The more I look at the Paulson "plan" the more I come to the conclusion it’s just an old fashioned stickup. A scam. The Republicans know they have only a few more months, and this is their last raid on the treasury. Republicans created this crisis, and in the way of scam artists everywhere now that there’s a crisis they’re demanding money and power to fix their own mistakes.
What I’m hearing is that the gun being held to Congress’s head is the fear of a money market meltdown. These funds are integral to the economy, yes, but 700 billion is far more than is needed to bail them out. They aren’t all going to fail tomorrow, which that number assumes – that they’ll zero out on Monday, and then a few banks will fail simultaneously. A few money market funds may break the buck, but you can deal with that with, oh, 25 billion, and with change to spare. Frankly the Fed’s Bernanke can deal with it with the authority he already has.
So the gun that Paulson is holding to Congress’s head, while not filled with blanks, is a BB gun. He’s trying to stampede Congress into giving him more money and more power than he actually needs to fix the ostensible problem by acting as if there’s no time to think through, or disaster will occur almost immediately.
Why?
Well, that 700 billion bails out Paulson’s friends and colleagues at the highest levels (most of the little people will still lose their jobs). It preserves the world that Paulson worked in all his life. It means that Wall Street and the Banking industry doesn’t have to change how they do business. The people in charge of it will stay in charge and they will stay rich.
Paulson is asking Congress for 700 billion dollars to bail out his friends and to keep his world intact. To ensure there is no meaningful reform of how the financial industry does business, or who runs it. He knows that if serious consideration is given to how to do a bailout it will include a lot of conditions, that the markets will be re-regulated and reformed, and that his friends will mostly be tossed out on their butts.
Be clear, the economy is in a crisis, but it’s not a crisis that requires the literal dictatorial powers that Paulson is asking for. He does not need to be free from all oversight. He does not need to be given 700 billion dollars now. The bailout does not even have to be done through the treasury but could easily be done through the FDIC. Conditions can be imposed on the parties being bailed out. Help could be given to ordinary people as well as banks, not just to banks. Most of all, Congress does not need to sign Paulson a blank check and legal immunity from consequences as to how he spends it.
This is a stickup. Paulson is trying to stampede the Congressional herd into giving him powers and money that he knows they would never give if they had time to think it through carefully. It worked with the Patriot Act. It worked with the AUMF. He’s betting it’ll work again. Create a crisis (or lie one into existence) then demand dictatorial powers and unlimited spending authority to deal with it.
Congress needs to not succumb to fear or to explicit or implicit blackmail. If the crisis was as severe as Paulson makes it out to be, virtually the end of market capitalism, he wouldn’t be quibbling over whether or not CEOs get to keep their golden parachutes.
In effect, that quibble is like you walking into your local bank and saying "I need you to loan me a million bucks. Here are the conditions I must insist are met before I let you lend me the money. First…"
Say what?
He’s given his tell, that he’s a liar, a thief and a scam artist.
Time for Congress to call his bluff, and to see that the financial crisis is dealt with on their terms, with strict oversight by people they can trust, not by a scam artist and liar like Paulson.



96 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Another Republican liar!
I still say there’s nothing in the proposal as it stands now to prevent Paulson taking all the money for himself.
Digg this post!
Shock Doctrine.
He could. As long as he laundered it through mortgages. Say buy up all the best real estate in the country, sell it to himself for a $1 mortgage. Perfectly legal.
DarkSyde over at Kos is talking about it being Torch-and-Pitchfork time on both sides of the aisle if this bail-out bill passes.
And not without justification. Handing 700 Billion over with no oversight is like giving an unlimited supply of untraceable cocaine to Glorious Beloved Leader and destroying every drug-testing kit and gas chromatograph on the planet Earth. It would be in the pockets of every Bush Crony who has known the family since the days of Prescott…
the ultimate golden parachute!
I emailed and faxed Dodd, Clinton, Schumer and my Rep. Arcuri and told them that I thought Congress, like last August with FISA, is being stampeded into doing something urgent when they need more time to study this thing before it gets out of the barn. I am deeply offended by this entire thing – these guys have had their heads in the trough for years and years and have made money off stuff that although it might not be illegal is very much immoral. That Paulson should be trying to get me and my family to send his buddies money so that they can continue to live their current level while other people are losing their homes and jobs? He may not be wearing lipstick, but he’s a PIG nonetheless.
