Remember all those stories about how US forces – under the SOFA – had to withdraw to bases by the end of June 2009 – well our Commander in Iraq, Gen. Ray Odierno has other plans:
… Odierno said that the pullback from Iraqi cities applied only to combat troops, not to trainers, advisers or other support troops.
“So we will continue to provide assistance with transition teams. We will still provide enablers to security forces. They are unable to provide those to themselves,” he said. The joint security stations, which have served as combat outposts in the cities, is “where we’ll provide them all the enablers,” he said…Odierno declined to say how many US troops would be assigned to the transition teams, and what percentage of the 146,000-strong US force they would represent.
Along with announcing his "Enablers" plans, Odierno raised doubts about the 2011 deadline:
But General Odierno said Saturday, as Pentagon officials have said previously, that the agreement might be renegotiated with the Iraqi government.
“Three years is a very long time,” General Odierno told reporters. (h/t Cernig)
Maybe he’s been hanging out with Dr Ali al Dabbagh, Maliki’s spokesman who was sent to Washington this week to discuss the SOFA and meet with advisors to the incoming administration. At a Pentagon presser, al Dabbagh said:
"We do understand that the Iraqi military is not going to get built out in the three years. We do need many more years. It might be 10 years."
Of course, al Maliki quickly called Dabbagh’s statement “only his personal point of view” and said “it doesn’t represent the opinion of the Iraqi government” (after all, it was only Maliki’s official spokesman at a formal press briefing) — but Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who was in Baghdad apparently had nothing to say about Odierno’s plans to break the SOFA before it even begins. I’m guessing that’s why Bush was happy to sign it this morning – before the shoes started flying.
PS – Don’t miss Gareth Porter’s Special Series at IPS on Iran – Part one is here and Jamal Dajani’s great piece here.
Update on Muthathar al Zaida from McClatchy:
Another Iraqi journalist yanked Zaidi to the ground before bodyguards collapsed on Zaidi and held him there while he yelled "Killer of Iraqis, killer of children." From the bottom of the pile, he moaned loudly and said "my hand, my hand."
Zaidi was hauled to a separate room, where his cries remained audible for a few moments.
It wasn’t clear whether Zaidi was hurt. His employer, Cairo-based Baghdadiyah Television, released a statement late Sunday demanding Zaidi’s release from Iraqi custody.
"Any action taken against Muntathar will remind us of the actions and behaviors taken by the reign of the dictator and the violence, the random arrests, the mass graves and confiscations of freedom from the people," the board of Baghdadiyah said.
Friends said Zaidi covered the U.S. bombing of Baghdad’s Sadr City area earlier this year and had been "emotionally influenced" by the destruction he’d seen. They also said he’d been kidnapped in 2007 and held for three days by Shiite Muslim gunmen…
Two other Iraqi journalists were briefly detained after the press conference. An Iraqi security guard hauled them away because one of them called Zaidi’s actions "courageous." They were released. One of them said American officials helped free them.
Hubris Sonic has a suggestion for anyone who might have some extra old shoes – check it out here. Suggested message care of Fighting Liberals:
"Footing the Bill for The Bush Presidency -in honor of our brothers and sister in Iraq"
Raed in the Middle has organized a petition on behalf of al Zaida - please sign!



44 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Thanks Siun, and especially, thank you for the update on al Zaidi.
“had to withdraw to bases by the end of June 2008″ — that’d be June 2009 (we can hope)
Aloha, Siun! I was just reading Spencer’s take on the SOFA referendum…!
Hi Siun, Did you just hear a big thud? It’s my shoe flying onto a wall with Odierno’s photo on it. *s*
How a General can declare such a change in policy.. is beyond me… Hopefully beyond Obama too.
Didn’t Fallon resign for less than this?
It’s an Enabler someone who enables an addict. Sounds like plans “Enablers” plan is designed to enable the addiction of the oil companies and contractors.
Some Iraqi bloggers’ reactions to the soleful fling.
I’m sending my shoe to the White House. Tomorrow.
Priceless!
Librarians, you see, have this irresistible urge to save and catalogue everything. Everything. Even shoes.
I’d love to see a collection there that would make Imelda Marcos jealous.
Ahh. Then I’ll send a shoe there, as well.
No matter what is contained in the referendum the US military will continue to do as it damn well pleases. GEN Odeirno’s staff will always be able to justify military action. It’s easy to say you’re sorry for the deaths of innocents when you don’t give a damn about them in the first place.
Along with a copy of “My Pet Goat”…! ;-)
As I have often said, Odierno is a dope. But just as Odierno has been hedging on the SOFA within hours of its signing, Obama has been backing away and adding conditions to getting us out of Iraq even under a very generous 16 month timeline.
Digg, please. Early and Often.
Mayhaps FDL will put a block with the address of the library so all can be reminded with each visit here. I’ll have to go to the thrift store, though, cuz my Chucks still have life in them.
I just posted a diary, Part I on that NYT draft copy of the SIGIR report…
Thank you, Siun.
