After eight years of the most profligate spending ever seen in American history, get ready for the "fiscal conservatives" to rear their heads and decide that if taxpayer dollars aren’t flooding to their K Street donors, we simply can’t afford it:
Conservative Democrats who’ve been a thorn in the side of liberal party leaders could grow into a major obstacle to Barack Obama’s agenda if he is elected president.
Majority Democrats are positioned for big gains in next week’s congressional election. But many of the new faces would join a growing chorus of "Blue Dogs" who often part from the party base on big issues like taxes and increasing federal spending.
That could set up a roadblock for Obama, who has promised to broaden health insurance coverage, start a new round of public works projects and improve early childhood education, among other things — all initiatives that would require substantial government spending at a time of soaring deficits.
The 49 House Blue Dogs — about one in every four House Democrats — could grow by as many as 10 in Tuesday’s election with wins in mainly Southern, conservative-leaning districts. Overall, Democrats are expected to pick up 20 or more House seats.
[]
Democratic leaders are well aware that even with larger majorities in the House and Senate, infighting among their many factions could upend their ambitious plans.
That’s what happened after Bill Clinton won the White House, and the resulting intramural spats derailed enough Democratic priorities to help usher in the so-called Republican revolution that cost the party control of Congress in 1994.
We can’t let that happen.
There’s a good article in The Hill on the primary project being funded by your donations to our Accountability Now PAC. As I’ve written before, we’re joining together with others like SEIU, MoveOn, BlogPAC, Kos, Color of Change, They Work For Us and the Steelworkers to start evaluating districts and recruiting progressive primary challengers to corporate con Dems (I was on Rachel Maddow’s show recently talking about it).
You can also hear Markos and Glenn Greenwald talking about it on Glenn’s radio show here.
The article has a couple of errors — the group is not called "Accountability Now," that’s the PAC sponsoring the current research project which is run by Glenn Greenwald and me. And there are no plans to do anything on Colombia Free Trade, that was offered up as an example of how the Blue Dogs might get started on their agenda in a lame duck session and not wait for an Obama administration to begin. But it should give Blue Dogs and their friends an idea of what’s in store.
The Blue Dog coalition may be growing, but we are too, and after the election we’ll be announcing more groups who will be joining with us. It may just be a happy coincidence that the Blue Dogs discover fiscal responsibility about healthcare and decide to gut it in a way that makes their insurance company donors happy, but as they get ready to cast those votes they should know someone’s watching.
Let us know about great progressive leaders in your community here.
Help us watch dog the Blue Dogs by donating to the Primary Project here.




52 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Accountability Now!
OOPs, there was a post crash, Christy’s post will be back at the top of the hour.
It’s going to be a lot of fun. We’re pulling together a lot of research right now so we can hit the ground running after the election.
Very exciting.
The toxic vitriol, also, that has been dumped into the “Dope Pool” is also, troubling, and will also be quite a mess for President Obama to also, clean up. Also.
I’m going to vomit.
Palin has her infant dressed as an elephant for display at her campaign event.
The woman is appalling.
-G
And they’ll get taken out to the woodshed next cycle if they don’t act right.
If this election goes like it looks it will, the writing will be on the wall re: conservatism. I think self preservation will dictate their move to the left.
“Appalling” is an upgrade.
I can only hope she becomes their standard bearer after the election; you think McGrumpy is bad…
Maybe we should reconsider our support for Murtha? How about a good, decent Progressive Dem from Colorado CD6 instead? http://www.hankeng.com
Jane,you tell em!!!!
didja see this?? oh my!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…..ablog.com/
two words:
AL Wynn.
Happy Hallowe’en Jane
Thanks, Jane. I can hardly wait until you folks unleash the products of your research. My hope is that the D majority gets larger than the blue dog contingent. There could be nothing better than making this idiots irrelevant to legislation that only needs a majority to pass. That also makes the job of Accountability Now much easier, if those we target are not essential to maintaining a majority.
Every time I contact my worthless Congresscritter John Barrow I remind him that he was primaried this year for a reason, and that it’s likely to happen again in 2010. Odd… I never get anything back from him other than “form letter 42.”
Hell Yeah Jane!
Have you seen any polls?
I thought i was the only one dry heaving. Fundies don’t even like Halloween. They say it is satan’s day. hmmm she is pandering to the heathens
LOL. they are good with form letters, aren’t they?
