It looks very much as if Hillary’s going to be offered Secretary of State, which would leave a bit of a hole in the New York delegation. A reliable beltway conventional wisdom source says there’s a frontrunner to fill it
3-1: Thomas Suozzi. Suozzi is known nationally (to the extent he is known at all) as the guy who ran a quixotic primary challenge against soon-to-be-governor Eliot L. Spitzer (D) in 2006. With two years of hindsight, however, Suozzi, the Nassau County executive, looks better and better.
Well. About that. Leaving aside the humorous thought that our friend at the Washington Post was put off Mr. Suozzi by his run at Spitzer, I take some issue with the use of the term "quixotic" to describe it – unless, of course, it’s meant to express "as the tool of an investment banker who resented Spitzer’s attempt to clean up Wall Street".
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer’s challenger for the state’s Democratic gubernatorial nomination received hundreds of thousands of dollars from people with ties to Home Depot Inc. founder Kenneth Langone, a registered Republican and target of a Spitzer lawsuit.
Langone, a defendant in Spitzer’s suit over ousted New York Stock Exchange Chairman Richard Grasso’s retirement pay, supports Nassau County Executive Thomas Suozzi for governor. Suozzi’s campaign received at least $300,000 from Langone, his wife, Elaine, and two adult sons, and present and former business and charity group associates, Suozzi campaign records on the state Board of Election Web site showed.
“I’ve found a substantial number in the business community inside and outside New York who feel that Spitzer as governor wouldn’t be friendly to business,” Langone said in a Jan. 12 interview. Earlier that day, he had a lunch with 15 business associates, nine of whom promised to help Suozzi, Langone said.
…
An examination of campaign records found Suozzi’s donors include Home Depot Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Richard Nardelli, who gave $16,200. Walter Buckley, an original Home Depot shareholder and his wife, Marjorie, contributed $32,000. Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus and his wife, Billi, gave $32,000, while Steven Holzman, who Langone named in 2001 as chief executive of his Invemed Associates LLC, donated $16,000.
Lest you think that former mayoral, PAC and presidential Giuliani fundraiser Langone’s only interest in opposing Spitzer was a principled disagreement about the whether corruption, mismanagement and self-serving amongst executives in the financial sector were healthy business practices, well, not so much
As Congressman Rangel pointed out at the time
…I read with great displeasure the comments of your number one financial backer, Ken Langone, who a few days ago stated: "I can’t tell you how critical it is that we preserve and protect the Republican majority in the House of Representatives and as well in the Senate. This is not a time to turn the asylum over to the inmates."
I find it hard to reconcile this statement with your comments in the past that Ken Langone is "a good man" and that you are "proud of his support." As the Ranking Member of the Ways and Means Committee I hope to one day represent this state as its Chairman. It is your lead and most public fundraiser who has dedicated resources to making sure that people like me do not assume these important leadership roles and that we as Democrats do not take back the House. If the Democrats take back the House, it will not be "inmates" in charge, but people who care about the core values of justice, fairness and equality.
Some of us believe that the Republican party has taken our State of New York, as well as our nation, in the wrong direction. I certainly thought that you were one of us.
Suozzi, for his part, said that Langone and his friends were donating to him knowing that he didn’t support their political goals, so that was OK (this was also, one imagines, the deal Langone had with our senior Senator, Mr. Schumer). Schumer was a supporter in Suozzi’s gubernatorial bid.
Suozzi does have other friends – his dad is a partner in a legal firm with Clinton revenant Harold Ickes and Governor Paterson’s dad. Former Managing Partner William Cunningham (who Suozzi supported in a recent race for Suffolk Country Executive) was appointed as Secretary to the Governor earlier this month. That – along with race, gender and religion – seems to be the sort of thing people are considering while they wargame this.
It might also be worth considering whose side he was by before the bubble burst.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

We really were a center-left nation, but all of these concessions to the repigs will drive our law making to the right. Since Obama pumped joLIE to be part of the dem party and hold his chairmanship, Patterson has ample cover to appoint a DINO, and do it without apology.
Why not appoint Spitzer? As punaise might say at a time like this – Accept no substitute.
Yeah, and Patterson has a reputation for cooperating across the aisle, so I expect someone not very progressive.
Back to reading Nixonland. It’s chock full of stuff, so slow go, and over 700 pages so I’ll be at it for awhile. But it’s fabulously written and really interesting, so it’s kind of like having a new/old set of friends and enemies to live with for awhile.
Well, if Paterson puts Suozzi in for Clinton, I can tell you as a resident of Upstate NY that he will not win reelection – NY already has a ‘downstate senator’ – that’s Schumer. If Clinton did nothing else, she did her homework and knew Upstate very well and represented the Upstate area well. Unless Suozzi does a huge job familiarizing himself with Upstate and its issues, he will not be seen as doing the job – he won’t have the support.
Great. Another DINO to help feed the coffers of the Rethugs.
If they’re really serious about Long Island, I’d’ve thought Israel or McCarthy – I still think Gillibrand makes more sense than either.
Yes, I want Spitzer in the Obama administration as Attorney General or in Congress in Hillary’s seat as Senator. Sadly, not going to happen. Even Assistant Atty General. We need a real Corporate prosecutor.
Well, at least I hope someone’s listening to him.
