<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Bubble: Treasuries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jomama</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739942</link>
		<dc:creator>jomama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739942</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Treasuries are what I’ve called The Last Bubble™.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the vast majority locks their capital in them&lt;br /&gt;
the private market is crowded out of borrowing, a&lt;br /&gt;
very distinct possibility and one I’m betting on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is already happening.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At some point, &lt;a href=&quot;http://djomama.blogspot.com/2006/12/first-world-government-junk-bonds-on.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they crash.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neo pushes the reset button…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…new game, new players.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treasuries are what I’ve called The Last Bubble™.</p>
<p>When the vast majority locks their capital in them<br />
the private market is crowded out of borrowing, a<br />
very distinct possibility and one I’m betting on.</p>
<p>This is already happening.</p>
<p>At some point, <a href="http://djomama.blogspot.com/2006/12/first-world-government-junk-bonds-on.html" rel="nofollow">they crash.</a></p>
<p>Neo pushes the reset button…</p>
<p>…new game, new players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBaker</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739557</link>
		<dc:creator>DBaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739557</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am talking about the bankruptcy rules on the high end, not the low end of the asset scale.  The current bankruptcy rules punish the poor in favor of the rich.  High net worth individuals should not be able to walk away from beach houses and rental properties as they can right now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mortgage floors should not be available for investment property or homes that are not the primary residence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is too simplistic to state that ALL banks bear equal responsibility for this entire mess.  While the banks and brokers that handed out Alt-A, interest only and other junk mortgages are to blame, many other banks did maintain proper standards and have not needed any TARP money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am talking about the bankruptcy rules on the high end, not the low end of the asset scale.  The current bankruptcy rules punish the poor in favor of the rich.  High net worth individuals should not be able to walk away from beach houses and rental properties as they can right now.</p>
<p>Mortgage floors should not be available for investment property or homes that are not the primary residence.</p>
<p>It is too simplistic to state that ALL banks bear equal responsibility for this entire mess.  While the banks and brokers that handed out Alt-A, interest only and other junk mortgages are to blame, many other banks did maintain proper standards and have not needed any TARP money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739520</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739520</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real estate floor is governed by 31% Debt-to-income ratios on FHA loans, average incomes &amp; interest rates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so, what happens if jobs disappear (which tanks income)? Does that push housing prices further down? How far?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The real estate floor is governed by 31% Debt-to-income ratios on FHA loans, average incomes &amp; interest rates.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And so, what happens if jobs disappear (which tanks income)? Does that push housing prices further down? How far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good article.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739513</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739513</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The world may shake apart by bits and pieces, but eventually we go too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you mean “eventually”? We’re Leaders! We’ll go first and be proud of it. heh&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The world may shake apart by bits and pieces, but eventually we go too.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What do you mean “eventually”? We’re Leaders! We’ll go first and be proud of it. heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739509</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739509</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It’s like Mick Jagger hiring Hells Angels for security at Altamont, only much much worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heh. Comparing Gates to Hells Angels? Pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
Hmmm, which is potentially the more dangerous? If&lt;br /&gt;
you can name a couple of Dems or Libs who would be&lt;br /&gt;
better for Defense then why haven’t I been hearing&lt;br /&gt;
their names the last week or two?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s like Mick Jagger hiring Hells Angels for security at Altamont, only much much worse.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh. Comparing Gates to Hells Angels? Pretty good.<br />
Hmmm, which is potentially the more dangerous? If<br />
you can name a couple of Dems or Libs who would be<br />
better for Defense then why haven’t I been hearing<br />
their names the last week or two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739496</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Supply side Keynesian liberalism, I guess.  In the sense that we need to recognize that demand side policies work best when there’s no supply bottlenecks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supply side Keynesian liberalism, I guess.  In the sense that we need to recognize that demand side policies work best when there’s no supply bottlenecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739488</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739488</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;could the next bubble be the one we’re living in right now - a dollar bubble? the so-called flight to safety? and what’s happening with treasuries is just a symptom?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it past time to move from gold (or other commodities) to dollars?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve been assuming that the day Obama takes over would be ideal, but maybe we’re getting close enough that people feel it’s safe enough to go $$$$ now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>could the next bubble be the one we’re living in right now &#8211; a dollar bubble? the so-called flight to safety? and what’s happening with treasuries is just a symptom?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is it past time to move from gold (or other commodities) to dollars?</p>
