<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s Acceptance Speech: Shameless Hypocrisy and Narcissism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:15:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: slouching</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616949</link>
		<dc:creator>slouching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Jim Lehrer is a republican. He is very good friends with Alan Greenspan. Gwen Ifill is very good friends w/Condi Rice.  They are Washington insiders, not journalists.I don’t watch The Newshour anymore. The only thing I watch on Public TV is Bill Moyers and Now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jim Lehrer is a republican. He is very good friends with Alan Greenspan. Gwen Ifill is very good friends w/Condi Rice.  They are Washington insiders, not journalists.I don’t watch The Newshour anymore. The only thing I watch on Public TV is Bill Moyers and Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unrepentantliberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616706</link>
		<dc:creator>Unrepentantliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Naw, he was Charles Keating’s man.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naw, he was Charles Keating’s man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacqrat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616665</link>
		<dc:creator>jacqrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope someone records that and runs it in every obama ad they can.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ALso, please tell me someone got the video of Mrs. Greenspan being pelted by balloons as she tries to make a report from the convention floor!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope someone records that and runs it in every obama ad they can.</p>
<p>ALso, please tell me someone got the video of Mrs. Greenspan being pelted by balloons as she tries to make a report from the convention floor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libbyliberal</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616637</link>
		<dc:creator>libbyliberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the patriarchal daddy leaders and the enthralled good “crony” children.  Xenophobic — Fear of otherness.  B/W thinking.  Fer us or agin us.  Critical thinking not encouraged.  Warm fuzzy codependency!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the patriarchal daddy leaders and the enthralled good “crony” children.  Xenophobic — Fear of otherness.  B/W thinking.  Fer us or agin us.  Critical thinking not encouraged.  Warm fuzzy codependency!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftdcin72</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616614</link>
		<dc:creator>leftdcin72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616614</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;say that to John Edwards and the Clintons&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>say that to John Edwards and the Clintons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonkers</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616608</link>
		<dc:creator>bonkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616608</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Obama’s strategy has been brilliant so far on so many fronts, that being one.  They’ve also anticipated a lot of the problems, and have had an unprecedented program in place for a while now to get lawyers pro-actively working on vote integrity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From their press release a couple of months ago:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a year that will likely see unprecedented turnout, we can’t afford to let our guard down. The stakes could not be higher. This election has to be different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s why the Obama Voter Protection Program has already launched, earlier than ever before, and will be the most comprehensive voter protection program in our nation’s history, with counsel in 50 states and a vote protection team on the ground now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.barackobama.com/VoterProtection&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://my.barackobama.com/VoterProtection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like much of what Obama has done so far, they keep this stuff under the radar, which is also very smart.  While Repubs will have some success with voter suppression since it all happens so quickly and they’re damn good at it, we’ll be able to stop more than ever before.  Gotta stay vigilant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Obama’s strategy has been brilliant so far on so many fronts, that being one.  They’ve also anticipated a lot of the problems, and have had an unprecedented program in place for a while now to get lawyers pro-actively working on vote integrity.</p>
<p>From their press release a couple of months ago:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a year that will likely see unprecedented turnout, we can’t afford to let our guard down. The stakes could not be higher. This election has to be different.</p>
<p>That’s why the Obama Voter Protection Program has already launched, earlier than ever before, and will be the most comprehensive voter protection program in our nation’s history, with counsel in 50 states and a vote protection team on the ground now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://my.barackobama.com/VoterProtection" rel="nofollow">http://my.barackobama.com/VoterProtection</a></p>
<p>Like much of what Obama has done so far, they keep this stuff under the radar, which is also very smart.  While Repubs will have some success with voter suppression since it all happens so quickly and they’re damn good at it, we’ll be able to stop more than ever before.  Gotta stay vigilant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cujo359</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616604</link>
