The Fed announced today that it would start issuing its own bonds, rather than going through the treasury. It’s hard to be sure of the exact number, but I’m guessing somewhere in the area of 4 or 5 trillion dollars worth, unless it wants to just print money.
Before this, the Fed was having the Treasury issue debt for it, but unfortunately, that money is restricted by the Federal debt ceiling, and getting Congress to increase that debt ceiling by a few more trillion would be politically explosive.
As I noted October 8th, when the Fed started buying up short term commercial paper, the Fed is steadily moving towards becoming a national bank. The bottom line is that banks are pulling back on lending. When the Fed or the Treasury gives them money, instead of using it to lend to business and consumers, they horde it or use it to pay down their losses. They have been increasing interest rates on credit cards, pulling or reducing lines of credits to businesses and just generally lending less and less, even as a huge flood of money gushes from the government into the bottomless pit of their greed and need.
So: lending less money, and charging higher interest rates for it. Not what the economy needs going into a huge recession, and completely frustrating Fed monetary policy. Rate cuts are not being passed on to most businesses and consumers.
There are two ways to get through this.
The first, which I’ve repeatedly suggested, is to nationalize some banks that are failing (like, oh, Citigroup) and use them to lend directly to businesses, consumers and on the overnight bank loan markets at rates the Fed and FDIC set. Other banks can either match rates, or lose customers. And even banks do need customers.
The second option is one the Fed seems to be backing into haphazardly. If banks won’t lend, the Fed can. Given the way the Fed has moved to prop up consumer debt markets, by buying up packaged consumer loans, it’s debt facilities to banks and so on, the Fed has already started down the road.
But what they’re finding is that buying and lending on the secondary markets isn’t working. Sure, lenders will take the money, but they won’t pass on the low rates to consumers, or even necessarily pass on the money. So while buying short term paper has stopped the market from collapsing entirely, it has only slowed the contraction and has not led to improved credit at lower rates.
Which means the next logical step is to just bypass the banks entirely and start letting businesses have Fed lines of credits. And as my friend Stirling and I were joking the other night, hey, why not start issuing Fed credit cards at prime +10%. The Fed will make lots of money, consumers will no longer be gouged by banks, and there’ll be credit. Get some card stamping machines, and set up a customer service department, and soon, you too can argue directly with the Fed about whether they should charge you for that hotel room you say you never slept in.
Sound far fetched? Probably it is, which is why the new administration will have to fail to clear the financial crisis by other means before finally backing into it.
But hey, how cool would it be to have a Platinum Fed Card. "For everything else, there’s the Fed. When you need credit, why go to other banks, go to the only bank allowed to print money."
Related posts:



