Yesterday a Texas-sized invader crashed Big Carbon’s Houston citadel and the coastal communities that lay between the Gulf and America’s Oilarchy. Homeland Security couldn’t divert the threat. Even the collective power of the Pentagon and the entire military-industrial complex couldn’t stop the invader. No surprise there. Though Homeland Security, the Pentagon, the military-industrial complex, and the corporatists they all serve have the power to harm and defile Mother Nature, they can’t stop her. Yesterday, the force of Nature we call Hurricane Ike reminded America’s Oilarchy that Nature bats last.
The Oilarchy is greedy, devious, and deluded. Like other mass-murderers, they’ve drawn lessons from their most notorious predecessors…kinda like interrogators in the Inquisition (or the Bushie Gulag) shared notes on how best to torture. Following in Big Tobacco’s funeral train, the Oilarchy has learned to play the doubt card really well. Big Carbon play the doubt so well that they’ve been able to stifle the urgent search for solutions to global warming with phony debates about whether global warming exists…or — if it does exist — whether human-produced greenhouse gases have caused it. [For those who have been watching too many commercials or hanging out with serial child-neglecter Sarah Palin, the respective answers are "yes" and "yes"].
Tonight we still don’t know how many died over the last twenty-four hours from the flood waters, shrapnel-like debris, electricity failures, and other mishaps Hurricane Ike brought to the Gulf Coast and the Texas counties where Ike swerved inland. We do know 1.2 million people evacuated their homes and five million will be without electric power for weeks. Tonight, over ninety percent of the homes under Ike’s path from Galveston to Houston have no electricity. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands will be without adequate running water. The cost of repairing just the insured non-flood damage (not the flood damage) for just those with insurance has been estimated at least six billion, and perhaps sixteen billion.
The victims — if they are like the Americans sampled in national opinion polls — are just as likely to believe global warming is real as to believe either that global warming is not real, or that human activity has not caused global warming.
Neat trick for the Oilarchy: fooling the same neighbors that Ike’s fear and flooding forced out of their homes. Good thing for the Oilarchs, too — if Ike’s victims ever learn how Big Carbon wrote them off, even Homeland Security couldn’t protect the Carbon Lords.
Why? The energy that drives hurricanes is heat energy. As the Fourth Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change expected and recent researchers have concluded, global warming pumps more heat into ocean waters, creating a heat pool which nourishes hurricanes to grow far larger than they would have done without the increased heat.
A 2006 study published in Geophysical Research Letters, relying not on storm track records but on global surface wind and temperature records between 1958 and 2001, confirmed the trends identified in the two 2005 studies above and found that a 0.45 °F (0.25 °C) increase in mean annual tropical sea surface temperature corresponded to a 60 percent increase in a tropical cyclone’s potential destructiveness.
The BBC reports on a more recent study:
Writing in the journal Nature, they say the number of weaker storms has not noticeably altered.
James Elsner from Florida State University in Tallahassee, US and colleagues believed the link might become clearer if they analysed data according to the strength of storms.
HOW TROPICAL STORMS FORM Sea surface temperatures above 26.5C (79.7F)A pre-existing weather disturbanceMoisture in the atmosphereFavourable conditions, such as light winds or weak wind shear Animated guide: Tropical storms
"We’re seeing a signal, and it’s telling us that the strongest effect (of rising ocean temperatures) is on the strongest storms," he told BBC News.
"At average or median wind speeds, about 40m/s, we don’t see a trend; but when we get up to 50 or 60m/s we do see a trend."
A hurricane featuring winds of 40m/s (89mph) is a Category One storm according to the often-used Saffir-Simpson scale.
At about 60m/s (134mph) it enters Category Four, the strength at which Hurricane Gustav recently hit Cuba before weakening to Category One over the US coast.
Another way of describing this is that global warming appears to help hurricanes grow into immense storms: like the Gulf-sized Katrina and the Texas-sized Ike.
