Imagine being stuck in a Kafkaesque nightmare like the one my pal Eric Ward faces:
I’m African-American and my family moved to California almost a hundred years ago after a lynching took place outside their hometown in Kentucky.
I’m also undocumented, or in the current anti-immigrant vernacular, “illegal.” I don’t have the necessary documents to prove my identity. Therefore, within four years, I won’t be able to vote, have access to social services, or receive state identification to travel.
How did this happen? Well, it all began when Ward — who has a visual disability, so he does not carry a driver’s license — lost his passport and Social Security card in an airport mishap. To replace them, he found he needed a copy of his birth certificate. After much wrangling, he finally obtained it. But that was just the beginning:
A few days later I headed to the Social Security Administration to obtain a replacement social security card. But when I got there, the Social Security Administration said I needed more than just a copy of my birth certificate. They said I also needed a passport, driver’s license, or state identification card to prove my identity.
But since I went to the Social Security Administration to obtain a new copy of my social security card so I could get a new passport, the Social Security Administration didn’t know what to do with me. So, they told me to head across town to the Illinois Secretary of State’s office to get my social security card. But when I arrived, the Illinois Secretary of State’s office said I needed my social security card to obtain any official document to prove my identity.
Now I’m stuck in a Catch-22 and I’m not alone in this predicament. Almost nine percent of African Americans (18 or older) are unable to document their citizenship. * Roughly 2 million African Americans, eleven million native born citizens, and nearly twice as many low income Americans than citizens with higher incomes don’t have a social security card, driver’s licenses, passport, birth certificate or proof of naturalization. *
As Swati Pandi at the LA Times blog observes, this all boils down to a simple formula: "Want to prove who you are? Get a birth certificate. Want to get a birth certificate? Prove who you are."
It’s not just African Americans who are being swept up in this hysteria, and it isn’t just this misbegotten measure that is victimizing ordinary American citizens. You can also include Native Americans and senior citizens among those whose status as voting citizens is now considered dubious:
Bernice Todd’s Choctaw family roots are sunk deep in the soil of Oklahoma, a state whose very name is Choctaw for "red people." But in the middle of a debilitating battle with cancer, Todd, a 39-year-old who cleans homes at a trailer park and baby-sits for a living, lost her state Medicaid health care coverage because, although she’s a Native American, she could not prove she is a U.S. citizen.
While Todd’s case is rich in irony, she is one of tens of thousands of Americans who are falling victim to a new federal rule—aimed at keeping illegal immigrants off the Medicaid rolls—requiring that recipients prove their citizenship and identity with documents many don’t have.
… States have always been required to check a Medicaid applicant’s eligibility, which includes citizenship. But a July 2006 rule, enforced by the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), now demands specific documents as proof, such as a passport or a birth certificate, driver’s license or military record. States face fines if they don’t comply.
The rule, which neither CMS nor the Bush administration requested, was adopted by the Republican-dominated Congress in 2005 despite the fact that there was no evidence that undocumented immigrants were falsely claiming U.S. citizenship to get Medicaid.
"This rule was the answer to a problem that really doesn’t exist," says Donna Cohen Ross, an analyst with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, a nonpartisan research organization.
That pretty much describes the nativist approach to immigration in general. And in the process of fixing something by making it worse, they’re conveniently disenfranchising thousands, perhaps millions, of American citizens, stripping them of their rights as citizens.
I happen to be one of those old-fashioned curmudgeons who believes that citizenship is a sacred part of how a democratic republic functions, and that taking away those rights is not what government should be in the business of doing. But maybe that’s just me.
Related posts:
- Birthers, Part Deux: Republicans Divided
- Late Night: Birth, Death, Sex & Race
- (Re)Birth(er) of the (Un)Cool: Trent Franks Changes Stand on Obama’s Citizenship
- David Broder and Five of His Friends Mean the “Nation” is “Ripe” to Cut Social Security Benefits
- Jamie Kirchick: Pervasive Republican Birtherism is the Fault of Liberal Blogs





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

You have to have a birth certificate in NH to get a driver’s license…
A passport won’t do, neither will licenses from other states, or naturalization papers.
