Comments on: Breaking: Judge May Hold CIA In Contempt For Destruction Of Evidence http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:55:29 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: T-Bear http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587647 T-Bear Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:47:41 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587647 <p>I will try to do better with that. I do agree with your stance earlier. Here is my reply FWIW as well</p> <p><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/limericks-of-the-damned/#comment-1587229" rel="nofollow">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08.....nt-1587229</a></p> <blockquote><p>It is just my opinion, but there are soooo many lies, flip/flops, delusions with which to cast light on a sad, delusional, wrinkled old has been, not even that, a never was, it is counter-productive to even go there. Leave alone the only thing the man ever did on his own, it is the only thing he has to show for his life, everything else has been handed him. His is not even a full life, his riches belong to another, his position bought for through fraudulent supporters. When he does have to account for his life, he will have precious little in the balance. He hasn’t a shadow to cast of his own.</p></blockquote> I will try to do better with that. I do agree with your stance earlier. Here is my reply FWIW as well

http://firedoglake.com/2008/08…..nt-1587229

It is just my opinion, but there are soooo many lies, flip/flops, delusions with which to cast light on a sad, delusional, wrinkled old has been, not even that, a never was, it is counter-productive to even go there. Leave alone the only thing the man ever did on his own, it is the only thing he has to show for his life, everything else has been handed him. His is not even a full life, his riches belong to another, his position bought for through fraudulent supporters. When he does have to account for his life, he will have precious little in the balance. He hasn’t a shadow to cast of his own.

]]> By: selise http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587645 selise Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:42:44 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587645 <p>( dakine01 )</p> <p>and howdy to citizen norske.</p> <p>now back to chores for me! gotta come back here and check the goings on every little while though *g*</p> ( dakine01 )

and howdy to citizen norske.

now back to chores for me! gotta come back here and check the goings on every little while though *g*

]]> By: selise http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587644 selise Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:40:35 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587644 <p>got it. thanks, that’s good news. can always use some of that.</p> got it. thanks, that’s good news. can always use some of that.

]]> By: ratfood http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587643 ratfood Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:40:04 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587643 <p>At 75, she’s probably somewhat prone to edema anyway. Also, with the combined factors of age, injury, and the fact that she spends most of her time at lower elevations, being in Denver could prove a bit of a trial.</p> At 75, she’s probably somewhat prone to edema anyway. Also, with the combined factors of age, injury, and the fact that she spends most of her time at lower elevations, being in Denver could prove a bit of a trial.

]]> By: dakine01 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587641 dakine01 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:39:07 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587641 <p>Please accept my apologies for my erroneous assumptions.</p> <p>I made those assumptions as some folks earlier today DID attempt to link to the DU articles on Vietnam Vets Against McCain.</p> <p>May I make the suggestion that when you are trying to link something, put a little bit of a description on what the topic is into your comment so that folks can know what they are looking for when there are link problems.</p> <p>Might have saved us both some “agro”</p> Please accept my apologies for my erroneous assumptions.

I made those assumptions as some folks earlier today DID attempt to link to the DU articles on Vietnam Vets Against McCain.

May I make the suggestion that when you are trying to link something, put a little bit of a description on what the topic is into your comment so that folks can know what they are looking for when there are link problems.

Might have saved us both some “agro”

]]> By: T-Bear http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587638 T-Bear Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:37:30 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587638 <p>Thanx Norske ;-)</p> Thanx Norske ;-)

]]> By: T-Bear http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587636 T-Bear Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:36:39 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587636 <p>My apologies the link at #43</p> <p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/18/BA2212DEQU.DTL" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....12DEQU.DTL</a></p> My apologies the link at #43

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/…..12DEQU.DTL

]]> By: NorskeFlamethrower http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587635 NorskeFlamethrower Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:35:11 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587635 <p>Citizen selise:</p> <p>Bless yer heart…I too like ta follow up on other citizens’ info…sometimes this place gets a bit “clubby”, it’s understandable but we need ta watch out for it.</p> Citizen selise:

Bless yer heart…I too like ta follow up on other citizens’ info…sometimes this place gets a bit “clubby”, it’s understandable but we need ta watch out for it.

]]> By: T-Bear http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587633 T-Bear Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:34:14 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587633 <p>Please go to my # 43 above, it is the SFGate that the DU was citing. Re: The 9th Circuit of Appeals has allowed people on the no fly list to question the government as to why and also to get a jury to remove them from the list. Pay no attention to dakine01’s assumptions, they are not worth the agro.</p> Please go to my # 43 above, it is the SFGate that the DU was citing. Re: The 9th Circuit of Appeals has allowed people on the no fly list to question the government as to why and also to get a jury to remove them from the list. Pay no attention to dakine01’s assumptions, they are not worth the agro.

]]> By: selise http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587624 selise Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:28:18 +0000 http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/19/breaking-judge-may-hold-cia-in-contempt-for-destruction-of-evidence/#comment-1587624 <p>personally, i find the info brought here by commenters at least as interesting as the front page posts (which are what brought me here in the first place).</p> <p>i also checked t-bear’s link and was disappointed not to get something that t-bear though important enough to share.</p> personally, i find the info brought here by commenters at least as interesting as the front page posts (which are what brought me here in the first place).

i also checked t-bear’s link and was disappointed not to get something that t-bear though important enough to share.

]]>