The Texas Oilarchs, the other Carbon Lords, and the GOP / Beltway Village that serves them may slide by Ike’s destruction without taking the heat from Ike’s victims. Hey — the Oilarchy and the GOP got off pretty lightly when Katrina destroyed a city, and the Goopers goose-stepped in to destroy the community. Why wouldn’t they continue to get off so easily?
Perhaps they will: but the pool of victims will be growing with almost every passing year. You see, as our planet warms, the reserves of global warming gases locked away in what was once tundra and under the seas will at some point burp out into our atmosphere, starting an ever-increasing spiral of warming. The fancy scientific name for this spiral is "positive feedabck loop".
The positive feedback loop that begins our planet’s ever-increasing spiral of warming is estimated to kick off when Earth’s temperature rises by 2 degrees C. Neither McCain nor Obama’s climate plan will prevent that: not in the handful of years we have before it is too late to stop the positive feedback loop that will bring every child living today into a hellish future.
You see, by playing Big Tobacco’s doubt card, the Carbon Lords and Darth Cheney have squandered a decade over which we could have stopped the rise from going over 2 degrees C. We’ve lost that chance: 4 degees C looks like a certainty. Which means the positive feedback will carry us far beyond 4 degrees C.
+3.4°: Rainforest turns to desert
The Amazonian rainforest burns in a firestorm of catastrophic ferocity, covering South America with ash and smoke. Once the smoke clears, the interior of Brazil has become desert, and huge amounts of extra carbon have entered the atmosphere, further boosting global warming. The entire Arctic ice-cap disappears in the summer months, leaving the North Pole ice-free for the first time in 3 million years. Polar bears, walruses and ringed seals all go extinct. Water supplies run short in California as the Sierra Nevada snowpack melts away. Tens of millions are displaced as the Kalahari desert expands across southern Africa
+4.4°: Melting ice caps displace millions
Rapidly-rising temperatures in the Arctic put Siberian permafrost in the melt zone, releasing vast quantities of methane and CO2. Global temperatures keep on rising rapidly in consequence. Melting ice-caps and sea level rises displace more than 100 million people, particularly in Bangladesh, the Nile Delta and Shanghai. Heatwaves and drought make much of the sub-tropics uninhabitable: large-scale migration even takes place within Europe, where deserts are growing in southern Spain, Italy and Greece. More than half of wild species are wiped out, in the worst mass extinction since the end of the dinosaurs. Agriculture collapses in Australia
[snip]
+6.4°: Most of life is exterminated
Warming seas lead to the possible release of methane hydrates trapped in sub-oceanic sediments: methane fireballs tear across the sky, causing further warming. The oceans lose their oxygen and turn stagnant, releasing poisonous hydrogen sulphide gas and destroying the ozone layer. Deserts extend almost to the Arctic. "Hypercanes" (hurricanes of unimaginable ferocity) circumnavigate the globe, causing flash floods which strip the land of soil. Humanity reduced to a few survivors eking out a living in polar refuges. Most of life on Earth has been snuffed out, as temperatures rise higher than for hundreds of millions of years.
Hey? Who sez the Goopers are always wrong. Looks they’ll get that "End Of History" they’re so keen on.
All courtesy of their masters in the Houston Oilarchy and the global Carbon Lords.
Related posts:





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Aloha, Doc!
Easy for you to say, out there on your lanai.
That must be a generic term because Alaska and the Northwest Territories in Canada contain vast stretches of permafrost too…!
Heh, you like that, eh? ;-)
Hope I Die Before I Get Old…
hi, doc.
Hi CT! Agree with you on the generic use of the term. (Scarily enough, the Siberian land mass is reported to have warmed sufficiently that some tundra is already outgassing…)
Kirk, I think you may have missed the point of one of the items to which you link.
