Christopher Buckley, the son of National Review founder William F. Buckley, endorsed Barack Obama on Friday:
Let me be the latest conservative/libertarian/whatever to leap onto the Barack Obama bandwagon. It’s a good thing my dear old mum and pup are no longer alive. They’d cut off my allowance.
Or would they?*
Here’s why he wrote this for Tina Brown’s online startup rather than share with the discerning readers of NRO:
I am—drum roll, please, cue trumpets—making this announcement in the cyberpages of The Daily Beast (what joy to be writing for a publication so named!) rather than in the pages of National Review, where I write the back-page column. My colleague, the superb and very dishy Kathleen Parker, recently wrote in National Review Online a column stating what John Cleese as Basil Fawlty would call “the bleeding obvious”: namely, that Sarah Palin is an embarrassment, and a dangerous one at that. She’s not exactly alone. New York Times columnist David Brooks, who began his career at NR, just called Governor Palin “a cancer on the Republican Party.”
As for Kathleen, she has to date received 12,000 (quite literally) foam-at-the-mouth hate-emails. One correspondent, if that’s quite the right word, suggested that Kathleen’s mother should have aborted her and tossed the fetus into a Dumpster…
At any rate, I don’t have the kidney at the moment for 12,000 emails saying how good it is he’s no longer alive to see his Judas of a son endorse for the presidency a covert Muslim who pals around with the Weather Underground.
Judging, though, by the comments at the Daily Beast (to give you the flavor of them, here’s a bit of the first)
How liberating. Both the parents dead. The inheritance securely probated. Finally. The chance to show one’s bona fides around the Manhattan salons.
and what Wonkette found at das frei republik
- What a sad testament to his parents. He obviously didn’t really even know them or what they stood for.
- The apple sometimes falls far from the tree then rolls away.
- Or the best parts was left as a stain on the bedsheet……………
- Christopher Buckley… you will regret your action.
- Chris, come out of the closet already.
- Follow the link and check out the photo of this peter-puffing little fruitcake. I think he has homo-erotic thoughts about Obama. I KNOW he does.
- I didn’t realize William F. had a gay son.
He’s going to get those e-mails anyway. Well, at least they won’t burden the National Review servers. After all, Buckley is on the Board of Trustees of his father’s iconic conservative magazine. He has to watch out for that sort of thing.
If you’re interested in hearing more about his reasons, he discusses them (as well as why he refused to vote for GWB in ‘04) here.
—–
*Probably not. This is what Buckley pere had to say about the president John McCain voted with 90% of the time
"I think Mr. Bush faces a singular problem best defined, I think, as the absence of effective conservative ideology — with the result that he ended up being very extravagant in domestic spending, extremely tolerant of excesses by Congress," Buckley says. "And in respect of foreign policy, incapable of bringing together such forces as apparently were necessary to conclude the Iraq challenge."
Of those few small spaces where Senator McCain acted like a maverick, let’s just say that the Supreme Court case which established campaign money as a form of constitutionally-protected free speech was called Buckley (his brother James) v. Valeo.
Related posts:
- BREAKING: Scozzafava Officially Endorses Owens In NY-23
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Christopher Eisgruber, The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process
- With Pressure Growing over Torture Pics, Obama Turns to Supreme Court to Stop Release
- Harwood Confirms: Comment Came from “Obama Adviser”
- Late Night: “Wait, My Fifteen Minutes of Fame Aren’t Up Yet!”





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Oh, good news! Not so easy to come by these days. Thanks
Of course Parker got hate mail. It’s all the wingnuts have left.
Digg the Julia excellence, please.
And, Thank you.
buckley misses a beat here
he could have headed off or at least embarrassed some of the soon to come critisism with;
“mccain is no more a republican then [insert name], he simply uses my party for his own purposes
“palin has never been a republican, nor could she be, she abuses everyone and anyone who stands in her way no matter that they are on the concervative side of the issue”
bing, no matter what they said after that it would land easy
never the less, quite the brave chap this christopher
I too find it fascinating that CB didn’t use his National Review platform to endorse Obama. Would his Trustee status be endangered, do you think? Or would the creaky servers, already burdened by K-Park & K-Lo’s fanmail, be overwhelmed?
Do they still have Salons in Manhattan, or have they gone the way of the Georgetown cocktail party?
The folks at the NRO blog aren’t pleased at all, although only Mark Steyn and Jonah Goldberg are really going after it. In a fairly restrained way, of course – they do sort of work for him.
Although the part where Jonah Goldberg said they were friends has gotta smart.
I suspect such salons as they have in Manhattan these days are either Republican or held in broom closet-sized rooms.
How ironic while the Sr. Buckley was the model of civility in debate, what vile language we encounter in those who claim his ideals. Sickening. When did our various positions become so intolerant and insulting. Word has it that Ms Parker was tres surprised. She must have had her head for in the ground to have missed the tone (a la Rush) for so long. Pity
From the party that loves to sneer at political correctness comes even more intense political correctness. “Toe the party line or die” should be the Republican motto, although given the lowbrows who post on these websites I suppose they’d end up spelling it “Tow the party line”.
Disagreement among Liberals tends to lead to arguments. Disagreement among Conservatives tends to lead to threats of violence.
Oh, I dunno – she’s flirted with the dark side before – I just suspect that she’s always had a vague feeling that the bad behavior on her own side was clearly provoked by the Badness of the people it was aimed at. Naturally she’s shocked that a Good person like her would get this kind of response.
I think we all hold our noses sometimes, but it’s generally best if we don’t pretend it’s not happening.
Buckley may have been civil, much evil has been done in the salons of civility, but his views on government were toxic and when appled were devasting. Was he a John Bircher JBS opposed the Civil Rights Act 1964, that is a turn off. I have always found Buckley seniot an officious snob who wallowed in self love. Now going to puke…be back in short order.
Good parlor manners have absolutelu NOTHING to do with morals and ethics. I am happy for Junior Buckley to free himself from the bondage of bigotry.
He owes us an essay on why. I am sure he has far more R supporters than detractors. I do not agree that GWBush has spent over spent domestically.
One thing he definitely wasn’t was a bircher. He led the crusade to drive the John Birch Society out of the mainstream of conservatism, because he thought they were offputting to voters.
He was a segregationist back when the Republicans were trying to bring those across the aisle, and his ideas about fiscal conservatism revolved around more for the few and less for the many.
There is no doubt that Christopher Buckley, unlike his pater, a patrician Homo Faithiens, somehow emerged from his cathechismic womb as a verifible Home Sapiens.
Rejoice that evolution Lives !!!