<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Morning Swim: The L-Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:01:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jpmdevildog</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675241</link>
		<dc:creator>jpmdevildog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675241</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At a shocking press conference this morning, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama announced that he has a half-man half-bat half-brother.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Obatma shares my DNA and will be uniquely qualified to understand some of the difficult issues facing mutants in this country and around the world.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/election-08/obatma/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/election-08/obatma/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a shocking press conference this morning, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama announced that he has a half-man half-bat half-brother.</p>
<p>“Obatma shares my DNA and will be uniquely qualified to understand some of the difficult issues facing mutants in this country and around the world.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/election-08/obatma/" rel="nofollow">http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/election-08/obatma/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregB</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675226</link>
		<dc:creator>GregB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jimmy Severini III.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-G&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy Severini III.</p>
<p>Hack.</p>
<p>-G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675192</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;their answer, and i think a correct one to that point, is that the provision for revision is by way of the amendment process not judicial decision. don’t get me wrong.  i don’t agree with FS position.  i just don’t see the fact that the constitution can be amended as supportive of an activist (I’m fine with that word) judicial philosophy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>their answer, and i think a correct one to that point, is that the provision for revision is by way of the amendment process not judicial decision. don’t get me wrong.  i don’t agree with FS position.  i just don’t see the fact that the constitution can be amended as supportive of an activist (I’m fine with that word) judicial philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675186</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;jeez.  off to a bad start.  my 66 was supposed to clarify that my 65 was a question not a statement.  not a reply to you oldnslow&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeez.  off to a bad start.  my 66 was supposed to clarify that my 65 was a question not a statement.  not a reply to you oldnslow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675185</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675185</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;?? that was a question&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?? that was a question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beerfart Liberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675183</link>
		<dc:creator>Beerfart Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675183</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;people still here&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people still here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someofparts</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675177</link>
		<dc:creator>someofparts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thought the “L” word meant Labor. Silly me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought the “L” word meant Labor. Silly me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston1775</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675164</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston1775</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One of the geniuses used to phone it in from New York and pretend he was in Boston.  This genius lost his job on Tucker’s old show (he was asked not to set foot in MSNBC again)  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so he moved to the North Shore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other genius hails from South Carolina, talks about being from a trailer park, and settled west of Boston with his wife and four kids.  One of his first WTKK deeds was to attack teachers in the public schools which prompted me to ask, “Why did you come here?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just didn’t want you to tarnish South Boston with these hatehacks who moved to the suburbs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They’re working on the Romney 2012 campaign; you know, the guy that insulted Massachusetts all over this land while running for president.  Yeah, he did this while Massachusetts endured him as our most loathed governor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impeach Obama!&lt;br /&gt;
Romney 2012!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the geniuses used to phone it in from New York and pretend he was in Boston.  This genius lost his job on Tucker’s old show (he was asked not to set foot in MSNBC again)  </p>
<p>so he moved to the North Shore.</p>
<p>The other genius hails from South Carolina, talks about being from a trailer park, and settled west of Boston with his wife and four kids.  One of his first WTKK deeds was to attack teachers in the public schools which prompted me to ask, “Why did you come here?”</p>
<p>Just didn’t want you to tarnish South Boston with these hatehacks who moved to the suburbs.</p>
<p>They’re working on the Romney 2012 campaign; you know, the guy that insulted Massachusetts all over this land while running for president.  Yeah, he did this while Massachusetts endured him as our most loathed governor.</p>
<p>Impeach Obama!<br />
Romney 2012!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosstimbers</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675156</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosstimbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My darker side makes me wonder what would happen if some crackpot speakers began rousing loner woman-haters about the dangers of a female vice president.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My darker side makes me wonder what would happen if some crackpot speakers began rousing loner woman-haters about the dangers of a female vice president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldnslow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675155</link>
		<dc:creator>oldnslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/early-morning-swim-the-l-word/#comment-1675155</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Federalist Society members say they do just that. Problem is they don’t see it as a living document. Since reproductive rights and other modern issues aren’t covered specifically in the Constitution Federalists don’t believe in expanding the scope of the document.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I always respond to those folks with “that is a difficult position to defend given the fact that the document it self provides provision for its’ own revision.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Federalist Society members say they do just that. Problem is they don’t see it as a living document. Since reproductive rights and other modern issues aren’t covered specifically in the Constitution Federalists don’t believe in expanding the scope of the document.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I always respond to those folks with “that is a difficult position to defend given the fact that the document it self provides provision for its’ own revision.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
