Pollsters and pundits are feverishly trying to discern whether McCain's choice of VP helps his campaign get in gear after a sluggish summer. The bigger story, IMHO, is not its effect on the presidential race, but the down ticket races like US House and state governorships.
Here in Missouri, the home of both Harry "Stop the War Profiteers!" Truman and John "I'm a Homeland Security Lobbyist Now" Ashcroft (and also the senator who holds Truman's seat, Claire "Bring Back HST!" McCaskill [pdf]), the elections are fierce up and down the ticket. Traditionally, the big cities of St. Louis and Kansas City come out for the Democrats, the rural areas come out for the GOP, and the elections turn on turnout. Who can get their own folks pumped up to get to the polls, even in the areas dominated by the other party?
This is where the VP choice will have its biggest impact. According to ABC (with emphasis added),
Given the sharp political divisions she inspires, Palin's initial impact on vote preferences and on views of McCain looks like a wash, and, contrary to some prognostication, she does not draw disproportionate support from women. But she could potentially assist McCain by energizing the GOP base, in which her reviews are overwhelmingly positive.
That "energizing the GOP base" is what has grabbed my attention in Missouri. Pollster.com has data on the races for governor and two US House seats here, some of which is both interesting and problematic.
The governor's race between the GOP's US Representative Kenny Hulshof (MO-09) and Democratic state Attorney General Jay Nixon is very complicated. Sitting Governor Matt Blunt, son of US House Minority Whip Mel Roy Blunt (update: oops!), surprised everyone earlier this year when he suddenly announced that he was NOT running for re-election, despite having spent a lot of energy raising money and keeping any challengers at bay. Perhaps the investigations over the destruction of official emails and the firing of one of Blunt's own lawyers who tried to point out how illegal that was had something to do with that decision.
But I digress . . .
Hulshof and his primary opponent both ran very hard to the right to capture the base, with each trying to out-fundy the other, and ended with a very close finish. The loser (who carried most of the state outside of Hulshof's district, neighboring St. Louis, and parts of SE Missouri where Hulshof grew up) conceded gracefully, which brought sighs of relief to the GOP apparatus across the state. Meanwhile, Nixon's been bashing the GOP all over the state as he gears up his campaign. As you can see from the chart at Pollster.com, in May and June, while the primary battles were running, Nixon had a 20-25 point lead on Hulshof, in the "if the pairing in Nov is . . ." polls (not terribly valid, but that's all you can do in primary season), which by mid-August (after the primary but before the Dem convention) had dropped to 6 point lead.
Which leads us to the first of those two US House races -- Hulshof's 9th District seat, which covers blue-leaning Columbia (home to the U of Missouri) , dips south a bit (but skirts the state capitol in Jefferson City), reaches east to the western suburbs of St. Louis, and extends north up to Iowa. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R) was trailing Judy Baker (D) just slightly in July (within the margin of error), but by Sept 1-2 had opened up a 12 point lead.
On the other side of the state in northwest Missouri is the 6th District, which includes the northern Kansas City and it suburbs and goes up to Iowa. GOP incumbent Sam Graves is running against former Kansas City mayor Kay Barnes, and the race here is very close. Graves had a slight 4 point lead in the last poll, taken at the end of July.
It's too soon for any serious polling to try to quantify how much the selection of Palin will bolster the GOP prospects in these three races, but I have no doubts that it has done exactly that. It probably will pull the Governor's race into a tie when the next polls come out, and push the two house races toward the GOP as well.
Whatever happens with the Obama/McCain race, it's in races like these three that Palin will have her biggest effect on the election this November. The rightwing loves her, and in races and districts like these where the GOP is fighting desperately to defend their seats, that TheoCon love may be what keeps them in the GOP column.
But the pushback is under way as well. Just today, the KC Star noted a countermove by Claire McCaskill to bring fellow Senators Jon Tester and Jim Webb to Missouri to campaign on Barnes' behalf. They should both play well in the 9th district.
Of course, that's my guess "if the election were held today." The way the news is going, a lot can change very quickly. But don't underestimate the effect of this nomination. The TheoCons love Palin, and she'll bring them out to vote in ways that McCain alone could only dream of doing, making life more difficult for Democrats like Nixon, Baker, and Barnes in the process. Now, more than ever, we need to put attention on the down ticket races.
Ever heard of this little thing called "Blue America"?
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Aloha, Peterr!
