AND I saw him looking for a friendly face and not finding one.
This is past comprehension for a US president to be treated this way…really shows how far we have fallen in the last 8 years.

Of course, it isn’t all his fault. But everyone needs someone to blame and I’ll take Bush in lieu of the others, mainly because it was him who sold US out to Freidmanite economics on steroids. I think he’s a traitor who had a lot of help getting US here.

And people are going to be howling for his head when it’s too late, and he’s ensconced in his non-extraditable haven in Paraguay. ( with our $$$ courtesy of the bank bailout)

This still doesn’t fully explain, however, why the first-row leaders entering and falling into position behind Bush manage to greet some second row counterparts when 43 isn’t.

Shaw does, however, plant a seed of doubt. And, doubt, something which has been sorely lacking on the Right, is something I am loathe to see absent on the Left. Personally, where other explanations exist, and where there is evidence to support alternative interpretations, true to my liberal roots, I feel obligated to consider them.

Michael Shaw is every bit as meticulous in his examination of evidence as Marcy is her examination of evidence. I reach for Shaw with all of the same trust that I reach for Marcy. I am unable to dismiss his interpretation out of hand. But, as they say, YMMV.

In today’s NYT Brooksie is upset because people being vetted for the next administration are from the top of their class, this from a Harvard alum.

One line is particularly telling though: “If an enemy attacks the United States during a Harvard-Yale game, we’re in trouble.” Apparently he doesn’t see the irony in that line because the US was attacked while a guy who got degrees from both schools was supposedly in charge.

I know people who never went to college who could have run this country better and not run it into the ground like this little prick did.