We’re not at the point where people who Got It Right are empowered to make things better, but they are nonetheless important bellwethers.
Time magazine famously named Mr. Greenspan, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers “The Committee to Save the World” — the “Three Marketeers” who “prevented a global meltdown.” In effect, everyone declared a victory party over our pullback from the brink, while forgetting to ask how we got so close to the brink in the first place.
[]
[O]nce the economy is on the road to recovery, the wheeler-dealers will be making easy money again — and will lobby hard against anyone who tries to limit their bottom lines. Moreover, the success of recovery efforts will come to seem preordained, even though it wasn’t, and the urgency of action will be lost.
So here’s my plea: even though the incoming administration’s agenda is already very full, it should not put off financial reform. The time to start preventing the next crisis is now.
The incoming administration obviously thinks Larry Summers is so very brilliant that he’s worth the price of his political baggage. I’m less concerned with his famous lack of tact than I am with his role in creating the current mess.
Naomi Klein refers to the bailout as "Bush’s Final Pillage." Here she is on Democracy Now, talking about the legacy of the intellectual dishonesty of the left who tried to pretend that all problems could be sourced to the misdeeds of the Bush administration:
Obama said again and again during the campaign that the crisis on Wall Street represented the culmination of an ideology of deregulation and laisse-faire trickle-down economics that had guided the country for the past eight years.
The truth is, it was not just eight years, they guided them under Reagan and also under Clinton. That is where Larry Summers comes in because he was the last treasury secretary under Clinton. He along with Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin were the key architects of the policies of deregulation that created the crisis that we’re living now. And those key policies are the killing of Glass-Steagall that allowed a series of very large but mergers that created these institutions that are too big and too intermingled to fail we’re told again and again.
The deliberate decision to keep the derivatives out of the reach of financial regulators- that was also a Summers’ decision. And also allowing the banks to carry these extraordinary levels of debt. 33 to 1 in the case of Bear Stearns.
Now, in my book the Shock Doctrine I started chapter with a quote from Larry Summers in the context in which he says it was 1992 and it was when he was making World Bank economic policy as it related to Russia, in the midst of a financial crisis. What he said and this is why I quoted him because it really shows the extent to which he is truly an ideologue and a follower of the very ideology- not just a follower but a propagator of the very ideology that Obama ran his campaign against. And here’s the qoute. This is Larry Summers in 1992: “Spread the truth. The laws of economics are like the laws of engineering. One set of laws works everywhere.” And then he laid out those laws a little bit later.
He referred to the three “ations”, and those were privatization, stabilization, and liberalization. So he has been preaching the doctrine. He is by no means an innocent bystander. He is a dyed-in-the-wool privatizer, free trader. And he along with Tim Geithner, his deputy play key roles during the economic crises.—along with Timothy Geithner.
They preached more deregulation, more privatization and economic austerity to disastrous results. I think this is really troubling. One thing that Obama said is that Larry Summers set the terms of the debate for this financial crisis and that once again is very worrying.
As Mark Ames says, "Summers was one of the key architects of our financial crisis–hiring him to fix the economy makes as much sense as appointing Paul Wolfowitz to oversee the Iraq withdrawal." I understand that you need the cooperation of Wall Street go get out of this situation every bit as much as you need the cooperation of the military to get out of Iraq, and having people in charge who make them comfortable is critical to that effort.
Still, let’s not kid ourselves. This is Larry Summers’ mess.
Related posts:
- Larry Summers Aide Luring Veal Pen with Donor Cash at Common Purpose Meeting
- Larry Summers Explains His Approach to Financial Regulation
- Robert Greenwald’s Message to Virginia And Not Larry Sabato
- Obama’s Weekly Address: The Consumer Financial Protection Agency
- Krugman: The Public Option and Why the Reagan Zombies Don’t Die





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

zero
Oy!
i think the big mouths in the bama admin might distract and confus the thugs and media so much that they won’t notice that great things are happening. let em talk. great fun, imo.
i still have a 7cents coupon for raisin bran, that snipped out and saved since the 60’s. I guess I’ll hang on to it.
OT w/apologies. Chris Matthews is gonna run against Specter. It’s official.
blergh.
Ugh. Undead zombies die and rise again. Jeeze, they never even had the decency to die.
My survival instict says to be optimistic about the future anyway. Can’t explain why, exactly. Bad things ahead could reform the ideologues? Public works and government spending is the only way out, so they will get the ghost?
mebbe Obama will rub Summers’ nose in his own mess, and order him to clean it up.
i can dream if i want to….
