptable appointments for undersecretaries at the dept of ag
Thanks for a brilliant and right-on post.
Unless you’re a policy wonk you may not know that a)progressive alternatives were put up for all of these positions;
b) Obama ignored petitions, personal appeals, etc
c) The positions of these 3 appointees are on the record as horrific.
I’m glad I never supported him in the primaries–I knew he didn’t give a damn about many of our issues.