When you (in my case– don’t ask!) finally produce something akin to a birth cert., they barely glance at it and proceed with the normal picture taking and collecting of money.
go figure.
Hello people– I am here, I was born.
OT – David, I left a thank-you note for you at the bottom of your erlier piece on Ted Stevens’ book review.
This is really scary for someone like me…I have a passport, military records, drivers license, a pilots license (my livelihood) but a birth certificate issued by the State Department (Consulate) for a foreign birth. Would that be enough? I also have my Naturalization Certificate signed by a Federal Judge which I had to get to become an Officer in Uncle Sam’s Navy…
What happens on the day that my non-raised-seal birth document from the US State Department isn’t enough?
And a Native American who has never left the US not born in the US? Uh, Duh? Were they beamed in by a Klingon warship in low-Earth orbit?
Their plan is working.
This merry-go-round of bureaucracy has been finely crafted by those who don’t want these folks to vote. Chances are if you’re an African-American, Native-American, or just low income, you may vote Democratic. They can’t have that. It’s the 21st Century Poll Tax.
What we need is an amendment to the Constitution that clearly spells out what happens during our elections. Who votes, who runs, how it is organized, how it is all paid for, what ballots are used, etc. Sounds rather Kafkaesque and redundant but something has to be done to keep the fascists from gaming the system.
Seems Bush and his minions are taking lessons on elections from Mugabe.
I am so sorry for you people.
amazing.
Always a pleasure. Hulk Smash Republican Death Grip On Alaska this year!
This is all part of the Republican’s effort to purge the voting rolls of people likely to vote for Democrats– especially people of color. It is despicable. It is the 21st Century version of the poll tax, and worse. The Republican double-think is that this is meant to prevent “voter fraud.” How can one argue against that?
One of the oddities of our Democracy, built on the power of voting, is that our Constitution says little about the right to vote. The next Congress might want to do something about that.
Bob in HI
Incidentally, Eric accompanied me to any number of militia meetings back in the 1990s. We often went together as a kind of mutual got-yer-back thing, since both of us were venturing into hostile territory. He was attending as a researcher/investigator for the Northwest Coalition Against Malicious Harassment and I as a freelance journalist.
It was very brave of him, since he always was the only nonwhite person at these events.
Yeah. Well. What are you gonna do about it? This problem has been reported on for years. Tens of thousands, eventually millions, of Americans will be suddenly… not Americans, not officially, and apart from tsk tsking about it, nothing will be done to correct the problem.
Why? Well, obviously. There are “too many citizens” as it is; it’s an easy and painless way to thin the herd. It’s a painless way to restrict citizenship to certain preferred categories of people. The tens of thousands who are already affected, and the millions who will be, simply don’t matter.
Every time states complain about it, they’re told to go hang by the DHS and its loving cadaverous face and master the Honorable Chertoff. There is resistance at the state level, but not enough to prevent the worst abuses that result from these rules.
The point is to limit citizenship, and to get people used to the notion of further limiting it to only certain “qualified” segments of the population. Only a few are being thrown overboard right now, and look! It’s saving money. As more and more get tossed out, will there be any further resistance?
It doesn’t take a constitutional amendment to stop this madness. What Congress did in 2005, Congress can undo now. But, strangely, they don’t want to.
Hm.
Who’d a thunk.
Kafka would be speechless. This has to be fixed.
See today’s Doonsebury. It’s a beaut.
Who’d a thunk we wouldn’t have ballots with paper trails by now either?
I’ll be darned, TheOtherWa. You beat me to it.
Also, hello to Bob in HI and happy Fourth of July weekend to all.
Or, you know, Doonesbury. I really need to use preview.