A frequent FDL Digger has asked me to post the following on-topic link to Glenn Greenwald’s column on this subject.
If you haven’t done so already, consider going over and Digging it.
I believe Obama and the Dem leadership should take the offense. Stick the Rethugs with tax legislation that imposes confiscatory rates on inheritances (exempt the first $500K) and high household incomes ( 50% rates on $500k for individuals $1 million for couples) then force Bush to sign it to pay for the mess. Impose legislation on them for funding to insure solvency for social security and medicare for 100 years. Impose the Conyers medicare legislation. Impose limits on executive compensation for financial frims that are rescued. Pure populism. At this time its good policy and winning politics.
So he can have a bigger dictatorial endowment than that smug bastard Michael Chertoff and wave it in his face.
ding
I want the bill, should it get to the floor, to be amended to include return of bonuses and salaries for any business executive whose company is bailed out. If they need jobs, they can compete in the minimum-wage market, because that’s about the level of skill they seem to have reached.
The problem is that Paulson, seeking to protect his constituency has already said that any provision like that would be a “poison pill” put there by the Democrats, therefore unacceptable. Becuz Dems is evil, doncha know?
This is how the Bushevics think (crony) capitalism is supposed to work – and for a long time they have been right.
You were much nicer than I was. I told Madam Speaker that I was opposed to bailing out thieves so they could do it again. Also e-mailed Obama and my own Congresswoman. Will do some more tomorrow.
Impose a Bush Levy. Make him put his name on it before he leaves office. Tax richistan and make it pay the Bush Levy.
(No one will ever name a levee after Bush, so it won’t be confusing.)
Make the douchebag pay for his friends’ partying. It’s only right.
And why, exactly, does Hot Hank need all this money all at once?
That makes no sense.
So call him on it. Make the Republicans either back down or reveal their true colors for all to see. We don’t have to accept his “poison pill” frame. Call it the “Protect the Public Interest” amendment, or something.
Weren’t they contemplating naming a Bay Area sewage treatment facility after Bush?
It’s even scarier than it looks.
I said, and I quote “Any member of Congress brain dead enough to vote for this proposal deserves to be tarred and feathered, placed in the stocks, and pelted with rotten produce, before being run out of the country.”
Agree
I borrowed most of the text of Marcy’s “No” post below and pasted it into a letter to my Democratic congresswoman with a plea to fight for fairness.
I believe Larisa has nailed it.
it being Torch-and-Pitchfork time on both sides of the aisle if this bail-out bill passes.
I was wondering when and if that might start occurring to people.
My sweet little ‘83 Beamer (246,00 miles) probably couldn’t take the strain.
Might check bus-prices tomorrow, just to be prepared.
Then let’s give Bushie some veto bait. If it’s really that important, he’ll just have to accept helping out the other 99.01% of Americans this bill doesn’t yet address.
Make him veto the sucker and take the financial system down the tubes.
And, Commissar Paulson? That “Section 8″ of yours is already a poison pill:
How unAmerican!!
Can we also quadruple the capital gains tax while we are at it. Currently sitting at 15%, I believe.
Dunking. Dr Dick, you forgot dunking.
Of course, these days perhaps waterboarding would be more fashionable…
the gun that Paulson is holding to Congress’s head, while not filled with blanks, is a BB gun.
Still constitutes armed robbery, in this state anyway….
We can do that while we are running them out of the country on a rail. 8-)
yup
Possible Amendments…..
- Oversight committee over Paulson which consist of economists such as Krugman to perform constant review
- Monthly reporting to congress on status of bail out
- No golden parachutes……
- All CEO pay and compensation is tied to performance…..
- Every CEO who wants to bailed out HAVE to present 1, 5 and 10 year business plans F*ch quarterly stock/dividend report & mentality….
We have no influence with the Repubs but the Dems need to be made to understand that there will be price to pay for this. We should let them know that no money will be donated, no door-to-door, no nothing until they represent the American people.
Finally, his name will be associated with an enterprise that is beneficial to Americans.
I begin to wonder what exactly “sucked all the oxygen out of the room” when Paulson met with Congressional leaders on Thursday night, now that we see exactly how dictatorial he envisions his office. Perhaps it wasn’t his dire predictions of the collapse of AmericaInc. Perhaps it was just the files Cheney asked him to take over on each Congresscritter at the meeting. Or their family. Or their finances. Or their mistress. Or their mistress’s finances.
