<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is Lieberman Rooting for in Georgia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:17:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: siri</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730237</link>
		<dc:creator>siri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730237</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it’s done.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Senate-Lieberman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to us by the damned dems AGAIN!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
damit!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it’s done.<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Senate-Lieberman.html?_r=1&amp;hp" rel="nofollow">to us by the damned dems AGAIN!</a><br />
damit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siri</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730225</link>
		<dc:creator>siri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730225</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hiya Eli.&lt;br /&gt;
My guess is that lieman is too busy rooting for himself right about now to be worrying or spending any time whatsoever on anyone else’s election problems.  It’s ALLL ABOUT JOE now.&lt;br /&gt;
I wish a psychologist would come out with something on this snake.  It looks and seems to me that his entire reason d’etre is to keep himself in the spotlight, always and forever.  There a psych term for that and an explanation of that kind of afliction.  It’s not Narcissism, though that’s certainly playing into it.  It’s about keeping self in a drama (soap opera) in front of cameras and masses of people and i really believe that’s a huge part of his, and consequently OUR, problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Eli.<br />
My guess is that lieman is too busy rooting for himself right about now to be worrying or spending any time whatsoever on anyone else’s election problems.  It’s ALLL ABOUT JOE now.<br />
I wish a psychologist would come out with something on this snake.  It looks and seems to me that his entire reason d’etre is to keep himself in the spotlight, always and forever.  There a psych term for that and an explanation of that kind of afliction.  It’s not Narcissism, though that’s certainly playing into it.  It’s about keeping self in a drama (soap opera) in front of cameras and masses of people and i really believe that’s a huge part of his, and consequently OUR, problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730149</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it’s plain old collegiality, plus the whole idea of 1998.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1998, you see, was when the Republicans thought they had Clinton by the balls — literally.  They geared up for impeachment and were all over the teevee about how they were going to use this to win sixty seats in the House and a dozen or so in the Senate.  But they wound up breaking even in the Senate (they took out a couple of ours, but we took out Al D’Amato and Lauch Faircloth) and saw their overall House margin drop by five seats.  (Of course, this didn’t stop them from moving forward with impeachment anyway.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s plain old collegiality, plus the whole idea of 1998.</p>
<p>1998, you see, was when the Republicans thought they had Clinton by the balls — literally.  They geared up for impeachment and were all over the teevee about how they were going to use this to win sixty seats in the House and a dozen or so in the Senate.  But they wound up breaking even in the Senate (they took out a couple of ours, but we took out Al D’Amato and Lauch Faircloth) and saw their overall House margin drop by five seats.  (Of course, this didn’t stop them from moving forward with impeachment anyway.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730130</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730130</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whatever happened to the nuclear option?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democrats are more into fossil fuels and Lieberman is one of the biggest fossils around.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whatever happened to the nuclear option?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Democrats are more into fossil fuels and Lieberman is one of the biggest fossils around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730124</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how much A*PAC was or wasn’t involved in the Obama’s cave to Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much A*PAC was or wasn’t involved in the Obama’s cave to Lieberman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomolos</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730122</link>
		<dc:creator>nomolos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Would love to know what intrigue has allowed LikudJoe to go as far as he has.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to know what intrigue has allowed LikudJoe to go as far as he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimWhite</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730117</link>
		<dc:creator>JimWhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ouch! My eyes!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! My eyes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaR</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730115</link>
		<dc:creator>LindaR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever happened to the nuclear option?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to the nuclear option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perris</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730110</link>
		<dc:creator>perris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730110</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and joe has guaranteed the democrats should NOT have a fillibuster, we need to throw him out of the party already&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and joe has guaranteed the democrats should NOT have a fillibuster, we need to throw him out of the party already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 60thStreet</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730107</link>
		<dc:creator>60thStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/ted-stevens-polarizes-saxby-chambliss/#comment-1730107</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;(To those of you with Photoshop skills, I beg you: Don’t do it.) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sorry, Eli, we beat you to it days ago…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samsedershow.com/node/4073#comment-281430&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.samsedershow.com/no.....ent-281430&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(To those of you with Photoshop skills, I beg you: Don’t do it.) </p>
</blockquote>
<p>sorry, Eli, we beat you to it days ago…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samsedershow.com/node/4073#comment-281430" rel="nofollow">http://www.samsedershow.com/no&#8230;..ent-281430</a></p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
