Only days after the first convoy through the strategic Khyber Pass, a weak point in the resupply of Afghanistan, reports have arrived that another convoy has been attacked. US missile strikes underlined the arrival of a renewed struggle to keep the strategic point open – one that featured Cobra attack choppers and tank columns.
The Khyber Pass links Lahore, Islamabad, and Peshwar to Kabul. It is the point through which invasions in, or out, of the Hindu-Kush generally pass. However important it is, it’s nature as a trade point means that the "Michni Checkpoint," the boundary between Pakistan and Afghanistan, is a hotbed of military, paramilitary, and criminal activity. Journalists and foreigners have been warned that the government cannot assure their safety along this corridor. There have been kidnappings and shootings, of foreigners, and those working with them. In 2007 the US delivered Cobras to Pakistan as part of a program to upgrade the Pak military forces and give them greater Air to Surface capability.
However, the Pakistan military has remained below acceptable in its ability to engage in combined operations, and this has meant that US air capacity has been increasingly tied down in ground support missions. Part of the reason that the Indian navy has largely taken the lead on dealing with Somali Piracy.
Expansion of the war in Afghanistan, has already drawn diplomatic warnings, even though Obama committed to it early. However, evidence indicates that supply across the Khyber is already near the breaking point and is offering a target for suicide tactics similar to those used at choke points in Iraq. In these infiltration of criminal and irregular police by assymetrical forces is accomplished, and then activated to create confusion by detonating a carried explosive device. This then allows a larger attack on the whole convoy, with the intent of raiding the supplies that are carried. The new container rules have already proven vulnerable, and as a result armed escort has been increased again. There has been a private admission that the "Khyber Pass problem" has remained not only intractable, but will likely grow worse because of the absence of good tactical doctrine in for this particular mission, and the present confused state of the rules of engagement, which have difficulty differentiating the complex status of the conflict.
Over the last two years, Pakistan’s involvement in Afghanistan has widened from support of a US mission to facing a domestic insurgency. The ability to flow through the pass, since it is critical to civilian trade, means that an integrated insurgency will have little difficulty in traveling between a war torn failed state Afghanistan, and a destabilizing Pakistan. The opening months of an Obama Presidency may see a "surge" style strategy undertaken in Afghanistan, with the intent of controlling key military centers and the main supply lines. Preparations for this strategy have been rumored to be underway for some time, and some which were mistaken to be preparations for an attack on Iran have, in fact, been bulking up US transport capability for a redeployment of forces from Iraq to Afghanistan. This would also mean further extensions of deployments for National Guard forces currently in Iraq, since they provide a disproportionate share of the Military Police and Security personnel that would be required in a "surge, suppress, stabilize" operational mode.
Further providing cover for the movement of Talib, insurgent, and "global guerilla" forces is the swelling refuge crisis and continued sectarian violence. Further strain on this weak point is being placed by accelerated construction plans for a new tunnel.
The re-appointment of Secretary Gates who has been instrumental in pushing for an escalation in Afghanistan in the belief that it is possible to win there. As 2005 dawned, I predicted that the US was within 18 months of a crisis point in Iraq based on relative casualty rates, and that the outcome would probably be a withdrawal from a de facto partitioned Iraq. The situation in Pakistan-Afghanistan, which now must be regarded as a single conflict in a conflict of conflicts which include Iraq, the Congo, Somalia, the Sudan, and Ethiopia – in that the root cause is the deterioration of control of the Western Indian Ocean power center and over-commitment of both combat ground support capacity and naval power – is far more complex and does not reduce to a simple logistical formula. However supply problems and political destabilization indicate that we may be facing another dark at the end of the tunnel – where the glide path outcome is a negative one leaving the political and security situation in a region in a worse state than a political solution would make possible.
These supply problems are a warning both that there is a military escalation planned, and a demonstration that this escalation, in itself, will increase the level of political instability in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Author and former diplomat Rory Stewart outlines how over reach has produced increasing failure in Afghanistan, and warns that further over reach may well produce conditions which will be worse still.



64 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
More foreign troops is just the formula for success against an insurgency caused by the presence of foreign troops. /s
Where do they find so many dimwits on all sides of the foreign policy elite in DC (and Chicago)?
Kipling comes to life as once again a western power gets broken on the rocks of the Khyber Pass.
Also recommend the Flashman series, also about the British military experience. Grim battle scenes but a hoot & a half.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb…..x=flashman
We need oil, can we continue to fight in the middle east if another oil tanker gets taken. You know that if the money is paid to ransom the oil tanker then every pirate will want to hijack one too.
