It’s been a little over a year, but it looks like Dan Rather’s lawsuit is a go:
A New York City judge says news anchor Dan Rather can proceed with his $70 million lawsuit accusing CBS of violating its contract with him when the network fired him.
(…)
Judicial Hearing Officer Ira Gammerman dismissed a fraud complaint against CBS Corp. on Monday and a business interference complaint against CBS and former parent company Viacom Inc. No causes of action remain in the lawsuit against Viacom.
Dan Rather’s initial complaint was… provocative, to say the least. I may be a complete legal ignoramus, but I’m really looking forward to hearing more details about how CBS, in the person of News President Andy Heyward, first set Rather up for failure, then made it impossible for him to defend himself against the character assassins of the right. From a broader perspective, I’m hoping that it exposes the inappropriate influence that conservative corporate ownership exerts on its media subsidiaries.
Even if Rather doesn’t win, I expect the trial to be very damaging to CBS and the myth of liberal media bias. Which would not be such a bad thing.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Sunlight!
Hey, Eli! Now to read!
Eli! Very kewl to c’ya and what encouraging news! Would that someone could live blog this trial!
The gourmet popcorn is ready, and AMEN to your hopes and wishes here.
I don’t miss any of your posts, but I get to them when everyone’s left, i.e. running behind.
You’re consistently great!
pax
:)
Media ownership study ordered destroyed
Sept 14, 2006
‘Every last piece’ destroyed
Adam Candeub, now a law professor at Michigan State University, said senior managers at the agency ordered that “every last piece” of the report be destroyed. “The whole project was just stopped – end of discussion,” he said. Candeub was a lawyer in the FCC’s Media Bureau at the time the report was written and communicated frequently with its authors, he said.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14836500/
Oooh, very good Eli! I can’t wait to see this unfold as well. And where did this myth of liberal media bias originate, anyway?
Who owns CBS any ties to the GOP and which wing of the GOP? The Corporate, Religious, Anti tax, Neo Con, Paleo Con etc?
mornin Eli…nice to see you for BRUNCH ….”g”
this is our hope, we suspect cbs would rather settle, I am hoping rather would rather not
Viacom sorry should have read first.
Rush LimpBoughs
CBS owned by Viacom owned by Sumner Redstone
Time to resuurect Sumner Redstone saying he preferred Al Gore for president, but that he must support GWBush because he would be so much better for his corporation.
So Sumner admits his corporation’s health is more important than the nation’s health.
I wonder how many up and coming subordinates in Viacom wanted to curry Mr. Redstone’s favor in helping Bush get elected.
CBS ….Katie Curic and friends…..empty vessels….or Vassals as it were
Maybe reporters following Rather’s lead will now feel a little more free to expose the past of Mr Obama’s drug use and missing years at Columbia University.
yea another MOFO gazillionaire,selling out AMERICA …hahahahahaha
ya cant take it with you ancientMAN
Into The Buzzsaw – The Myth of s Free Press
by 60 Minutes producer
Kristina Borjesson
how are your moldy cheetos this morning pal?
Eli on a Wednesday a.m.? Provocative!
Viacom went from $44.03 a share using the 5 year google financial chart to $25,20 now. Never mind how much the Dollar has dropped in that time.
Its hard to see how Bush was better for his company.
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Viacom
Sarah Palin how many colleges did she go to in how many years:)
How many planes did John McCain crash sober? Well we think he was sober?
In the 1940’s the media was complicit in fighting fascism on the side of democracy. In these times the media is complicit in fighting against democracy on the side of fascism. Why has the media been turned upside down in the struggle of right and wrong? Let us ask this question over and over until we get some accurate responses.
All evidence in this case would point directly to Karl Rove. He’s the one who set Rather up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Y73sPHKxw
I like the Robert F. Kennedy, Jr quote: “We’re the most entertained, least informed people in the world.” In this country we have the media. We do not, however, have a news media. We may have had one at some point but we certainly do not have one now.
Not only can’t Republicans do GOOD government,
they STINK at staying solvent.
Rove accused Chris Wallace of being an “Agent Of Congress”
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/….._0819.html
One thing you can always take to the bank where Rove is concerned. He is ALWAYS guilty of that which he accuses others.
Rove is an agent of influence, to be sure.
Look who has won and who has lost as a result of Rove’s efforts.
Iraq is being depopulated and the oil pipeline to Israel is being built.
Iran will be attacked next, at Israel’s insistence.
Poppy Bush’s Opium crops in Afghanistan are producing record profits.
Weapons systems are being degraded, requiring replacement – record profits for the Defense Industry.
Oil is stair stepping its way to record highs, and will continue to do so.
