This week Dr. Ronald Heberman -- director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Center -- released a memo warning staff and faculty of health risks that may be connected with cell phone use. In May researchers from UCLA and Denmark analyzing data from a vast 13,000 person study reported cell phone use in pregnancy seriously elevated the risk of behavioral problems and diagnoses. In March an award-winning UK neurosurgeon warned that the impact of brain cancer associated with mobile phones may be more dangerous than asbestos and smoking. In January a study sponsored by the cell phone industry itself found cell phone radiation delays and reduces sleep and causes headaches and confusion. Last October, the journal Occupational Environmental Medicine published findings that people who have had the phones for a decade or more are twice as likely to get a malignant tumour on the side of the brain where they hold the handset.
The scientists who conducted the research say using a mobile for just an hour every working day during that period is enough to increase the risk - and that the international standard used to protect users from the radiation emitted is "not safe" and "needs to be revised".
What to do? Well, last September the European Environment Agency called for immediate action to reduce exposure to Wi-Fi, cell phones, and cellular masts. A few weeks before, Germany's Environment Ministry warned citizens to avoid using Wi-Fi and use landlines instead of mobile phones. Earlier in 2007 the French government "warned against use of mobile phones, esecially in children". Just a Western Europe thing? Nope.
The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection says that use of the phones by both pregnant women and children should be "limited".
Remember Dr Heberman? He directs the University of Pittsburgh's [National Cancer Institute (NCI) - designated] Comprehensive Cancer Center. Along with twenty-one other international experts, he drafted The Case For Precaution In Cell Phone Use: the report released on Wednesday.
The report gives us ten practical recommendations to reduce cell phone risks:
Practical Advice to Limit Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted from Cell Phones
1. Do not allow children to use a cell phone, except for emergencies. The developing organs of a fetus or child are the most likely to be sensitive to any possible effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields.
2. While communicating using your cell phone, try to keep the cell phone away from the body as much as possible. The amplitude of the electromagnetic field is one fourth the strength at a distance of two inches and fifty times lower at three feet. Whenever possible, use the speaker-phone mode or a wireless Bluetooth headset, which has less than 1/100th of the electromagnetic emission of a normal cell phone. Use of a hands-free ear piece attachment may also reduce exposures.
3. Avoid using your cell phone in places, like a bus, where you can passively expose others to your phone's electromagnetic fields.
4. Avoid carrying your cell phone on your body at all times. Do not keep it near your body at night such as under the pillow or on a bedside table, particularly if pregnant. You can also put it on "flight" or "off-line" mode, which stops electromagnetic emissions.
5. If you must carry your cell phone on you, make sure that the keypad is positioned toward your body and the back is positioned toward the outside so that the transmitted electromagnetic fields move away from your rather than through you.
6. Only use your cell phone to establish contact or for conversations lasting a few minutes, as the biological effects are directly related to the duration of exposure.
For longer conversations, use a land line with a corded phone, not a cordless phone, which uses electromagnetic emitting technology similar to that of cell phones.7. Switch sides regularly while communicating on your cell phone to spread out your exposure. Before putting your cell phone to the ear, wait until your correspondent has picked up. This limits the power of the electromagnetic field emitted near your ear and the duration of your exposure.
8. Avoid using your cell phone when the signal is weak or when moving at high speed, such as in a car or train, as this automatically increases power to a maximum as the phone repeatedly attempts to connect to a new relay antenna.
9. When possible, communicate via text messaging rather than making a call, limiting the duration of exposure and the proximity to the body.
10. Choose a device with the lowest SAR possible (SAR = Specific Absorption Rate, which is a measure of the strength of the magnetic field absorbed by the body). SAR ratings of contemporary phones by different manufacturers are available by searching for "sar ratings cell phones" on the internet.
What motivates Dr. Heberman to and his peers to warn us? According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story:
"Recently I have become aware of the growing body of literature linking long-term cell phone use to possible adverse health effects including cancer," Dr. Ronald Herberman said in the memorandum. "Although the evidence is still controversial, I am convinced that there are sufficient data to warrant issuing an advisory to share some precautionary advice on cell phone use."