Ewwwww.
Does this mean he has to quit at MSNBC? That would be great news.
Hi Jane – still in Tulsa?
Barbara – Spector has been battling cancer again will he be running for reelection in 2010 even?
The repeal of Glass-Steagle was signed by Bill Clinton.
Well, it depends on whether he was on MSNBC staff when emoluments were added to Senate salaries. /s
I am guessing Matthews could run a good campaign. He has certainly seen enough action.
Not for historians who would be reading the Congressional record. But it would be nice to rid the airwaves. Wonder if it has anything to do with KO and Maddow taking the top spots at MSNBC. Bitterness?
Bingo.
Good question. I suppose they’ll trot out a conservative stud/studess to take on Tweety.
Now I need to read Jane’s links and get back on her track. Piracy is not a good thing! *g*
yep, absolutely. and phil gramm’s and rubin’s and greenspan’s. i know it was election-season-madness that made us focus on gramm’s role (since his was mcsame’s advisor), but by doing that we overlooked the absolutely critical role that summers et al. played with gramm to bring us our current crisis.
i’ve been reading old hearing transcripts and part of what makes this so infuriating is that this wasn’t a case of “no one could have predicted….” there were people like brooksley born at the cftc who got it right (more than 10 years ago) and were forced out by summers at friends.
do ya know which party wants the guy?
He’ll run as a Dem.
Democratic.
i don’t want him. thanks but no thanks.
Did he say what party?
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/”>FiveThirtyEight now waffling on their firm Matthews-gonna-run-story.
(sigh)
In descending order, the Panic of 2008, the housing bubble, and the dot-com bubble were the worst economic crisis of the past two decades, and Larry Summers had a hand in setting up all of them.
Why is it that when picking for competence in Economic advice, long experience in persuading people to do the wrong thing counts as experience?
At least they didn’t put Summers in Treasury … in a purely advisory role he could be invaluable, so long as they remember that when he gives economic advice, that should incline them to doing the opposite.
OOOps, read the damn comment nomolos…. sorry. A f**king Democrat? Doesn’t he know that the DLC is on its last legs.
nyt, nov 1999: Clinton Signs Legislation Overhauling Banking Laws
Ooops. Link improved (I hope).
Actually I would imagine he still has all his notes from the bollixing he has done so maybe if he just does the opposite of that which he done before we should be OK
Betcha if R’s were in a stronger position he’d run R.
Obama’s picks have really disappointed me. Not surprised, but disappointed.
A zero-snark question: Who would be a better choice(s)?
These are precisely the ego maniacs that created the finance system which was doomed to failure while making the same people richer and richer.
It is simply astounding that they are all not banished from the country.
But like Bush, Obi is having his “heck of a job Brownie” moment with the financial team he is kinking upstairs. I fully expect him to give these slackers the Medal of Freedom for “saving america’s financial system.
Oy
Mr SOS was no bloody prize except for the free trading, money grabbing, lying, thieving, anti union swines.
Matthews Hiring Staff To Run Against Specter?
Jane’s on it
Heh. It would be schadenfreude if Matthews got his head handed to him on the campaign trail-his ego is so big. But I suppose that is not to be. Having all the publicity of a talking head will give him a head start against the opposition.
Stiglitz for one, Max Aronowitz for another.
There are “other” economists aside from wall street suck ups.
Says it all.
The up side is we won’t be seeing on teevee as much. hahahaha
oops Stanley Aronowitz
geithner is not a reassuring choice for treasury. worse is his record at the ny fed in the current wallstreet ballouts. from william greider:
There’s also the consideration about who would accept the positions in Obama’s cabinet. Perhaps people who are qualified aren’t interested.
my criteria would be: someone who got it right early, someone with previous gov experience, not batshit crazy, not a self dealing wall street insider.
short list of possibilities: stiglitz, bair, roubini, james galbraith, dean baker,…. ? i’m sure there are a ton more i don’t know.
Good point. Nothing these slackers will do will save the finance system. It is in it’s death thoes and Obi is trying to task the jerks that caused it to get “us” out of it. They won’t.
Interesting to see what comes next.
thank god fer that.
Yeah, we’ve been pointing out the roles of Rubin, Summers, Greenspan, Geithner, etc. in the meltdown pretty much fromthe start.