The banking industry pushed through bankruptcy reform, just as the Fed had brought the cost of lending as close to zero as possible, while Greenspan insisted that everyone with a pulse buy a house they could not afford using adjustable rate credit, then borrow against it to inflate the economy, artificially.
Use of illegal labor in the US is at record highs – driving corporate profits at record highs and wages down.
The ranks of the uninsured in the US is at record highs, as are Prescription Drug prices.
The AGENT is Rove.
speaking of health:
Perhaps community organizers who are looking for something new to do since s-chip didn’t pass can hold a bake sale for those poor corporations on wall street. I hear they need some help. compassion and all that.
Seriously, if those CEOs got together with their own private funds, I’m sure they could find a buck or two to bailout their own companies.
Non-authoritarian regimes tend to rely on more sustained social engineering campaigns that create more gradual, but ultimately as far-reaching, change. Examples include the “War on Drugs” in the United States, the increasing reach of intellectual property rights and copyright, and the promotion of elections as a political tool. The campaign for promoting elections, which is by far the most successful of the three examples, has been in place for over two centuries.
Social theorists of the Frankfurt School in Weimar Germany like Theodor Adorno had also observed the new phenomenon of mass culture and commented on its new manipulative power, when the rise of the Nazis drove them out of the country around 1930 (many of them became connected with the Institute for Social Research in the United States). The Nazis themselves were no strangers to the idea of influencing political attitudes and re-defining personal relationships. The Nazi propaganda machine under Joseph Goebbels was a synchronized, sophisticated and effective tool for creating public opinion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S…..science%29
A number of techniques which are based on social psychological research are used to generate propaganda. Many of these same techniques can be found under logical fallacies, since propagandists use arguments that, while sometimes convincing, are not necessarily valid. A few examples are: Flag-waving, Glittering generalities, Intentional vagueness, Oversimplification, Rationalization, Red herring, Slogans, Stereotyping, Testimonial, Unstated assumption.
In the West, the term propaganda now overlaps with distinct terms like indoctrination (ideological views established by repetition rather than verification) and mass suggestion (broader strategic methods).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
http://ap.google.com/article/A…..wD9304JE80
Obama was Harvard Law Review
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
So a drug using Obama is smarter than a sober Sarah ever was? McCain as a POW who was tortured has every reason to use pain killers even today however I’m not sure we want that as a President.
As the 1983 American Heritage Dictionary noted, fascism is: “A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.” (The US dictionary definition has gotten somewhat squishier since then, as all the larger dictionary companies have been bought up by multinational corporations.)
Mussolini was quite straightforward about all this. In a 1923 pamphlet titled “The Doctrine of Fascism” he wrote, “If classical liberalism spells individualism, Fascism spells government.” But not a government of, by, and for We The People – instead, it would be a government of, by, and for the most powerful corporate interests in the nation.
“You can’t tell any more the difference between what’s propaganda and what’s news.”
FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein
15 August, 2006
…money…power…
we suspect cbs would rather settle, I am hoping rather would rather not
No way is Rather gonna settle.
They wouldn’t do that in a million years.
These are animals who pee in their communal pools, and think they are smarter than those who don’t.
Did I mention they also stink ??
And maybe we can have more about McCain’s womanizing, past and present, his drunken bashes, being up to his eyelids in lobbyists, oh and lots more about the Keating 5. Let’s see and then there is temper tantrums and senility. Lots of good stuff. Thanks for a great idea.
You have to keep reminding yourself this is not fantasy: that truly dangerous men, such as Perle and Rumsfeld and Cheney, have power. The thread running through their ruminations is the importance of the media: “the prioritized task of bringing on board journalists of repute to accept our position”.
“Our position” is code for lying. Certainly, as a journalist, I have never known official lying to be more pervasive than today. We may laugh at the vacuities in Tony Blair’s “Iraq dossier” and Jack Straw’s inept lie that Iraq has developed a nuclear bomb (which his minions rushed to “explain”). But the more insidious lies, justifying an unprovoked attack on Iraq and linking it to would-be terrorists who are said to lurk in every Tube station, are routinely channeled as news. They are not news; they are black propaganda.
http://www.newstatesman.com/200212160005
Neil Postman
Don’t forget mixing his pain killer pills with booze the two of which combined might explain John’s success with women. People have been dousing girl’s drinks for a long time.
And somebody introduced Cindy to pain killers.
Question What is Rove likely to be charged with in the Rather case?
bom dia pups
I hope all had peaceful rest
(now off to read)
hello sweets…busy here too
Media Reform Information Center
http://www.corporations.org/media/
plunger..you are saying all the correct things, if only there were more listeners.