[snip]
A child's developing organs "are the most likely to be sensitive to any possible effects of exposure," according to the document.
Will every single clinician agree with the findings and suggestions of the EU's Environment Agency, Germany's Environment Agency, the Russian Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation, the UCLA/Denmark researchers, the top UK neurosurgeon
who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers [and] reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones,
the study published in Occupational Environmental Medicine, and the twenty-one international experts who this week joined Dr. Heberman in releasing Important Precautionary Advice Regarding Cell Phone Use?
Nope. As The Secret History Of The War On Cancer reveals, tobacco, benzene, asbestos, and a host of other lethal toxins were known to be deadly decades before the entire scientific community acknowledged the risks. Of course, the fact many of the holdouts were paid to hold out -- some by the same PR/manipulation megacorps Big Carbon now pays to obstuct global warming solutions -- explains why the wait for "consenus" can be deadly.
Fortunately, the precautionary principle points out we needn't wait for a consensus that may never come (until the checks stop coming). We can -- and should -- act to protect ourselves and our families when technologies appear to be harming us. With cell phones, there's a wealth of experimental evidence describing mechanisms through which cell phone signals change the biology of living creatures. The studies and findings above describe apparent health risks. And that's enough to satisfy the precautionary principle.
Do we have to wait for the American Cancer Society? Nope. The Secret History Of The War On Cancer describes how the ACS delayed making public information about tobacco's dangers, and has been largely MIA in fighting the known environmental (read: chemical) causes of our cancer epidemic. Of course, the fact many of the Big Pharma firms that support the ACS are connected with the Big Chemical firms that market the carcinogens may have something to do with this.
Do we have to wait until everyone in the blogosphere stops raising objections to the findings above? Nope. As we learned when Jordan Barab hosted David Michaels here in Book Salon to discuss Michael's book Doubt Is Their Product, industry depends on many epidemiologists and other "experts" in industry and academia to raise spurious questions in order to kill new regulations. Until you know where the "expert" weighing in makes their money, you can't know who they serve: industry, or your health.
We can act now. Dr. Heberman's prescription is a good place to start.
Be well.
[photo: VivaAntartica]
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Aloha, Doc!
Who would believe that giant American companies would sell products that endanger their customers? That could never happen, right?
Can you hear me now?
kirk!
Oh, boy. And I cancelled my land line to teach AT&T a lesson.
Dr. Kirk!
I wish you well, also.
See, one of the advantages to living on the edge is I choose not to have a cell phone. That and buying natural ingredients and cooking and baking most of our food here.
Sady, I know a lot of people battling cancer right now. Even my dog’s girlfriend dog has cancer. And, the human she lives with. With everything else going on, the health of our nation needs to be lifted up.
(At least, the new hands-free only cell phone use law recently in force has prolly, okay, maybe reduced some cell phone activity in CA.)
I suppose this is one way to rid the planet of humans.
My guess is the biggest health risk from cell phone use is still from wrapping one’s car around a tree because of chattering on the phone while driving. That, or being the pedestrian or motorist they flatten through inattention.
I saw that you had made that decision. What next? tin cans? telepathy?
I hate the things and rarely use mine and only on speaker phone.
I can imagine this like 9.11 exposure the workers and local residents had… no prob. get back to work and now 50% of them have respiratory disease and many have died prematurely.
I pity the people who feel they need to use them all day long. Brain cancer? Ick
Wow.
Yeah. My daughter got hit while she was checking the mail. Fortunately, she’s okay. I like the new law here in CA.
Cell phone and email!!!
Good for you Kirk. And won’t it be nice when curtailing the use of cell phones stops the constant need to be connected to work or whatevah. Turn off the phones!!!!!!! Stop talking. Rest. damn it.
Corporate America with their better living through chemistry and technology is killing after robbing us.
And I thought I was the only one who felt that way.
;)
I’m glad to hear she’s OK.