Hank is running neck and neck with SoS Coffman, 40% to 40%, with the rest undecided.
Marion – at this point, I’d like a ‘form letter’ from Mike Arcuri better than the smarmy, patronizing, arrogant emails I get from him with the basic message that as a voter, I don’t know what I’m talking about when I write him against FISA, the bank bailout, etc. He’s probably going to win next week and I would like to nominate him for a primary challenge, big time.
I generally get the gingerly worded one, designed to not piss me off any more than I am already!
Halloween, socialism with costumes! Plus the devil!
-G
As far as the Blue Dogs, they are now going to be dealing with a far reduced number of Republicans…..So in many regards, their chance for success is going down. They will merely be filling in the gap for all those ejected GOPers.
Looks like Markey is well ahead of Musgrave in CD 4
let the blue dogs howl!
This is officially the hour that the progressive dems start to follow the republican model of keeping the fuckers in line… I’ll give the congressional republicans one thing: they brooked no public dissent from the agenda from their members. That needs to start with that rat-bastard Hoyer and trickle right on down to the rest of the Blue Dogs with the tin hearts.
Or they need to get gone in 2010. Simple as that… time for Nancy-Pants to start earning that salary, she’s been singularly unimpressive up to now, so it’s time for her the walk the walk. Or join the other unemployed Americans.
Marion, Just to balance your congress critter my wonderful Congressperson Carol Shea Porter is, after a few close polls, looking a lot better. She did well in her debate the other night being far more articulate than Bradley who, when he was in Congress, was a sop for bushie. Carol also voted against the golden parachute bill which is standing her in good stead with the independent thinkers of NH.
The project sounds very exciting Jane. Just this morning we were discussing what we could do to stop the “leadership” from being the craven cowards they have been the last few years. My spouse suggests that every time they make a decision that appears anti-progressive we should flood them with emails and phone calls, as you have done in the past, to remind them that in the end they really do work for the people.
Betsy is totally kicking muskrat ass! We ponied up a little bit for her, and for Bidlak down in CD5 (Colorado Springs), but we’ve had to keep most of our money and work here in CD6. I tell the DCCC “No! I won’t give you money, until you start feeding my district!”
Great piece on HuffPo about change coming to TX and what would make Molly Ivins laugh…more hope out there. The times they are/maybe/ achanging.
Well kids, I hate to pop your balloon but just because I’m voting against Republicans from the bottom of the ballot to the top that doesn’t mean I’m for every liberal plan and law that is championed by them.
I am voting to return sanity to our country by removing rightwing goofball extremists from positions of power. BUT, I am not willing to hand everything over to LEFTWING GOOFBALL EXTREMISTS. You better learn something right now, if you think this is a mandate to reshape the country according to the liberal platform you are mistaken. We want our country back but that doesn’t mean I want it reshaped into something as extreme left as Bush was right.
I myself am a moderate who just despises what Bush and his party have done to the Constitution, the country and the world.
I want balance.
Having said that, let’s repair the damage that Bush and the Republicans have done.
given the no drama policy of the obama campaign, coupled with the rigid discipline, I think we will see just that
Both the DNC and Jim Martin are running ads in GA. He needs to win by 50% in order to avoid a run off.
As a Left Wing Hippie Extremist, I resemble that remark and you popped my bubble.
In case you haven’t noticed there is no balance and the majority of Americans support a progressive agenda.
Our economy is tanking into a major depression and we have major upheaval coming. Where do you find a moderate psition in the face of the last 25 years of wealth redistribution and inequality?
Wobs, that would just make me ecstatic seismic orgasmic.
Oh, and Happy Halloween fellow Pups… know that somewhere out there is at least one Christofascist shuddering at the thought of little kids dressed as devils and collecting candy. But then again, Sarah Palin is wearing her Tina Fey costume today, and collecting votes and applause. Trick or Treat on a new level?
Christy’s post has reappeared
“In case you haven’t noticed there is no balance and the majority of Americans support a progressive agenda.”
In case you haven’t noticed, Democrats didn’t touch gun control at all this election. Why would that be? Lol. They’ve also scaled back a lot of talk that makes conservatives uncomfortable.