		<dc:creator>Cujo359</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616604</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You’re right, Scarecrow. “Shameless” is the right word. Not only is he shameless in exploiting the sort of experience that many veterans don’t talk about at all, but he’s shamelessly given up his principles in the last few years (such as they were) to get one last shot at the Presidency.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be sad if we all weren’t along for the ride.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right, Scarecrow. “Shameless” is the right word. Not only is he shameless in exploiting the sort of experience that many veterans don’t talk about at all, but he’s shamelessly given up his principles in the last few years (such as they were) to get one last shot at the Presidency.</p>
<p>It would be sad if we all weren’t along for the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleanth</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616600</link>
		<dc:creator>cleanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616600</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I LOVE you for using the correct grammar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the correct grammar in present-day UISA can be dangerous to ones health and peace of mind, opening one to ridicule.  All-too many people think that the proper usage is wrong and the user an ignoramus!  Sometimes one must write “[sic]” to reinforce that ones usage is indeed correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example: Why is the &lt;em&gt;present perfect&lt;/em&gt; tense so little used in the USA now? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Most often an egregious error. For example (but this failing is nearly ubiquitous among present speakers/writers of English hereabouts), Bush &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; says things such as “We &lt;em&gt;got to&lt;/em&gt;…; They &lt;em&gt;got to&lt;/em&gt; understand….”  The correct forms are clearly &lt;em&gt;“We have got to…; They have got to….”&lt;/em&gt;  Bush is hardly alone in this misusage, and even the MSM are now adopting such deplorably ignorant grammar. Alas, use of this vitally important tense is little understood in recent American (USA) usage, judging from current examples of speaking and writing. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Try this mini quiz:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grandmother always baked the Thanksgiving pies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Question 1:&lt;/strong&gt; Is grandmother alive or dead as of that sentence?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grandmother has always baked our Thanksgiving Day pies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Question 2:&lt;/strong&gt; Is Grandmother alive or dead as of the time of that sentence?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Answers on application, if needed/desired.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I LOVE you for using the correct grammar</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Using the correct grammar in present-day UISA can be dangerous to ones health and peace of mind, opening one to ridicule.  All-too many people think that the proper usage is wrong and the user an ignoramus!  Sometimes one must write “[sic]” to reinforce that ones usage is indeed correct.</p>
<blockquote><p>Example: Why is the <em>present perfect</em> tense so little used in the USA now? </p>
</blockquote>
<p> Most often an egregious error. For example (but this failing is nearly ubiquitous among present speakers/writers of English hereabouts), Bush <em>always</em> says things such as “We <em>got to</em>…; They <em>got to</em> understand….”  The correct forms are clearly <em>“We have got to…; They have got to….”</em>  Bush is hardly alone in this misusage, and even the MSM are now adopting such deplorably ignorant grammar. Alas, use of this vitally important tense is little understood in recent American (USA) usage, judging from current examples of speaking and writing. </p>
<p><strong>Try this mini quiz:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Grandmother always baked the Thanksgiving pies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Question 1:</strong> Is grandmother alive or dead as of that sentence?</p>
<blockquote><p>Grandmother has always baked our Thanksgiving Day pies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Question 2:</strong> Is Grandmother alive or dead as of the time of that sentence?</p>
<p>Answers on application, if needed/desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymccurnin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616589</link>
		<dc:creator>marymccurnin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616589</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and lots of Perseveration .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and lots of Perseveration .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanGorilla</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616574</link>
		<dc:creator>UrbanGorilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/09/04/mccains-acceptance-speech-shameless-narcissism/#comment-1616574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;McInsane will be able to keep it too close for comfort it seems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that worries me too.  If it’s close enough for the Diebold coup, it’ll be a mess again.  The only thing I can say to that is that Obama has changed the map and there might not be the right operatives in the right swing states this time.  Karl’s magic spreadsheet showed them to get the goons to Ohio and Florida; but if it ends up being all the states West of the Mississippi, that’s a lot of goons, baby!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McInsane will be able to keep it too close for comfort it seems.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that worries me too.  If it’s close enough for the Diebold coup, it’ll be a mess again.  The only thing I can say to that is that Obama has changed the map and there might not be the right operatives in the right swing states this time.  Karl’s magic spreadsheet showed them to get the goons to Ohio and Florida; but if it ends up being all the states West of the Mississippi, that’s a lot of goons, baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