I walk to work, and I won’t cross streets in front of talker-drivers unless they’ve come to a full stop at the light and I’ve made eye contact with them. I’ve had to wait through lights a few times to be on the safe side, but better late than run over.
i mostly use speaker phone also, mainly because i can hear it better. maybe i’ve already got a tumor in my ear!
Aloha, CT!
Teddy, who could have anticipated America’s beloved telcos would ever act contrary to our best interests?
Hi Suz!
Bummer, Loo Hoo :(
Demi, though I have to have a cell phone, I go out of my way not to use it (or carry it next to my body)
Elliot, it sure will cull a lot of us.
SamFromUtah - welcome! I don’t recall seeing you here before, and I’m always glad to see a new face here. The precautionary principle suggests we address all relevant risks associated with specific technologies. From this perspective, both the adverse impact of cell phone use on drivery attention (and hence safety) and the direct adverse effects of cell phone signals deserve our attention…beause we and our families deserve to be safe and healthy.
i finally got off my tushkie today and went down to the verizon store and got a bluetooth headset for my cellphone. glad to know that it has much less risk than the actual cell (and that i avoided all the guilt from not doing it and then reading this post)
also, i love to drive up next to people who are driving while on the cell phone and scream out “hang up and drive you moron!”
My niece told me about these videos. Can’t tell whether they are hoaxes or real, but they sure scared the crap out of me!
Let’s talk about it.
Hi skippy! Hope you are tumor free. For those who must use the things, the Bluetooth (or other remote) devices that act as speaker phones (not the headsets) appear to be least risky….
Oh, that was you?!?
:) just kidding skippy.
if those are the “popcorn” videos, they are ad company creations….
Any old time. Call me, I don’t have a cell phone.
I completely agree. In our city, everyone is driving and talking. Makes me nuts; either they are going very slow and/or not paying attention and yakking. I have looked for the “Shut Up & Drive” sign, but not found it. So I have to shake my fist at the driver;)
Really? That’s good to know! Why on earth… ads for what?
Hi, Dr. Murphy, and thanks. I’ve been reading FDL for years, but I don’t post much.
My comment was meant mostly as a darkish joke, and I didn’t carry it off too well, sorry. I agree that all the risks are worth looking at, and I’m glad in the light of your report that I don’t use a cell phone very much.
Good for you…what kind of reaction do you get?
Kirk can we have a diary and 9.11 illnesses? So many people are really sick and not just the rescue workers. The amount of toxins that people in the area had to breathe is staggering and Christy told us the air was safe to breathe.
This is an enormous problem here in NYC which is not being told.
road rage would be my guess revdeb
Rest. damn it.
Twist my arm.
Nah, I’ll just do it anyway, since it’s you and all.
Illegal now in CA I think.
yep. We weren’t designed (didn’t evolve) to have coonstant interruptions from electronic technology. For example, exposure to TV watching in the first year or two of life appears to alter brain wave patterns (during use). The long term-consequences (if any) aren’t clear — but the phenomonon alone scares me.
SanderO, I fear your anology with 9.11 is all too apt. The same Occupational Environmental Elist (from Gary Greenburg at Duke) where I read about cell phone risks had posts within a day (hours?) of the Towers’ fall describing exactly the expected (and now observed) pulmonary consequences of inhaling the dust.
Being a physician who cares about the environemnt and public health is often like watching train wrecks happen over decades….
When are we getting our functionality back for Firefox? Anyone know?
hehe. I did too.
if you are talking about the new comments notification, the tech crew is aware of it.
Illegal now in CA I think.
I’ve been wondering for a while now whether there’s a law in Indiana requiring that if you’re female and driving an automobile, you’re *required* to have a cell phone to your ear.
(ducking)
The lead, the mercury, other heavy metals from computers, the asbestos settled over lower Manhattan, tons of toxins suspended in the air.
It’s unbelievable that the government cannot be sued for lying about the air quality after the collapse.
My show text doesn’t work either
A wireless headset manufacturer. I hope they go broke from a boycott. Getting this info clearly is not easy: their freaking viral ad campaign just helps the wireless industry discredit the accurate biomedical info.
