<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By George, What A Prick: Will Obnoxiously Corrects Donna Brazile&#8217;s English On National Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:39:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe2</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708691</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708691</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Will has always been a pompous patrician of wealth and priviledge and will always be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will has always been a pompous patrician of wealth and priviledge and will always be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: questioneverything</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708638</link>
		<dc:creator>questioneverything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bigot in a sheet?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigot in a sheet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alank</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708573</link>
		<dc:creator>alank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708573</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Old southern american english:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like Australian English and English English, the English of the coastal Deep South is historically non-rhotic: it drops the sound of final /r/ before a consonant or a word boundary, so that guard sounds similar to God (but the former has a longer vowel than the latter) and sore like saw. Intrusive /r/, where an /r/ sound is inserted at a word break between two vowel sounds (”lawr and order”) is not a feature of coastal SAE, as it is in many other non-rhotic accents. Today only some areas like New Orleans, Mobile, Savannah, and Norfolk have non-rhotic speakers (Labov, Ash, and Bomberg 2006: 47-48). Non-rhoticity is rapidly disappearing from almost all Southern accents, to a greater degree than it has been lost in the other traditionally non-rhotic dialects of the East Coast such as New York and Boston. The remaining non-rhotic SAE speakers also use intrusive r, like New England and New York City.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New southern american english:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The merger of [ɛ] and [ɪ] before nasal consonants, so that pen and pin are pronounced the same, but the pin-pen merger is not found in New Orleans, Savannah, or Miami (which does not fall within the Southern dialect region). This sound change has spread beyond the South in recent decades and is now found in parts of the Midwest and West as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yat:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In and around New Orleans, you can hear an accent similar to that of New York City. It is referred to as Yat, from the phrases such as “Where y’at?” for “How are you?” Additionally, many unique terms such as “neutral ground”[12] for the median of a divided street (Louisiana/Southern Mississippi) or “banquette”[13] for a sidewalk (Southern Louisiana/Eastern Texas) are found here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Creole:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;    *&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Louisiana Creole French (Kreyol Lwiziyen) is a French-based creole language spoken in Louisiana. It has many resemblances to other French creoles in the Caribbean. While Cajun French and Louisiana Creole have had a significant influence on each other, they are unrelated. While Cajun is basically a French dialect with grammar similar to standard French, Louisiana Creole applies a French lexicon to a system of grammar and syntax which is quite different from French grammar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old southern american english:</p>
<blockquote><p>Like Australian English and English English, the English of the coastal Deep South is historically non-rhotic: it drops the sound of final /r/ before a consonant or a word boundary, so that guard sounds similar to God (but the former has a longer vowel than the latter) and sore like saw. Intrusive /r/, where an /r/ sound is inserted at a word break between two vowel sounds (”lawr and order”) is not a feature of coastal SAE, as it is in many other non-rhotic accents. Today only some areas like New Orleans, Mobile, Savannah, and Norfolk have non-rhotic speakers (Labov, Ash, and Bomberg 2006: 47-48). Non-rhoticity is rapidly disappearing from almost all Southern accents, to a greater degree than it has been lost in the other traditionally non-rhotic dialects of the East Coast such as New York and Boston. The remaining non-rhotic SAE speakers also use intrusive r, like New England and New York City.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>New southern american english:</p>
<blockquote><p>The merger of [ɛ] and [ɪ] before nasal consonants, so that pen and pin are pronounced the same, but the pin-pen merger is not found in New Orleans, Savannah, or Miami (which does not fall within the Southern dialect region). This sound change has spread beyond the South in recent decades and is now found in parts of the Midwest and West as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yat:</p>
<blockquote><p>In and around New Orleans, you can hear an accent similar to that of New York City. It is referred to as Yat, from the phrases such as “Where y’at?” for “How are you?” Additionally, many unique terms such as “neutral ground”[12] for the median of a divided street (Louisiana/Southern Mississippi) or “banquette”[13] for a sidewalk (Southern Louisiana/Eastern Texas) are found here.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Creole:</p>
<blockquote><p>    *</p>
<p>Louisiana Creole French (Kreyol Lwiziyen) is a French-based creole language spoken in Louisiana. It has many resemblances to other French creoles in the Caribbean. While Cajun French and Louisiana Creole have had a significant influence on each other, they are unrelated. While Cajun is basically a French dialect with grammar similar to standard French, Louisiana Creole applies a French lexicon to a system of grammar and syntax which is quite different from French grammar.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevBev</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708524</link>
