While fanciful fiscal creatures like derivatives and CDO’s devoured bricks-and-mortar banks, very tangible bulldozers and chain saws devoured immense expanses of real forests on our real and finite biosphere. Who cares? Well, anyone who thinks bailing out Wall Street is expensive. Compared to the real costs of forest destruction, the $700 billion Paulson/Obama bail-out bill Bush signed over to Wall Street is a bargain.
Who cares, anyway? What did the forests ever do for us, anyway?
Provide clean water: that stuff we’re running out of so fast that it’s literally killing some of us.
Oh – and absorb carbon dioxide: that stuff we’re producing so fast it’s literally killing some more of us.
How much of the planet’s forest wealth do we clever humans destroy every year? And how does that cost compare to the recent Wall Street meltdown?
"So whereas Wall Street by various calculations has to date lost, within the financial sector, $1-$1.5 trillion, the reality is that at today’s rate we are losing natural capital at least between $2-$5 trillion every year."
Why are we cutting down our planet’s forests? We cut down some to ship the wood to consumers and paper mills in rich countries and China. We cut down other forests — like Brazil’s Amazon — to grow more beef for people in the US and other places where people already eat meat in such excess they sicken and die as a result. We cut down yet other forests — like the rainforests of Southeast Asia — so people in the US and Europe have more of the under-priced fuel that alows them to continue driving in such excess they sicken and die as a result.
And because we’re such clever animals, humans in the World Bank and the IMF subsidize the destruction of the developing world’s forests for the (very) temporary enrichment of the wealthiest people in the world.
Because the Washington Consensus the IMF and WB exist to enforce is, don’cha know, so good for life on this planet: if the lives in question are those of the upper 0.5% in the US and the other wealthy "enforcer" nations. And if we restrict "good" to mean "more money for a handful of years".
Who is pricing out the cost of forest destuction?
The folks working on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (Teeb), a review initiated by Germany during their rotating EU presidency and funded by the European Commission. Yesterday at the World Conservation Congress, Teeb’s director described how long we’ve been racking up the bill for forest destruction
Speaking to BBC News on the fringes of the congress, study leader Pavan Sukhdev emphasised that the cost of natural decline dwarfs losses on the financial markets.
"It’s not only greater but it’s also continuous, it’s been happening every year, year after year," he told BBC News.
OK — so forest destuction costs more than the Wall Street meltdown. That’s still just leaf litter compared to vast canopy of the global economy, right?
Uh, not so much.
As the BBC report, the Teeb review found deforestation consumes more than one fifteenth of the world’s total economic output
The first phase concluded in May when the team released its finding that forest decline could be costing about 7% of global GDP.
Oh well — what’s one-fifteenth of the huge global economy anyway, right?
Well, compared to the costs of the groundwater wasted on speculators’ commodity bubbles, the topsoil devoured by speculators’ housing bubbles, and the global climate change that Big Carbon bribes global governments to continue, perhaps not so much.
Teeb will have more to tell us about the global bill for planetary eco-destuction.
The second phase will expand the scope to other natural systems.
Of course, unless the pols who pass for our "leaders" choose to do something about global ecological destruction, all the tree-free reports in the parsec won’t help our biosphere.
Or the half of the world’s mammal species now endangered…much less the 25% of the world’s mammals now facing extinction. Or the nearly one-third of all amphibians now facing extinction. Or the one in eight bird species now threatened with extinction.
We two legs are such great managers, don’cha know.
Right?




33 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
The “Paulson/Obama” bill?
Still clueless, I see.
message from starhawk yesterday was on topic, and so was the link to EAT – earth activist training:
p.s. great post kirk, thanks.
perhaps Palin can ask the rethug god to create more living things… for her to shoot.
Aloha, Doc!
actually ‘gods’… they probably have a pantheon.
Hi Kirk, we aren’t so smart, are we?
Someday, eons from now, a new sapient species will piece together the unbelievable Descent of man.
Hey selise: glad you liked the post!
Aloha, CT! so glad to see you on the front page at the Lake. W00t!
And Blub, I’m convinced the fundies do have a pantheon: for all their surface piety, the earthly popwer they serve worships momney above any other God.
That future sapient species will have our vast legacy to draw on:
the fossil record of the anthropocene….
and, as Ursula LeGuin foresaw in Always Coming Home, the vast gyres of plastic waste now floating atop the Pacific will “enrich” the posterity we bequeath to those future sapients: with fumo balls.
Here in KC, Strobe Talbot was a guest on a local public radio political show (Dep SecState under Clinton and now head of the Brookings Institution] . They’d been talking all about the financial bailout, foreign affairs, and all kinds of other hot button issues. At one point, the host asked Talbot something like “What keeps you up at night — Iraq, Iran, N Korea, what?”
Without missing a beat, Talbot said “Climate change.” The host stumbled, not expecting this at all. “Climate change?” “Absolutely,” said Talbot. “This is The. Big. Issue. I probably won’t live to see the effects of all the problems, but my children will. And if we don’t start to address it now, it’s just going to be worse down the road.”