Sigh.
yeap… all part and parcel of the same issue that they are working on.
Really! Because what the hell are all those people saying? Hi, I’m stuck on the freeway. What ‘r u doin’? Yeah…blah blah blah.
They ain’t saving the world, I’ll tell you that.
ok girls. Lets get this guy once and for all. Ready!!!?!!!
I’m surprised that Jane hasn’t posted on this…
Particularly since she is quoted in it…
When I was working as a City architect I went into the electrical distribution bldg at our large international airport. There were tens of thousands of volts going thru. Every hair on my body stood on end and I became itchy. In the 1980’s Germany and other Euro nations banned fiberglass insulation for health resons. In the USA we have established numerous agencies to protect the people. They have all been co-opted by the corporations they were meant to regulate and are now about as worthless as breasts on a boar hog.
ding!
The EPA adminstrator (Whitman, IIRC) misled millions. Many folks on the OEM list were appalled. Media did not seem to want to hear accurate info re bad news…and a few docs don’t have the clout the EPA administrator has with the press and public opinion. Whoever gave Whitman the false assurances did a terrible thing….
much the folks who have blithely assured us all that cell phone and Wi-Fi couldn’t possibly affect us.
hey now - and I’ve got a video with your name on it for later.
Dang.
I think it’s probably safe to say that, regardless of the truth about cellphones, we cannot depend on this government to tell us…. or help us. That’s the real tragedy.
Thanks, Kirk. Disinformation seems to rule more and more in life, donut?
The economy is really biting hard on every one except the uber rich and so this and the insanity of Irak are what everyone in the world knows about.
I suppose that this is what they want to fight over in the campaign and the constitution means little. We have accepted like sheep being treated like cattle by the airlines. We have no fight in us it seems and they are slowly turning the population into mindless bots who lust after sports, pop culture, high tech especially HD TV with nothing to view on it, and other nonsense. We’re #1 all right in stupidity.
foothillsmike and blub, i couldn’t agree with you more. the megacorps have hijacked much of the remaining regulatory/safety agencies — and they’ve done so under Dem and Rethug admins.
Mommybrain, glad to be of help. I’m hoping FDL and Indymedia and Source Watch/PR Watch can serve to inocualte at least some of us from the disinfo memes…
Jaaaayyyyyaaaaattte.
Kirk we here at the Lake can see that most of what comes out of a PR person, corporate, politcal, whatever is bound to be all lies. And that is how we receive “information” about the world - press releases from PR people.
And then of course we know that there is absolutely NO accountability for anyone in power, whether as CEOs or management in corporations, the brass in the military or the executive branch.
But of course if you sell a nickel bag of grass your life is ruined by our justice system and you can spend yrs in the system.
Oops.
Should have been:
lotsa men are now learning what it feels like to have been a woman who was told not to worry her pretty little head over troubles and let men deal with it.
the only current change made from that statement, which i heard as late as the 80’s, has been that it is no longer limited to just women - it is now the government’s attitude towards all americans.
In addition to cellphones, cordless phones and WiFi may be associated with significant risks.
Does anyone here use those technologies?
*raising hand* cordless phones, kirk
This one’s a hoax, thank doG, Loo Hoo. But, yeah, dang…
No worries! I’m glad you joined us tonight.
Nooooo, say it ain’t so about wifi, the boone of my existence! How far away should you be from a wireless router? Does the laptop/computer kill ya, too?
I watched a few vids about 9.11 yesterday and I am of the belief that this was not done by Al Qaeda but by someone with the knowledge and assistance of people within this country and government.
We are lied to constantly.
Healthcare workers have a high incident of cancer from the exposure of toxic chemotherapy drugs. Those workers who mix and administer were exposed to the chemicals. In the last hospital I worked in, five of my coworkers were diagnosed with various cancers, 4 with breast cancer and one with extensive brain tumors.
Medical Surveillance for Health Care Workers Exposed to Hazardous Drugs
Do you have Wifi if you use a laptop?
Ditto!
Any press is good press?