<p>I’ve been assuming that the day Obama takes over would be ideal, but maybe we’re getting close enough that people feel it’s safe enough to go $$$$ now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesgpc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739372</link>
		<dc:creator>wesgpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739372</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A small note: the Swedish (or Scandinavian, or Nordic) plan from their financial panic in the 90s was a way to let financial firms that should ‘eat it’ in fact ‘eat it’ in a quick way with minimal disruption to the rest of the economy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current administration is willy-nilly going the Japan route (supporting a bloated financial sector whether we need it so big or not), and have found creative ways to keep dong that as their intiial schemes have flamed out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan settled for zombie banks, Paulson seems to be going for zombie financial firms of every imaginable kind. And they had a much better national finance situation that we do now. The cost of dithering over for the last six months of the Bush administration will be big.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small note: the Swedish (or Scandinavian, or Nordic) plan from their financial panic in the 90s was a way to let financial firms that should ‘eat it’ in fact ‘eat it’ in a quick way with minimal disruption to the rest of the economy.</p>
<p>The current administration is willy-nilly going the Japan route (supporting a bloated financial sector whether we need it so big or not), and have found creative ways to keep dong that as their intiial schemes have flamed out.</p>
<p>Japan settled for zombie banks, Paulson seems to be going for zombie financial firms of every imaginable kind. And they had a much better national finance situation that we do now. The cost of dithering over for the last six months of the Bush administration will be big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesgpc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739358</link>
		<dc:creator>wesgpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/25/the-next-bubble-treasuries/#comment-1739358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, but letting the total mistakes go will still leave plenty of good housing that should be occupied if it does not decay first. An example of possible useless development around here is the something-or-other called Mountain House. An isolated would-be future bed-room community far away from anyplace to commute to (and now no jobs to commute to even far away).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Driving by it from the Central Valley side is funny: you see vast acreage with nothign but very regularly placed stop-signs and conduit coming out the chopped up ground.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t want to think what the vacancy and foreclsure rate is in the finished sections. Can’t turn it back into farms and grazing right away, probably scarpped too much topsoil off, but maybe windmills would be good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Problem is that even if you find a away to unbuild those, I think the majority of the problem surplus housing is potentially very useful, and inside, or right next door to viable communities, and transit corridors. At least, that is what I have seen in California. No reason people should not be living in them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Economists can explain anything that has already happened. The theory is flexible enough to do that without breaking any of the usual economic assuptions about how things work. Economists of a certain kind see that as a feature. Economic statisticians (econometricians) and others see it as a bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, this time is different. I do not see how Washington consensus economic theory can explain huge chunks of financial and credit markets just plan old freezing in their tracks and disappearing. Akerlof and Stiglitz sure can explain that (hence their Nobel prizes). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also do not see how anyone but a crazy person can say that building too many houses to sell them at a breakeven price for the builders and financers, and then kicking people out ’cause they can’t pay and letting them stand empty and rot is not a huge misallocation of real capital on an epic scale. But that is the basis for this crisis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And apparently potentially very useful houses are starting to rot. I heard a news report from someplace in PA that said a mortgage rescue plan someplace there was running into trouble because of decay of now long vacant houses. “they aren’t in good shape anymore” was the quoe I remember the local guy in charge using.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but letting the total mistakes go will still leave plenty of good housing that should be occupied if it does not decay first. An example of possible useless development around here is the something-or-other called Mountain House. An isolated would-be future bed-room community far away from anyplace to commute to (and now no jobs to commute to even far away).</p>
<p>Driving by it from the Central Valley side is funny: you see vast acreage with nothign but very regularly placed stop-signs and conduit coming out the chopped up ground.</p>
<p>I don’t want to think what the vacancy and foreclsure rate is in the finished sections. Can’t turn it back into farms and grazing right away, probably scarpped too much topsoil off, but maybe windmills would be good.</p>
<p>Problem is that even if you find a away to unbuild those, I think the majority of the problem surplus housing is potentially very useful, and inside, or right next door to viable communities, and transit corridors. At least, that is what I have seen in California. No reason people should not be living in them.</p>
<p>Economists can explain anything that has already happened. The theory is flexible enough to do that without breaking any of the usual economic assuptions about how things work. Economists of a certain kind see that as a feature. Economic statisticians (econometricians) and others see it as a bug.</p>
<p>But, this time is different. I do not see how Washington consensus economic theory can explain huge chunks of financial and credit markets just plan old freezing in their tracks and disappearing. Akerlof and Stiglitz sure can explain that (hence their Nobel prizes). </p>
<p>I also do not see how anyone but a crazy person can say that building too many houses to sell them at a breakeven price for the builders and financers, and then kicking people out ’cause they can’t pay and letting them stand empty and rot is not a huge misallocation of real capital on an epic scale. But that is the basis for this crisis.</p>
<p>And apparently potentially very useful houses are starting to rot. I heard a news report from someplace in PA that said a mortgage rescue plan someplace there was running into trouble because of decay of now long vacant houses. “they aren’t in good shape anymore” was the quoe I remember the local guy in charge using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
