Comments on: Ned Lamont Does “We Were F*&#ing Right” Tour of Big Tent

By: RevDeb

RevDeb — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:22:06 +0000

Amen to what you said, Jane.

F*cking Joe has got to go. The only thing better than him being on the ticket is his having to return to the Sentate twice defeated for veep. Where will he go? Who will care?

delicious.

By: plunger

plunger — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:00:23 +0000

Lieberman = Dangerous

Don’t forget - these NeoConvicts have demonstrated that they are willing to do virtually anything (including murder) to seize/retain power.

Sexpionage, blackmail, false flag attacks and assassination. ANYTHING. There is a cohort for whom the thought of a “President Lieberman” is just too delicious to pass up. If they are willing to do virtually ANYTHING to make it happen, take off your moral filter and see their version of reality for what it is. They not only know where all the bodies are buried, they have it all on audio tape, video tape and still photos. They know all the co-conspirators by name and the numbers of their foreign banks accounts. They have their own dark ways of accomplishing change that are described by our own defense department as:

Ruthless and cunning.

http://www.newsmax.com/archive.....4826.shtml

http://www.washington-report.o.....07043.html

http://cryptome.org/dea-il-spy.htm

http://cryptome.org/fox-il-spy.htm

By: NelsonAlgren

NelsonAlgren — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:09:00 +0000

As a part shot .. even these Californians hate Slummy Joe:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08.....ref=slogin

By: Cujo359

Cujo359 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:06:21 +0000

Since I didn’t hear the speech, either, it’s hard for me to judge, but it seems possible she was going for symbolism. As in “I’m on the campaign trail, and now it’s to support this guy”. If the speech didn’t match that message, it might not have made sense, but from this article that’s the impression I got.

Obama has had some problem attracting Clinton supporters. Tying an old visual symbol to a new purpose seems like a good idea.

By: Larue

Larue — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:05:00 +0000

And run the slide show to get a real overall perspective of how she looked in the outfit.

One pic alone doth not a true picture tell . . . *G*

By: newtonusr

newtonusr — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:03:47 +0000

I thought she looked great.

By: Larue

Larue — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:03:02 +0000

I’m not a fashion cop, but I thought the orange/persimmon? was STRONG! VIBRANT!

And it matched the flawless delivery she gave . . . her complexion and hair suit what she wore, too.

But I’m not a fashion cop and I have NO training in said matters . . . *G*

I DO know what I like . . . though. *G*

By: Suzanne

Suzanne — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:01:12 +0000

pirate radio upstairs

By: Loo Hoo.

Loo Hoo. — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:00:33 +0000

Not that, Suz linked to the outfit she wore tonight. I just don’t like it. I think she should have worn something special tonight. A long dress would have been nice, knowing that she likes to cover her legs. She’s been boring in her clothes, trivial as this seems. Check Michelle’s astute taste.

By: Suzanne

Suzanne — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:58:37 +0000

i thought so too – it looked good to me