[Paraphrasing from memory, not verbatim quotes]
hehe. a true lost tribe of descendants from the Canaanite golden calf crowd… come out after hiding in caves for all these millenia?
more seriously, here’s an interesting article about Chevron and amazon deforestation:
http://news.mongabay.com/2008/1008-chevron.html
“The set back for Chevron comes after a July report revealed that the oil firm has hired lobbyists to persuade the Bush administration and Congress to threaten the use of trade sanctions against Ecuador to get it off the hook for damages.”
um….. so they poison the rainforest, fleecing the countries that own it, then get shrubco to impose trade sanctions against those same countries for the sole purpose of getting themselves off the hook from paying for the damages. k. leave it to the usual suspects…. perhaps we can extradite shrub to Equador.
Mammon is the god of the conservative power structure. I suspect the rabid part of the base has a warped baby jeebus image in mind when they worship – a baby jeebus that offers salvation for poor believers is they are white and republican and pretend to be hetero.
What a beautiful book. Will look for it, the art is a draw in.
‘cept that they’re gods aren’t supposed to let ‘em stay poor for long. Under the prosperity gospel, their gods granted them irrationally cheap adjustable rate mortgages so that they can enjoy their spiritual just deserts while still on earth.
Kirk, have you gotten over to the new California Academy of Sciences building yet?
From what I’ve read and seen online, it’s an incredible place. Talk about making folks aware of the environment in which they live!
GREAT post kirk; so true. Recommended !!
Went by today, but the access was jammed: I’m gonna wait for a weekday…but I can’t wait for my first look.
Thanks for the news re Strobe Talbot, btw. Glad to know the word about Climate Change has even reached through the Village Bubble!
Shrub today at the G7:
“We’re in this together”
Thanks to you, shitehead.
and if climate change wasn’t enough – we’ve got a Asian longhorned beetles infestation. as of yesterday, 1500 affected trees had been found.
not so important i suppose compared to other changes we face, but i’m still very sad to think of autumn here without the sugar maples… especially now, at the height of the fall foliage color..
thanks – and thanks for the rec. i’m hoping digg and reddit help get this news out….
crap. sorry for the bad beetle news. ain’t globalization grand?
that is tragic, such a beautiful -and tasty- tree.
the kind we got? not so much. apparently there are a bunch of volunteer (and paid) tree climbers and inspectors trying to inspect ever susceptible tree. that doesn’t sound right, because we have a lot of trees here…. but who knows. if i see one of the inspectors i will ask.
apparently the sugar maple are expected to just move north – so hopefully the world won’t lose them entirely. just us. i don’t know what the best estimates are on time frame, but i think i’ve heard within 100 years. hate to think of what we’re leaving, and not leaving the next generation.
We’re losing the ash down here, too, to the emerald ash beetle.
sux
on top of losing the hemlock
and the tragedy of the elm
and the demise of the chestnut.
28 diggs in ‘world news’; I suspect part of the problem is people’s choice of the subject area in ‘digg’ing’ a story. I suggest to myself and others that we think carefully about choosing the subject area where we ‘digg’ stories as such can make a large difference in where such shows up on digg.
Right now everyone wants to talk about Palin and the election; excuse me while I go barf.
and the spruce lost to bark beetles in the boreal forests of Canada and Alaska …
and the lodgepole pines of British Columbia lost to bark beetles…
and the forests lost to bark beetles in the Rockies…
Who knew winter killed off bark beetles,,,until winters got too warm?
Who could have anticipated?
Oh — of course those silly ecologists did. But why should Power listen to that lot?
thanks, ubetchaiam!
though I want to see McSame and the Rethugs lose, I wish the horserace were over. The only reason the elections matter is they (theoretically) provide incumbents with the official power to solve problems confronting us: like global ecological destruction. Unlike FISA and the Paulson-Obama $700 billion Wall Street bailout, perhaps Obama will step forward with profound changes in US policy that truly protect the biosphere for all the world.
Alas, I fear I’m as likely to see that as I am to see endangered monkey species flying out of my ass.
Watching the national media circus about the freaking Prez race (between two faithful servants of the Rubin – Citigroup – Chicago School – Hamilton Project – Goldman Sachs cult) suck most all the oxygen out of public consideration of the policy choices that would actually save the biosphere from the pending Anthropocene destruction has been one of the most disheartening experiences of my life.
After Bush/Cheney Obama will be lucky if he can find the money to keep the lights on in the WH.
New thread upstairs
Quoting George Carlin: “the purpose of man is to create a new paradigm, “Earth plus plastic”.
Kirk, in case you come back to view this; I’ve sent a note to Bill MOyers suggesting he do a story on this issue given that he had Soros on yesterday talking about the financial meltdown; Soros thinks that addressing global warming will be the new engine for economic growth(as contrasted to American consumerism) and made the comment about it stopping us from ‘burning up’.
We can price not cutting down trees pretty well. In Finland, a 50-year conservation easement for old growth forest today costs around 10,000 euros per hectare. That’s just about as much as the landowner would get for whacking the trees, although he could get a second cut in 30 years. For about 800 years, our legal and economic systems have been based on profiting from the difference in taking natural resources while ignoring the costs of habitat loss and destruction of the biosphere. But the linking of biosphere preservation costs and the financial world has become manifest in a day-to-day way here.