“Our economy is tanking into a major depression and we have major upheaval coming. Where do you find a moderate psition in the face of the last 25 years of wealth redistribution and inequality?”
I hate the Republicans and their “save the rich” policies. If I’m not mistaken I didn’t say one thing about wealth redistribution or anything even remotely related to economics.
Basically what I said was I have no interest in far leftwing policies EITHER. Liberals shouldn’t make the same mistake Republicans did. This is not some liberal equivalent of Limbaugh’s “as it should be” moment where they get to totally reshape the country. I don’t want liberal extremists, and there is such an animal, to dictate to me any more than I want some wingnut a**hat to. I’m tired of that bs.
Mornin’ Jane and Firedogs
wobbs – further signs the Obamalypse is upon us - when we moved here 5 years ago the small town to the south of us had stopped their annual Kids Halloween Parade in a bow to the fundies . . .
well they had one last night with over 5,000 happy ‘pagan’ celebrants :D
Heathens!
-G
Devil worshipers!!!!
LOL awesome news. If they actually knew the true history behind Halloween, they might think differently about the church…nah
I bet there are actually Democrats who find this surprising, not having thought things through.
Very glad to see that planning is going forward on this project.
With respect to ‘research’ – what are your needs? Are you looking for volunteers?
The Blue Dogs are the 21st century’s New Hooverites: exactly the wrong prescription at exactly the wrong time.
America shouldn’t listen to them. Great to know we can help with that.
What, exactly, are “leftwing goofball extremist” positions?
Please clarify.
We would actually love volunteers. Looking for good progressives in their own communities is going to be labor intensive. Drop me a line if you’re interested in helping out.
Revenge of the Blue Dogs! Kneepads Lieberman must be jerking their hormones, engorging their hopes by parading partners in heat in front of their kennels, and threatening the Democratic Party’s leadersheep with the claim that only he stands between the Dogs and a rout of their agenda. Only he can prevent the Dogs from turning solid majorities and an Obama presidency into a dried husk of frustrated aspiration, a blight on the hopes of Democrats and African Americans for a generation. That’s why the Dems should preserve for him his seniority, his committee chair (which he never sits in), his access and his “influence”.
Good story line, a real threat manipulated by Lieberputz and the Dogs to bolster their respective positions of power. But I don’t think Kneepads as the juice, or enough Chapstik, to pull it off.
Sadly, the Democratic leadersheep seem unlikely to test him. In fact, they need no excuse to huddle in their corner of the field, afraid of the dogs, the wind and rain, the shepherd, their own shadow. They aspire to be great Ra[h]ms, but their vision is limited to mint and mutton chops.
Will they fold (on Lieberputz, the Dogs, their agenda) without a fight? I don’t know. But I would point out to them how similar their psychology is to that of camp guards, who take on their captor’s duties with the fervor of a convert, while telling themselves that by doing so, they are saving their co-religionists from greater horror. Mind you, I do not equate or accuse Lieberman or the Dems of being camp guards, only that they display a similar, self-deluding psychology that perpetuates the horror they tell themselves they are working to avoid.
Thank you.
I am always confused when I read articles like the one above. Why do you think conservative democrats are elected in red states? Guess what, they represent the views of the people in their district. It is no surprise that many of them are from the South, democratic support in Southern states is a relict of pre-Southern strategy practiced by the republicans. Progressive democrats will not win in many of these districts.
In my state of Oklahoma we have only one democratic member of congress, Dan Boren. Yes, he is a blue dog, and he is a conservative democrat. He’s still a democrat, though, and will vote with the democrats most of the times. Run a progressive in his district and he or she will most likely lose, giving the district to a republican who will seldom or never vote with the democrats.
I have called Boren office supporting or opposing bills and have been clear that I do not live in his district. His staff always listens and records my opinion because he is aware that he represents all the democrats in his state and is the only voice we get in the House. Take him away and replace him with a republican and we will have no democratic voice.
Conservative democrats are conservative because their districts are. Oklahoma is anti-choice, anti-gay, anti-union, pro-gun, and pro-military. Nominate someone who isn’t at least moderate on those issues and she or he will not win. It’s a fact that seems to escape those who don’t live in flyover country.
The main thing I like in the Bluedogs is that they support the 2nd amendment.
