<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama and McCain Move Towards Drilling Compromise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:49:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Synoia</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567743</link>
		<dc:creator>Synoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567743</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its clever because it take a point of attack off the table. You are dreaming if you believe this drilling will happen in anyone here’s lifetime. The oidl is more valuable in the ground, sorry under the ocean.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An there are no drill ships available for over 5 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its clever because it take a point of attack off the table. You are dreaming if you believe this drilling will happen in anyone here’s lifetime. The oidl is more valuable in the ground, sorry under the ocean.</p>
<p>An there are no drill ships available for over 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohbytheway</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567736</link>
		<dc:creator>ohbytheway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From what I’ve read, this offshore drilling wouldn’t even be profitable so let them have their off shore drilling.  Who will they pump the oil to — no refineries available.  This sounds like a phirric victory for the Republicans and the Democrates get improved efficiency standsrds and support for alternative fuels.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I’ve read, this offshore drilling wouldn’t even be profitable so let them have their off shore drilling.  Who will they pump the oil to — no refineries available.  This sounds like a phirric victory for the Republicans and the Democrates get improved efficiency standsrds and support for alternative fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muzzy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567692</link>
		<dc:creator>Muzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567692</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a smart approach by Obama as well.  The prize to keep your eye on is improved efficiency standards and promoting alternatives.  Big oil would MUCH rather have that shelved than to have more offshore sites opened for lease.  Clamoring to lift restrictions on offshore sites is a way to shift eyeballs away from ambitious goals for improved efficiency without openly opposing it.  In other words, for goopers, it’s better to talk positively about something that won’t work than to talk about nothing, or worse, talk negatively about something that makes good sense -efficiency and alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a smart approach by Obama as well.  The prize to keep your eye on is improved efficiency standards and promoting alternatives.  Big oil would MUCH rather have that shelved than to have more offshore sites opened for lease.  Clamoring to lift restrictions on offshore sites is a way to shift eyeballs away from ambitious goals for improved efficiency without openly opposing it.  In other words, for goopers, it’s better to talk positively about something that won’t work than to talk about nothing, or worse, talk negatively about something that makes good sense -efficiency and alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarecrow</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567684</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarecrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567684</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks; that’s very helpful background.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks; that’s very helpful background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badwater</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567682</link>
		<dc:creator>Badwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At the end of the Clinton Administration, nearly all Republics were apoplectic about releasing oil from the strategic oil reserves because of price jumps then.  Now, they are strangely quiet.  Is it possible that the Republics put Party before Country?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the Clinton Administration, nearly all Republics were apoplectic about releasing oil from the strategic oil reserves because of price jumps then.  Now, they are strangely quiet.  Is it possible that the Republics put Party before Country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567678</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i think a couple of my comments got lost in the toobz.  just wanted to say thanks for your take. i’ve had way too little sleep and not enough coffee to come up with my own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think a couple of my comments got lost in the toobz.  just wanted to say thanks for your take. i’ve had way too little sleep and not enough coffee to come up with my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567676</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;definitely worth listening to the video uptop&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely worth listening to the video uptop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wasabi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567674</link>