Under the “We’ve lost that chance” text in your post, the link itself says “By focussing on long-term emission targets, such as 50% by 2050, climate policy has essentially ignored the crucial importance of current emission trends and their impact on cumulative emissions. As a consequence, although we should aim to reduce global emissions in line with a 2ºC target, adaptation policy must focus on climate change impacts associated with 4ºC or more.”
As I read it, this doesn’t say “we’ve lost that chance,” but rather, “if you want that chance, you’ve got to aim at a different target.”
Hi jayt.
The part that still wanted to be a parent has dessicated up and blownaway the last few years: I couldn’t bear to answer my child’s question: “Knowing what was to come, why did you make me be born?”
Dr. Murphy!
Um, “interrogators”, perhaps, Kirk?
But, but, but, gee whiz, and gosh golly!!! We’ve got a brand spankin’ new ‘Northwest Passage’ ….
Yeppers! Looks like the human species is goin’ for the ‘end times’ one way or another …
After they’ve killed everybody off, Big Carbon won’t be posting any more record profits… that’ll show ‘em.
Even the collective power of the Pentagon and the entire military-industrial complex couldn’t stop the invader.
Whuh? You’re trying to imply that “Drill Baby Drill” and Mrs. Palin’s combination energy (nee “Oil”)/national security experience won’t keep us safe?
Puhlease… that would mean that somebody’s lyin’ to us.
Who would do such a thing?
that’s weird – I was just having the same thought….
wow Kirk, that’s one helluva storm. I’m surprised there’s any left of Galveston.
We’d been following the storm, but it wasn’t til Friday morning that I realized just how big Ike was; and that the hurricane force winds stretched out from the eye even further than they did in Katrina. These mega-storms are terrifying.
Peterr, I used the wrong linky (correct linky to PDF here), and I wish correcting the linky would alter the conclusions I report.
The PDF is a Royal Society publication: dense prose.
The Scotsman gives this (accurate) summary:
I am shocked, shocked.
You gotta admit, Doc., that this is a small victory for us…
would you like me to replace that link for you, doc?
Yep. Really good news: direct action got the goods and the jurors got the science.
Thanks, Suz – that would be great (and congrats on the new rental: pics you linked to a few late nigts back were gorgeous!)
link replaced kirk, and thanks. open invite for ya doc
Wow. That says alot. I’m not sad that I had kids.
They’re fabulous human beings and I feel confident that they will make a very significant positive change to this world.
My children have never asked me that question. They are busy learning and focusing and moving in a positive direction.
They understand that it’s all a pretty complex situation and doing a good job at discerning and helping others move forward.
The problem is systemic. Capitalism locks us into the status quo. We need jobs and if our job is making internal combustion engines, we fight to continue making internal combustion engines even if they are hazardous to our health. Capitalism also promotes competition as the path to progress. Cooperation is far more powerful, but we cannot cooperate when we profit from keeping our discoveries to ourselves.
We also think the Ayn Rand entrepreneurs keep things going when they are killers of the planet and sometimes of people who get in their way. The oil billionaires want to drill more even though they damage the environment they inhabit. It’s insane. We’ve got to get sane before anything good happens.
Allow me to also extend my congrats on the amazing new digs, Suzanne. I enjoy a slightly lower standard of living here in my discarded refrigerator box beside the railroad track. It suffices, I just have to remember to pull my feet in when the train is coming.
Here’s more from the conclusions of the Royal Society article [Philosophical Proceedings of the Royal Society for us proles… :) ]
(note: “CO2e” means total CO2 equivalents from multiple greenhouse gases)
I undersdtand your feelings, Kirk, and as I’ve mentioned to you before, I haven’t a ‘good’ answer for my children, but they seem to be glad to be here and share their old dad’s concerns ’bout oh so many things …
Just speakin’ to my own predjudice Kirk, but I be thinkin’ you’d be a rather wonderful father, and personally I’d like to see the sensibilities of your genes as part of those ‘contemporary’ (relatively) with my own children’s. If there’s to be any hope, ’twill be in those who have been encouraged to ‘understand’, by teachers and examples such as yourself.
