Before she became the first female Labor secretary in 1933, Frances Perkins had seen firsthand the tragedy of Manhattan’s 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Locked in by their employer, 146 mostly young girls died when they couldn’t escape the burning building where they toiled in sweatshop labor. Later, as the New York industrial commissioner, Perkins held employers accountable for workplace safety and health, expanding factory investigations and championing other pro-worker laws, like unemployment insurance.
Now, imagine if Elaine Chao had been there instead. Rather than improved job safety legislation, Chao likely would have pushed laws forbidding workers to challenge employers for unsafe working conditions, fair pay or anything that would cost greedy employers a dime.
In fact, Chao, the nation’s current Labor secretary, once again has taken the side of Big Business against working people. As Congress debates whether and to what extent to approve the corporate financial dictatorship proposed by U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Chao yesterday said Congress must pass the bailout "quickly and cleanly."
Cleanly as in giving Paulson, a political appointee with no accountability, powers so sweeping even the president couldn’t override his decisions.
Quickly, as in making sure the Wall Street CEOs, whose greed outpaced their brains and created the current debacle, get away with golden parachutes and massive bonuses.
(We at the AFL-CIO strongly oppose giving Paulson a blank check on the bailout. More info here and here. You also can tell Congress "No Blank Check for Wall Street" by clicking here.)
Fittingly, Chao was speaking to reporters at an event in posh Fairfield County, Conn., famous for its expensive houses and site of many hedge funds and other financial service companies. She also took the opportunity to dodge a question about whether she favored extending the unemployment insurance time frame, saying Congress already had extended it this year.
(Let’s see…Chao’s Labor Department reported yesterday there were 1,772 mass layoffs initiated in August, the most since September 2005, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. And two weeks ago, Chao’s Labor Department reported unemployment worsened from 5.7 percent to 6.1 percent, a figure that economist Jared Bernstein noted in Sunday’s FDL Book Salon is more like 10.7 percent when underemployment is factored in. But I digress. Why would rising unemployment have anything to do with a need to extend unemployment insurance?)
At the same time that Chao was carrying out her role as a Bush-Paulson puppet, a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing examining pay discrimination heard from Lilly Ledbetter. After years of working at an Alabama Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant, Ledbetter discovered she was being paid less than the lowest-paid man doing the same work.
But although a jury awarded her $3.8 million, Goodyear appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Bush-packed Supreme Court essentially said "tough luck," and Ledbetter now not only is out tens of thousands of dollars in income, but her Social Security and pension are smaller as well.
As Christy pointed out a few days ago:
Even worse for all of us, the Ledbetter decision has now been cited in hundreds of cases nationwide to justify disparate treatment based on race, gender, age, disability and other reasons to pay someone less or treat them differently because these cases have been jimmied into an analogous argument to what Lilly faced in her claim. The SCOTUS decision effectively undercut decades of precedent on equality in one, fell swoop in favor of companies who want to justify internal discrimination.
Now, let’s imagine Frances Perkins was our current Labor secretary. It’s a safe bet that rather than backing massive CEO pay bailouts while making the rounds in a wealthy New York bedroom community, Perkins would be in those Senate hearings.
Right next to Lilly Ledbetter.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

No
Bailouts
for
Billionaires
Without
Middleclass
Bankruptcy
Rewrites
Sure, it’s off topic, but that’s never stopped me before, and I EPU’d myself on the last thread (and I was polite enough not to post in the Book Salon)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com…..9c82_o.jpg
(Yes, it could use some professional assistance, my fonts are limited, as is my patience with Corel).
W has been success at implementing his destroy govt program. Chao just another example.
CNN: Peasants with Torches and Pitchforks are storming Wall Street. Who could have anticipated?
What do you expect from the
beardwife of the Senior Senator from Big Bidness?And her response to Slavery would be: Bill them for the Transportation.
. . .sigh
of course if she were, Nancy Pfotenhauer and caves full of rapacious harpies would be filling the airwaves with noise about how Perkins is really hurting women
Don’t forget the excellent site http://www.shameonelaine.com.
Frances Perkins heard the screams and saw the charred bodies of the victims of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Evidently Elaine Chao is indifferent to the suffering of American workers who aren’t being burned to death.
Crazy Guy is working hard on the Economic Meltdown. It is not easy to melt it down. But since he has suspended his campaign, he has help from Rick Davis and Joe Lieberliar.
Gasp!! More Palin/Couric..regarding Russia:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/…..ar-russia/
Thanks for highlighting ShameonElaine.
I hyperlinked to it in my text, but didn’t note it. The talented Michael Whitney created the ShameonElaine masterpiece when he was at American Rights at Work.
Bush/Cheney have put a lasting finish on what Reagan/Bush started. McCain/Palin (or vice versa) would be the icing on the cake.
It’s clear you understand Chao well….
I applaud reporters finally putting these people on the spot but dang, that was painful to watch.