You know BushCo has this information. Why would they NOT use it in a final, grand stick-up?
art imitating life. On a 20 year old britcom, Are You Being Served I just heard the line
Ok then . . .
And associated with something for which he is justly famous.
About a 12 hour drive for me. I’ll watch for notices. The streets of Washington need to be absolutely full if they actually come to a vote on this as it has been disclosed today.
I would do that, too, but I don’t thing Kay Bailout would pay much attention.
Bitch.
Ooo, did I type that outloud?
Frank Rich is up early tonight. He’s kickin’ ass and talkin’ names….
Go for it here . Just went on the front page.
Ooo, did I type that outloud?
didn’t hear a thing, darlin’.
Will the BushCo outlaws successfully rustle another stampeded herd of Congresscattle into one of their box canyons?
I am sick of this picture.
Twain, I have to say I agree with you on this, but what happens if we get “the finger” like we did from Obama on FISA? He knew about the progressive/liberal FISA sentiment, and took for granted, the support of the progressive community even with his vote on that unconscionable piece of legislation. Nothing like getting boned by your own candidate because he knows he’s the only game in town.
I don’t know how much many members will really care, until there is a concerted campaign to toss one out and that’s not going to happen this year, sadly.
The self-assured arrogance is breathtaking.
I’m considering going to bed with a
bottleblood pressure pill.Teddy teddy teddy…. you stole my line……
what do they know about them? on their mother, father, sister, their kids…… All I see is a pile of manila folders and fingers tapping them….. and they fold like cheep folding chair….
Same with my Rep. the (dis)Honorable Denny “Where’s Mine?” Rehberg, but I sent my letter to him as well just to harass him. Wish I could see his face when he reads the line, “This administration, best noted for gross incompetence and pervasive corruption, cannot be trusted with spare change, let alone $700 billion, without intensive, detailed oversight.” His head may explode.
E-mailed Obama through the box on his ‘issues’ page (yes, you can make suggestions to the campaign about this stuff). E-mailed Boxer earlier.
I agree with katymine: no golden parachutes, no fat paychecks, no stashed-away options for execs who run things into the ground. (I’d love to extend that to elected officials too.) In fact, let them go into the employment pool as low-wage workers for a few years, so they can understand what the real world is like.
Why?
HAJHAHAHAHA!
Because they can.
And they will get away with it.
Theft on the grandest scale the world has ever seen.
They have just crippled the security of this nation by tripling the national debt to give their thieving assed buddies the keys to Fort Knox.Expect round two to begin Monday.
Not a peep about the devastation in Texas, blacked out the press coverage and effectively just signed the death warrant to this countries ability to do anything constructive for ten years.
Just a word of caution, they are not done raping this country, they still have lots of time.
All we can do is keep pushing. There must be many ways we can punish the Dems for this – maybe not before this election but after. We are not completely powerless and we need to use the power we have.
look for some Twin Cities-type “law enforcement” action if anything like that is attempted
Found on kos:
Are we being held hostage?
Excellent! But I doubt he’ll ever see it.
We should not be whining and pointing blame. Who could have anticipated that liberals would allow all those hippies to buy houses when they have no jobs to pay mortgages. We are all to blame, and we need to listen to those wise corporate lobbyists on the tee vee. Give the neo-cons their $700,000,000,000. They are going to get it one way or the other.
This may be the last chance for neo-conservatives to claim their legacy. The wealthy, such as Lady de Rothschild, need their assets protected.
Stop criticing them you ungrateful bahstads! You are so lucky that they have ruled us the last eight years.
Busted, you know it’s funny you say that. Back in ‘02 and ‘03 when I was blogging up a storm over at Democratic Veteran, I used to go on about how the Debt was a National Security issue of some import. You would not believe the responses I got (yeah, right quit smoking crack was the most common email) and I quit writing about it when no one seemed to believe me or wanted to talk about it.
Here we are in ‘08 and our security rests on the very capital markets the republicans have destroyed, and run up debts making war on countries we never needed to invade.
Ian, thank God we have you on FDL. I have read only half of your post (I found it when 40 others had already commented). I think I see where you are going: Paulson/Bernanke/Bush are just economic terrorists, and are about to cause far more economic damage than any foreign terrorist did to us on 9/11.
