Everyone in Canada knew it was coming, and today it happened. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper declared an election (unlike in the US, in Canada the PM can choose when the election happens, up to 5 years after elected.) Harper could continue for a year longer if he chose, but the Canadian economy is taking on water fast, so that would be a bad bet, since incumbents take the blame for a bad economy. Current polls mostly show that the likely outcome of the election is another Conservative minority government, in which Harper would not have control of Parliament and thus not be able to move bills without the cooperation of the opposition.
Harper opened his campaign with a cry for voters in the province of Quebec to ignore the separatist Bloc Quebecois, because they can’t form a government and he can. More pragmatically, a breakthrough in Quebec is Harper’s only realistic shot at getting a full majority. Harper is a hardcore devolutionist—he believes the federal government in Canada is too powerful and involved in areas it doesn’t have the "constitutional" right to be in. (I put that in scare quotes because I think his argument is dubious, and essentially a US talking point repatriated to Canada to allow him what he wants to do anyway.) Since Quebec is always asking for more powers, Harper has a fair bit of appeal there. Sure, Quebec won’t get unique powers that the rest of the provinces don’t, but it’ll still get more power.
Unfortunately for Harper, there are some dead bodies standing between him and the Quebec love and votes he wants—dead Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. Quebec is deeply anti-war, as it has been since Confederation, the majority of Quebecois having been against both World Wars, the Korean war and so on. Quebecois see no reason for Canadian troops to be fighting and dying in Afghanistan, and Harper has made Afghanistan his signature foreign policy issue.
The other parties are all in various forms of disarray. The Liberals, who stand an outside chance of actually beating the Conservatives, have lost a lot of strength in Quebec and have a relatively unpopular leader in Dion. Their green economics plan is popular in some areas of the country but scares resource areas. The NDP are caught between the Liberals on their right flank, and the rising Green party on their, well not exactly left flank, but rear, I suppose. Because Harper is so hated by the left (he’s a neocon in Canadian drag) the NDP stands to lose a good 5% of the population, people who prefer it, who will vote Liberal in fear of a Conservative majority (a reasonable fear, in my mind, but most people will throw their votes away, as in most ridings switching your vote to the Liberals doesn’t help).
The Bloc Quebecois, meanwhile, will come out of this election weaker than it went in. They are almost certainly the hinge party, and in an odd twist of fate, strong federalists like myself, who don’t want to see Harper weaken the federal government, will be cheering the Quebec independence party on. As for the Greens, they need their breakout election, and it’s unclear who they’ll hurt most other than the NDP. There is some reason to believe that their odd version of libertarianism and green policies could actually give disgruntled conservatives (of whom there are quite a few), a place to go.
The stakes in this election are quite high. The "Conservatives" aren’t, they’re a reactionary party which has attempted to apply a version of US Republican philosophy to Canada. They have taken Canada from having a 12 billion dollar surplus, to the edge of deficit, just as the country goes into a recession. Their first reaction to everything, as with Republicans in the US, is "tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts". The conservative party in the election is actually the Liberals (though by US standards they’d be flaming lefties), who managed the country’s finances into multiple consecutive surpluses and paid down the debts. More dangerously than his bungled budgets however, Stephen Harper wants to make significant changes to the Canadian constitution, such as having an elected Senate, which will weaken Canada as a nation and introduce US style gridlock and corruption.
So, personally, all I really care about in this election is that Harper doesn’t get a majority. A minority I can live with but a majority will change what type of country Canada is, into something much more like the United States. As someone whose job it is to watch the US economy and US politics, forgive me dear readers, but that’s an idea which fills me with horror.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Aloha, Ian!
I’d read that Harper dissolved Parliament!
Sigh. What’s backing him up, barrels of money?
Ian, why on earth would any intelligent person in Canada believe that debt, gridlock and a more unitary executive are a good thing after watching what has happened south of US-Canadian border for the last eight years.
OTOH, if Canada does lose it’s mind, would they be interested in taking Scalia, Alito, Thomas and Roberts off our hands? We’ll pay the shipping.
Well, actually, it’d be less unitary executive, along with the rest of it. There are lots of regional grievances that can be played on Canada. A ton.
I’m a Canadian, and I don’t think Harper can get a majority because we loathe him. The only reason he got a minority government is that the Liberal Party had become deeply corrupt from 12 uninterrupted years in power and the Canuck electorate felt they needed to be pruned and sent into the wilderness to eat weeds for a while.
