Comments on: Leahy: Lieberman Should Lose His Chairmanship

By: Hugh

Hugh — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:56:31 +0000

The gung-ho types always seemed to forget that John Wayne was an actor.

I’ve heard John Wayne accused of many things but acting wasn’t one of them. *Insert rim shot*

By: Bluetoe2

Bluetoe2 — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:34:03 +0000

Have to agree. The netroots are barely on the radar screen of public opinion unless of course it’s to raise money. Flea

By: dakine01

dakine01 — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:41:32 +0000

Sounds like what would have happened to him if he’d been Army.

The gung-ho types always seemed to forget that John Wayne was an actor.

By: Mary

Mary — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:39:11 +0000

Has anyone involved the CT Dem party in the decision on “what happens” to their “quasi-Dem” Lieberman? Bc it seems to me that the Dems in the state he purportedly represents should have some say – and they may very well want him to stay on, I don’t know. But he is a Senator from CT and the CT Dem party should be prominently involved in the discussion IMO. fwiw.

By: SouthernDragon

SouthernDragon — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:36:15 +0000

He didn’t last long. Tried playin’ John Wayne and Charlie ended his career.

By: dakine01

dakine01 — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:34:17 +0000

If that Lieutenant had been army, he probably never would have made it beyond Butter Bar status.

By: yellowsnapdragon

yellowsnapdragon — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:43 +0000

Maybe I’m not representing Jane’s argument well.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/11.....tes-panic/

By: eCAHNomics

eCAHNomics — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:25 +0000

Heh. Thought sock puppeting here was forbidden. *g*

By: eCAHNomics

eCAHNomics — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:32:49 +0000

Good on both of you.

By: DWBartoo

DWBartoo — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:32:45 +0000

Well, however it was ‘managed’, Filkins felt that the ‘display’ an effective ’strategy’. He did not elaborate.

I am merely reporting.

I take no moral stand.

It is too confusing.

;~D