Shelby of ALA just stepped out of white house waving petitions and comments from economists from every reputable college and univ saying there was NO deal yet and that hey wasn’t interested in contradicting all those economists (5 pages of names he waved around) who said this bailout is a bad idea. He was actually cool. damn
shelby sounded like (on cspan) he wasn;t interested in accomodating wall street at all. Said Mccain and Obama were in there being polite to each other. NYT headline sez there’s a deal, but there isn’t.
Any news on the protests today??
There is only ONE silver lining to this hideous twilight-of-empire enshrinement of INJUSTICE:
“No one could have predicted” there would develop a public outpouring of demand for a New “New Deal.” That’s what I see happening in the months and years to come. Oddly for me (who has never been able to even read one single economic textbook) I was predicting this whole turn of events in 2004. Of course, everybody (except Mr. K8) laughed at me then.
It was inevitable, though. Once they (the Bush Crime Family) stole their way back into power in that hijack of an election in 2004, we all could have predicted that they would use that ha-ha “mandate” to ram through their final looting and pillaging, crossing every single line of legality, much less any conception of fairness.
Sadly, it took a truly suffering nation to produce the legislation of the original New Deal. Sadly, it will take the hideous suffering of all but the top elite to bring about a new New Deal.
The prospect of a broad consensus (everyone but the bandits in the top 2%) to usher in a real attempt at fairness again is the ONLY bright spot on the horizon, IMO.
Thanks for the post, Tula.
Ooops, one thing I forgot to say –
Thank you again, Tula. I always love what you write, and today is no exception. Thanks for all you do for the “little guy.”
Audacious Rape in progress, just look the other way….
Watching Hardball and here’s a scary thought. Sen. Jim Bunning is starting to make more sense than anybody I’ve heard pontificate about cleaning out the arteries of the clogged credit system.
Yeah, another example of stepping through the looking glass is when Bernie Sanders and Jim Bunning are on the same side of an issue.
good for shelby. i wish some dems were doing the same.
statement from the sunlight foundation:
When Bunning makes sense it is scary. Usually one of the nuttier ones.
Has St. McCain taken credit for facilitating the agreement yet?
McShame & Obama snuck out of the WH while the press corpse was waiting for
them. Obama to give words at Mayflower in a few minutes. McShame hiding out.
I’m glad Obama didn’t want a photo op at the White House. The fact that McCain didn’t want one is not a sign of modesty, as everyone around the Lake knows, but a sign of his fear that his latest stunt has backfired.
There is no agreement yet
Reply to Badwater@24
McCain scuttled out a side door with no comment. Obama left for the Mayflower where he will hold a press avail in a few minutes.
McCain waiting to see what Obama has to say before his handlers prep the cue cards he will hold.
I’m afraid it will take another tragedy like Triangle to highlight the greed of corporations at the expense of workers.
I’m not even sure a tragedy like that will move people to wake up.
And–a question that’s been bothering me–
Why *not* Lehman Brothers??
I’ve heard the argument that AIG was “too big” to fail. Something just bugs me about selective bailouts. Not that I think we should be bailing them out…I just wonder why some and not others?
So I email my wimpass congressman tom allen who wants me to send him back to DC as a senator. I tell him NOT ONE DIME for these guys and he sends me back this lameass email about working people and how the bailout is necessary, etc. NOT ONCE does he ask WHY this is necessary. NOT enough folks are asking WHY. The post here yesterday connecting all this to oil was really great.
that ’s all i wanna know. WHy’ is this necessary. John Tester tried to ask paulson that yesterday, bless him. This is a huge thievery. DAmn i wish i’d bailed when the euro was lower.
Details of the Plan Congress submitted to Paulson at McClatchy:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/583085.html
kittykitty –
I stopped emailing my own lameass senator a long time ago. My senator? McCain. He never even had the decency to respond with blather, with gibberish, with ANYTHING. No response at all, ever.
And my OTHER lameass senator, Jon Kyl, responded the same way, too. Silence.
They both believe they don’t owe constituents who don’t agree with them a single damned word of response.
[Oh, I should make it clear: I always wrote respectfully, even while disagreeing vehemently, never a word even remotely close to profanity. What I muttered under my breath while hitting “submit” or hitting the fax button was another story.]
Hey who says Bush isn’t the most accomplished and efficient MBA ever. Results don’t lie.
700 billion for a 3 page memo and a 14 minute speech.
thanks. can’t wait to see the actual language of the bill.
I usually get a one size fits all response within a couple of weeks from Salazar. The other guy is (has) retired
Spencer upstairs with a plea
i just can’t believe they’re gonna pass this deal without paulson ever having told them WHY there’s such a rush. These folks are too stupid to breathe. Who would have thought Sen. Shelby would come out of this a star of true fiscal conservatism, not corporate welfare.
corporate welfare! repeat. By the way, Nader’s take on this whole thing on Democracy Now today was well informed and cogent. If they won’t let him debate they shoulda (channelling Palin here) invited him to the white house roundtable today.
Dave Neiwert a couple of flights up on Palin’s witchhunter
Thank you. I wish I did not.
A caller on NPR pointed out that wall street firms being paid to take write offs, will be able to get a tax refund on any taxes they paid on those assets — in essence getting to double dip.