I predict another minority government, and though I would like the NDP to be a bigger player, I believe the Liberals will end up the largest opposition party (with a chance of heading a minority government. Dion has surprised people before, and he could again.
And the electorate in general here are liking minority governments more and more, precisely because they simply can’t do anything too radical, left wing or right wing.
Canada just lost another soldier and 7 wounded in Afghanistan.
-G
Thanks, Ian. I can understand your horror.
I really don’t know much about Canadian politics, so please explain why he would make Afghanistan his signature foreign policy issue. Seems like a risky thing to do. Thanks in advance.
Are they in the requisite pay grade? If not, we should take up a collection.
The upside for Canadians is that they only have to suffer for a little more than a month between the announcement of the election and the event. We to the south envy you as you cannot believe.
True dat.
Would you please explain what it means, drop the writ? I think I figured out the other unfamiliar term, ridings are districts, right?
Ian:
Keep us posted. What’s it like up there? Do a lot of Canadians sense the importance of the elections? Is there any chance Harper can get kicked to the curb?
totally OT, just up at the NYT:
MSNBC Takes Incendiary Hosts From Anchor Seat
leaving only the mediocre dancin’ puppet o’Rove aka David Gregory in the driver’s seat.
I fear the worst for MTP.
Yah. US elections are insane. I have fought against fixed election dates for precisely this reason.
October 14th!
I love the way you Canadians do elections, Ian. I’ve been involved in the USA 2008 election since November 6th 2006.
Suz, if you’re here, I left you a question at the end of the previous thread.
When you give up office, you get a writ of election from the crown (Queen/Governor General). Thus “dropping the writ”.
Canadian elections are extremely regional. The conservative party has a hard core of support. They could lose the election and become the main opposition party (the “official opposition”) though, polls are quite close. However, right now the conservatives seem to have a better chance to break upside than the Libs.
But Canadian elections can be quite volatile, a lot will depend on how good a job the parties do. The election season is brief, so people pay attention.
I was afraid of something like this as soon as I heard that KO had pulled the 9-11 video and apologized for the network even showing it…
Because he really believes in fighting wars, having a strong military and being a good ally to the US (we to his left have less kind words for his relationship with the US.) Harper’s a true believer on a lot of things.
i am aware and saddened by the horrible end to such a happy day. how tragic, please include my sympathies demi
teddy upstairs
Neutered Broadcast Company
Hi Ian, that was a good read, I always wished you’d write more about Canada. I don’t understand something you said about Senate Reform though. I see how an elected Senate would introduce US-style gridlock, but how would it increase corruption?
done.
As a fellow Canadian, I will fight to keep the Conservatives from either a majority or minority government. They have to go.
Glad this election is finally on.
With gratitude,
Heather
Short and sweet…having lived half of my life in each country, I prefer Canada’s way of governing in numerous ways.
More people to buy, without parliamentary style discipline. Right now it’s pointless to buy MPs, depending on how it’s done, Senators could be worth buying.
Pretty good analysis Ian. I’m also rooting for the Bloc in Québec (let’s face it, beside the independence issue, the three opposition parties agendas are quite similar) and I believe they have a good shot at maintaining at least 40 of Québec’s 75. The Grits will get their 15-20 safe ridings (mainly in anglo Montreal and the Outaouais), which would give a maximum 15 to the Cons (+5).
However, I’m pretty worried about the 905 area code, in the suburban Toronto area. With a strong NDP leader (Jack Layton) and a weak Liberal one, I’m am very afraid of three-way splits that could go awry for progressives and give Harper a blank check to implement the Bush agenda in Canada.
…give a blank check? He operates as if he already has one.
…our military being slaughtered in Afghanistan…SPP…
…his head is stuck so far up Bush’s butt that he was probably talking to
those polyps before they were removed…
I figured this was coming, although I had a less clear idea why. I just figured that if they were talking about having an early election, they must have figured the timing was better for some reason. As usual, you’ve clarified things, Ian.
Well, Harper is Cheney Junior, he grants access to selected journalists, every interview is a scaremongering event, the scripts are different in Quebec… If we see Harper on tv, if he says something in print, believe me, it’s always about the next election…
bouchecl@30:
There’s a good chance the cons will win more ridings around Quebec city, in lac St-Jean, and I believe a couple more in Montreal’s suburb. There’s a rash of new families who abdicate in front of those twisted leaderships that are offered by Harper, and Dumont in the provincial arena. Fascism is on the rise.
I’ll be voting for the Bloc Quebecois, even if they stole my nic without asking… hehehe.
Consider this a trackback.