Outgoing FCC Chair Kevin Martin will try to push through his plan for free wireless internet (via Silicon Alley Insider) before the year ends. . . with a big caveat.
The free Internet plan is the most controversial issue the agency will tackle in December. . . .
The proposal to allow a no-smut, free wireless Internet service is part of a proposal to auction off a chunk of airwaves. The winning bidder would be required to set aside a quarter of the airwaves for a free Internet service. The winner could establish a paid service that would have a fast wireless Internet connection. The free service could be slower and would be required to filter out pornography and other material not suitable for children. The FCC’s proposal mirrors a plan offered by M2Z Networks Inc., a start-up backed by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers partner John Doerr.
Much of the wireless industry objects to the plan on its face—it does require them to give something away, after all, even if it will be an inferior product. “Consumer advocates” (as the WSJ calls them) object to the pornography filter.
I certainly object to any porn filter—it’s a basic First Amendment conflict. Plus, these filters have proven to be blunt instruments that don’t account for ambiguities of content or malicious third-party attachments. But I also have other concerns:
What does “slower” mean? Would this free product be so inferior as to be practically useless? Would “slower” allow for sponsored content to get pushed through the pipe at faster speeds (something service providers have lobbied for on the wired net)?
Who gets to program the filter? Would the responsibility be completely outsourced to this company that conveniently has a plan just like Martin’s that’s about ready to go? Or, no better, would the question of what constitutes smut be up to some branch of the federal government?
And, who profits? It sure looks like the FCC plan is designed to benefit M2Z Networks. I don’t know much about their connections, but you can’t help but notice that they feature a quote from Kevin Martin at the very top of their home page (it cycles through other quotes from the likes of FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein, and Sen. Daniel Inouye, as well as still-President George W. Bush).
It should also be noted that the quotes provided to buttress their “online child safety” filter come from Republican Senators Sam Brownback and Orin Hatch—just the men I want deciding what is and isn’t indecent. . . uh, no.
Backer John Doerr sits on the boards of many of the boldfaced names of the net (Google, Amazon, Intuit, Sun), and tends to support Democrats and high-profile causes that most would consider liberal (e.g. The Alliance for Climate Protection, Grameen). Last month, Doerr offered some advice to the president-elect, including kick-starting new energy research, encouraging foreign-born engineering students to stay in the US, and restoring DARPA to “its former glory and autonomy.”
Missing from the reportage and likely missing from Martin’s considerations, too, is that the airways belong to the public, and are granted to private service providers for a fee so that they might serve the public interest. I, for one, am not interested in the pay-for-freedom model the FCC is proffering.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

my concern is that I like porn
Somehow, I have this idea that Martin’s version of “porn-free” would include blocking sites like FDL because the fucking fuckity fuckers like Martin think the use of the word fuck by foul mouthed fem blogs like FDL constitutes some type of porn fuckery.
Well, that’s another reason as well.
“The free service could be slower and would be required to filter out pornography and other material not suitable for children.”
Martin’s quite the visionary. Selling a product that, even free, nobody will want. Look at any ISP advertisement and what ’s the first thing you see: “Speeds up to a gazillion times faster than (insert competitor’s name).
And kids want slow internet service? Riiiiight.
And let’s not forget that porn is the internet’s number one revenue generator. Where exactly did all those economic stimulus rebate checks go?
Yeah, well, fuck that!
I was talking with a colleague in the quad one Friday afternoon a few years ago, and said something like, “Well, I wonder what new crap is going to come in the Friday-at-five memo?”
A person nearby said, “Watch your language, there are children present.” I looked around and saw the usual mixture of college students, faculty and staff. I found out later he was a teacher at our local Christian School for Dobson wanna-bes.
This post may well catapult FDL to number one:
http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/v/blog_cuss
Fuck Yeah!
Do you know, I had to read that three times before I realized you referring to “crap” as the dirty word. I was wondering at first if Friday-at-five was code!
That’s rough.
Now I grew up in the south back in the day when even an occasional damn or hell caused looks of horror. But I also attended a military school where my mother was librarian. She’d laugh at the cadet leaders who would be cussing out some poor soul and then see her standing nearby and get all flustered that she’d overheard the language.