Of course, if they’re not, he’s probably the only son of a billionaire in NY they’re not listening to.
Home Depot is a big Republican donor. Newsmeat.com
I do not see any way around Article 1 Section 6, and I can’t imagine a situation where no one would make an issue of this. The language of the Constitution is very clear on this point.
Why not Christine Quinn?
More:
Hmmmm. And she seems to get on well with Bloomberg, and certainly her dad has enough connections to help.
I haven’t seen her floated so far. She’d actually be a pretty good choice, although I’m guessing the people gaming this would say that she’d be unlikely to win upstate in ‘12.
Really? And why wasn’t this a problem for Senators John Ashcroft or Spencer Abraham, who went directly from the Senate to Bush’s Cabinet in 2001? We never even heard of this obscure, and oft-gotten round, Constitutional prohibition until Hillary Clinton was selected to be Secretary of State.
And, yes, it’s been gotten round: Saxbe, Muskie, Bentsen.
Waaay too NYC centric for a NYS senator. Read TW’s comment at 4 again.
Gotta win in 2010 first, for the balance of the term. Then run for a full term in 2012.
except, no
subprostitute.Whoa. Teddy. Sounds like logical, linear thinking to me.
What’s up ?
erm. Well, I’ve been concentrating on the succession in Alaska…
Erm? Not getting your comment. At all.
Meaning I don’t get your response to my question to Teddy.
Teddy’s linear thinking regarding your concentrating on succession in Alaska means what?
a belated Digg
We have all the old DLC Administrative crowd reassembled, other than Robert Rubin, who has done enough, thank you. Might as well toss in another Senator. America will damn well be a Center Right Nation, whether that is what the Citizens want or not.
I mean that Teddy was correcting my understanding of NYS law, and I’m making a feeble excuse that I woulda knowed that if only I hadn’t been trying to figure out who Palin was going to appoint to Ted Stevens’ seat.
Happily, we’ll never know.
Well then.. we wouldn’t need a Senate at all! *g*
Well, okay, I guess.
Crazy times, please forgive my not understanding.
I think Sarah’s got us all thinkin a little unclearly, also too. And jobs creation, gotta have that too, also.
Ermmm. That woman had no authority over me.
Blaming Sarah? Get out.
There are a variety of issues affecting our overall world-view.
You give her too much time and space.
She means nothing to me.
Oh, please, no. It’s been a rough year. Speaking for myself, I heart Teddy and his politics to pieces.
hee.
and those values there.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
I’m glad you like Teddy’s politics.
I’ve supported them here for a long time. Consistantly.
Why you slamming me?
Check it.
Nobody’s slamming nobody
As long as it is a true progressive Democrat, I will be happy.
# 27 sounded like a slam.
No, honestly, that’s the opposite of what I meant to say. I was just (clumsily, it’s been a long week) trying to say that my response to your comment wasn’t meant as a slam to anyone.
Okay.
Teddy – you don’t know me.
Look at history though…the first six Cabinets (and who better to understand original intent) had over 24 former Congressmen appointed to Cabinet positions, with many more going into Ambassadorships, Federal Judgeships, and other Federal offices. Hard to believe that they believed that it meant what the Republicans (who wish to assert this in Hillary’s case) think it does.
BTW there was continuous office holding members appointed to these offices- were there no budgetary increases (not just salaries but any emoulement) for Federal judgeships, diplomatic posts, or other Executive appointments in this time period from 1780-1830?
That’s about as inviting a book review as I’ve heard lately, eCahn. I’ll check it out.
I would suppose that Suozzi is pronounced “Swazi”. So I wonder if those upstate feeling unrepresented if this appointment goes through will start referring to NY City as “the apartheid Bantustan of Suozzi-land”.
Yeah, that’s how it’s pronounced. I suspect, though, that if he is appointed the people who don’t like it will be less poetical about it ;)
straight-up Italian pronunciation would be Swote-tzee or some such.
How about Nadler? Charlie Rangel, both in safe demo districts. How about Cuomo, senior or junior, both good. All these men have good track records.
My first choice is Nadler.
Suozzi will not be named.
mario cuomo
Ah, Teddy, perhaps you have not noticed, but she has taken a sharp turn to the right and acts like Bloomberg’s lap dog. She also is known as a unstable individual who is given to ranting and raving at staff and comissioners of city agencies. That is not effective leadership.
Her stand against Bloomberg’s refusal to send out the property tax rebates is pandering (although I understand that Bloomberg’s people misled property owners in the beginning).
Quinn would be a terrible choice, regardless of her sexual orientation.
There are other big hitters who are ready to jump into the fray, even if Suozzi gets the nod. Don’t look past Carolyn Maloney who knows how to win an election. I’m confident she will run, and, having seen her in action, my money’s on her.
Quinn is awful, she’s a self serving ass who happens to be gay. Gays can be assholes too.
If you haven’t already read it read Garry Wills “Nixon Agonistes” if you want to be reminded of old GOP politics.
I re-read it before reading Nixonland and it evoked a lot of memories. After I finished Nixonland I re-read J. Anthony Lukas’s Nightmare.
This whole generation of hell we’ve lived through including Bubba has its roots deep in the cesspool that was the Nixon administration.
And we’re not finished with these people yet until some of them start doing time and being held accountable for what they’ve done.