Please…
Just getting here. I’ve been hearing speculation for years about cell phones and health risks. The “I refuse to wear a leash” issue was enough for me to refuse to have one, and now I’ve profoundly glad I’ve used one once in my life.
Drive-by ‘evening, all-
I remember asking questions about cell-phone radiation and proximity to the brain and other organs in the late 80’s, early 90’s-and I was called a nut. Since I suspected that might indeed be true, I pretty much forgot about it. I can’t tell you how validated I feel, and I thank you for the post.
Dr
Off on the business of the Queen. See everybody later.
Laptops and desktops can emit significant EMF…..this is where the inverse-square law can be your friend.
if i had three hands, i’d have to raise them all: wifi (all the time - if my router counts), cordless phone (alot), cell phone (sometimes).
Hasn’t been proven that Police who used those radar guns to catch speeders and sat them in their laps had a high indent of genital cancers such testicular and others from exposure?
If you are connected to the net without a phone line (or other cord), yes. Even those physically connected (though phone line or cable) to the net can forget to turn off their wireless signal — as long as the wireless function is on, you have an active WiFi signal from your machine.
yikes!
In English, please?
I have a cordless phone, who here doesn’t? And, I spend a lot of time at the pc. Let’s not even talk about the microwave…
Yikes again.
Say what? Does this mean that I have to scrounge around in the system controls to turn off something I’ve never turned on? I’ve got nothing wireless connected to my computer. Is “wireless” an “always on” option that I have to turn off?
RonD, thanks for stopping in: glad to have been of use.
Welcome, Marion!
OT- So do you suppose the Mahdi army got together with al Maliki and whatever other groups and decided to let the Americans win so we’ll get the hell out of there?
So we are killing off our healthcare workers with exposure to toxic chemicals
And killing our Police and safety officers with exposure to radiation from the radar guns…
And we are allowing the exposure of our young to unlimited cell phone use with those unlimited minute plans AND it is SO yucky to use a wired headset (which I use)
And we are now going to deal with all the toxic chemicals and depleted uranium from Iraq for generations to come….
What a world…. what a world
I bought a phone with a cord about five years ago because I could never find the cordless. Girls…
Totally depends on the computer. Some (especially desktops) don’t have wireless capacity. Others (esp laptops) have built-in wireless. IF the dealer/manufacturer shipped the machine with the wireless capacity set “on”, the end-user’s machine can be “on” for wireless even if the end user doesn’t ever touch the setting.
ON an Apple machine, “internet connect” will let you change the settings….
I think of wireless as a laptop. A computer you can move around your house.
Anyone up for digging the post? I’d love to see word get around as widely as possible….
Puts me in mind of the Iranian hostages who were released pretty much simultaneously with St. Ronnie the Senile being inaugurated or elected president. But of course outside forces have NO influence on our free and fair elections…
For Windows Users…. Go to Start -> then Connect to -> show all connections then look for a wireless network, highlight it then right click. Click disable and that should turn off your wireless radio.
IBM computers select Function + F5 and turn off your radios…
Let me try.
WHEW! I’ve got a big old clunky desktop machine.
Not just girls. The prodigal son lost his cell phone. Guess where I ALWAYS find my cordless? And also guess how many calls I get? Freaking none unless it’s some jerk wanting to come give me some more cancer causing technology. Ha.
Good Gawd, what a bunch of drivel…!
Too bad Du had left the other thread… I’m sure he’d have a field day with that…! First and foremost, Badr was the primary bunch of extortionists and instigators of violence in Baghdad… I’m sorely disappointed with the Grey Lady with that garbage…
5 on digg now, Kirk.
dugg and sorry i neglected to mention it earlier doc
At my age, the damage is done. I don’t care if I die tomorrow, because the remainder of my years will be spent living in an RV or a tent once I lose my job, and that prospect (especially the tent) has little appeal.
Great depression? What’s coming will make 1929-41 look like good times.
Sadr, you mean?
Can you rent a room?
Thanks LooHoo and Suz!
Marion, congrats!
one more Yikes for ya….
Use to laptops my damage male fertility /a>
And Doc…. you got mail