The Obama campaign released a new ad featuring Lilly Ledbetter, who found out only on the verge of retirement that she’d been making 40% less than the men at her plant while doing the same job for years. This is a wonderful ad, mostly because Lilly is as fantastic and down-to-earth in it as she is in person.
Lilly is fairly blunt:
I worked at this plant for 20yrs before I learned the truth. I’d been paid 40% less than men doing the same work.
John McCain opposed a law to give women equal pay for equal work. And he dismissed the wage gap saying women just need education and training.
I had the same skills as the men at my plant. My family needed that money. On the economy, it’s John McCain who needs and education….
The worst part for Lilly? When the SCOTUS dismissed her case, in a 5-4 decision, that also meant her pension and her social security benefits — calculated based on her wages — are less than male counterparts for her whole retirement.
Even worse for all of us, the Ledbetter decision has now been cited in hundreds of cases nationwide to justify disparate treatment based on race, gender, age, disability and other reasons to pay someone less or treat them differently because these cases have been jimmied into an analogous argument to what Lilly faced in her claim. The SCOTUS decision effectively undercut decades of precedent on equality in one, fell swoop in favor of companies who want to justify internal discrimination.
Lilly’s absolutely right: McCain needs to be educated on just what women think of being treated as second class simply because they are women. Just because we have boobs doesn’t mean we have to vote for one, now does it?
PS — Bob Geiger has the Saturday editorial cartoons for your guffaws.