		<dc:creator>RevBev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think there is a word….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a word….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MollyNYC</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708518</link>
		<dc:creator>MollyNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can reasonably assume that anybody who claims that others are voting for Obama solely because of his race (as Will did with Colin Powell) is himself picking his presidential candidate entirely on the basis of race.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There should be a word for these people . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can reasonably assume that anybody who claims that others are voting for Obama solely because of his race (as Will did with Colin Powell) is himself picking his presidential candidate entirely on the basis of race.</p>
<p>There should be a word for these people . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlofhuntingdon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708510</link>
		<dc:creator>earlofhuntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;George W., despite fans like the usually more discriminating Scott Horton, generally hopes to make others look ridiculous.  Rudely correcting what he considers non-standard English is a peculiar neocon code, one familiar to admirers of the bon mots of Mary McCarthy or the less obviously acidic Nancy Mitford.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speakers of what’s perceived as non-standard English, whether from Brooklyn or Harlem, Anchorage or Charlotte, Liverpool or Lisson Grove, are poor, foreign, other, uppity abusers of English and the welfare system, no matter how many degrees they have or the professional heights they’ve scaled.  It’s a legacies pat on the back to himself and his mates that they’re made men and the doors are closed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope Tavis Smiley’s people give Georgie a call and “a” invitation to come onto his show.  Let him try the same thing in less assured surroundings.  Humpty-Dumpty, meat Wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George W., despite fans like the usually more discriminating Scott Horton, generally hopes to make others look ridiculous.  Rudely correcting what he considers non-standard English is a peculiar neocon code, one familiar to admirers of the bon mots of Mary McCarthy or the less obviously acidic Nancy Mitford.  </p>
<p>Speakers of what’s perceived as non-standard English, whether from Brooklyn or Harlem, Anchorage or Charlotte, Liverpool or Lisson Grove, are poor, foreign, other, uppity abusers of English and the welfare system, no matter how many degrees they have or the professional heights they’ve scaled.  It’s a legacies pat on the back to himself and his mates that they’re made men and the doors are closed.</p>
<p>I hope Tavis Smiley’s people give Georgie a call and “a” invitation to come onto his show.  Let him try the same thing in less assured surroundings.  Humpty-Dumpty, meat Wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaf48</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708508</link>
		<dc:creator>jaf48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Look, I found this to be a schadenfreudaliscious treat. This is what impotent rage looks like from a chickenhawk.  Expect varying degrees for the next 96 months minimum. I am especially looking forward to the bleating of Doughy Pantload!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I found this to be a schadenfreudaliscious treat. This is what impotent rage looks like from a chickenhawk.  Expect varying degrees for the next 96 months minimum. I am especially looking forward to the bleating of Doughy Pantload!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708507</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708507</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m sorry, I’m not a George Will fan but it sounded to me like he was just asking for a clarification to make certain he heard her correctly (as someone not attuned to Nola accent) and it looks as though that’s the way she took it as well.  She &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; switching topics (slightly from early voting to rural voting) - I think you sometimes see (hear) things that aren’t there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sorry, I’m not a George Will fan but it sounded to me like he was just asking for a clarification to make certain he heard her correctly (as someone not attuned to Nola accent) and it looks as though that’s the way she took it as well.  She <em>was</em> switching topics (slightly from early voting to rural voting) &#8211; I think you sometimes see (hear) things that aren’t there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granny3</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708505</link>
		<dc:creator>Granny3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That’s exactly what I heard.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s exactly what I heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamazboy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708503</link>
		<dc:creator>mamazboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/02/george-will-obnoxiously-corrects-donna-braziles-pronunciation-on-national-television/#comment-1708503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you hit it exactly. We’ll be seeing more of this, no doubt, but its real effect will be to make the right-wing idiot sound like, well, a right-wing idiot. Marginalizing themselves so you don’t have to bother!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you hit it exactly. We’ll be seeing more of this, no doubt, but its real effect will be to make the right-wing idiot sound like, well, a right-wing idiot. Marginalizing themselves so you don’t have to bother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