OK, your take – is this a measure intended to keep a grip until a date-certain, or is it an extension of the long-planned continuation of the occupation? Have the commanders not anticipated the incoming administration and their “plans?”
Where have we heard “transition teams” and “enablers to security forces” before?
I don’t see a road to peace, or stability, or even political unification anywhere in this idea.
Money wasted in Iraq! Why were we not told?
Odienrno sounds as if he’s trying to push back against an administration that has yet to take office in DC.
I would hope that those superior to him would listen to his words. The good general’s appointment as head of US forces in Iraq, you know, “might be renegotiated” by the new Commander in Chief.
Thanks for catching that – I’ve fixed it now.
Laura – thanks for those links! I see Raed has a petition demanding the release of al Zaida – I’ll add that to the post so everyone can sign as well.
I’d love to see us all send shoes – WH and the Library – can we all organize to get tons sent?
What astounded me the most, was that Bowen had the audacity to say that fraud was minimal in the squandering of the billions we’ve expended…! That will be another diary all it’s own…!
LOL! Call the drive: Put Your Sole Into The White House!
I’ve had a couple of commenters at JustPeaceNow saying they would, and Mock Scissors Paper is linking up the idea, too. Shall we spread the word? I wonder how many blogs we can reach…..
I love it. A Last-ing treasure, so to speak….
Can I send shoes that have a little present from the tigers in them?
I’ve just sent word out to a large list of blogs – we’ll see what we get but I’m hopeful!
And Southern, presents from little tigers might be considered dangerous or toxic and so probably not a good idea imho.
I could let ‘em dry out reallll good. *g* Was bein’ facetious anyhow.
smiling – and I was just being a responsible blogger ;->
I do like the idea of putting them on the spikes on the fence around the WH. Damn, there was a time when I used to sit on that low wall, lean against that fence and feed squirrels who would swarm all over ya. That was before Ike had them poisoned for tearin’ up his putting green.
It’s the Vietnamization of the war, a surefire stage that served Nixon well in 1969.
Shoes for Odierno, too!
Good point Teddy!
They, the military, didn’t learn anything then and won’t learn anything when they repeat the same shit and it blows up in their faces.
Is his name pronounced “Oh dear no”?
I’m thinking that, as inconvenient as it might be to mail a package tomorrow, sending shoes to the White House especially is a way of making very clear that al Zaidi has support. The info in Raed’s petition indicates that he was badly beaten after he was taken away. I hope others will join in this expression of solidarity.
I seem to remember Pres Elect being rather clear – apparently – with Petraeus about who would be Commander in Chief. Let’s see if he reigns in Odierno as well – and if he follows through on his promises.
The military seems to be taking clear advantage of this “we only have one president at a time” goodwill. Which, as Barney Frank pointed out, significantly overcalculates, given the current situation.
Thank you Siun.
and DUGG!
I saw that on 60 Minutes. Leslie Stahl couldn’t keep herself from trying to shout Barney down when he said things she didn’t agree with. I would imagine that when she said, “You think I don’t know what I’m talking about?” and he replied, “Yes” her Rethug ego took a huge hit.
Those in the military with this kind of mindset are the equivalent of the corporate CEOs who are constantly angling for the short-term benefit and ignoring the long term consequences. “One president at a time” is true, but the difference between Jan 19 and Jan 21 will come a something of a shock to Odierno.
Like a shoe in the face!
Does Jim Webb still wear his son’s boots, or might he be willing to donate them to the Bush Library?
PW’s up with Supporting the Troops?
Maybe we could send these shoes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIEnnzsBJ-Q
Would you folks please settle down and think a little bit before you get yourselves spun up over things like this?
Jeeze.
Look, for all intents and purposes (except those of press parasites, war profiteers, and neocons standing for re-election), the Iraq War has been effectively over for the last two years.
Who won? Iran, of course, for the same sort of reasons that France won the Thirty Years’ War.
The only reason our troops are still there is because a plurality of the Shiite factions who are running most of Iraq these days want them there. After all, the United States was no end of help during the ethnic cleaning of Baghdad two years ago.
American soldiers can be very useful. If you’re a Shiite faction leader. They can be used for all sorts of unpleasant tasks that would otherwise cut into your own fighting strength, and make you unnecessarily hated by the other factions.
Our people are going to remain there until the Shiites decide they no longer have any real use for us. At which point, they will either pack up and leave, or they’ll be ejected, mostly dead. In the second case, of course, the cost’ll run into the hundreds of thousands of locals. At minimum.
But I don’t think that cost will matter very much to the people on top of the heap over there. It never has in decades past.
Bishop Berkeley suggested that the object a person perceives is the only object that the person knows and experiences. If individuals need to speak at all of the “real” or “material” object, the latter in particular being a confused term that Berkeley sought to dispose of, it is this perceived object to which all such names should exclusively refer..
In other words, the tangible is actually illusion.
Can’t say the same about blood and treasure, though. Or are you?