I’m in Indiana again this week for my mother’s memorial. Coming into Bloomington there was a billboard for Blue Dog Baron Hill that had an NRA endorsement on it. And while I don’t like the NRA’s politics, I do support
I think gun control is an issue Accountability NOW PAC should shy away from when choosing opponents in the next primary… get the information, let contributors target contributions to challengers that they can support.
I disagree strongly with Bluedogs on fiscal issues in the short term. Increasing the national debt by 30% over the next 4 years while investing in energy technology and healthcare, increasing taxes in both a progressive and regressive fashion (carbon tax is regressive, and needed) is fine with me, in fact I think we have to do it. Bluedogs are going to try to obstruct this as well. And some will likely do knee-jerk opposition to health care reform. It’s possible some bluedogs will realize that fixing healthcare would fix the Medicare funding problem, and also be good for US business, particularly old line manufacturing.
I think infrastructure spending, fixing healthcare are the issues where bluedogs will be most vulnerable. Them talking about the long term deficit isn’t as big a problem, in fact it does need to be addressed – spending power will decrease due to the increased debt and money supply, wages will not go up commensurately.
Highlighting this kind of bad behavior will be effective opposition.
That’s a really, really good point, msalley, and I, for one, am glad you made it!
Artful man’s logic seems skewed. S/he’s against the current crop of incompetents, but not for anything in its place, having equated Dems with extremism as perverse as the incompetents s/he wants out. An argument I perceive as a false claim to “the middle”, which neocons, for example, misdefine as wherever they are.
The heat of a campaign is a hothouse not amenable to breeding hardy policy plants with the mettle to withstand wind and rain and extremes of temperature (though the pace and pressure of administering government is little better). But so-called “progressive” policies, laws, and regulations are what Dems and most Republicans in LBJ’s time, and as you say, most of Main Street today, would have called responsible stewardship of the commonweal.
The incompetents artful man wants out of government misdefine the “commonwealth” as wealth for the few who’ve grabbed hold of the levers of power, lobbying, business and finance. A caustic irony, given the origins of common-wealth. As Obama pointed out, “sharing” is something we expect children to learn by the age of five. The current crop of Republicans, it seems, spend the rest of their lives unlearning it, pretending to share while keeping all the toys for themselves. Progressives need to take back their pride and define competent public stewardship, commonly funded by those not clever enough to avoid paying tax, not as tangential, not as a small arc on the edge, but the center around which we all of us turn.
My main problem with Blue Dogs is that while they support the 2nd amendment, I don’t see them as doing as well for the rest of the Bill of Rights! I’d like it better if we didn’t have to scrounge to get the first or the fourth amendment supported! I’d like it better yet if Posse Comitatus was not seen as something to be disregarded.
I accept that individual CongressCritters often, but too rarely, reflect and respond directly to their constituents.
As a group, however, I think they consider constituent interests about as much as Hank Paulson’s Wall Street peers consider the rights and interests of shareholders. Which is never, unless they hold shareholdings as big as Warren Buffet’s. They primarily consider increasing the wealth and power of management, executives and compliant board members. And CongressCritters consider first the interests of those who pay for their having to go to the voter trough every two or six years. That is a considerably smaller and more private group, whose interests are often at odd with constituents’ interests.
The Democratic leadership, as opposed to individual members, is charged with enacting national policies, laws and regulations. But that’s as much about jockeying for position among competing holders of power in Metro DC as it is about representing the interests of large swathes of Americans.
I agree. The Second Amendment is not the only text to the Constitution, nor its most important. Without rights of speech, assembly and petition, for example, most of the other rights would fall away as unusable. Without the Fourth and Sixth amendments, that precious right to bear arms would find many of its admirers in the klink, before, after or without their having used those arms.
I agree that the rest of the constitution, bill of rights is very important too.
I don’t belong to NRA. I do belong to the ACLU. I have belonged to GOA and likely will again… the ACLU does have some issues with the second.
My point is that there are a lot of 2nd amendment litmus test voters, and some of the reason Bluedogs win is those voters. There are electable progressives that support issues like concealed carry, and if we’re going to get rid of bluedogs we should find those progressives. It’s an issue that doesn’t have to divide progressives.
Would you mind detailing a few “far leftwing policies” as you define them for us, or at least me?
As a starter, universal single-payer healthcare, with the government as the payer, in the eyes of moderate or conservative righties is and will continue to be defined as a “far left wing policy.”