So much for Bush making the world safe from terrorism.
The struggle to control the pass is a taste of what we will see if there is full blown escalation in Afghanistan. Someone in J-5 should tell the higher ups that if they insist on pushing this, they should plan on what happens when Pakistan fissure. This is now one conflict, and needs to be looked at in it’s totality.
The more we shoot, the less oil we will get.
The Independent’s Robert Fisk has returned to Afghanistan, the scenario is the same as just before the Russians were expelled in defeat. Note all the similarities Fisk reports. Read carefully his words as well as Sterling’s.
http://www.independent.co.uk/o…..29920.html
When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
So-oldier _of_ the Queen!
Hmm…Perhaps Kipling would be required reading for those adverturing in the Hindu Kush.
I’m all for getting Osama if we can if we have a reasonable plan which I doubt.
I see no reason for troops in the middle east unless Ossama looks like he can take over Pakistan and their nukes.
Then we have to secure them or destroy them.
Getting better governments in the middle east should be our priority. What happened to the billions in aid Bush sent Pakistan? Did any of it reach the little people?
We can’t throw money at problems any more governments that want to help the middle class and poor are more stable than the governments we have been supporting.
Linked to the Fisk piece. And no, we have learned nothing.
The ghost of Soviet Communism must be out there, some place, laughing at us.
as osama says only death awaits those who come to afg. no one has been able to take that region. yet. we will pay dearly for activity to track and capture. i would not like to be the one who is tasked with that duty. just like anything else the us has to learn for itself.
Thanks for this Stirling – the situation is bad and getting worse.
Meanwhile, the UN has just issued a report that Afghan children are facing more violence than ever.
Such is my opinion; doG must have loved fools, (s)he made so blessed many of ‘em.
Allowing destabilization and loss of control of the area is exacerbating humanitarian disasters on all sides.
what is the pass used for? commerce? commerce between whom? what all travels back and forth? seriously.
specifically, what is it used for that can’t be done by air? locals? why is it necessary to keep it open?
afghanistan imports/exports what? to pakistan…pakistan imports/exports what? to afghanistan…
close it off, any movement, bomb the shit out of it/them. if that’s the taliban’s only free ‘pass’ then close it.. transport everything by air. it’s gotta cost more going by convoy with protection costs and everything.
i don’t believe most americans can truly appreciate how brutal that society is. it is a way of life for them. been that way for hundreds of years.
oh, boy. you got lots of questions.
There’s another cost. I am an example of it. I have now served both in Afghanistan and in Irak. My reports to my superiors are like those that I have seen from other officers in armies allied to the USA.
Horrified contempt at the cackhanded brutality and inefficiency of the American armed forces.
I see no reason why one drop of civilised blood should be even risked let alone spilt in any of America’s anti-Muslim wars.
My attitude to our so-called allies is an increasingy common one. The importance of the loss of American military credibility amongst your allies should not be underestimated.
Well… this is somber. Apart from all the destruction and despair, what keeps hitting me over and over is the environmental degradation of the regions that you mention, and the increased stresses as a result of population and urbanization.
I’d not connected the Somali pirates with the Khyber Pass, but the linkages are now obvious. Kudos.
rhetorical/ in case i missed ‘that part in the middle’
one more thing, about keeping it open–if it’s solely to resupply the military, why aren’t they resuppyling using those new airstrips and bases they just built over there? in afghanistan, for the last 18 months. pulled construction crews out of iraq and moved them to afghanistan to do just that.
Afghanistan is landlocked. The Khyber is the only passable route between Pakistan and Afghanistan on the East. Curiously, Iran on the west doesn’t allow passage through its territory for Murikans to resupply their armies. The British at one time were able to enter Afghanistan from the West but were faced with hugely hostile tribes IIRC. Otherwise Afghanistan is effectively landlocked. For your second point about airlifting supplies, you would need the modern equivelant of the Berlin airlift at modern costs. Best of luck with that, not a good position to conduct a war from IMHO.
Medvedev & Putin are certainly laughing at us.
It’s how the “NATO” troops get their supplies into Afghanistan.
And is none of our business.
It’s the same sort of groupthink that kept us in Vietnam for so many years. For the world to see the mighty U.S. armed forces driven out in apparent defeat by a ragtag group of militants would be too damaging to the tattered remnants of our prestige.
However ill-conceived the invasion(s), I can understand the aversion to leaving behind failed state(s). Don’t think bombing wedding parties is the solution, though.
