When all those Rove-connected AG Gonzales underlings hit the pavement in that mass exodus of resignations, the working theory was Hatch Act avoidance as the primary rationale. That and mitigating losses were finally staunched with Gonzales’ own resignation. At least for a time.   

But I think we need to add another reason to the laundry list: Interview Avoidance.

An intense effort to determine how the firing plan originated and whether perjury or obstruction-of-justice laws were violated in refusing to reveal the basis for the dismissals has been thwarted, partly because investigators lack the power to compel testimony from people outside the department.

The latest IG/OPR report is out. Marcy had a superb preview yesterday.  

Will the special prosecutor appointment from Mukasey end-run the interview avoidance ploy — from folks like Kyle Sampson, Monica Goodling, and more? It makes me wonder. Will there be more than just the USAtty firings in the mix? Say, politicization of the civil rights division, perchance? And who might be answering some pointed questions about this in particular:

But the investigation did unearth some e-mail messages that were not disclosed to Congressional investigators during their own review of the controversy last year, the lawyer said, and that e-mail and other evidence are expected to shed new light on the motivations for the firings.

Obstruction or mere oversight? When we had David Iglesias on for book salon, he mentioned an article he did for Slate on the laughable executive privilege claims the Bushies have been making. Somehow, I have a feeling we’ll all be revisiting that issue. For years to come.

Related posts:

  1. Executive Privilege and the Cheney Interview Documents
  2. BREAKING: Cheney FBI Interview Notes Released
  3. Fitzgerald-Cheney Interview: A Comedy of Excuses
  4. Cheney’s Lawyer Already Leaked the Content of Cheney’s “Privileged” Interview
  5. Does Lanny Breuer Have a Conflict in the Cheney Interview FOIA Case?