Peterr & Ct how goes it??
Kinda sad really to think that an adulterous wife-abandoning scandal-ridden Senator who picks a book-banning power-abusing premarital sex practicing and passin’ on Governor would be the darlings of the “family values” GOP.
Go figure.
Aloha!
How’d you like *your* governor’s speech at the GOP convention?
I’m doing alright! Al da Spook wants me to cross post my latest post over at the Beach House… Waiting on him for the keys…! ;-)
OK Pups I opened the Digg for ya… So go ahead and DIGG IT!!
I’m going to be in and out here, folks . . . got some family stuff to deal with.
Read that earlier today… Great post ”’ bush screwing it up again… Shit won’t he learn he is toast and just go away??
I keep telling you, Palin is very bad for the Ds. And they will underestimate her influence at their peril.
I was groaning throughout with all the comparisons to Palin… Interestingly, I think Lingle would’ve been a much better pick as Veep… Maui is a lot bigger county and she’s been Guv a lot longer too…!
Here’s a song to energize that base!
Ding!
Of course, that’s my guess “if the election were held today.” The way the news is going, a lot can change very quickly.
Mentioned this downstairs. First Dood’s former business partner filed an emergency Motion today to seal the records of his divorce.
And yes, by golly, that *is* the guy “some people” are saying Mrs. Palin had an extra-marital affair with.
Gary Hart just leapt to mind. Odd, that.
Link?
Unless a D funded 527 gets pointed with facts prairie sunshine raises.. and jayt. We may just find your warning to be all to true. She’s a nasty book banning bully. Only way I know how to take a bully down a notch is to swing back.
Righto. And when was the last time a D swung back?
You can digg it if you want:
http://m.digg.com/politics/Pal.....rce_Papers
I’m trying to stay out of this shit but just when I think I’ve made a clean break the lure of the puerile sends out its sirens call.
Link?
I was gonna just post a link to Andrew Sullivan’s blog, but the link within *his* small article is more interesting.
(guess I was wrong - looks like the “emergency” seems to have begun erupting two days ago)
http://www.courtrecords.alaska.....t?68762762
The media would have loved that.
“Hey, Editor, I’ve got to chase down this lead on a story on the Veep. Can you sign this travel voucher to Hawaii? It shouldn’t take me more than a couple of weeks.”
Gee ET Rachel is on for Keith and you haven’t bonkers… whats with that???
I’m trying to stay out of this shit but just when I think I’ve made a clean break the lure of the puerile sends out its sirens call.
yep. I agreed this morning when someone said that the best strategy re Mrs. Palin is to just plain ignore her.
BUT, later in the morning, there she was, on my teevee again, repeating lies and insults to a crowd in Wisconsin, and now I’m all conflicted again.
I just don’t do “turn the other cheek” very well. Mebbe I should, but I yam what I yam.
Obama’s pivot to stronger choice language was very encouraging. Should help those who know their candidate/party has their back on the issue.
I was taking the high rode this morning too, saying it was just “National Enquirer” material…the best thing to do with Sarah Palin is to ignore her (as much as that obnoxious voice would allow for anyway).
My lovely bride then dropped this lovely little tidbit on me, “You know, the only person to ever successfully sue the National Enquirer for slander was Carrol Burnette and she was given damages of a single dollar.
So, if that’s true, I guess the NE has got a little street cred. The goopers certainly thought so when John Edwards were in their sights.
According to wiki CBS & The New York Times did a poll and these are the percentages of people by groups who think abortion should be illegal.
Group “Not permitted”
Overall 22%
Women 24%
Men 20%
Democrats 21%
Republicans 28%
Independents 18%
Northeasterners 19%
Midwesterners 25%
Southerners 25%
Westerners 16%
The rest believe abortion should be either “Generally available” or “Available, but with stricter limits than now”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.....ted_States
Hmmmm, from your link: initial filing for divorce for First Dood’s business partner: July 24, 2007.
Now, jump to March 6, 2008:
Let’s see, March 6, 2008 is “about seven months” after July 24, 2007.
Can’t wait for what those National Enquirer reporters find….
It was a 2003 poll.
Wow.
The Washington Week, Jeanne ?, (can’t remember her last name) did a great arguement on the press right/obligation to do the investigation about Palin, the right & need to know, she has been brought into the arena…really good points about the Party who has brought her forward into heart beat next to the President. Very effective with the added opinion that it is also evident that the press now working the story are not going into ground that has been well-vetted as would ordinarily be the case.
geez, jay - read your own links.