She never let it bother her aslong as it wasn’t directed toward her. That teacher needs to get over himself/herself.
Just another big corporate giveaway, crumbs and poison pills for everyone else. David Addington said that they would push and push and push until somebody stopped them. He might have added that they would loot and loot and loot even as they left the building. There are a lot of these final wet kisses to corporations floating around out there at the moment.
do you think it’s just a coincidence that the average percentage of cussing per page is 404?
I got yanked out of the bus line one day while in kindergarten for telling a girl to “shut up”. Standards have changed some.
There’s no way to filter out porn without looking at all of the content, which is tantamount to the government watching everything people do on the internet. Just like the Great Firewall of China. Great model for a free and open society, there.
Or take the block-whole-sites approach current filtering companies do, which have been proven to be used for political and social agendas. And, by the way, can also be circumvented.
We actually had (have?) a porn-free internet in this country, called WAP. It was set up by cell phone companies to provide a filtered, controlled internet-like experience. But it sucked badly, and the only content available was what went through approval of the gatekeepers. Being stuck in the WAP universe is kind of like using CompuServe or AOL, you’re in a little pond that has no bearing on reality.
So yeah, no. Kevin Martin is high on mushrooms. Or totally doesn’t understand technology (awesome for an FCC chair). Or maybe doesn’t like our First Amendment (also awesome).
Once you allow anyone to “filter” the internet, you open up the door for them to start deciding what is “proper” and creating more restrictions according to their definition of what is decent. If people can’t parent their children sufficiently to keep them from spending hours downloading porn, then they need to cut back on their social activities and pay more attention to their children. Not have some government regulators doing their parenting for them. I was able to monitor my son’s internet use just fine until he left home. All it takes is paying attention, and setting rules of use and enforcing them (you can get a program that tells you exactly where your kid has been). And maybe not being so quick to use games and internet as a babysitter. I’m getting sick of lame parents wanting to put restrictions on the internet because they can’t keep track of their spoiled little brats online.
Interesting Gregg, how does this relate to ‘free the air waves?’
http://www.freetheairwaves.com/
Was her name Sarah Palin?
It’s just Republics returning to their roots: porn’s bad; deficits are bad; flag burning is bad. Soon, they’ll all be ranting and raving in unison, just like the good old days. It helps them pass the time as a minority party. They certainly don’t want to spend time actually trying to help fix the mess they created when they were in complete control.
Can’t remember after 48 years. ;)
It was code. Our administration at the time had this habit of sending out unwelcome news just before 5 PM on Friday.
And I couldn’t figure out what naughty word I’d said either. I thought about finding the Language Policeman after I’d figured it out and asking him if he knew the etymology of the term, crap.
Friday news dumps are not just confined to politicians.
Foul mouthed fems. Is there a name for that fetish?
emptywheel upstairs on FISA
and not 666?
Nope.
But I think our Admin adopted it from the pols. Although it could have been an independent discovery too. I’m not sure how much credence to put on that thought, because I’ve heard that University Administrators have their cerebral cortex ablated before taking office.
That late night thread were every comment contained ‘fuck’ pegged that meter, lol.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid need to stand up on their hind legs and let the word go forth from all the committee chairs to every single Bush agency, appointee, and department; the word is STOP, motherfuckers. Just STOP with your crap ideas and stealthy regulations and crony embetterment. Just STOP stealing taxpayer dollars, bandwidth, workplace safety, environmental reasonableness. Just STOP, motherfuckers.
It’s a New Deal, and your old shit is over, so STOP. Right now.
Interesting. Not sure if there is a direct connection, but “free the airwaves” is a Google initiative; Doerr sits on Google’s board and is also a big backer of M2Z. My guess is that their interests are “happily convergent.”
Thanks for the reply and opening up this subject. I think ubiquitous wireless is forming an interesting topic.
Filter material not suitable for children? Of what age? Will the restriction be on violence and bad language also?
I feel religion is not suitable for children. Can I get that content banned?