;~D
Even so, the phrase “Given the reluctance . . .” says to me that it’s not too late. The authors are making a political statement, not a scientific one — though I am not going to disagree with their assessment of the political state of things today.
It does suggest, however, that if something were to shift that reluctance into action, things might be different.
Hello. . . Mr. Axelrod? . . .
Well, it’s not easy being a parent.
It helps if you want to be one.
Know what I mean.
(anybody here want to jump in?)
or….????
things might be different.
That’s a nice if.
It’s easy to go negative these days, don’t you think?
But, still, I’m naive enough to hold out hope.
My children give me hope.
Kirk, thanks for this (another) great post. And, Peterr, thanks to you also, from a post (was it only yesterday?) which first made me aware that it was the sheer size of Ike that was important, not just the force of the winds (as in hurricane number ratings). I had never realized that before.
Anybody got a statistic on how many kids are planned, versus how many are Palins (figuratively speaking)?
Beats me. That’s a tough question. Would be hard to get statistics I would think. Even here people change there minds. Having a kid? Even tougher.
Okay, sorry.
I’m out.
Continue….
It is not easy being a parent, demi, but you will allow that it is ‘fun’ at times and always an ‘education’.
Yes, parenthood (ain’t English a weird language?) should be at least desired before one ‘finds’ oneself in that, um, position.
I sometimes worry that childless folk (all present company excluded, of course) do not feel the same connection to time or share the same concern for the health of the planet that we bekiddelated ones (sometimes, though not always) do.
Many young people assure me they do not think they wish to have children. I shall wait and see …
Without children there certainly shall be no future of interest to people.
Our species is simply suffering from outmoded and now dangerous thought patterns, myths, and expectations.
Of course it doesn’t help that we’ve stone-age minds and emotional ‘tool-sets’ which even more primitive.
But with luck and consciousness, we may yet muddle through …
According to the Minnesota Department of Health, 49 percent are unintended (in the U.S.), 80 percent among teens (might have read that somewhere else). Here is the link.
Reading the scientific paper, I find a very different implication: preparing for 2 degrees C is misleading, while expecting over four degrees (4.8) is accurate. I wish for the authors and I to be proven wrong.
I very much wish for the possibility you describe to exist, and I would like to believe that it does. I prefer a future — and a present — in which that assessment is correct. Certainly, if the OECD leaders and those of China and India were to embark on crash programs coupling what would appear to be decreased living standards/ GNP with a massive global re-engineering over the next handful (five, roughly) of years, one could find reasons to expect the quoted conclusions were not accurate.
I cannot imagine Obama, Pelosi, Reid, McCain, Biden, Palin, the Blue Dogs, the DC Dems/Rethugs, the GOP or the Media Villagers showing such leadership. They walk under the sun, but they embrace the policies of death and madness: the policies the corporatists who fund them pay them to execute. Literally.
Though I will try to bring about a different outcome, I have no hope that it will come to pass.
Thermoclines in the Oceans create extreme weather
Haven’t had a chance to read through the comments. Maybe this has been mentioned.
Is anyone tracking the oxygen content of the atmosphere? ‘Cause when THAT starts to twitch — the fat lady is warming up to sing!!
Curiously, it was two years ago today (September 13, 2006) that James Hansen was quoted as saying,
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14834318/
So we are now down to 8 years to act decisively and as Kirk has pointed out political cowardice and inertia make such action unlikely in the extreme.
I should also note that the big rises in sealevel will come about if the Greenland ice sheet goes, or more unlikely if Antarctica begins to melt (i.e. more than the current back off of ice sheets). Otherwise such rises will be limited to a couple of feet. With either of these we’re talking in the 26 foot range.