I would note too that Vikram Pandit CEO of Citigroup said that repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed Citi to become the great company it is today.
you may not believe this, but it gets worse when it comes to theCommodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000. from my notes (which if i’m not too much of a slacker will become a diary at some point):
and i thought the fisa legislative story was bad.
Not as sure about Galbraith but I agree with the others. The important thing is that Geithner and Summers promise so far to be a continuation, not break with, Paulson and Bernanke’s failed and stupendously expensive policies.
haven’t read galbraith’s new book, predator state, only listened to a talk he gave recently – and included him based on that.
wasn’t homeland security 900 pages and jammed thru in the same way?
i didn’t follow that one. fisa modification was really the first piece of legislation i tried to follow.
Are you thinking of he Patriot Act? It passed 98-1 with Feingold only voting against.
http://www.senate.gov/legislat…..vote=00313
Forgive my lack of parliamentary vocabulary, but the Senate vote — not the final vote — was something like 54-44, which mitigates Democratic complicity in this. It was a Clinton-Rubin/Republican bill with Democrats in tow.
Shelby was the one Republican who voted against the final bill, the other nay votes of course being the most liberal Democrats.
which vote are you referring to? do i have it wrong?
iirc, in the heat of the primary campaigns, as the sub-prime crisis continued not to bottom, Hillary proposed an “emergency working group” to tackle the mortgage problems. i remember Greenspan’s name floated, which struck me as odd at the time.
No, you don’t. The final language was passed 90-8. The Senate’s first vote, whatever you call it, was the close one.
Yeah, it’s been surreal watching Bill Clinton blame Wall Street excess for this mess. Also, even more surreal for Obama to give his Wall Street vs Main Street speech post Lehman, and watch two of the four people most responsible for fiasco on steroids, Rubin and Summers, directly behind him, smug as can be. All that Wall Street campaign money didn’t go to waste, it looks like.
Granted everything you say about the two new appointees above is true. However, it is so nice to see Paul Volker again. We have him largely to thank for the relatively low inflation rates of the last 20-25 years.
ah, you’re referring to the gramm-leach-bliley Act, i was confused (thought it was the CFMA). iirc, the different senate vote was about changes to the community reinvestment act – and nothing to do with removing the glass-steagll regulations.
Excellent post, selise!
One of the people “forced out” by Summers was JOSEPH STIGLITZ! Most of you probably have the book, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy – by Greg Palast. The specific references to Summers and Stiglitz are on pages 151-158.
“Joseph Stiglitz was chief economist of the World Bank.
In 1999 the World Bank fired Stiglitz. He was not allowed a discreet “retirement”; U. S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, I’m told, demanded a public excommunication for Stiglitz’s having expressed his first mild dissent from globilaztion World Bank-style.”
[I paid less than $5.00 used from Amazon.com, paperback]
RE: James K Galbraith: He was on Bill Moyers Journal 10/24/08. I will give links to text and video below. If links don’t work, go to http://www.pbs.org then click on Bill Moyers Journal. When there search for James Galbraith (gets text). For video, click tab Watch/Listen, scroll down to October 24, 2008.
text: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/jour…..ript2.html
video: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/jour…..atch2.html
Jane: I would like to see one of your diaries on the history of Summers and Stiglitz. We need to hammer away at Summers – he’s a Bush Dynasty mole.
thanks for the moyers links – i had forgotten about that interview. will have to give the podcast another listen. thanks again!
p.s. don’t think his a bush dynasty mole – or is there more i dont’ know? i think of him as a clinton/dlc/dem guy. another example of the bipartisanship for corporate governance.
Summers was born 1954. He was on the staff of the Council of Economic Advisers under Pres. Reagan (GHW Bush=VP) from 1982-1983.
I labeled him a Bush Dynasty mole more for his record at the World Bank as being repressive toward developing nations. The PR propaganda about the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and World Trade Organization is a lot of cover-up. The book I reference above reveals the ugly side, as does the books by John Perkins (Confessions of An Economic Hit Man; The Secret History of the American Empire). There is a video on YouTube of interviews with the author. Amy Goodman also interviewed him on democracynow.org.
There is a very good article about Summers on Crooks & Liars 11/06/08.
link: http://news.yahoo.com/thenatio…..n/45381035
He had to resign as President of Harvard University because he made a public statement that he did not think women were innately mentally suited to be scientists. (so, was Marie Curie a freak of nature??)
Here is the link to a petition to be delivered to Obama’s team requesting that Summers not be appointed Director of the White House National Economic Council:
http://action.openleft.com/page/petition/treasury