Thanks for this post David. This is a real and serious problem in Colorado. FYI, my wallet was stolen in 8/06 and I haven’t replaced my Driver’s License since. The reason is that state law mandates that our physical address be listed and I don’t want that. Had my physical address been listed on the copy that was stolen, the thief would have gotten my house addy to go along with my car keys which were also stolen at the same time. She had all my cards, ID and bank info from checks. I refuse to list my physical addy, so I can’t get a new license. The one that was stolen had my previous address on it, I had moved in 04 and never changed it, again for the obvious reason.
I had a xerox copy of that license in my files and have used that successfully for going on 3 years now. No one questions it. It’s valid so if anyone runs it, it comes out OK. I’ll continue to do that until I move again, when I’ll get a new one with THIS address, then move, and have a laminated copy, current pic on it and an invalid address. it’s a security consideration, nothing else. I’m friends with the cops in the neighborhood, so they all know where I live anyway. LOL
This is a real problem, however, in Colorado. Document requests are extensive and not always easily attainable, i.e. birth certificates and copies of marriage certificate or divorce papers, and it goes on and on.
Do we really have to loose another election to voting fraud before Congress addresses this real problem?
I had to produce a birth cert and a pink slip to get a driver’s license in TX. (What car ownership has to do with a license still escapes me.)
I’m lucky enough to have a driver’s license, a real raised-seal-and-purple-stamp birth cert, and an expired US passport.
But can someone explain why my photo ID from work doesn’t count as ID (even though I have to produce DL/birth cert/passport for the job), where the mumble-year-old birth cert with no prints or anything else does? (All it proves is that someone with the same name was born at a certain time in a certain place to a certain set of parents … it doesn’t prove it’s me.)
Absolutely, they knew exactly what they were doing! First they make it impossible to get the required photo ID, then initiate this cure for a problem that even the Court admitted wasn’t demonstrably a problem. And the solution sounds, oh so reasonable to most of us, since we have a wallet full of such items.
I am also in TX and did not need a pink slip for my license. I showed my license from a previous state and proof of my current address.
Not to undermine the topic – there is definitely a major Republican effort to disenfranchise any opposition party voters and more (displacement of New Orleans’ poor and low income residents, for example) – but, IIRC it may be possible for someone with a recent or bonafide birth certificate to obtain a State ID card.
Those caught in this predicament should be allowed to file a non-existent persons form with the IRS and be considered exempt from Federal Taxes until the government can figure out how to dislodge its cranium from the proverbial posterior orifice.
The wingtards are now making a big to-do about Obama refusing to show them his birth certificate, passport, etc. to establish that he was actually born in the US! I don’t recall that Bush was ever required to show ALL his Federal records. I suspect it would have been very interesting to see how many visits he took to Central America (and where) in the 1970’s.
I recall that when I lost my prior passport in the US all I had to do was submit a new form. Because I was still resident at the same address I don’t recall any need to demonstrate any identification. So perhaps that’s the starter for Eric…apply for a replacement passport. They already have your SSI# on file, as well as a file photo and your signature. You may have to submit new photos (that look like your old ones as much as possible).
Also hunt around for some old expired passports.
One more point…never carry or put all your ids in one place…both to avoid collective loss due to disaster or theft, but also to prevent identity theft.
I’ll tell you one thing they’ll make sure he’s able to do: pay taxes.
Oh, and maybe “die for his country”
I was at Dallas Love Field and was going through Security and they asked for Photo ID & feeling obnoxious, I produced my VA card. It actually should meet the requirements IMO, after all, it is issued by the US Govt. They, of course, refused it. While I was digging for my TX ID card, I pulled out my Visa card, which had my picture on it. The security person accepted that. To say I was stunned is a gross understatement…
And they tend to charge an amount for those IDs that may be small change to many of us but is a significant amount for someone on a fixed or non-existent income.
A form of a “poll” tax if you will
Actually, Obama has released a copy of his birth certificate, but the wingnuts claim it’s forged. Ha! Something about the kerning, I’m sure. ;)
They’re desperate and it shows.
Julia upstairs on some of the men behind McCain’s curtain
Good point!
If we lose another election the way we lost the last two
Congress won’t fix it then, either, because the congress will be totally under the thumb of the unitary executive.