The case has no chance of moving forward to the point that Rove will be called to testify. The justice system is not available to those with a case against the fascists.
Michael Rivera
Marvelous quote. Where did you get it, please?
You never know after all Bush will need a fall guy to blame for all the bad stuff during his term Rove fits the bill as a fall guy.
The love of money and power..that is why newspapers don’t tell the truth anymore…
“That propaganda is good which leads to success, and that is bad which fails to achieve the desired result,” he wrote. “It is not propaganda’s task to be intelligent, it’s task is to lead to success.” Joseph Goebbels…http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Joeseph_Goebbels
And success is money and power gained from lying to promote and protect the Republicans who are in power.
I find David Leonhardt a really annoying writer at the Times. He says we should only be focusing on how to minimize taxpayer losses in the financial meltdown. Well duh, of course that’s important but seeing that it doesn’t happen again is kind of important too, don’t you think. He says that Congresspeople don’t know anything about what they are supposed to make decisions on. But he sort of forgets that Paulson’s drive to de-regulate markets is what got us here so maybe he doesn’t know that much about what to do either. Leonhardt also doesn’t say anything about who will be administering this program. I guess that is too much of a distraction too, but Paulson’s plan is to leave it to Wall Street to fix Wall Street’s problems Wall Street’s way but with taxpayers’ money. Gosh darn details, better not look at them and just move along. What a hopeless sap.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09…..ref=slogin
drivin’ by with a little o/t
an anecdotal observation about the toxicity of the NYT/Davis story
total blackout in Right Stoopidistan – not even the obligatory railing about librul media
after watching these klowns for 5 years, I take it as a very good sign :D
Christy has a bright, shiny new post up entitled “McCain’s Cronies: More Hinky Questions About Rick Davis And John McCain” for our enlightenment.
Um, yeah!
the contempt is pretty much in my grill. It’s all about who’s schl*ng is bigger and who can take the government for more free money than the other guy. competition vs cooperation. I mean, are you kidding me, Paulson?????
McCain is the poster boy for government freebies and no accountability. his contempt not only for political opponents but for the american voter is becoming more plain with every passing day.
This whole bailout is just another business negotiation to Wall Street. Buy now! This offer to buy my trash expires at midnight! Don’t wait!
Quotations on terrorism
I repeat it often.
Thanks
I think that Sarah was a drug user in college. It would make sense because she smoked marijuana in Alaska.
Palin said she has smoked marijuana..remember, it was legal under state law, she said, even if illegal under U.S. Law..but says she didn’t like it and doesn’t smoke it now. Palin adds, “I can’t claim a Bill Clinton and say that I never inhaled.”…source: Anchorage Daily News Aug 6,2006
http://onthe008/Sarah_Palin_issues.org/2
How much of McCain’s “pain” is the result of torture; and how much can be placed on his own shoulders for failure to maintain proper procedures when ejecting from his (last) crashing plane? I recognize that lack of proper medical attention when he was captured may be considered torture (though not under OUR current definitions) . . . but was he partially responsible for his own misfortune?
Did you notice Barney Frank’s offer of legislation to legalize?
While privacy laws prevent revealing Palin’s grades, I’m pretty certain that I saw her (or read about it on another blog) that she sailed through her economics class with a grade of D.
try the link again…http://ontheissues.org/2008/Sarah_Palin_Drugs.htm
Yes, I did…It would make sense, but I doubt that it will happen unless the gov’t decides to tax it. Too much money at stake…the drug lobbyists would fight that ’til their last breath!
Besides, prisons make too much money off of the people who are there for drug related reasons..don’t think ‘they’ want to kill that cash cow!
The CIA would not want to give up any of their profits…but then, I guess they would just take over pot growing, too. Assuming of course that they haven’t already, of course.
…oops…I forgot to hit reply…I answered you at 58…
google: Dan Rather 911. A reminder that he and fellow reporter Barry Peterson were digging up the truth quickly.
I think that is why he was ‘dumped’. He remained under contract and they stuck him behind a desk. Between exposing Bush’s awol and 911..he did his job and paid the price.
Why does the media suck?
Go read Carl Bernstein’s Rolling Stone piece about how after Watergate the CIA decided it was time to completely devote propaganda time to the people in the US by infiltrating assets into the various media outlets in the US.
We are on the verge of transferring more wealth to the capitalists in this country than was transferred to the railroad barons in the form of land grants during the administration in history that held the title for “Most corrupt in history” until this cabal came along, the Grant administration, in the earliest days of the Republicans. Interesting that at that time it was his Treasury secretary who was shoveling money out the door.