The aid the U.S. sent to Pak was strictly military (U.S. still has sanctions against importing Pak clothing) and the Pak military used it to buy big aircraft & other items they could use if India decides to attack them. The kind of military equipment the Pakis need to fight insurgents has been promised (helocopters to carry troops over rough terrain, night vision googles, etc.) but not supplied, probably because the U.S. is using it all in Iraq.
i ‘get’ that it’s to resupply, seems like it’s more costly to use the pass. and if that’s what they intend to keep doing, why all of the new airstrips/bases in afghanistan?
On the same page.
But don’t forget bombing the funerals too. /s
only after much more pain with the us figure that one out.
yes, we are not suited for that kind of fighting. i agree with you. have you been wounded there?
Land transport costs are pretty much always cheaper than by air plus the volume able to be transported is much larger.
For air transport, there is a load master that has to calculate and balance every load.
As far as building airstrips and bases, they still have to be built to accommodate the fighters and transports bringing things in directly from the US. Say they transport ammunition and people via air, they still need to bring in food, water, medicines etc.
The more bulk in the supplies, the easier to transport via ground.
Re failed state. It’s not the Taliban, it’s the Pashtuns. And they have grievances with the central government which is run by Northern Alliance, the Pashtun’s civil war enemies. The solution, if there is one, is political, and U.S. could work to try to bring about reconciliation.
Bwahahahahaha. Just typing that sentence shows how absurd that would be. When was the last time the U.S. ever did anything like that?
Um, not to mention the fact that Afghanistan is not our country and who are we to be building military bases there to fight against 1/3 of the population?
Rhetorical Q, obviously.
actually, one of the reasons the current admin gave for continued iraq occupation was that we had to avenge our dead. same in afg. we are there so we have to persist.
And as was mentioned earlier, the amount of planes necessary to fully re-supply via air would constitute the equivalent of another Berlin Airlift. T
That’s why the bulk of the supplies even within the US are still moved via Truck and Rail. Small products get moved via air which is why FedEx, UPS, USPS, et al have size and weight maximums for shipments.
Historically, undermining foreign governments is the thing we do best. Building stable relationships is just too danged HARD.
looseheadprop upstairs
Bush fought the wars, and the wars won.
http://exiledonline.com/war-ne…..-wars-won/
We’ve already installed Karzai, and it’s a testament against the policy of regime change, we can’t just install governments. The people don’t respect or support puppets. Real leadership is organic.
Bush bought Musharraf for 10 million. He undermined their democracy, arrested his opposition party members, lawyers and judges, and bombed buildings full of civilians to target a few suspects – per US instructions, thereby increasing the number of hostile angry people exponentially.
Afghanistan was a failed state when the idiots in Washington illegally bombed and invaded a state, one of the world’s poorest, not at war or threatening war with the American cretins. Just what exceptional thoughts do you have that you can now do any good. If you do have such thoughts you are madly deceived. The world’s message to you is: stop, withdraw, do not expect respect until you are capable of showing same. Pull your heads out of your asses and get some air. Learn about the world and its peoples before you go about slaughtering them and their children. It is you that are the killers, and maimers of innocent people, do not ask for forgiveness, you have made that quality in short supply. /rant
Possible lessons of the Bush years.
Even a good army with bad leaders is a bad army. An army that will not say no to impossible or immoral orders lacks the ability to say no to bad leaders.
We need more Generals who will risk getting fired.
RawStory links to this BBC video of an Afghan battle. If people actually saw this real war as it happens, I believe it would give them reason to say STOP IT!
I know why we are killing, Irakis, for
theirour oil. Why are we killing Afghanis. Is it to suppress the Hashish trade?More wasted money
Agreed buy we do not need to support bad governments.
thanks, dakine. but what i am wondering is, we’re not talking regular truck transport here, we’re talking mountain pass warzone; convoy, protection by land and air, planes, personnel, how may days through the pass? i don’ tsee how that could be cheaper/..
not when they could fly it in from pakistan and land on one of those new airstrips. in a matter of hours. how many trips could that one plane make in comparison to one convoy? with how many personnel?
and meanwhile close the pass and obliterate anything that moves. isn’t that how the fighters are getting in? sorry, just does’t make sense to me….even IF it costs more, end it quicker, less cost in the long run, human and fiscal..
problem with the pass is that we both need it so we’re losing because the taliban uses it? duh. close the thing.we can go by air.
(oh, just thought, i forgot, personnel paid already-military and with nothing else to do, can’t have that!….companies supplying trucks and weapons can’t be left out. i was taught to follow the money, only sendse this makes to me is that someone is making money doing it this wya.bet they’re in connecticut.)
