<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jane on MSNBC &#8211; Obama&#8217;s First Choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putnik</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735625</link>
		<dc:creator>Putnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jane, I hate to piddle in the punchbowl, however, what makes you think that Hillary, a bought and paid for shill for AIPAC, would be considered any kind of an honest broker by any Mideast faction but the Israelis?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, much as I had HOPED for some semblance of change with the election of Obama, most of what he has done is to return to his administration retreads of the Clinton administration, and the most hawkish and divisive ones at that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hardly “Change We Can Believe”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane, I hate to piddle in the punchbowl, however, what makes you think that Hillary, a bought and paid for shill for AIPAC, would be considered any kind of an honest broker by any Mideast faction but the Israelis?</p>
<p>Also, much as I had HOPED for some semblance of change with the election of Obama, most of what he has done is to return to his administration retreads of the Clinton administration, and the most hawkish and divisive ones at that.</p>
<p>Hardly “Change We Can Believe”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammy1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735621</link>
		<dc:creator>sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jane..You’re becoming a “talking head”!!&lt;br /&gt;
Ya did good! (and looked great!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane..You’re becoming a “talking head”!!<br />
Ya did good! (and looked great!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hazmaq</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735614</link>
		<dc:creator>hazmaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735614</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, cut the 9-11 New Yorker martyr crap will ya.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In your mind then 9-ll = torture, kill and maim anyone in the paths of the US or Israel, for revenge??  What does covering Israel’s ass for everything&lt;br /&gt;
have to do with 9-11??&lt;br /&gt;
More hard line propaganda.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my Western liberal ladden town of 9500, we raised $11,000 for 9-11 victims. So keep 9-11 out of your hard-line ideology. The two are as related as the Torah is to Depleted Uranium tipped missles and child maiming cluster bomblets.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, cut the 9-11 New Yorker martyr crap will ya.  </p>
<p>In your mind then 9-ll = torture, kill and maim anyone in the paths of the US or Israel, for revenge??  What does covering Israel’s ass for everything<br />
have to do with 9-11??<br />
More hard line propaganda.</p>
<p>In my Western liberal ladden town of 9500, we raised $11,000 for 9-11 victims. So keep 9-11 out of your hard-line ideology. The two are as related as the Torah is to Depleted Uranium tipped missles and child maiming cluster bomblets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otay</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735602</link>
		<dc:creator>Otay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735602</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read Firedoglake, but have not signed in to comment until now.  But I just had to sign in to comment for the first time after seeing Jane Hamsher’s appearance on MSNBC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jane did an absolutely fantastic job, particularly on dispelling the talking points about Lieberman.  I thought that Kos did a great job the other day (also on MSNBC?) and could not be topped, but I must say Jane topped it.  By emphasizing Lieberman’s blockage in investigating Katrina and investigating the graft involved in Homeland Security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bravo, Jane!  Excellent work!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Firedoglake, but have not signed in to comment until now.  But I just had to sign in to comment for the first time after seeing Jane Hamsher’s appearance on MSNBC.</p>
<p>Jane did an absolutely fantastic job, particularly on dispelling the talking points about Lieberman.  I thought that Kos did a great job the other day (also on MSNBC?) and could not be topped, but I must say Jane topped it.  By emphasizing Lieberman’s blockage in investigating Katrina and investigating the graft involved in Homeland Security.</p>
<p>Bravo, Jane!  Excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735586</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735586</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Obama won with 53% of the popular vote. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as HRC’s hawkishness, it’s obvious from her record on the Middle East that came from her role as a US Senator from New York. Please see my comment 128.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will she revert back to where she was as First Lady? I don’t know, that’s a good question. Simply omitting from your analysis that she was a Senator from the state that took the biggest hit on 9/11, however doesn’t really help your credibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama won with 53% of the popular vote. </p>
<p>As far as HRC’s hawkishness, it’s obvious from her record on the Middle East that came from her role as a US Senator from New York. Please see my comment 128.</p>
<p>Will she revert back to where she was as First Lady? I don’t know, that’s a good question. Simply omitting from your analysis that she was a Senator from the state that took the biggest hit on 9/11, however doesn’t really help your credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735582</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735582</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;By the way, great job nailing Sanctimonious Joe on substantive issues that every American can agree puts Joe’s interests and George Bush’s interests  above the American people’s interests at a substantial cost to the American people.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, great job nailing Sanctimonious Joe on substantive issues that every American can agree puts Joe’s interests and George Bush’s interests  above the American people’s interests at a substantial cost to the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735578</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735578</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fantastic appearance Jane. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You rejected the opportunity to present the concerns as a crisis and, you distinguished yourself from the extreme position, and you stated the issues clearly by connecting back to Obama’s campaign values and making reasonable inferences about what current Obama and Senate’s decisions indicate.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have earned  a center left administration, not a center right administration that the losers would like you to believe is America.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Fantastic appearance Jane. </em></strong> </p>
<p>You rejected the opportunity to present the concerns as a crisis and, you distinguished yourself from the extreme position, and you stated the issues clearly by connecting back to Obama’s campaign values and making reasonable inferences about what current Obama and Senate’s decisions indicate.  </p>
<p>We have earned  a center left administration, not a center right administration that the losers would like you to believe is America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krissyderic</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735575</link>
		<dc:creator>krissyderic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alex Witt is a horrible “interviewer” and a ditz - to boot.&lt;br /&gt;
Guess that’s why they put her on during the weekends.&lt;br /&gt;
Very sloppy work on her part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jane did a Great Job!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex Witt is a horrible “interviewer” and a ditz &#8211; to boot.<br />
Guess that’s why they put her on during the weekends.<br />
Very sloppy work on her part.</p>
<p>Jane did a Great Job!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jumpinjack</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735547</link>
		<dc:creator>jumpinjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735547</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great. Obama’s not even sworn in yet and already our progressive bloggers are bitching. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Worse, MSM is picking up on the theme that lefty bloggers are already pissed about Obama, therefore giving credence to rightwing bullshit about Obama’s election. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama will have a tough enough job correcting our economy and government while fighting the rightwingers. I thought us progressives would at least support Obama for awhile. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just because we got him elected does not mean we are supposed to be telling him how to do his job. We voted for change. Now that he’s trying to enact the change we voted for….bloggers and commenters are bitching because it’s not the “right kind of change”. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What the hell are we going to do when he actually takes office? Demand that he sit when we say “sit” and rollover when we say “rollover”??? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s not change we can believe in.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Obama’s not even sworn in yet and already our progressive bloggers are bitching. </p>
<p>Worse, MSM is picking up on the theme that lefty bloggers are already pissed about Obama, therefore giving credence to rightwing bullshit about Obama’s election. </p>
<p>Obama will have a tough enough job correcting our economy and government while fighting the rightwingers. I thought us progressives would at least support Obama for awhile. </p>
<p>Just because we got him elected does not mean we are supposed to be telling him how to do his job. We voted for change. Now that he’s trying to enact the change we voted for….bloggers and commenters are bitching because it’s not the “right kind of change”. </p>
<p>What the hell are we going to do when he actually takes office? Demand that he sit when we say “sit” and rollover when we say “rollover”??? </p>
<p>That’s not change we can believe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klynn</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735535</link>
		<dc:creator>klynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/22/jane-on-msnbc-obamas-first-choices/#comment-1735535</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Self-controlled, intellegent, articulate, reasonable and classy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Webster’s definition of Jane…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-controlled, intellegent, articulate, reasonable and classy.</p>
<p>Webster’s definition of Jane…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.267 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 06:06:20 -->