From the court records link at my #18, above:
09/04/2008 Order Denying Motion Case Motion #3: Motion to Make Case File Confidential
ET lives in Mrs. Palin’s home-town, right?
Time for some quick viewing of public records, methinks.
Today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEfwX6WWsKY
Joe Biden provides a textbook example on how to stop the insanity. Should be required viewing for all Dems.
Truly mind-boggling how hypocritical and easily-led modern day Repubs are, isn’t it? Certainly makes one wonder about the future of this this country that such a large part of the electorate can be so misguided. Sad.
Peterr-
I thought he was Roy Blunt, not Mel Blunt.
VG image for you to check out, which a made ages ago. Blunt at the drycleaners.
http://i8.photobucket.com/albu.....s_0001.jpg
Isn’t he great ! That’s a wonderful speech. He’s OUR pitbull.
Bill Moyers has Kathleen Hall Jamison commmenting on the Palin choice…can’t wait. She is most always really sharp.
It’s a start.
Aacckk!
Somehow, I think I got Mel Blanc and Roy Blunt mashed into Mel Blunt.
Thanks!
I’m always anxiously awaiting Bill Moyers every Friday nite…! *sigh* I’ve got another 6 hours to wait…! *g*
I just watched CNN’s interview with the brother-in-law, Wooten. He divorced in 2005 and has already married and divorced, his fourth. My opinion is that he’s not the type of person I would want to have over for dinner but Sarah is not the type, I would want to befriend because of her vindictaness. What is in the water up there? I certainly do not want to offend anyone by my comment, but these are two are not good examples.
Must be tough sitting out on the lanai for 6 hours like that, CT.
*G*
You’re quite welcome! I thought the Blunt house of cards was gonna collapse long before now. And thus, I made the image.
Did you look?
Ha!
Gotta save that one for the top of another post.
Jamison says Palin had the 2 strains, incompatible, as the Maverick and the fundie, very conservative; let alone hhow these differ with McSame, who has been reliably prolife.
Not off limits to question her qualifications re. President; raises the age issue in subtle way as did the house question: couldn’t remember.
Peterr, an excellent question to consider. I have no idea what’s happening anywhere else in the country, but just where I work (where I’m notorious as either the “tame Democrat” or, my preference, “the office crypto-Commie”) I now have 3 or 4 people relying on me for their political education. Two (both black women) had not been registered to vote until Obama came onto the scene. Both of them came to me worried about what they had heard Caribou Barbie say about Obama. They simply couldn’t grasp the concept that people could get up in front of God, the Convention, and 20 million people and lie their asses off. Now they know. They’ve been given the fact checks on McCaint’s speech too. Now that they’re safely wrangled up ticket I’ll start on exposing the down-ticket liars. We may have to fight this one person at a time, but it’s worth the fight.
Heh, Touche’…! I zedded on a draft by Eli…! Somebody goofed…!
Oh, feel free! I do miss the snarky visuals at FDL.
The Blunts had pretty much gone off my radar of late. At one time, I was hoping/ thinking that Blunt Sr. would be brought down by the Abramoff connections (which I can’t remember right now). Silly me!
Hi Marion- I do fear, however, that Palin is gonna bring the fundie zealots out to vote in GA. Looked at one point that Obama might have a chance, but…
I was truly disappointed McCain didn’t take little boy Blunt from us. I was really surprised by the SurveyUSA poll, but taken with the results for the top of the ticket in MO from the same poll, I’d wager that there was an oversampling of R’s in the poll. Hopefully this will motivate the Dems to come out in November, and to GOTV between now and then. Actually, I think the best chance for a dem pickup in MO-9 and for Obama will be for the polling to show a small lead for the R’s.
With all this investigative digging there’s hope yet that some day America will have relatively truthful political candidates…because they’ll have no choice.
Dems, progressives and all those who are of the 21st Century and not the 19th Century cannot expect that “scandals” and “corruption” are going to sink the Republicans. The U.S. has endured 8 years of scandals and corruption with hardly anyone being held accountable (with the exception of Abramhoff and Duke Cunningham). Americans have become so inured that they just shrug their collective shoulders. Don’t count on the “wheels of justice” to give the Republicans what they so richly deserve. The wheels of justice move exceedingly slow, if at all, for the wealthy and well connected.