Spotlight






Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake

Is it just me or is it getting ridiculous out there?
I for one, cannot grasp what all has happened to this country in the last year.
I cannot hope to understand all this financial wizardry or should I say Alchemy?
Turning lead into gold,turning worthless paper assets into money, it’s the same thing just without the incantations.
the big banks have failed due to mismanagement/greed. maybe a size limit? small/local banks that are conected to communities is the way to go. they (banks) can’t be allowed to exist on the profit motive based on the americun consumer habits. we are now in a cycle of debt reduction. that is where we need to be. as the thugs say “the market will adjust”.
OK: this one’s got me stymied, and there isn’t much in macroeconomics that stymies me. First, where does the Fed get its authority to borrow by bond issue? I’ve never heard of that one? Plus, I’m really lost as to the logic of printing up paper bearing interest rather than just plain old paper– you know — the kind that used to be money. It seems to me just to deepen the liquidity trap. Bernanke’s not a dope, so there must be a reason. It would be nice, though, for them to come clean and explain to the rest of us what it is.
As to bank services: the Banque de France offers services to the public. You get a better rate of exchange there (or used to when the country was one the franc) than anywhere else. Have to stand in line, but if you are changing a bundle, it’s worth it. Their post office also offers banking services. And why not? They have a branch in every village.
There is a third way to unstick the banks’ reluctance to lend.
As to those banks that have received money from the government and won’t lend it out, start picking out the officers responsible for those decisions and indict a couple for misappropriating funds, or for lying on the application documents or some similar financial chicanery. Or just call them terrorists. Which, given the way people are reacting to this, they can rightly be called.
As in the case of Mr. Thain (of Merrill Lynch) and his $10 million bonus, which was indispensible to him one day, and totally unnecessary to him the next, a little whiff of powder (and government power) will work wonders. All it took with Thain were a couple letters – from a Congressman and the NY AG.
don’t think this will work. where’s the ability to self deal to their wall street buddies? how do the execs of financial companies get $3 million bonuses?
nope. i can’t seen bernanke going for it.
Republican-econo-terrorists have bankrupted the valued capital system. This requires more than a plan..it requires a new finance system.
i thought it was the same place they get money – don’t they print their own authority?
The “Federal Reserve” is NOT a US Government entity. It is a private bank. They don’t want you to know that. It is not Federal, and there are no “reserves.”
Just yesterday, one of the masters of the universe, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild featured himself on Mr. Rockefeller’s CNBC. Among other things, he implied that the US was a colony of the Crown, and stated that our banking system has failed because it is not run by the Government.
Assume that the Federal Reserve is just an arm of the globalist banking cabal (including the IMF & World Bank), under the supervision of the Crown, and they are in the midst of taking down the existing system to replace it with a globalist system.
”hoard”
well, sir. you haven’t heard of it bc we are still without martial law. i do believe that the shrub would exert that (or similar) power IF he had the time in office.
it’s time for regulation big time. AND for the public to get real.
Why aren’t the banks lending money? That is why we gave them the bailout money? Under what conditions will they loan money again?
Our banking institutions were called to big to fail so what are they doing,
combining. Brilliant just brilliant.
there are NO good risks in this environment. tres is selling @ 0%. hold what ya got.
True but that never stopped the banks from giving out credit cards to drunk college kids before.
the bubble has burst!
This is the first time debt has contracted since they started doing surveys, is this crisis worse than the 70’s?
The FED won’t be issuing a credit card to you. They’ll be implanting an RFID chip with “money” in it. Piss them off, they drain your account.
Interrogators at yesterday’s House Hearing on TARP Oversight hammered on Neel Kashkari (Director of the Troubled Asset Relief Program) mercilessly about Treasury’s lack of oversight TARP expenditures to banks and specifically about the lack on lending on the part of the banks. There was strong criticism from both sides of the aisle; many of the critters cited telephone calls from their constituents complaining about their inability to get credit.
i would think so. china has reported that their exports are in decline, etc. world wide we are in trouble. good thing fer us is that we are over fed. hard times are in store. thank god fer bama.
Of course it is worse. Republics created this one and are still trying to sustain it. Real Mission Accomplished.
Aaron Russo on the FED’s real plan for US.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…..re=related
Nice that the critters pretended to oversee. Jolly good show. OK. Over now. Nothing more to see. Move along.
those folks need to be removed from office. they are not big thinkers. er, not thinkers at all.
it is a slow process this democracy.
Assuming facts not in evidence: process.
IS PARIS BURNING?
(Paris brûle-t-il?) is a 1966 Franco-American film dealing with the 1944 liberation of Paris by rival branches of the French Resistance (communist and gaullist) and the Free French Forces from the occupying Nazis.
Plot
The title is Hitler’s question to his chief of staff Alfred Jodl on the eve of the liberation of Paris (August 25): the military governor of Paris, General Dietrich von Choltitz, had been ordered to destroy Paris rather than let it fall undamaged into the hands of the Allies, but von Choltitz disobeyed.
Screenplay by Gore Vidal a man that has Academic Standing when dealing with all things Nazi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is_Paris_Burning%3F
Is The World Burning? The Bush Cabal are not disobeying their Masters this time.
agreed. i am a dreamer. what process would ya suggest?
Without a GM bridge loan, you don’t need to worry about the future because it is so bad there’s little to be done.
Back to my book. BBL
don’t agree. this country could/can figure it out. i am not interested in a dooms day scenario for the us. it simple is a time to get real.
Even with a GM bridge loan, there is no way to save the global economy from those in charge, intent on destroying it – and creating a new global currency, government and system out of the ashes.
Assume the worst of them:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP73cK3GXdo
Freedom To Fascism.
Segment on the creation of the Federal Reserve.
You may be right. Some of them seemed pretty exercised though. Maxine Waters was angry as hell and Thaddeus McCotter was surgical in taking Kashkari apart.
Bank of America to cut 35,000 jobs.
Excuse : Per CNN breaking news
Tula upstairs “Unemployed in America”
Let’s get real people, there is no credit crisis, the people who lend money have money to lend, but they’re sitting in front of silent telephones because nobody in their right mind wants to borrow any money.
All you have to do is ask around, everybody is behaving exactly like you are, nobody is buying anything, we’ve all become very sensible lately.
It’s a consumer confidence crisis, those big guys, they’re just worried that Paulson is going to run out of ‘Loyalty Bonuses’ before they get their share.
Most bankers are not able to do anything that requires any depth of thought. On the other hand the Federal Bank Examiners are tighter than they have ever been. When a bank makes a loan if it isn’t to a borrower that doesn’t really need the money the Examiners criticize the bank and make them set aside capital against the loan. The examiners need to lighten up also or you will never see any loans made. The banks are more afraid of the examiners than they are of anything else.
“beeatch”
heh
They claim the other banks who want to borrow from them are holding a lot of mortgage-backed securities which have lost value as the housing bubble burst and this means those banks can’t be trusted to repay any loans.
They might be right or just lying to execute some other agenda.
They would have every reason to loan again if the mortgages are modified to be sound again. But, even then they’re likely to be less valuable than they appeared to be at the height of the artificial housing bubble.
If their agenda is to ruin the economy, then nothing can make them loan short of a gun.
Ooooooh, very interesting. So, it’s not JUST the Wall Street bankers, it’s Bushie politics at work too. Verrrryyyy interesting.
Got any links to evidence that it’s much more strict than usual?