Rebuts Bush's claims, while laughing at Bush.
Spencer on MaddowBy: egregious Wednesday December 17, 2008 7:00 pm |
Rebuts Bush's claims, while laughing at Bush.



| Behind the Mask: Animal Rights Activists | |
| View Show |
Sunday, July 5, 2009 5:00pm Eastern Chat with Eric Lotke about his new book. Hosted by Eli. | Wednesday, July 7, 2009 3:00pm Eastern Chat with George Soros about his new book. |
Great job, Spencer, no matter the distraction off to your right….
Laughing at Bush is good.
Meanwhile Dana Perino sports her new shiner…though she’s no where to be seen at the “Shoes Conference”.
And is that an “O” above her right eyebrow…Hmmm!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....51412.html
Yay Becks.
“Magical Mystery Tour” - ROFL
Um … which one is Spencer ? *g*
especially since I’m quite sure he’s laughing at us.
Now maybe the cool kids will start hanging over at his place, since he’s extra popular all of a sudden.
Excellent job, Spencer !
Although you reminded me of my childhood friends, who were forced to wear a tie, comb their hair and go to Church. *g*
I watched him too and thought he did very well.
Was this Attackerman’s tv debut?
OT but consistent with the somewhat lighthearted mood I this thread, it seems that Mr al Zeida may have started something with the whole show thing. The New York transit agency held a pressed today announcing it’s plan to greatly increase fares whole greatly reducing service. An angry straphanger in attendance reportedly thew a shoe at the commissioner. No word on his fate, but presumably mayor Bloomberg frowns on torture (unlike his predecessor)
I thought Ackerman did a great job.
As I posted on an earlier thread, if anyone knows him, a small suggestion is that he get the anti-glare treatment on his eyeglasses if he intends to be on TV often.
Dear heavens, Petro. You are so classy with a K (as Rachel says!)
I’m glad you made this suggestion again. He’ll look more pro next time. (hopefully)
He made too much sense to be on TeeVee often. *g*
((( Loo Hoo )))
Hugs! Hope you’re wrong about Ackerman, though. eCAHN is right…he need the tv glasses.
He should still take my advice, just in case. *g* I costs only about an extra $40.
I completely agree about the glasses and perhaps a ’smaller’ tie, unless he had a bet with someone … *g*
Dammit, completely forgot … ((( Eg )))
And calling a
spade a spadelying liar a lying liar.Boo yah to you (or Oooh Rah, as you prefer).
I’m soooo stoked. One of my “friends in the computer” was on my TV machine!
FunnyD
I think those big ties are all the rage with the young people today. Or no tie, like Spencer’s buddy Chris Hayes.
I noticed the tie too, but didn’t want to be too negative, since my overall impression was good. A plain blue tie would be both symbolic & attractive.
Eli is upstairs!
Compassionate Conservatism, The Ultimate Oxymoron
Loo Hoo and I are the (un)Official Wardrobe critics of this blog. Welcome aboard ! *g*
and if they could put the monitor (or whatever) a bit lower so he doesn’t have to crane his neck up in that funny way…
Yes,
good, I’m not the only one who noticed.
I didn’t mind the tie. The stripes were wide and low-contrast enough not to do weird things on my TV machine screen.
TV glasses? You can get those?
There he is, star of stage and screen!
I’m not worthy!
coming late to this thread after seeing Spencer on Rachel redux - he’ll take all the critiques in to consideration - but what a treat to hear him speak and hold forth - very nice Spencer - uhhh. gimme some
awwww thx. I will indeed take all critiques into consideration. Hopefully this won’t be my last time doing this, even if I had to interrupt to wish my roomie a happy birthday. Thanks for watching, I am drunkenly stumbling to bed.
nice one.
she will have you back.
now crash.
You have to … you’re a Star !
Stellar job !
Late to the post, but a laurel and hearty kudo to Specer Hoss!!
NICELY DONE!!!
A minor quibble of content regarding laughing versus truth tellling about their lies . . . we will need to continually assualt, berate, ridicule and prove facts to every syllable that’s uttered from the sources or the GOP about the legacy of this admin. Constantly. Everywhere. In our daily lives, on the toobz.
In the MSM when progressive liberals can get there.
We just CANNOT let them get any ground up on defining the past 8 years, and 40 years, in any of their lying and distorting and revisionist ways.
ATTACK! ATTACK! ATTACK! (TM to Da Rex)
What Larue said!
XXOO
FunnyD
Um, aaah, you know, kind of, Imean, etc. Rachel doesn’t do that. Many liberal interviewees do that to the extreme. Not as many republican interviewees do that.
It may be that the repubs are repeating rehearsed talking points while liberals are giving their own ideas, thinking on their feet.
Nevertheless I think people respect well spoken phony talking points more than facts spoken in: um, you know, ah, kind of, what I mean is…..