DW Bartoo, myhat’s off to you and all the other folks who do the hard work of parenting. I’d like to believe I’d be half as good an influence as you describe.
Valley Girl, so glad you like the post.
And ratfood, love your description re pregancy stats…
dugg doc
Just remember, ED’s Fred Krupp doesn’t believe that we should use hurricanes to talk about Global Warming.
Glad that you didn’t listen to him …
Peterr Please do the reading:
Al Gore “An inconvenient truth”, Environmental Defense Fund: “Earth: The Sequel, National Resource Defence Council
, World Wildlife Federation, GreenPeace and a long list which should include the Kyoto agreement and the Rapid Climate Change Conference
Thousands of scientist agree on this, when Greenland, the polar icecaps, and Glacier all over the world have recorded huge massive meltdowns is there any room to doubt this post?
A Siegel, thanks! And thanks for that great post you had for us here last weekend.
What is about the Beltway Big Green groups? Between the ones who compromised Northwest old-growth under Clinton in the 90’s and ED’s cave-ins, I’ve started to wonder if they care about preserving anything other than their Pew/Rockefeller/ et al funding (actually, I’ve stopped wondering).
A Siegel, in all seriousness, what do you think motivates the Big Green fifth column orgs?
Thanks, suz.
I’d love to see this concept (and A Siegel’s post from last week) Dugg and redditied as widely as possible
(and I’d love to figure out why Digg just turns my Mac browser into a beachball venue, but that’s another topic)
Hi Kirk-
I was trying to remember some details from the Gore movie- it struck me as a bit of irony at that time- how loss of permafrost in areas of AK have made roads (permafrost roads) now inaccessible mud sink holes, limiting access to “oil” areas.
And, DW Bartoo, I don’t have any R friends anymore, so I can only speak for the left wing- and, therein would make no correlation between kids or not, and concern and activism for the future. Cuts both ways. People with kids have a huge time commitment there, just in daily life. People w/o kids (for whatever reason) have more time to push the message in a different venue.
Kirk, I share your concerns and suspect that ‘motivation’ to change outmoded attitudes and muderous policy will be forced upon us.
Remember, old mother nature can be a really unplesant presence and reminder that.won’t.go.away, and it appears she’s workin’ up quite a head of steam, before blowing out all the stops, and, at some point, the ‘responsibility’ is ours, modesty and politeness and turn-the-cheekiness, notwithstanding.
The rest of our lives, whether we like it or not, are going to be both busy and ‘interesting’.
As you already know.
However, before China or India, or even Russia may be expected to do ANYTHING, the United States MUST do SOMETHING: and it is ‘we’, the people of the nation, who MUST INSIST that this be so.
Kirk, you happen to be one of our best ‘Insistors’, as your post(s) so amply demonstrates … so, more power to you, by whatever means …
David
Fortunately, being phenomenally unattractive and difficult to get along with means I don’t have any descendants of my own to worry about.
In addition to the people, comprised mostly of new arrivals not responsible for our looming cataclysm, I feel bad for every other species of life on Earth that will pay the price for our folly.
Is Sarah Palin going to fly down to Texas for a hurricane photo op?
Might be a good chance to ask her some questions about her disbelief in science.
The Conveyor Belt controls our usual climate. Global wrming will disrupt it.
I’d like somebody to ask Sarah some hard questions but unfortunately, the McCain campaign has declared Whoopi, Joy, and Babs persona non gratae.
Please don’t misunderstand my questions of Kirk. I’m trying to sort out the scientific conclusions from the political. I don’t doubt the scientists when they talk about science — but their political conclusions are a different matter.
I’m not at all trying to downplay the seriousness of all this; simply (!) trying to sort out what evidence is supporting which statements.
david has lou dobbs spreading hate upstairs
I wonder if Michael Crichton is gonna stop by texas too
Thank you for the laugh-out-loud comment, and isn’t it a shame it’s so true?