Thank God we are finally going to show that the Emperor has no clothes. It will be weird to end up on the same side as some of the worst GOP tax-cutters and govt.-shrinkers, but we must stop this latest Plutocrat Piracy. If we give them $700 billion in September, they will come back in an “emergency session” in December and demand a TRILLION dollars more, to bail out all the “dark market” pirates (credit default swaps-CDSes, derivatives, special investment vehicles–SIVs, the entire array of Enron bullshit).
Yep…. they are getting ready for the Fire Sale ……. it will be that Looting video of Iraq except it will be here in America…….
True, but I will have the satisfaction of ruining the day of one of his aides.
Mission accomplished?
time to pull this one out again:
p.s. still a big gore fan here, but he can bite me for not speaking out against the dem’s fisa bill in june.
A tech-savvy Bushnik would probably bring a PowerPoint presentation. After it failed to launch because he couldn’t remember the password, an assistant would trot out the manila folder backup.
We do what we can do… *g*
Jesus H……
This may sound incredibly stupid, but if this were a Bush-led project, could he have pulled off those prune-faced “press-conferences”?
That fucker can’t even come close to keeping a straight face when he thinks he’s in the tall clover. He’d have been smirking and blinking up a storm.
The obvious counter-argument to this is that nobody has let Dim-son in on the master-plan, because he is so obviously fucking irrelevant.
Mission [almost] Accomplished. Give ‘em their bail-out unconditionally and it’s all over but the crying.
We’ll be lucky if they go that easy on us.
Good god! That little weasel could never dream something like this up on his own and if they told him about it, he would find a way to totally fuck it up. FUBAR is his middle name.
Adam Davidson of NPR blogs about the so-called bailout bill as follows:
I would guess that this has to be one of the biggest peacetime transfers of power from Congress to the Administration in history. (Anyone know?). Certainly one of the most concise.
The Treasury Secretary can buy broadly defined assets, on any terms he wants, he can hire anyone he wants to do it and can appoint private sector companies as financial deputies of the US government. And he can write whatever regulation he thinks are needed.
Most importantly, Davidson points to this passage in the bill:
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
WOW!!!!
Out of respect, I think you should have included, “Tap-dancin’.”
reason why I say folders is that they could just have blank paper in them….. but showing up with big fat folders…… with a few of them having actual stuff which would be the intimidation factor………
Michelle Obama is on Paula Dean FoodNetwork right now…..
well, I still had Larissa’s generational-Bushes-for-fascism theory on my mind for a minute there…..
Many of us have read it, but again, get Naomi Klein’s book “Shock Doctrine.” It explains this all and is now in paperback. Or check it out from your library (see, I’m not just gratuitously plugging a book!)
Any congress person of either party who is stupid enough to vote for this
deserves to be summarily removed from office, with no chance of ever being elected to anything again. Paulson could institute a Police state, declare martial law or even start a war in the name of that “Act” and it would be non-reviewable.
Nothing like giving away the Republic just for the hell of it, is there?
Well, I do not think they are alone in that project and there are likely others in “an undisclosed location”.
Not even a “signing statement” this time?
Huge ballz trying to pass that one.
Well, I do not think they are alone in that project and there are likely others in “an undisclosed location”.
Yeah, it is hard to imagine any Bush younger than GHWB being let in on the play.
Involve any of the individually, collectively, and unanimously dumb-as-a-post sons in on this?
wtf was I thinking?
Well, you might let Jeb fetch coffee or something, but Fredo (who makes Dubya look bright) and Dubya are worse than lost causes.
Isn’t that a Rove trick? I seem to remember that he showed up for debates with stacks (if not boxes) of index cards. They were all blank. Meant only to intimidate his opponent.
I seem to recall Fredo liked to fish.
Is anyone giving a reason for the “no review by any court of law” provision?
Well, he liked to “troll” anyway. 8-)
The Dems will AS USUAL get all scared and shit and just do what they do best. CAVE. And Pelosi standing up there saying they want protections for the homeowners that are in trouble. That’s fine and dandy BUT HOW ABOUT THE COMPLETE LACK OF OVERSIGHT OR ACCOUNTABILITY??? Or giving ONE GUY a 700B blank check? Or ZERO regulations??? WTF???
And she did mention not giving these CEOs big checks on their way out. It took years for this to happen, now they want it solved in one weekend???
Please excuse me I’m having another panic attack and I think my head is going to blow off.
Where are you seeing the text of the bill that you are referencing?
Ian, this says probably more than most realize: “It preserves the world that Paulson worked in all his life.”