		<dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567674</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s the scoop on offshore drilling…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is NO INFRASTRUCURE built to handle offshore drilling in these new locations.  To get oil out from the continental shelf at the west coast of Florida for example, new underground pipelines need to be laid.  Then, there needs to be land-based infrastructure along the Florida coast that holds the oil.  Floridians need to take a little tour of the Texas/Louisiana coast to appreciate the beauty (sights and smells) of having refineries/oil depots dotting the coastline.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it should be left up to the states to decide how they want to proceed.  For now, Floridians think they want to drill offshore, but in all likelihood, the cost/benefit ratio of drilling offshore will not be in their favor.  It’s an issue that with time, the electorate will understand what is at risk and what is to be gained.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oil companies stock value is related to their known reserves.  The more reserves they have on the books, the greater the value.  That doesn’t mean that they are ever going to exploit the leases.  They would like to have these leases added to their portfolio though.  Looks good to the shareholders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is an example of what is required to get one deep-sea offshore drilling rig online.&lt;br /&gt;
- Do sisemic testing to evaluate the potential for oil.  (year or better)&lt;br /&gt;
- Partner with other oil companies to shoulder the risk.&lt;br /&gt;
- Order rig.  The existing available drill ships are booked solid for the next 5 years.  If you want to build a new drill ship, then you can put your name on the list and wait 6 years at a minimum for it to be built.  All shipyards are running at capacity right now.&lt;br /&gt;
- Tow the drill ship to it’s new location  (3 months)&lt;br /&gt;
- Build local infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;
- Begin testing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The largest drill platform in the Gulf of Mexico has been working on getting up for the past 2 years, and it has not produced a drop of oil yet.  It had some Hurricane Dennis damage, and some structural design issues that needed to be worked through.  The discovery well was drilled in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
From start to finish (and it’s not quite there yet) the process has taken over 9 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the scoop on offshore drilling…</p>
<p>There is NO INFRASTRUCURE built to handle offshore drilling in these new locations.  To get oil out from the continental shelf at the west coast of Florida for example, new underground pipelines need to be laid.  Then, there needs to be land-based infrastructure along the Florida coast that holds the oil.  Floridians need to take a little tour of the Texas/Louisiana coast to appreciate the beauty (sights and smells) of having refineries/oil depots dotting the coastline.  </p>
<p>I think it should be left up to the states to decide how they want to proceed.  For now, Floridians think they want to drill offshore, but in all likelihood, the cost/benefit ratio of drilling offshore will not be in their favor.  It’s an issue that with time, the electorate will understand what is at risk and what is to be gained.  </p>
<p>Oil companies stock value is related to their known reserves.  The more reserves they have on the books, the greater the value.  That doesn’t mean that they are ever going to exploit the leases.  They would like to have these leases added to their portfolio though.  Looks good to the shareholders.</p>
<p>Here is an example of what is required to get one deep-sea offshore drilling rig online.<br />
- Do sisemic testing to evaluate the potential for oil.  (year or better)<br />
- Partner with other oil companies to shoulder the risk.<br />
- Order rig.  The existing available drill ships are booked solid for the next 5 years.  If you want to build a new drill ship, then you can put your name on the list and wait 6 years at a minimum for it to be built.  All shipyards are running at capacity right now.<br />
- Tow the drill ship to it’s new location  (3 months)<br />
- Build local infrastructure<br />
- Begin testing</p>
<p>The largest drill platform in the Gulf of Mexico has been working on getting up for the past 2 years, and it has not produced a drop of oil yet.  It had some Hurricane Dennis damage, and some structural design issues that needed to be worked through.  The discovery well was drilled in 1999.<br />
From start to finish (and it’s not quite there yet) the process has taken over 9 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567671</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But perris, that’s part of the problem; to paraphrase Mr Rumsfeld a bit, we’re dealing with the poll that &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; not that poll that &lt;em&gt;should be&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But perris, that’s part of the problem; to paraphrase Mr Rumsfeld a bit, we’re dealing with the poll that <em>is</em> not that poll that <em>should be</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perris</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567668</link>
		<dc:creator>perris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/04/obama-and-mccain-move-towards-drilling-compromise/#comment-1567668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;if we consider politics you might be right, however the politics now are surely favoring this direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;reagan was possibly more damaging over all then bush and this is one of the reasons&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in any event, the new licensing is no stop gap until they exploit their existing license, and believe me, even republicans agree with that point, they just don’t know that point exists&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if we consider politics you might be right, however the politics now are surely favoring this direction.</p>
<p>reagan was possibly more damaging over all then bush and this is one of the reasons</p>
<p>in any event, the new licensing is no stop gap until they exploit their existing license, and believe me, even republicans agree with that point, they just don’t know that point exists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