Thanks for the link. Pretty much spot on.
News flash for you chappies, the Taliban stopped the opium trade completely under their jurisdiction. The Americans and their allies promptly restarted the trade. Poppy Bush is not a misnomer. Please get your facts in order before disseminating them.
“A Fool Lies Here…”
Now it is not good
For the Christian’s health
To hustle the Aryan brown,
For the Christian riles
And the Aryan smiles
And he wearth the Christian down;
And the end of the fight
Is tombstone white
With the name of the late deceased,
And the epitaph drear,
“A fool lies here
Who tried to hustle the East.”
Rudyard Kipling
Obama is about to become acquainted with the Pashtun.
I know it sounds counter-intuitive but there are a lot of costs associated with air transport that just aren’t there with ground transport, even in a war zone. The wear and tear on the planes and crews. You just can’t carry as much in planes as you can in a convoy of trucks. The fuel costs for planes is much greater than it is for the trucks. Trucks are cheaper to replace than planes and drivers are cheaper to replace than pilots. In order to fully re-supply Afghanistan by air, the planes would be having to fly virtually 24/7. We just do not have enough resources to support that tye of response.
Actually I said Hashish, not heroin. I will let you find the linkies to the heroin.
Thank you for saving me the trouble.
A sad duty. For one, don’t suffer fools gladly, if at all.
You live in Spain I think? If so you’ll know that the street price of heroin has dropped dramatically and that Europol are explicitly blaming the war in Afghanistan.
Hey the CIA has always had to get a lot of “funding” from non-government sources.
Although that may now be the DoD “Intel” agencies. Small price to pay for continuing to fund disruptions to governments that parts of the US dislike. /s
Rudyard Kipling, “The Young British Soldier”.
I hadn’t been following that news at all. There was a Columbian shipment intercepted off Ireland of €450 millions recently IIRC. It is accepted knowledge that the Yanks opened the floodgates for opiates, possibly to finance their actions, no telling the level of complicity. People who live in secrets, usually expire in secrets.
It’s rising to bite a lot of European governments and they are very far from happy about it.
ok, thanks, i’ll ponder it some more…and probably see the sense in what you all are saying. maybe.
if the objective is to keep the taliban fighters from pakistan out, then you have to close the pass. only logical. then you would need less supplies for fewer troops. isn’t that the objective?
for now, i’m leaning in the pay more now rather than more later, close the pass direction.
i’ll think about it some more.
bbl
There is a growing anger against the U.S. that I have not seen before. I think the patience with American ignorance and dyspolity are finally coming to roost, as yet not towards individuals, but towards the members of the dysfunctional community that has supported these atrocities. Americans are going to be experiencing that censure the Germans faced after WWII. That responsibility will be exacted.
Why would any civilized government be happy with another exporting their failures in the form of a drug culture. Some day, the accountants will have to assay the costs to the governments of treating the disease of drugs in their communities. Those costs will be exacted from the exporter in the form of trade barriers until the export is halted. That will take some small measure of fortitude, but the hegemon has become an economically toothless tyrant.
I would agree with you. Denmark is one of the most pro-American country’s in Europe and there’s a lot of bitterness and animosity now. Especially among the armed forces. Let me give you an example. I have just finished expediting the return to civilian life of one of my best sergeants. He was looking forward to turning up to his daughter’s school in uniform plus medals to fetch her home his first day back. He’s so horrified and ashamed at the way that his honour and courage and patriotism were misused that he wants out. He’ll do well in civilian life (we train our people and give them good skills that transfer unlike the Americans). But there are 2 things:
1. He represents a major loss to the army. I am going to have big trouble replacing him and he is not the first.
2. When talking about what he has seen to civilians he makes no secret of his loathing and contempt for American soldiers and the society that created them.
Good people are great losses to any organization when they leave. The education and skills that are lost are not calculable. American disrepute has been ongoing since the Vietnam action. The complete absence of reliable reporting to the people hides governmental malfeasance of the highest order. What has been created is an incredibly ignorant population, ungrounded in fact, disrespectful of knowledge, adverse to excellence, a mob ready to react to imaginary fear, or manipulative suggestion. A frightful monster it is armed with incredible power to destroy. That is what Iraq suffered, the destruction of an ageless culture, and without a doubt, it is barbarians who did it. There is great shame on the country of my birth that cannot be expunged.
Sadly I must agree.
FTR:
I go back in in a few days. My task. My ONLY task. Is to get my men out alive.