And I’m sure the Dem strategy -including Senator Obama- is to try to bargain for some of there pet initiatives as the price to pay for screwing the public. And then they’ll tout what they ‘achieved’.
I keep thinking about how the game plan seems to be to tie the hands of whomever becomes President and put into stone Bush’s perspectives. The narrative of this is die to ‘naked short selling’ seems to be making headway when the opposite is exactly true. And if I remember correctly, it has been only one money market MUTUAL FUND that has had the NAV go below $1. What seems to have been the trigger for this crap to be pushed is the temp jump in the interest rate for commercial paper but NO ONE is talking about the fact that it is the issuance of credit and the associated CDS’s that is the root of this and all the ‘plan’ seems to be is to put such ‘credit’ again on an easily acquired basis. And how does this help -really- the average consumer for whom it is repeatedly said to be the majority factor in the ‘economy’? Such won’t boost home values and after this and the general state of the economy who wants to go further into debt?
I don’t want to hear the word democracy again used to describe this country; it’s a plutocracy or oligarcy, not even a representative republic.
Socialist is the correct word I believe.
NO, the words I used were the correct words; Socialism covers a lot of ground and none of the ground reflects what has -and is- occurring.
And for those wondering about the ‘collapse’ paradigm being touted -along with the ‘naked short selling’ paradigm, read this:
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/126306
The Republicans are already blaming Democrats for everything that’s gone wrong in the country, so Congress has nothing to lose by telling these unsavory characters, Paulson and his ilk, to fuck off.
national socialism
Here’s a WSJ perspective on the money market mutual fund issue:
http://online.wsj.com/article/…..lenews_wsj
“The possibility of businesses shutting down for want of funding, said Paul Schott Stevens, the Investment Company Institute president, was bracing for the government. He told Washington officials of the worry conveyed by his talks with executives this past week at dozens of fund firms.”
So why don’t these firms have the cash to to address their financing needs? (strictly rhetorical question).
Ian, very good tell-spotting.
It is a scam, as the whole thing has been from the decision to use mortgages as the vehicle for robbing the middle class. That bankruptcy bill is another one of many tells. The quiet creation of a structure that got most of the risk off the balance sheets of the prime beneficiaries is another; one of the most insulting aspects of Paulson’s proposal is that many of the ultimate net recipients of those bailout funds have already made out like fat rats off the fee-generating side of the lending process.
Larisa AlexandrovnaPosted September 20, 2008 | 08:11 PM (EST) BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Bloggers’ Index
Welcome to the final stages of the coup…
Where are you seeing the text of the bill that you are referencing? 82 see 89
Thanks, I’m off to write more letters and alert others to this crappy(politely stated) legislation.
I agree with your point here, jayt.
Note that he doesn’t have to have dreamed it up himself. That’s what the help are for. Note, too, that the standard types of schemes are quite well-known, one only needs to find the one (or ones in this case, where several are nested and otherwise interlocked to provide different aspects of the mechanism) that fits the situation and tools one has on hand.
What we’re victims of here could be called The Longest Con, after the terminology whereby a Big Con, Long Con, Big Store game, or some such, is a scam run through a special-purpose phony enterprise, like the fake gambling house used in The Sting to hook the Shaw character. Recall too how executing that scam involved a lot of subsidiary games, some of which were run on participants in the game in order to get them to do certain things naturally.
A critical element of The Longest Con: Reloading Scams. Think of it as a kind of waterboarding.
From Dean Baker, Progressive Conditions for a Bailout. Good points to expand on in letters to congresscritters. Dean’s blog is another good source for everyday economics commentary as well.
In view of the hustle for an “Emergency Bailout To Save The World”, I would suggest that Paulson/Bernanke tell the POTUS and VPOTUS ” that I will ONLY sign 30 seconds after they both resign from office and President Pelosi is installed…Wouldn’t they agree? to save the world? Wouldn’t you agree if you were in that position?
This is a typical Hank Paulson/Goldman Sachs operation. See the very insightful Does Goldman Sachs Run The World? for what these guys are up to.
How about this?
The values of existing loans are tanking. That’s the discipline of the free market. So let’s set up a mechanism whereby homeowners can purchase their existing mortage at market value.
Let mortgage holders offer the devalued mortgages that they want to unload on a government run ebay-like mechanism. But, before a loan gets sold, the homeowner gets to buy it by matching the high bid, and we set up an institution to loan the homeowner the necessary funds to purchase his/her existing mortgage at market at reasonbly favorable terms.