More weather factors caused by ozone depletion
Indeed… and happy to be of service.
been there, Dugg that
Perhpas just moving the box further from the trackside would do the trick… *g*
I am totally fed up with the Sarah Palin woohaw. Fed up, meaning it’s so depressing and I want to destroy something every time I read more about her.
But, that doesn’t stop me from checking out the excellent work of AK bloggers.
Two reports, one from ET and another from AKmuckracker about the big (relatively for AK) Anchorage Demo.
Anchorage Anti-Palin Protest Sets Record
Infiltrating the Palin Rally in Anchorage.
Cook Island study. Remember when the flights stopped at 9/11 an atmospheric change took place in temperature too. These are all cummulative effects onclimate change.
World temps were dropping from 1940 – 1975.
World temps moved up from 1975 – 2000.
World temps dropping since 2000 – present.
good for you.
i have no idea what it means to “believe in science”, but imo it sounds too much as though we have to choose who to believe: the “priests” of science or some other kind of priest. imo both choices are profoundly anti-thought and are appeals to authority. i think of science as a way to try to understand / make sense of the natural world. it’s a method, it’s not the conventional wisdom of scientists.
Don’t try to CHANGE me, Doc… :}
Source?
Linky?
I have a question re the temp of the Gulf and hurricanes – i know the heated water of the gulf fuels/intensifies hurricanes, but does the hurricane siphon off heat from the Gulf? does the water cool down somewhat after a hurricane?
Here is a map of ocean temperature the red, warm areas create a lot of moisture hence hurricanes and typhonhref=”http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/”>es.
Kathryn in MA
Summer/winter determined by the planets tilt to the sun. During the sunny season ocean water is warmer for the whole season That is what they call hurricane season. That coupled with the conveyor belt linked above gives a picture of how weather develops. There are a lot of other factors too. I hope that gives you some tools to work with.
bigbrother – i love the map in tne link @66.
i was thinking along the lines of the earth trying to ‘cure’ itself, and a hurricane is a means of ‘lowering its temperature.’
You might want to look at the graphic on page 11 of this IPCC report.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessm…..g1-spm.pdf
The paper does not postulate new technologies allowing radical accelerations in the rate at which economic activity may be decoupled from CO2e production. As your comment focused upon “political conclusions” without mentioning alternative technologies in any fashion, the fact the model did not attempt to calculate how these technical factors could affect CO2e output would not appear to lie within the realm of the political conclusions you perceive in the authors’ model.
What follows is a look at what the authors actually say. I heartily recommend this technique to those offering asessments of scientific literature.
In other words, the aspect of the authors’ model dismissed as ”political conclusions” is sufficiently common as to rarely be disregarded by other climate modellers.
Peterr, can you share with us the factual basis that would allow us — and the climate modelling community — to assume that absolute annual carbon mitigation rates greater than 3 percent should be considered viable?
Even if David Axelrod and his band of spin-masters merged with Rove’s minions, does anyone seriously believe they’d persuade Americans to adopt the Soviet Union’s collapse as the cost of controlling global warming?
In the cited paper, the authors describes their climate model’s use of atmospheric chemistry from current conditions and known contributions to that chemistry from human activity and consider possible paths to decreasing the human contributions under the widely shared constriants described as “political conclusions”.
Rather like this:
Peterr, once you have taken the trouble to read the paper cited in the link your inital comment helped me to correct and have become conversant with the material under discussion, I’ll be delighted if you can supply to me, the study authors, and our readers examples of how what you perceive to be “political conclusions” set forth in the model are demonstrably invalid.
Invocations of Axelrod don’t cut it.
Should no such examples be forthcoming, the basis for rejecting this component of the authors’ analysis is not apparent.
i think peterr was just asking questions…. so good on him. and great response, kirk.
Shouldn’t our estimable administration, with its heady whiff of corruption, be called the oily-garchy?
totally agree, selise — thoughtful questions are always good (and often require the most thorough responses :)